What the image shows
A screenshot of a social media (X/Twitter) post by user "Buzz Patterson" (@BuzzPatterson, verified). The post argues that the federal judiciary is engaging in "tyranny" against presidents, particularly Trump, and includes a bar chart comparing the number of preliminary injunctions/policy blocks against sitting presidents' administrative policies by administration, with bars for George W. Bush, Obama, Trump 1.0, Biden, and Trump 2.0, the last two shown in orange, the first three in blue (Trump bars are both orange, Obama/Bush/Biden bars are blue). A source note below the chart cites CRS, Harvard Law Review, and an NYT tracker. The post shows 2:31 AM · Jun 23, 2026 and 31.8K views.
Text in image: Buzz Patterson ✓ @BuzzPatterson 🚨 Tyranny of the Judiciary. Let's talk about it. Marinate on this: Number of times judges blocked a President's policies: • Bush: 6 • Obama: 12 • Trump 1.0: 75 • Biden: 21 • Trump 2.0: 169 (and climbing) When Democrats lose, they stomp their feet and sue, depending on activist judges to nullify the will of the voters. This isn't "checks and balances." It's lawfare on steroids. The Supreme Court has started reining it in, but the resistance never sleeps. Our Republic will die in a black robe. Preliminary Injunctions Against Sitting President's Administrative Policies (Updated as of June 2026) 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 6 12 75 (64-86) 21 (14-28) 169 George W. Bush Obama Trump 1.0 Biden Trump 2.0 Number of Preliminary Injunctions / Policy Blocks Note: Trump 1.0 shown as 75 (range 64-86); Biden shown as 21 (range 14-28). Trump 2.0 ≈169 from active cases with halted policies (NYT tracker). Data from CRS, Harvard Law Review, NYT tracker. Numbers are approximate. 2:31 AM · Jun 23, 2026 · 31.8K Views
Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.