THE LIES OF ROBERT MUELLER AND HIS CRIMINAL GANG: https://stonezone.com/russian-collusion-lies-recycled-yet-again/
0:00
0:00
Search Posts
Platform:
Date range:
to
50+ results for "tag:vulnerable-narcissistic-state"
https://nypost.com/2025/02/12/opinion/trump-hasnt-created-a-constitutional-crisis-hes-teaching-dems-a-lesson/
There has never been a President who was so evilly and illegally treated as I. Corrupt Democrat judges and prosecutors have gone against a political opponent of a President, ME, at levels of injustice never seen before. Corrupt judges, or judges so blinded by their hatred of me and my political ideology to “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,” are making a mockery of the United States Judicial System, and the World is watching in disgust. Deranged Jack Smith, the evil and sinister prosecutor appointed by Crooked Joe Biden to “take me down,” was found to be illegally appointed by a CORRUPT DOJ and FBI, and all of his many charges against me were dropped or dismissed. His illegal raid of my home, Mar-a-Lago, will go down as one of the “dirtiest tricks” ever perpetrated by one candidate, a dumb as a rock, Sleepy Joe Biden, on another. With all of this said, I still have confidence that the Appellate Courts will bring JUSTICE TO AMERICA!!!
0:00
0:00
One of the Greatest Examples of DOJ Weaponization is the fact that they are suing Virginia to put ALL of the Illegal Voters, which were fully exposed and removed by the important work of Governor Glenn Youngkin, back on the Voter Rolls. Obviously, this was done so that they can CHEAT on the Election. So sad! What has happened to our once Great Country?
0:00
0:00
Judge Jeanine Pirro: “There's no question that the Department of Justice has had regulations over the years that say - Whenever there is an Election on a State or National level, you do not release, Number One, an investigation, an Indictment, anything that may impact the Election…This is definitely Election Interference—There's nothing new in this. It's the same old stuff, over and over again. Where Hunter Biden got the benefit of every doubt in every calendar, and every schedule, and every statute of limitations, they're doing whatever they can to hurt Donald Trump.”
0:00
0:00
Andrew McCarthy: “The point of this was to try to get this information, which has been hashed out again and again before the American people. None of this is new, but the idea was to get the evidence out in a spectacular way as possible. The point of releasing this now can only be to affect the Election. There's no legal need for it.”
0:00
0:00
Elie Honig, Chief Legal Analyst, CNN: “First, this is backward. The way motions work — under the federal rules, and consistent with common sense — is that the prosecutor files an indictment; the defense makes motions (to dismiss charges, to suppress evidence, or what have you); and then the prosecution responds to those motions. Makes sense, right? It’s worked for hundreds of years in our courts. Not here. Not when there’s an election right around the corner and dwindling opportunity to make a dent. So Smith turned the well-established, thoroughly uncontroversial rules of criminal procedure on their head and asked Judge Chutkan for permission to file first — even with no actual defense motion pending. Trump’s team objected, and the judge acknowledged that Smith’s request to file first was ‘procedurally irregular’ — moments before she ruled in Smith’s favor, as she’s done at virtually every consequential turn….
0:00
0:00
….Which brings us to the second point: Smith’s proactive filing is prejudicial to Trump, legally and politically. It’s ironic. Smith has complained throughout the case that Trump’s words might taint the jury pool. Accordingly, the special counsel requested a gag order that was so preposterously broad that even Judge Chutkan slimmed it down considerably (and the Court of Appeals narrowed it further after that). Yet Smith now uses grand-jury testimony (which ordinarily remains secret at this stage) and drafts up a tidy 165-page document that contains all manner of damaging statements about a criminal defendant, made outside of a trial setting and without being subjected to the rules of evidence or cross-examination, and files it publicly, generating national headlines.”
0:00
0:00
This is a case of Election interference by Jack Smith. Old information that should not have been released prior to the Election. There was no reason to release it. Gregg Jarrett, FoxNews
0:00
0:00
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lindsey-graham-demands-fbis-christopher-wray-recant-testimony-says-its-clear-trump-hit-bullet
I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/trump-campaign-fact-checks-abc-crime-statistics-presidential-debate
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mark-penn-calls-abc-news-launch-internal-probe-moderators-fact-checking
https://americanmind.org/salvo/disgorgement-and-despotism/
https://loomered.com/2024/08/29/axios-fabricates-story-about-kamala-harriss-social-media-dominance-over-trump/
Steven Calabresi: “President Donald Trump's First Amendment freedom of speech rights render his recent convictions in a Manhattan New York State trial court unconstitutional.” Mike Davis: “It’s an election-year assault on the Democrat Party’s number-one enemy.” Former Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker: “We must stand against the Weaponization of Justice in Courts around this Country. This can never happen again.”
0:00
0:00
PERSECUTION OF A POLITICAL OPPONENT!
0:00
0:00
SHE PAID AND RAISED BAIL TO GET THE VIOLENT RIOTERS IN MINNESOTA OUT OF JAIL!
0:00
0:00
More Fake News! https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pbs-correspondent-issues-apology-for-comments-about-trump-interference-in-gaza-ceasefire-talks/
0:00
0:00
….“It is important to remember that a gag order is a prior restraint on speech. The First Amendment prohibits prior restraints except in the most extraordinary circumstances, in which important countervailing interests are at stake. In New York Times Co. v. U.S. (1971), the Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme Court rejected such claims by the government and allowed the media to publish sensitive classified information…The marketplace of ideas shouldn’t allow one candidate to take unfair advantage of a questionable conviction while the other candidate has one hand tied behind his back by a questionable gag order. Voters who haven’t yet made up their minds, and who might be influenced by what both Messrs. Biden and Trump have to say about the fairness of the conviction, should consider filing friend-of-the-court briefs so that the justices can consider their interests as well as Mr. Trump’s…The politicization of the courts poses a threat to due process and the rule of law.”
0:00
0:00
….“Thirdly, Merchan allowed the prosecution to charge Trump with a misdemeanor crime which has long been considered dead due to its vague character. Fourthly, Merchan allowed the jury to convict Trump not because he specifically intended to defraud anyone, but rather because of a ‘general intent’ to defraud ‘any person or entity.’ In other words, even if he didn’t falsify anything in this case, if you think Donald Trump is a lying liarpants, you can still convict him because of his ‘general intent.” Is it any wonder that Trump was convicted on all 34 counts, on this basis?….
0:00
0:00
….“Campaign finance limits prevent speech by people who want to engage in it. They have changed Congress so badly that today Members of Congress spend 70% of their time raising money rather then legislating or meeting with their constituents because of absurdly low campaign finance limits that have not been adequately raised to match inflation since those laws were enacted in the 1970's. The post-Watergate campaign finance laws were and always have been flagrantly unconstitutional in their totality….
0:00
0:00
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/trumps-secret-service-driver-wanted-quickly-refute-cassidy-hutchinsons-j6-tale
https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/13/the-biggest-revisionist-history-about-jan-6-2021-comes-from-democrats-like-nancy-pelosi/
Without Presidential Immunity, a President will not be able to properly function, or make decisions, in the best interest of the United States of America. Presidents will always be concerned, and even paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation, after they leave office. This could actually lead to extortion and blackmail of a President. The other side would say, “If you don’t do something, just the way we want it, we are going to go after you when you leave office, or perhaps even sooner.” A President has to be free to determine what is right for our Country with no undue pressure…
0:00
0:00
MISTRIAL!!!
Elie Honig: “The Manhattan DA’s employees reportedly have called this the ‘Zombie Case’ because of various legal infirmities, including its bizarre charging mechanism. But it’s better characterized as the Frankenstein Case, cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator.”
0:00
0:00
Steven Calabresi: “President Donald Trump's First Amendment freedom of speech rights render his recent convictions in a Manhattan New York State trial court unconstitutional.”
0:00
0:00
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/06/03/fncs-turley-i-dont-see-how-the-trump-conviction-stands-up-on-appeal/
Thank you, @JonVoight! https://www.DonaldJTrump.com
Video transcript
fear all around. Everybody's angry. What's going on with this planet? We're allowing this sick President Biden to give permission for all to steal, cheat, lie, kill, and no one is paying the ultimate price for this. We must stop these animals. We must stand up now and make a choice for righteousness because this is a critical time. So this is what we must all do. We must vote for truths, trust, honor, safety, love, respect, and we must destroy these animals. My fellow Americans, I witnessed these crimes on social media, the news. I'm here to testify for truths and for honor. The man who has this country's best interest, Donald J. Trump, he's the only one who can save our country from destruction. We're losing loved ones every day from the criminals walking our streets. We must wake up and stop this crime. These false accusations that have been put upon Trump's life to try to destroy his chances of getting elected. These judges, they are the corruption of this society's morals. They are taking down our safety, allowing our streets to be full of horror, and they are consumed with deceit. My words are for all to hear that the power of what once ruled the land of the free, the forefathers that fought with blood, sweat, and tears for the people, for their freedom, for the safety of their loved ones, is now destroyed by the left's greed, deception, power, and darkness. But now with the power of God and all of us, let us bring back the glory of the People's Declaration. For that, my friends, is the greatest testimony of all, and it shall be again. And the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, will make America safe again, for he will fight, and he will win, because lies will die, and the truth shall prevail, and all will be wishing they saw the truth and didn't follow the herd of the unjust, corrupt mob, the swamp, the evil. And when the truth prevails, the glory of the notes of Benjamin Franklin will shine again. Much love to you.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
MY CIVIL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TOTALLY VIOLATED WITH THIS HIGHLY POLITICAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AND ELECTION INTERFERING WITCH HUNT. OUR FAILING NATION IS BEING LAUGHED AT ALL OVER THE WORLD!
0:00
0:00
JUDGE JEANINE: “THIS IS UNHEARD OF….”
Video transcript
Thank you so much for joining us. So, Judge, tell us your thoughts in this moment. I don't know, predictions, what we're leaving out, what should we be looking at as this jury is deliberating? - I'm flabbergasted by the charges to the jury. You may have already gone through that, but I was doing something else. I have never heard a jury charge like this judge's charge to this jury. We knew the judge was flaky. We knew that he hated Donald Trump, but this judge is beyond the pale. To say that he's gonna take dead misdemeanors and raise them to felonies when they don't have to unanimously agree on what that felony is is stunning to me. It is absolutely stunning. I wanna be clear about something. In New York State, when I was a DA, if I wanted to raise a misdemeanor, and by the way, not a misdemeanor that is expired in terms of the statute of limitations, but if I wanted to raise a misdemeanor to a felony, the only way to do that would be to file a certificate of conviction of another crime. It could be a DWI, it could be a gun possession, to prove that in this particular case, this misdemeanor would end up as a felony, and that is done outside of the presence of the jury, where it's very clear that there's another real committed convicted case that raises the level of misdemeanor to a felony. This judge is making stuff up as he goes along. This is a kangaroo court. I'll tell you that the level of reversible error on this is stunning, and this judge, unfortunately, is connected to the jury in the sense they see him as this calm, reliable guy who is as out of control in terms of the law, and he doesn't know it, or he's making it up as he goes along, so that this defendant, a former president of the United States, is convicted of dead misdemeanors that, like magic, is turned into a felony. This is unheard of, Sandra and John, and I gotta tell you one more thing. It's almost like it's a rabbit show. You're gonna pull a rabbit out of the hat, but don't look over here, look at Stormy Daniels. Look at what she said. None of that had anything to do with this. It's all about destroying Donald Trump, and this jury charge has set me over the edge in terms of the law that's being made up as we go along in a felony that we have no idea of, but now it's New York election law, but it could be federal election law, too, or it could be a tax violation, and even if he didn't underpay his taxes, it could still be a crime. What is this man talking about? Right, and then, Judge, there's the other aspect of this, which is the multiple choice aspect of the predicate crime, that the jury does not need to unanimously agree on what the predicate crime was. When you were a judge in New York, did you ever instruct the jury to say, here's a smorgasbord of things that you can find him guilty of, and you don't all have to find him guilty of the same thing. Some of you can find him guilty of one thing or her. Some others can find him or her guilty of something else, and then the remainder of you can figure out something else to find him or her guilty on. Have you ever issued an instruction like that? It's not done. John, it's not done. And let's talk about the one of three. One is a federal election campaign violation, the other is a tax violation, and the other is the creation of additional records. Federal election campaign violation, they did not let Brad Smith testify, but you heard David Pecker testify about a federal election campaign problem. You heard Michael Cohen testify about that, but Donald Trump in his defense was not allowed to talk about it, but now, all of a sudden, the jury has the ability to go in and not agree that that is one of the felonies that is necessary to resurrect these dead misdemeanors, but there's no evidence. The defense couldn't defend themselves on it. That's bizarre, John. No one has heard of this. It's like a menu, A, column A, B, or C. You don't all have to agree on it, whatever, folks. This is a kangaroo court. This is unheard of. I'm telling you, I've done this for 32 years. I'm not a federal prosecutor. I'm a state prosecutor. I'm not a federal judge. I'm a county judge, just like Mershawn. This is New York law. This is my wheelhouse. He is wrong. - All right. - Judge, thank you. - Thanks, Judge. - And the problem is, okay, guys. - Nope, finish your thought. Finish your thought. - No, and the sad part about it is this jury is gonna think they're doing the right thing based upon a charge that no one has ever heard of and that he created. - All right. - Thank you, Judge. - Thank you. We'll be right back after this. Stay tuned.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
Biden Witch Hunt!
Video transcript
of Sunday Night in America, Andy McCarthy, Fox News contributor and former assistant U.S. attorney in litigant who corresponded for Fox Business. So, Andy, let's start with you. The judge said that the jury has to unanimously believe that Donald Trump committed a crime in order to convict him, but they do not need to unanimously agree on what that crime was. And in what world does that work? Not in any world I've ever been in, John. What makes a criminal prosecution appropriate in the sense of taking somebody's liberty away, the array of constitutional protections we have. I've always understood them in 20 years of prosecuting cases and then more years than I care to count analyzing them. I've always understood that to mean every crime has a set of essential elements, and what the jury has to be unanimous on is that the government's proved the elements beyond a reasonable doubt. To me, it's an essential element of that case. Of this case, it's the most essential element of the count that they find this other crime because the only reason we're here is because Bragg used that other crime to inflate what would otherwise be a misdemeanor into a felony that allowed him to escape the statute of limitations. So, the thought that they don't have to be unanimous on that makes no sense to me constitutionally.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Pete Hegseth: "The Prosecution's case is a disaster!"
0:00
0:00
CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT I, AS A DEFENDANT, AM NOT ALLOWED TO REBUT OR CORRECT THE MANY LIES TOLD DURUNG THE 5 HOUR FILIBUSTER JUST PUT ON BY THE SOROS BACKED D.A.’s OFFICE IN THE MANHATTAN COURT. WHAT A DISGRACEFUL PERFORMANCE OF MISREPRESENTATION IT WAS!!! MAGA2024
0:00
0:00
LEGAL EXPENSE = LEGAL EXPENSE!!!
0:00
0:00
The bookkeeping error that I am being incorrectly and unconstitutionally prosecuted for is the fact that a bookkeeper, innocently and correctly, called a “Legal Expense” paid to a lawyer, a “Legal Expense.” IN EVEN SIMPLER WORDS, I CALLED A LEGAL EXPENSE, A LEGAL EXPENSE. WHAT THE HELL ELSE WOULD YOU CALL IT? A BIDEN INSPIRED ELECTION INTERFERENCE HOAX!!!
0:00
0:00
https://paulingrassia.substack.com/p/engorons-350-million-verdict-against
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/355m-trump-crazy-civil-court-decision-kinds-unexpected-consequences
“There weren’t any campaign violations committed by Trump.” Jonathan Turley
0:00
0:00
Jeremy Hunt, Fox News: “This is about one man Alvin Bragg who puts his political ambitions over Rule of Law and Judicial System - Made a promise to go attack Trump, and he went and made up a case to support that aim.”
0:00
0:00
Nicholas Chamberas, Lawyer, Newsmax: “There is no law against securing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) out of concern for your marriage and protecting your family. The Manhattan show trial against President Trump is a gross abuse of power; it is a Kafkaesque, profligate, and disgusting spectacle. It should terrify all of us.”
0:00
0:00
Gregg Jarrett: “Bragg’s argument is legally flawed because Trump used his own money, not campaign funds. The law imposes limits on the latter, but not on the former. That is one of the principal reasons why the Federal Election Commission (FEC) determined there was no campaign finance violation. The Department of Justice agreed. No civil fine was levied or criminal charge rendered. Those two entities have exclusive authority over federal elections. Not a local prosecutor such as Alvin Bragg.”
0:00
0:00
Matt Whitaker: “As a former acting Attorney General, I'm deeply concerned about the Trial in New York targeting President Trump. This politically motivated prosecution undermines the bedrocks of our Justice System, and erodes Public Trust in the Rule of Law. We must ensure that Justice remains blind and fair for all Americans. That isn't happening in Judge Merchan's Courtroom.”
0:00
0:00
Andy McCarthy: “Bragg knows what he is doing is improper, completely political case. Maybe Merchan is having second thoughts…They haven't come close to proving that fraud has taken place, and they don't just have to prove that fraud has taken place, they have to prove that it was fraud that included a specific intent to commit another crime, ‘which we believe is a Federal Campaign Finance Crime’…But there's not a scintilla of evidence that Trump was even thinking about Federal Campaign Law.”
0:00
0:00
John Yoo: “Based on everything seen so far, the prosecution has not proven a single element of the ‘crime’!”
0:00
0:00
“President Donald J. Trump to Hold a Rally in Wildwood, New Jersey”5/11/24 | 5pmE — Tickets: https://event.donaldjtrump.com/events/president-donald-j-trump-to-hold-a-rally-in-wildwood-new-jersey
Jonathan Turley: “We don't know what the crime is. Judge should have brought clarity on what the fraud was. Trump did not commit a Campaign Finance violation. Department of Justice chose not to charge it - Only reason we’re here is because Bragg has a bizarre theory… I have never in my career seen a trial like this one!”
0:00
0:00
ALX: “Donald Trump isn’t even able to defend himself due to a gag order.”
0:00
0:00
Jonathan Turley: “TRUMP IS RIGHT — NEW YORK CASE IS AN ‘EMBARRASSMENT…Trump is right this is an embarrassment. The fact that we are actually talking about this case being presented in a New York court room leaves me in utter disbelief…You had this misdemeanor under state law that had run out. This is going back related to the 2016 election. They zapped it back into life by alleging that there was a campaign finance violations under the federal laws that doesn’t exist. The Department of Justice doesn’t view it this way.”
0:00
0:00