8 results for "tag:pre-verdict"
Karl Rove: “What is the Manhattan D.A. doing prosecuting a case that is based upon supposedly a violation of Federal Election Law - The FEC looked at that and took a pass, the Department of Justice, Joe Biden's Department of Justice, took a pass, the Democrat who held the DEA position before Bragg took a pass, and now the guy who said when he was running for office, 'I'm gonna get Trump’ didn't take a pass!"
Thank you! https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6353938226112
Greg Gutfeld: “We were told for, I don’t know, three years, that ‘No one is above the law,’ but they were saying that because they were making sure that Trump was below the Law. They didn’t raise the bar for him, they lowered it, and so you are prosecuting the current Leading Candidate with an unprecedented theory that is so difficult to follow that nobody knows what’s going on. Wouldn’t you want to streamline this, and make it the best possible, most persuasive argument possible since this is the leading Presidential Candidate?”
Jim Trusty: “It's the basics of is there any crime here at all?”
Kash Patel: “@realDonaldTrump’s case is littered with reasonable doubt because he is not guilty- there is no crime. He is [an] innocent man.”
Trial Attorney Randy Zelin, CNN: “There is reasonable doubt all over this case.”
Gregg Jarrett: "The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this Case - Business Records were not false, they were accurate. Trump had no involvement, there's no evidence he willfully violated Election Laws, and no Laws were even broken. Plus, it's factually impossible to influence an Election after it's over, yet that's how the Indictment reads...Where is the crime? It's nowhere! This is what I call a Bigfoot Case. It's a Trial in search of an imaginary crime."
DEFENSE OF COUNSEL DEFENSE!