Search Posts

and RNC co-chair, Laura Trump. Good morning to you, Laura. - Good morning, guys. Great to be with you. - Well, great to have you here. What's your reaction when you hear the CNN legal analysts say that he has a man-crushing-- - MSNBC. - Oh, MSNBC, sorry. - Yeah, all the same, CNN, MSNBC, about the same. Yeah, this is not a surprise at all. This guy is a hero to the left because you have to take a look at all the ways he has ruled against Donald Trump and his defense and for the prosecution. Let's start at the beginning. Let's start with the fact that miraculously and defying all statistical probabilities, this judge has gotten every anti-Trump case possible. He got Allen Weisselberg, the former CFO of the Trump Organization, Steve Bannon, and now Donald Trump. We remember he slapped an unconstitutional gag order against Donald Trump at every possible turn, ruled for the prosecution and against the defense. I would love to see the contrast of overturned objections via the defense versus the prosecution in this case. We have seen time and time again how he has weighed the scales. He wouldn't even allow the defense to call a witness that would have shown what a sham and total waste of time this entire trial is. And then just to put the final nail in the coffin for Donald Trump and to weigh the scales as much as humanly possible, he tells the jury, you don't have to be unanimous. Choose whatever you want and we'll work it out on the other end. - Right, with the second crime, right, Laura? With the second crime. - Exactly. - Yeah. - Three choices. - And if you're a person who wants Joe Biden to be assisted by this case and you dislike Donald Trump, I bet you have a big man crush on Juan Mirchon. But anybody, to your points you guys just made a second ago, who cares about the law, who actually cares about the future integrity of America, ought to look at this case and this judge and feel shame and embarrassment. 'Cause that is exactly what it is. - So Laura, how is the former president? I mean, let's just be real here. He's facing jail time right here. - A lot. - A lot of time there. So he's not able to campaign right now. He's stuck in the courthouse. We could get averted soon. How's the morale of him? - He's remarkable. And Lawrence, you know this. You guys have seen him day in and day out, on the way into that courtroom and leaving that courtroom, talking to the press every day, saying whatever he can, of course, with this crazy gag order. I've never seen a person with the focus of Donald Trump. I've never seen someone who can be facing so much, who can really not just take it and still remain standing, but still be fighting. Not only has he gone in that courtroom every day and had to sit there and listen to lie after lie, knowing what they are trying to do to him, knowing this is all about politics and has nothing to do with justice or actually prosecuting a crime. But then he leaves the courthouse and he goes to a bodega in Harlem. He delivers pizzas to the FDNY firefighters. He holds a rally 25,000 people strong in the deep blue Bronx of New York. And that tells you what you need to know about this man. He's a fighter, no matter what they throw against him, he will never back down. And this, just like everything else, I believe will boomerang and only help him in the end. - I know you got all these different flow charts of what if he's convicted, what if he's acquitted, what if he gets home confinement? How detailed are the plans for the campaign judging on these scenarios that are possible at some time we believe this week when Alberta comes down? - Yeah, and you have to think about that. Of course, this is something that has been the goal. They wanted him locked in the courtroom and not out on the campaign trail. Why not lock him in his home so he can't go out and campaign as well? I think it makes it very obvious that this is truly about election interference and nothing else at the end of the day. But we'll turn lemons into lemonade like Donald Trump continues to do at every single turn. We will have him doing virtual rallies and campaign events if that is the case. And we'll have to play the hand that we're dealt. Everything has been stacked against him from the day he came down the Golden Escalator in Trump Tower in 2015 and decided to run for president as a Republican. It continues to be stacked against him today. And despite all of it, he always ends up on top and this will be no different. - All right. Laura, thank you very much. We know you've got a very busy day. Thank you very much for kicking things off with Fox and Friends. - Thanks guys. - Just keep in mind too.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> Yeah, Shannon and Trey, my Twitter's been on fire ever since I put out Trey, what you reported earlier today that four jurors could agree on one crime, four jurors could agree on a different crime and four jurors could agree on a different crime other than that. And as long as it adds up to 12, that's okay. So it's not unanimity on exactly what the crime is, but you get 12 jurors saying he's guilty. As Andy said earlier today, he doesn't know how to square that with the constitution. Trey, you want to go first then, Shannon? >> I don't want to go first because I don't know how to square it either. I think what makes it even more complicated is, I mean, I would have asked for a special verdict form, at least tell us which crime you picked. The judge mentioned three crimes, but as Andy and Shannon and I have been discussing, it could be a crime that the judge didn't even mention. Furthermore, when does something become a crime? To me, it's when a jury of 12 says you're guilty or when you admit it, but crime has a specific meaning to me, does it have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? What are the elements of this unknown crime? It is, to me, void for vagueness.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.