29 results for "tag:lawfare-narrative"
Exclusive—‘Breaking the Law’: Exposé Reveals Biden White House Orchestrated Lawfare Against Trump to Rig 2024 Election: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/04/exclusive-breaking-the-law-expose-reveals-biden-white-house-orchestrated-lawfare-against-trump-to-rig-2024-election/
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-trump-victim-not-villain-lawfare-war-against-him-crumbles
https://thegreggjarrett.com/with-trumps-victory-the-lefts-crooked-law-fare-game-is-over/
https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/09/05/breaking-hidden-camera-shows-doj-spox-admitting-anti-trump-lawfare-campaign-is-political-perversion-of-justice/
https://paulingrassia.substack.com/p/doj-official-calls-state-officials
Andrew Cherkasky: “Democrats want to see Trump prosecuted for their own lawfare benefit.” Leo Terrell: “It’s all politics. If anyone tells you otherwise, they are not a lawyer.” Alan Dershowitz: “I have observed and participated in trials throughout the world. I have seen justice and injustice in China, Russia, Ukraine, England, France, Italy, Israel, as well as in nearly 40 of our 50 states. But in my 60 years as a lawyer and law professor, I have never seen a spectacle such as the one I observed sitting in the front row of the courthouse.” Bill O’Reilly: “The State of New York's image as a place of freedom and fairness is in tatters. There is no justice in New York…There is no question New York ranks up there with Venezuela and Cuba.”
….No Presidential Candidate, or Candidate for any Office, has ever had to put up with all of this Lawfare and Weaponization directly out of the Office of a Political Opponent. They’ve Weaponized local D.A.s and Attorney Generals, and anybody else that will listen, to Interfere with the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election - Never been done before. This is now Kamala’s Weaponized System against her Political Opponent. All of these Scams will fail, just as Deranged Jack’s Hoax in Florida has been fully dismissed, and we will win the Most Important Election in the History of our Country on November 5th. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/25/dnc-democratic-national-committee-law-firm-payments-e-jean-carroll-trump-supreme-court/
Stephen Miller: “What are we, as a nation, going to do about it? Are we just going to sit down and take it—or are we going to RECLAIM THIS COUNTRY FOR FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, AND THE RULE OF LAW?"
Gregg Jarrett: “I dare say that in the history of American jurisprudence, never has a defendant been tried on an unidentified charge. No ethical prosecutor would ever do it. No fair or competent judge would ever allow it because every defendant has a right to be informed of the precise accusations against him. It is guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and rigorously guarded…The U.S. Supreme Court has held that unanimity in jury verdicts is required under the Sixth and Seventh Amendments. That requirement extends to all issues, said the high court. To find someone guilty, jurors must always agree —without dissent— on every necessary element of the purported crime. This is an indispensable feature of jury trials. Yet, it has inexplicably vanished in this case. District Attorney Alvin Bragg has deprived Trump of a fair trial by robbing him of his due process rights guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Judge Jeanine: “This is a Kangaroo Court…”
Monica Crowley: “They're so deeply invested in this lawfare because they believed it was going to neutralize Donald Trump...and it's only strengthened him...this pile on is completely unjustified…”
Andy McCarthy: “Former FEC commissioner Bradley Smith’s testimony would have established that Trump cannot have willfully violated FECA [The Federal Election Campaign Act]. Because NDAs are not campaign expenditures, Trump did not have a FECA legal duty with respect to them…Ergo, he could not have intentionally flouted a known legal duty.”
IF A PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE IMMUNITY, THE COURT WILL BE “OPENING THE FLOODGATES” TO PROSECUTING FORMER PRESIDENTS. AN OPPOSING HOSTILE PARTY WILL BE DOING IT FOR ANY REASON, ALL OF THE TIME!
Andrew C. McCarthy: “Bragg wants to prosecute Trump for a federal campaign-finance crime — something he has no jurisdiction to do, and that the feds who do have jurisdiction decided not to charge.”
Hans von Spakovsky: “TRUMP’S NY PROSECUTION IS A BOGUS CASE BY A BOGUS PROSECUTOR…Neither the FEC nor the Justice Department ever filed an enforcement action against the Trump campaign or Trump personally over the payment; specifically, because it was not a campaign-related expense. You know what would have led to enforcement actions? If Trump had actually claimed this was a campaign-related expense and had used campaign funds to make the payment, I have no doubt he would have been prosecuted by the feds for the illegal use of campaign funds to pay a personal expense. That’s what former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Ill., went to prison for after he pleaded guilty in 2013 to spending $750,000 on personal expenses.”
Jonathan Turley: “ON ALVIN BRAGG AND THE ART OF NOT TAKING THE LAW TOO SERIOUSLY…Bragg is vague as to what should have been noted on the ledgers for the payments. It is not even clear if Trump knew of this expense’s designation as a legal cost. However, it really did not matter, because the misdemeanor has been as dead as Dillinger for years…For months, Bragg has suggested that the ‘other crime’ was the violation of federal election laws, suggesting that the payment was really a campaign contribution Trump made to himself that was not properly recorded. The problem is that the Justice Department investigated that crime already and decided that it was not a viable criminal claim. It did not even seek a civil fine.”
Gregg Jarrett: “NY VS. TRUMP: DA BRAGG'S WEB OF DECEIT STARTS TO UNRAVEL…There’s no there there. But Alvin Bragg could care less. He deliberately commandeered a state statute that has no application to a federal election and twisted it into a pretzel to bring a preposterous charge against Trump that is utterly unsupported by the facts and the law.”
Andrew McCarthy: “HOW JUDGE MERCHAN IS ORCHESTRATING TRUMP’S CONVICTION…Bragg, a county district attorney responsible for enforcing state law, has no authority to prosecute federal crimes, much less crimes under FECA — a corpus so abstruse that Congress created a specialized bureaucracy, the Federal Election Commission, to ensure its uniform application, vesting the FEC and the Justice Department with exclusive enforcement jurisdiction…Yet, Judge Merchan has swallowed whole Bragg’s theory that he can enforce FECA.”
Andrew McCarthy: “BIDEN’S COLLUSION IN THE ANTI-TRUMP LAWFARE GAMBIT: The president is thoroughly complicit in the prosecutions of his opponent, which he hopes to ride to a second term in the Oval Office…Unlike Trump, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign actually did violate the campaign-finance laws by misdescribing its disbursements in concocting the Russiagate smear (e.g., the production of the Steele dossier) as legal expenses rather than opposition research. Consequently, the FEC fined Clinton’s campaign. Now, let’s say a district attorney in some deep-red county in Florida, Texas, or Oklahoma theorized that Hillary had schemed to steal the 2016 election, and that the shady description of the Russiagate expenditures in her campaign’s ledgers amounted to falsification of business records under the laws of that DA’s state…”
Page 2: “Let’s say that ambitious Republican DA, in order to court the affections of MAGA populists or Clinton-loathing conservatives, had gotten a grand jury to indict Hillary on the Bragg theory — namely, falsification of records to conceal a violation of federal campaign law. Ask yourself this question: In those circumstances, do you think there’s a scintilla of a chance that the Biden Justice Department, with its exclusive jurisdiction over criminal enforcement of federal campaign law in the United States, would sit idly by while a red-state prosecutor, with no federal authority, indicted a Democratic icon? Or do you figure that they would instantly bury the state and federal courts in voluminous legal briefs to get the case shut down as a lawless abuse of power? Would the media–Democrat complex be cheering the prosecutor, or ripping him as a reckless hack who was making up his own version of federal campaign law in order to persecute a partisan rival?”…
Garrett Ventry: “Judge Merchan’s gag order against President Trump is wildly unconstitutional and it is the peak of election interference. The entire campaign they’re running against President Trump has been lawfare. They can’t beat him at the polls.”
https://townhall.com/columnists/mikedavis/2024/04/08/the-absolutely-inane-case-in-manhattan-n2637482
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/federal-judge-who-criticized-trump-cnn-faces-ethics-complaint
https://dailycaller.com/2024/04/05/dershowitz-jarrett-jack-smith-judge-trump/
https://paulingrassia.substack.com/p/the-lawfare-against-john-eastman?utm_campaign=post&triedRedirect=true
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/27/exclusive-sebastian-gorka-exposes-lawfare-being-weaponized-against-trump-we-need-president-trump-back/
Garrett Ventry: “This about stopping Donald Trump…they wait 30 months to bring charges against him…now they want to fast-track and bypass the Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court saw right through it.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/2015-video-leftist-judge-engoron-who-is-presiding/