Byron York: It’s all in a case that was suspiciously weak from the very beginning. James alleged that Trump overstated the values of his various properties for purposes of getting better terms for big real estate loans. One big problem in the case was that the banks involved, the alleged victims of Trump’s alleged fraud, testified that 1) they made the loans based on their own assessments of the properties, not Trump’s; 2) they were paid back on time and in full; 3) they made money on the loans; and 4) they would do business with Trump again. All that meant James’s case against Trump was uniquely unfair. 'An Associated Press analysis of nearly 70 years of civil cases under [New York] law showed that such a penalty has only been imposed a dozen previous times,' the Associated Press reported in January, 'and Trump’s case stands apart in a significant way: It’s the only big business found that was threatened with a shutdown without a showing of obvious victims and major losses.'"
Search Posts
2 results for "tag:legal_gaslighting"
Great to be in Iowa, getting ready to make some very big stops with already large crowds of people forming, but before I do, I want to thank almost everybody, even perceived opponents from the “other side” politically, who have spoken up against the Radical Left, Soros backed, New York State Attorney General, who yesterday asked me to pay a “fine” of $370,000,000, plus other harmful things to N.Y., after a years long Witch Hunt, for essentially borrowing money from a bank, and paying the bank back, ahead of schedule. There were no defaults, discounts, or anything other than profits for the bank. “THEY WERE TWO PERFECT LOANS,” and the bank in question testified that the loans were great, and FAR SMALLER THAN THE FINE. I didn’t even need the money, the bank wanted to make the loans - That’s what they do, make loans. Additionally, I won the Appeal in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Judge refused to accept their decision, A FIRST. Also, great Financial Statements!