How much is she being paid, and by whom? She’s at all of my developments protesting. Others, likewise, are the same people. These are paid protestors, aren’t they?
0:00
0:00
Search Posts
Platform:
Date range:
to
17 results for "tag:insinuation"
More than 600,000 voter files ripped off Arizona site in 2020 by hacker, but DOJ didn't prosecute: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/6amhundreds-thousands-voter-files-were-hacked-arizona-2020-doj-declined
0:00
0:00
Video transcript
but take a look, June 19th, a male, blue shirt, reaches in, stays there for a little while. He goes back down, comes back up multiple times. What's he doing? Then a female, white tote bag, she reaches in, needs a better angle, sets the bag down, dives in a little deeper. And we don't know who these people are. No one was stopped or questioned by police, so no arrests. And we don't have the police report yet. But what are they doing with their hands in the pool? Are they cutting the lining? Are they peeling off the paint? And we don't know if they're committing a crime. They'll probably tell you they dropped their wedding ring. The Department of Interior says this, quote, "In the video, you're seeing two suspects observe destroying and removing a piece of the lining and attempting destruction of the lining. This incident took place on June 19th, 2026, and we are investigating. Destroying, injuring, defacing or removing cultural or architectural resources is a federal crime." The Department of Interior says the Department of Interior
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Image 1
A screenshot of a heavily redacted government email chain document, with black boxes covering names and identifying details. It shows an email header block (From/Sent/To/Cc/Subject/Classification fields, mostly redacted) followed by a message body discussing an election-related intelligence report, then the start of a second, earlier email in the same thread. A signature block lists a "Strategic Intelligence Analyst" role in "China & North Korea Strategic Assessments." Institutional labels visible include "NSA" and "USA GOV" repeated throughout the redacted recipient/sender lines.
Text in image: [?] Regards, █████ From: ████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████ Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 8:22 AM To: ████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████████ Cc: ████████████████████ @nsa.████ █████@nsa. Subject: RE: (U) Note to Election Threat 45 day ICA China Section Drafting Team Classification: ████████████████ All, █ has heard/received nothing. We have deliberately massaged our one pending PDB to avoid any direct links to the election. The massive report we have been waiting on has been chopped up into 13 reports that likely will not get out until late next week. Many/all of them will be cross-posted into ████ or downgraded to ████ so that can be more readily incorporated into the 45 day piece, if needed. ----(U)████████ ████████ Strategic Intelligence Analyst ████ China & North Korea Strategic Assessments ICemail:████████ NSTS:████████ Bldg/Room:████████ ----(U)████████---- From: ████████ NSA ████ █@nsa████ Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:25 PM To: ████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████████ NSA ████ USA GOV ████████████████████
Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.
Image 2
A screenshot of a declassified government document — an email chain with a red header stamp reading "DECLASSIFIED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP on 3 July 2026." The document is an intra-DNI (Director of National Intelligence) email thread with three nested messages, each showing From/Sent/To/Subject header fields where the sender and recipient names are redacted with black bars. Classification, "Classified By," and "Derived From" fields are also redacted with black boxes. The subject line of all three messages is "RE: NSA deliberately messaging elections PDB" (the earliest message drops the "RE:"). The visible body text of the top email discusses the PDB (President's Daily Brief) having been "worded away from elections," concern about intelligence being "deliberately messaging away from" election-related analysis, and a separate NSA reporting effort tied to a "45 day report" and a "30 November date on the ICA draft." A second email beneath it reads "I'm not sure what to make of this. If this is off, why does [redacted] say, 'ok'?" Page number "1" appears at the bottom.
Text in image: DECLASSIFIED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP on 3 July 2026 From: [REDACTED] -DNI-[REDACTED] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 2:18 PM To: [REDACTED] -DNI-; [REDACTED] -DNI- Subject: RE: NSA deliberately messaging elections PDB Classification: [REDACTED] Classified By: [REDACTED] Derived From: [REDACTED] Declassify On: [REDACTED] ================================================================ I think we have two albeit related things going on here- - i Jeremy One, the PDB which apparently they've worded away from elections. I haven't seen the draft ([REDACTED]?) but [REDACTED]'s characterization is familiar as to what we heard a couple weeks ago (and I would be concerned as to why they are "deliberately massaging" analysis away from elections. I haven't heard that it is off but it may be further delayed pending the upcoming releases. - Two, there is a larger effort in NSA that they will get all [REDACTED] reporting needed for the 45 day report into [REDACTED] for ease of reporting (I've asked [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] to check in with the regional NIOs to see if they are making progress toward the 30 November date on the ICA draft per our email exchange with the DNI. [REDACTED] From: [REDACTED] -DNI- Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 1:45 PM To: [REDACTED] -DNI-[REDACTED]; [REDACTED] -DNI- Subject: RE: NSA deliberately messaging elections PDB Classification: [REDACTED] Classified By: [REDACTED] Derived From: [REDACTED] Declassify On: [REDACTED] ================================================================ I'm not sure what to make of this. If this is off, why does [REDACTED] say, "ok"? From: [REDACTED] -DNI- Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 8:17 AM To: [REDACTED] -DNI- Subject: NSA deliberately messaging elections PDB 1
Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.
What do they have to be afraid of. Republicans are moving too fast on nominations!!!
0:00
0:00
HOW DID SAMANTHA POWER MAKE ALL OF THAT MONEY???
0:00
0:00
Kamala’s Medical Report is really bad. With all of the problems that she has, there is a real question as to whether or not she should be running for President! MY REPORT IS PERFECT - NO PROBLEMS!!!
0:00
0:00
There’s something wrong with Kamala, I just don’t know what it is — But there is something missing, and everybody knows it!
0:00
0:00
Failed ABC Fake News reporter Jonathan Karl just wrote another bad book. He works sooo hard, but has sooo little talent - Some people have it, and some people don’t. In the “book” he has the World’s most overrated celebrity, Kim Kardashian, supposedly telling me that she “would leverage her celebrity to get football stars to come to the White House,” if I would commute the sentences of various prisoners. This story is Fake News in that she would be the last person I asked to get football players. I’ve had many teams, from all sports and leagues, in the White House. If there was even a slight reluctance, I would immediately withdraw the invitation, there would be NO Negotiation - But this did not happen often. I did help with prisoner commutation, but only if deserving, and much more so for Kanye West than for Kim, who probably voted for Crooked Joe Biden, and look at the mess our Country is in now. Many other false stories in Karl’s very boring book, but nothing worth mentioning!
0:00
0:00
If you want to know about Hillary Clinton's honesty & judgment, ask the family of Ambassador Stevens.
0:00
0:00
Third rate reporters Amy Chozick and Maggie Haberman of the failing @nytimes are totally in the Hillary circle of bias. Think about Bill!
0:00
0:00
Romney was the architect of ObamaCare. Bush’s Chief Justice legalized the monstrosity. Notice a trend?
0:00
0:00
How much money are the lawyers for the Central Park Five getting out of the 40 million dollars, or are they paid by the City (or both)?
0:00
0:00
Once ObamaCare is fully enacted in NY, conveniently after 2014, expect higher premiums, bigger deductibles, &, worse care. Job killer!
0:00
0:00
There was a major diplomatic breakthrough yesterday w/the White House, Iran &, China. All celebrated Chuck Hagel being voted in as SOD.
0:00
0:00
I wonder if @BarackObama has promised Iran and China that he can be more flexible after his last election?
0:00
0:00
Libya is adopting a more radical form of Sharia Law now under their new leadership. Is this what @BarackObama wanted?
0:00
0:00