Search Posts

Platform:
Date range:
to

9 results for "tag:legitimacy-attack"

Post from Truth Social

Marc Thiessen: “She (Kamala) is the least examined major party nominee in American history…”

Video transcript 3:43

>> Joining me now, Marc Thiessen, former speech writer to President Bush and Fox News contributor, Marc, great to see you. I mean, we had Haydn Biden, now we have Duck and Cover Kamala, Haydn and Slide and Biden, and now we've Duck and Cover Kamala. She will try to get through this election cycle without giving a major interview to a real journalist. >> Oh, 100%. I mean, look, she's rising in the polls right now, but it's a sugar high because all it is is that she's not an octogenarian who has dementia. That's why people are excited about her. She is the least examined major party nominee, probably in American history. She didn't make it to through the primaries, she didn't make it to Iowa in the first time around. She didn't go through a primary this time around, which means she didn't have a debate where Democrats attacked her record. She hasn't done a single town hall with voters, taking questions from voters, hasn't done a single major interview, hasn't done a press conference, and she's only gonna do one debate. Now we all know that one debate can ruin a presidential campaign so there's a great opportunity there for Donald Trump. >> Has it happened before in modern politics where they've only done one presidential debate? >> I think Ronald Reagan only had one debate with Jimmy Carter, but most of the time it's three debates at least, and they agreed to two. So Joe Biden took one of the debates, did she get a pass because the former nominee got to have took one of her debates? >> Okay. >> I think she ought to do, they agreed to two debates, they should do at least two. But one debate can end a presidential campaign, we just saw that with Joe Biden. >> Don't you agree that the meme campaign and the joyful stuff, that's all gonna kind of fall away in the debate, and it's going to be bait Donald Trump. To me, that's what they're gonna prep her to do, to bait him January 6th, or Charlottesville, or go back to, you don't like the way I look, or it's gonna be that kind of thing. >> They're gonna try and get him off his game. Look, if he goes into that debate the way he went into the debate with Joe Biden, and focuses on the record, and lays the traps and lets her fall into them, she is just as inarticulate as Joe Biden without the excuse of age. So you just need to give her a chance to get her off the teleprompter, and let her fall on her own face, she will do it. She hasn't given anything without a teleprompter yet, so he's just gotta be incredibly disciplined because this may be his one chance, this may be the one time we get her clean for an unscripted moment. >> Yeah, American Samoa just gave the roll call, we got the DJ up there, and yeah, Cassidy the DJ, so hopefully that will get everyone jazzed up. Mark, you wrote a great piece about the two factors that are most important in understanding the support that Donald Trump has, and that Kamala's vulnerabilities, really quickly what those are. >> So the two statistics you need to understand why all this, what Biden was saying yesterday didn't fell flat, is on Biden and Harris's watch, Americans have gone from the highest personal savings ever recorded to the highest personal debt ever recorded. All the savings were spent down, they now got record credit card debt, record personal debt and record interest rates, which means they can't get out of that debt, and it's compounding every month. >> That's right, real life, by the way, RFK has now, apparently they're trying to figure out whether they're gonna join forces with Trump. >> That would make a huge difference. >> That would indeed, I agree 100%, yes. >> He's either deciding whether he's gonna drop out or he's gonna join forces with Trump to beat the party that refused to allow him to have a real debate within the party. >> That would be quite a thing to have the son of Robert Kennedy endorsing the Republican candidate for the- >> In the end, will it have been a mistake for them to have shunned him aside as they did? >> I think very much so, yes. >> All right, we appreciate it. Thank you so much, Mark. >> Thank you.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

“Jack Smith Isn’t a Special Counsel ‘by Law’” https://www.wsj.com/articles/jack-smith-isnt-a-special-counsel-by-law-regulations-constitution-ccca6514

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

Gregg Jarrett: "The most egregious violations in the New York conviction of former President Donald Trump were federal Constitutional 'due process' violations that states are bound to follow. New York did not… Under the Sixth Amendment, all defendants have a right to be informed of the precise ‘nature and causes of the accusations’ against them so that they can properly defend themselves at trial. This did not happen.”

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

Andrew and Katie Cherkasky: “The New York case against Donald Trump is drawing to a close…but one critical aspect seems to be missing: Where’s the crime?”

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

Andrew McCarthy: “Bragg has no authority to enforce Federal Law...The NDA payments were not Campaign expenditures under Federal Law...That’s why the FEC and DOJ — which do have exclusive authority to enforce Federal Law — took no action against Trump...Bragg is making up his own version of Federal Campaign Law.”

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

“Graham slams Trump’s court battles as ‘selective prosecution’” https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4627812-graham-slams-trumps-court-battles-as-selective-prosecution/

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

Jonathan Turley: "The fact that we are actually talking about this case being presented in a New York courtroom, leaves me in utter disbelief."

Video transcript 0:41

here is in this case trump is right media this is an embarrassment made the fact that we are actually talking about this case being presented in a new york courtroom leaves me in other disbelief the the arguments today did in fact capture all the problems here you know you had this misdemeanor under state law where they had run out this is going back to related to the two thousand sixteen election and they zapped it back into life by alleging that there was a campaign finance violation under the federal laws that doesn't exist the department justice doesn't view it this way

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00

Post from Truth Social

https://hannity.com/media-room/jarrett-unloads-jack-smith-should-be-indicted-for-stupidity-watch/

Post from X (Twitter)

....won’t convict and remove the President - Then the House should not be Impeaching the President in the first place. If this is the new standard, every President from here on out is impeachable.” Andy McCarthy @FoxNews So well stated. Thank you!

0:00 0:00