Search Posts

So tell me if I have my legal bearings correct here. The president has immunity for his actions while president, not afterwards or not before, but while president. Somebody like Joe Biden does not have immunity and he was involved in this. Somebody like Hillary Clinton, of course, does not have immunity. She was never president, never will be. So you could see potentially some very big names brought down in this. Is that correct, Mike? Yes. And presidential immunity applies to your official acts. If you investigate Barack Obama, he can litigate whether it is an official act for him to set loose the Democrat National Committee, the Steele dossier, to work with his Justice Department, with his FBI, with the CIA to orchestrate the biggest scandal in American history, to use your law enforcement and intel agencies to help a presidential candidate of Hillary Clinton and hurt a presidential campaign of Donald Trump. And that's exactly what they did. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Clapper, Brennan. There were so many bad actors in this. And the law fair against President Trump to take him out afterwards with the prosecutions, poor prosecutions for non-crime. Non-crime is trying to bankrupt Trump for non-fraud several times, trying to take him off the ballot unconstitutionally. And several states tried to take off his head by underfunding a secret service protection. And Biden saying Trump was a fascist and the gravest threat to democracy and to put a bullseye on. These law fair Democrats must be held accountable. So this never happens again. If they're not held accountable, it's going to be very ugly the next time they're back in the White House and they run the Justice Department and the CIA. So, hold on, Mike. I have to dig down on that answer. So you're telling me that Barack Obama's actions, even as president, if they were illegal, it could still be charged. So Barack Obama could potentially be charged here as well? Presidential immunity is an affirmative defense. You can charge him, even charge him as an unindicted co-conspirator. I'd charge him, but I'm a little bit more bold and fearless than most. But then you let Barack Obama litigate whether he has presidential immunity. Barack Obama is the most demonic force in American politics in decades. He is an evil man who is a Marxist Trojan horse who was the worst actor in politicizing and weaponizing our intelligences and law enforcement to go after your political enemies. This guy is a fraud. He is a Marxist, and he is subversive. He's the Trojan horse for the Marxists. And he absolutely was and is trying to destroy America from within. He tried to create so many racial grievances, racial tensions, sicking the intel agencies and the FBI, the Justice Department, after your political enemies. monster and he has to be held accountable.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So all that matters now, Eric, is knowing this, knowing this is communist persecution, knowing that this is left-wing Biden lawfare, knowing that this has all been engineered by the Democrat Party to take out Joe Biden's rival. What are we as a nation going to do about it? Are we just going to sit down and take it? Are we going to reclaim this country for freedom and democracy and the rule of law? That's the only question that matters now, Eric.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

to me it was a very difficult day today. I heard a man with a robe instructing a jury that on issues that I know as a former judge exactly as he was were just plain wrong, reversible error. I was stunned at what he brought up and what he said and specifically I refer number one to the fact that we've been talking for weeks, months actually since in this indictment came down is to what is that unknown felony that will be used to resurrect two dead expired misdemeanors. Well that unknown felony is an election law violation according to this judge that is made up of a federal campaign violation of a creation of a false record or of a tax law violation. The Trump defense team didn't know this so they couldn't speak to it and it is a Fifth Amendment requirement that you know the charges against you, that you know it in the indictment in the bill of particulars and discovery in the opening statement and through the testimony. This was and I knew it during the prosecution summation this was clearly it was like a game between the prosecution and the judge where the defense was left out of it and specifically there was they talked about there was no legitimate press function and no one had talked about that during the course of the trial neither side presented evidence as to what a normal legitimate press function was but the jury hears about it from the prosecution in summation. No evidence whatsoever by either side and of course we know that there was no evidence allowed of a federal campaign election campaign violation because the defense was not allowed to put on Brad Smith who was the head of the Federal Election Campaign Commission. So the prosecution put on evidence the defense wants to put on evidence of what an FEC violation truly is and is not allowed to do that and then the defense of advice of counsel was not allowed that's what Trump wanted. This is a kangaroo court you've never heard of anything other than a unanimous verdict in a criminal trial and here's a new one legal expenses are if you report them as as income is a crime I never I wrote it again reporting money as income when its reimbursement is a crime so the judge is saying that itself is a crime no one knew that they could have argued it at the trial but they didn't have the opportunity so I mean those are just some of the issues it was a sad day for me I sat with Andy McCarthy and Jonathan Turley and Trey Gowdy and Shannon Britton we were all like this is unheard of.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.