Search Posts

Look, I think this issue of the big beautiful bill should be nonpartisan. I don't know how to tell what the hell is the matter with everybody up in Congress. People are dying every day. I use this wrestling three times many criminals that Biden administration did. We're taking public safety threats and national security threats off the street every single day, but we got over 600,000 illegal enemies of criminal histories walking the streets of this country. We got less than 5,000 deportation officers. This should be a no brainer. The more resources we get, we get this bill passed. We got more agents on, on, on the, on the road. We buy more beds. We get more transportation flights, more agents being more bad guys arrested, taking off the streets of this country every single day, every day. We rest a public safety threat or national security threat. This makes this country much safer. Who the hell would be against that? And I, and I get irritated. I get pissed off because I'm sick of meeting angel moms and dads. You want to talk about family separation. They bury their children. So this, I've done this since 1984. I've worked for six different presidents. No one has had the success of the Trump administration. We got the most secure border in the history of this nation today. But we, but we need more border wall border wall, save lives. Women and children can't get over that wall, which means they go to a place where there's not a wall and what's waiting on them, the men and women, the board of children who take care of this humanitarian needs and save their lives. We already got fentanyl seizures down half. Fentanyl seizures should be a hundred percent. We should have zero fentanyl come in this country. We need money to help secure that border at higher level. Stop the fentanyl from coming in. Stock the sec, stop the sex trafficking of women and children. Stop the known inspected terrorists coming across that border. Right now, I was looking at the stats today. I used to arrest in a record number of known suspected terrorists in this country, along with the FBI. With more money, we can arrest more of these people, make this country safer. This is a nonpartisan issue. Let's make this country safe again. So to the Democrats and the Republicans and the Independents, I don't care who you're from pass the bill. So we make this country safe so we can stop the violence against ICE officers. Let's make this country safe again. And without that bill, it's going to be a hard road. We got a lot of people to look for a lot of people to arrest. A lot of national security threats we know are in this country. We need to find them. We need more money to do that. We know we need more agents to do that. For God's sake, let's pass this bill and get this done.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

welcome back America you know we have an opportunity this election to help save the country and I'm not kidding you see what's happening to the country things we've never thought were possible what's happening in the streets the anti-americanism the anti-semitism the violence that's taking place you see what's happening with a lawless border and the horrendous inhumanity that's taking place there our economy that used to be prosperous and vibrant is on its back people are very down people are very distrusting of each other our country's coming apart why because the Democrat Party has the man they want in the White House and this is the mindset of the Democrat Party they hate America ask yourselves this question where is this party trying to take us we know we're Trump and the conservatives want to take where is this party trying to take us they're taking us off the cliff this election is so critical and we have a great opportunity to put our foot down it's called November I'll see it tomorrow night on life Liberty and Levin

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

all you need to know is if the liberal elite will weaponize the United States justice system against a former president, every single one of your millions and millions of viewers need to know we could be next. This is egregious, this is disgusting, but this is the plot and the plan of the radical left. Hear me clearly. President Donald Trump represents the working class of America. He represents the victim who understands clearly the only thing standing between the liberal elite and the everyday American is former president Donald Trump. That's why we have to all lean in on this election and make sure that the results are indisputable, clear, crystal clear. We must elect Donald Trump. Not only will we better off with Donald Trump, but if you want to eliminate chaos and return to law and order, which means that lady justice wears a blindfold, you must vote for Donald Trump. If you want to make sure that kids in the poorest neighborhoods in this country are afforded a great education and not the teacher's unions making decisions for adults and not kids, you must vote for Donald Trump. If you want to make sure that every single American has a chance to live their American dream, Donald Trump is our only choice. And finally, Sean, if you are disgusted by this, if you're disgusted by this two-tier legal system, if you're disgusted by the actions in New York or this attorney general, you must have your voice heard loud and clear. And that happens on election day. They are absolutely petrified. So that Donald Trump is bringing a coalition of working Americans.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Welcome back, America. We're here with one of the great civil rights criminal defense lawyers of our time, David Shone. He also represented President Trump in one of the impeachment cases. You're familiar with him. David Shone, I want to talk about Judge Chunken for a moment. I've made the case that this setting the date on March 4th violates the Sixth Amendment, effective representation by counsel. There's 12.8 million pages of documents. You have five months to prepare. Even the feds couldn't say that they've ever had a case where five months was enough. And this is a very complex case. You have a lot of questions that are raised for the first time, complexity involving a former president, motions, filings. She also sets the date one day before Super Tuesday, the most important date in the election cycle in the Republican primary. She also jumps the line, jumps in front of the first case that's in Florida with Judge Cannon, who already set her trial date for May. And I'm sure that's created a lot of chaos down there on the other case. My argument, David Shone, is she's doing this. She wants a Democrat jury. She wants at least one conviction on one of the counts. So, Donald Trump is walking around with a scarlet letter. Convicted felons are the likes of Chris Christie and others, as well as Democrats can say, well, he's a convicted felon. What's your take on this? Well, I think we've seen just that sort of thing in some of her words. In other words, the lady doth protest too much, methinks. She has made clear that this is only, this is going to be treated like every other case for every other defendant and she won't cow-tow to election concerns and that sort of thing very defensively. Of course, it's not like any other case. There's a great public interest. The government spoke about a public interest in a speedy trial rather than the defendant's interest in a speedy trial. There's a greater public interest here in the election and the democratic process and letting that democratic process run its course. I had a misdemeanor case in this same district set for eight months in the future, not this kind of schedule. This schedule is outrageous. Nobody could prepare in this timeframe, certainly not these lawyers. It's once more, unfortunately, the political process reaching another branch of government where it has no place. And I earlier read what the code of professional conduct is for judges and this would seem to me to violate it in multiple ways. That's number one. Number two, she says it's like any other case, whether it's athletes or anything else. And yet the Department of Justice for several decades, Democrat and Republican attorneys generals have issued memos in March of election years specifically saying this is not like any other case. You better make sure that when you conduct investigations that you do not interfere with a campaign and they go further. You're not to charge people before a campaign unless you get a sign off by the attorney general of the United States himself. But they give warning after warning after warning that this is different, that you are not supposed to use the criminal justice system to affect an election. Yet we have a prosecutor and a judge who are doing exactly that. No? Yeah. Well, I don't think you got the most recent memo, which was if Trump is involved, ignore all previous memos for every other election. No, you're a hundred percent right. In my view, it violates the fifth and the sixth amendment rights. There's no possible way you hit on the most important one, the effective assistance of counsel, but also due process, all of the fair trial rights, the right to compel witnesses. He can't even sort out who the witnesses would be. They don't know what the exculpatory evidence would be. And the prosecutor said, well, they streamlined things and they've gone through and made it easier. It's not for the prosecutor to decide what evidence the defense finds most important. The defense has to do the painstaking work of going through the evidence. Listen, I've had experience with two members of a couple of members of this Mr. Smith's team. And especially in this DC process, I have right now a sanctions motion going against JP Cooney, the lead fellow in this case, and Molly Gaston in another case in this district, we're awaiting a hearing because of their outrageous government misconduct. And in that case, the judge said he's very concerned about their misconduct and he's concerned that they don't seem to be concerned, but we haven't had the hearing yet. So Trump is a speedy trial on behalf of the government, not on behalf of the defender or the public. Let's make that clear. And you have a matter before one of these judges in the same district and they can't seem to get around to it, right? Right. I've got a case actually with judge Chutkin and another judge in this district, Judge Walton, both of whom I'm sure in another setting of fine judges, but literally I've had a motion to dismiss and those are civil cases, but important cases with claims hanging over my client's head. And then literally I've had motions to dismiss pending for over three years without any action on them. Well, maybe judge Chutkin can put that in the front of her calendar and work that out. I mean, it's been sitting there for three years. Yeah, this is a railroad job. That's all it is. You're in simple.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.