Search Posts

Platform:
Date range:
to

5 results for "tag:january-6-indictment"

Post from Truth Social

THERE IS NO WAY I CAN GET A FAIR TRIAL WITH THE JUDGE “ASSIGNED” TO THE RIDICULOUS FREEDOM OF SPEECH/FAIR ELECTIONS CASE. EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS, AND SO DOES SHE! WE WILL BE IMMEDIATELY ASKING FOR RECUSAL OF THIS JUDGE ON VERY POWERFUL GROUNDS, AND LIKEWISE FOR VENUE CHANGE, OUT IF D.C.

0:00 0:00
Visualize
41.7K 10.9K 4.9K

Post from Truth Social

Look, it’s not my fault that my political opponent in the Democrat Party, Crooked Joe Biden, has told his Attorney General to charge the leading (by far!) Republican Nominee & former President of the United States, me, with as many crimes as can be concocted so that he is forced to spend large amounts of time & money to defend himself. The Dems don’t want to run against me or they would not be doing this unprecedented weaponization of “Justice.” BUT SOON, IN 2024, IT WILL BE OUR TURN. MAGA!

0:00 0:00
Visualize
32.9K 9.4K 2.9K

Post from Truth Social

https://hannity.com/media-room/a-total-disgrace-republicans-rally-around-trump-after-latest-indictment/

Listen Visualize
12.4K 3.3K 375

Post from Truth Social

Gregg Jarrett: “This is a junk indictment, and it is politically motivated.”

Video transcript 1:24

Next, your thoughts on this? This indictment strikes me as an amateurish joke. Frankly, Jack Smith, a special counsel, should be indicted for stupidity. It's that bad. But he has this disreputable habit of bringing politically driven prosecutions by contorting the law and mangling the evidence. And, you know, these four counts are the definition of a stretch. It's a Gumby indictment, conspiracy to defraud the government because Trump challenged certification of electors on January 6th. Well, he's entitled to do that under the Electoral Count Act. Democrats did the same thing in 2016 and in prior elections. Nor is it a crime to claim the election was stolen, which Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi alleged four years earlier. And the main point is if Donald Trump truly believed he won, even if he was wrong about it and he used the legal process to contest the outcome as the law clearly permits, that is not election fraud. And then Smith tosses in obstruction charge, conspiracy charge. Those are redundant of the first charge and the exact same defense applies. So, you know, this is a junk indictment and it's politically motivated.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00
Visualize
17.1K 4.8K 831

Post from Truth Social

Also, why are they putting out another Fake Indictment the day after the Crooked Joe Biden SCANDAL, one of the biggest in American history, broke out in the Halls of Congress??? A Nation In Decline!

0:00 0:00
Visualize
30.4K 8.7K 2.7K