Search Posts

When it comes to the question of whether the man who tried to end American democracy should face trial before voters decide if they Want to elect him to finish what he started? It appears for now the magazine court just doesn't appear to be in much of a rush But today in the year 2023 this Supreme Court has decided the no rush to judgment argument is good enough for them Not why would the special counsel want to move so fast? But why would the former president not want to resolve this so fast in the heat of a presidential election and to your point? He's trying to delay and trying to stop. That's a thorough investigation into him The media melting down after the Supreme Court rejected Jack Smith's request to hear Trump's immunity dispute It's a move that will likely delay his trial here to react Fox News contributor Joe Concha, Joe That's the first time I've seen some of that reaction I didn't know that we had moved toward the MAGA Supreme Court and such an open antipathy towards due process Come on. Just hurry up. Let's get on with this Isn't that amazing? I mean during that montage the MAGA Supreme Court I hadn't heard that one before and they want a rush to judgment in this situation And by the way MAGA Supreme Court as if Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barron aren't immensely qualified for that job And look the question is why is Jack Smith trying to fast food this process so urgently guys I mean unless of course he's trying to directly impact and interfere with the presidential election and you read and listen to sane and sober legal analysts and scholars like Jonathan Turley and they make a very simple argument that Jack Smith does not have the right to deny due process because he says so we can't simply demand the Supreme Court to put everything else aside and hear his case and it's very clear right now to many Americans even independents and some Democrats that the Democratic Party is in a full-blown panic because they have an 81 year old president that is Wants to seek reelection and is in the worst position of any president seeking reelection in the modern era. He's on a timeline Joe He's Jack Smith is on a timeline He needs to hurry this up because of that March trial start date And it's interesting you raised that because the tip for the Supreme Court to take case You have to have at least four and say yes, we'll do it now. There's three liberals on the court That means all six conservatives said no. Thanks. We're not gonna give in to this political badgering. Is that you read of it? That's exactly what we see here And now the argument will be and just like with Colorado guys, right because that's gonna go to the Supreme Court as well And and they will make a decision on that before the ballot Becomes binding on January 5th and they're gonna rule most likely maybe even 9-0 Hopefully that Donald Trump should be back on the ballot in Colorado And if it does happen that way where it's 6-3 for example and only conservatives vote that way You'll see the MSNBC's and CNN's and New York Times is of the world saying that wow This is a weaponized court only there to support Donald Trump So the hope here is that that comes back Nine to zero as far as putting Donald Trump back on the ballot in Colorado this way It strips away any political bias that we may hear or see from the court system or more importantly the media That covers it. Well, and Joe Jack Smith and the DOJ really they continue to intervene They're trying everything they can because Biden is not doing well And they're worried about the 2024 election, but at what point do we say that hey, you know This is a violation of the Hatch Act by it's completely forgoing due process Like why don't they just allow it is they allow it to happen at the ballots like let Americans decide who they want for president Exactly Nicole. We have an election. That's less than 11 months away at this point if you don't want Donald Trump to be president then fine go to the ballot box and make your voice be heard if you want him to Be president then do the same but give Americans the choice to vote for who they believe should be president. Don't let the courts come in here and decide I mean, could you imagine if the Colorado ruling holds up then in states that matter states that decide elections Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, I could go down the line if he's pulled off the ballot there What's this country gonna look like what will be 30 reaction particularly with Trump in the lead right now? There's 31 section 3 litigation cases out there right now 31 efforts to remove him for being an insurrectionist a charge for which he's not been officially charged in any of his indictments Or obviously convicted now let Americans buy their voice censorship changing the voting manner Inditing him four times on criminal charge I mean just kind of go down the list of things that are done to ensure that the democracy doesn't choose Donald Trump you start What asking yourself? What's left? What's left on the list of things that they haven't done to stop Donald Trump?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.