The Radical Democrats have lost another pathetic, unAmerican Witch Hunt. After spending tens of millions of dollars, wasting over 6 years of obsessive work that should have been spent on protecting New Yorkers from violent, rampant crime that is destroying the City and State, coordinating with the Biden/Harris Department of Injustice in lawless Weaponization, and bringing completely baseless, illegal, and fake charges against your 45th and 47th President, ME, I was given an UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE. That result alone proves that, as all Legal Scholars and Experts have said, THERE IS NO CASE, THERE WAS NEVER A CASE, and this whole Scam fully deserves to be DISMISSED. The real Jury, the American People, have spoken, by Re-Electing me with an overwhelming MANDATE in one of the most consequential Elections in History. As the American People have seen, this “case” had no crime, no damages, no proof, no facts, no Law, only a highly conflicted Judge, a star witness who is a disbarred, disgraced, serial perjurer, and criminal Election Interference. Today’s event was a despicable charade, and now that it is over, we will appeal this Hoax, which has no merit, and restore the trust of Americans in our once great System of Justice. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Search Posts
16 results for "tag:hush-money-case"
I appreciate the time and effort of the United States Supreme Court in trying to remedy the great injustice done to me by the highly conflicted “Acting Justice,” who should not have been allowed to try this case. Every Legal Scholar stated, unequivocally, that this is a case that should never have been brought. There was no case against me. In other words, I am innocent of all of the Judge’s made up, fake charges. This was nothing other than Weaponization of our Justice System against a Political Opponent. It’s called Lawfare, and nothing like this has ever happened in the United States of America, and it should never be allowed to happen again. To this day, this highly political and corrupt Judge has put a gag order on me, which takes away my First Amendment right to speak about very important aspects of the case. For the sake and sanctity of the Presidency, I will be appealing this case, and am confident that JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL. The pathetic, dying remnants of the Witch Hunts against me will not distract us as we unite and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-bragg-merchans-vindictive-lawfare-strategy-against-trump-failed-can-go-until-2029
BREAKING: In a completely illegal, psychotic order, the deeply conflicted, corrupt, biased, and incompetent Acting Justice Juan Merchan has completely disrespected the United States Supreme Court, and its Historic Decision on Immunity. But even without Immunity, this illegitimate case is nothing but a Rigged Hoax. Merchan, who is a radical partisan, wrote an opinion that is knowingly unlawful, goes against our Constitution, and, if allowed to stand, would be the end of the Presidency as we know it. Merchan has so little respect for the Constitution that he is keeping in place an illegal gag order on me, your President and President-Elect, just so I cannot expose his and his family’s disqualifying and illegal conflicts….
https://nypost.com/2024/09/05/us-news/top-spokesman-for-manhattan-us-attorneys-office-caught-on-secret-recording-blasting-da-bragg-over-trump-prosecution/
“ALVIN BRAGG ENGAGING IN LAWFARE”
Video transcript
And I just don't feel comfortable acting like the creeps on the other side who hunt us for political reasons. Take, for example, this, in a secret recording for Steven Crowder's "Mug Club," a spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office admits what we already knew. The hush money case against Trump was nothing more than Alvin Bragg engaging in lawfare to boost his own political image. Watch. - Those felonies did nothing to stop Trump from running. - No, in fact, they made him more relevant. - Did that backfire? - Sure did. - And those things is disgusting. They're just all together. - And that's why I like the surgery of the brothers. You know, it's a perversion of justice. - Why? - Because I think the case is not nuanced. Before he decided to prosecute Trump, did you know who it was? - Thank God for the secret hidden vagina cam. (audience laughing) Now, that dude in the video told the New York Post, he said all of that in private to a stranger that he was trying to impress, which makes sense. It's the oldest trick in the book. If you want to get something from someone you just put on a thong and pretend you're interested. That's how I got this job. (audience laughing) But his confession is also true. We always knew this leftist law fair (beep) was real and it pisses all of us off and it should. But do we want to be like them, scumbags, who will imprison you for political purposes?
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Judge Jeanine Pirro on today’s sentencing delay in New York…
Video transcript
with me now the 5 co-hosts judge Jeanine Pirro, a former New York State judge and district attorney, a ton of experience with all of this. There's another picture of Jeanine. It's another life. How are you? Good to have you here today. So what's your reaction to Judge Rishon moving? You are? I am stunned. Look, this is a judge who at every turn ruled against Donald Trump. This is a judge who allowed prejudicial evidence to come in, evidence that had nothing to do with the underlying charge. And speaking of the underlying charge, most of it is expired pursuant to the statute of limitations, bootstrapped and resurrected by another crime that the jury didn't have to really identify. And there's a lot of hearsay and there's some privileged information. Then in the interim is a Supreme Court decision that came out in July that said, hey, you know, you have to separate immunity or immunize and privilege testimony from the underlying essence of the crimes in this case. And now all of a sudden Judge Rishon is saying, well, I don't want to be political here. I think it's time that we took, you know, took note of the fact that we're in a presidential election season. Are you kidding me? This is a political decision made by a judge who said, you know what, this is a close election. I'm not going to give Donald Trump any kind of advantage here. That's my interpretation based upon a judge who did everything he could. Even the verdict sheet in this case is not, you don't, you can't understand it. I've never seen anything like it. And so now suddenly the DA, Martha agrees, the DA says, we're not going to object to his sentencing. They want to throw him in jail, but they know that this is a case that will that will go in Trump's favor and they don't want that to happen. So this is Alvin Bragg. There's so many cases that we've been keeping straight, but this was, this was the hush money case. And you remember that Alvin Bragg basically took something that was beyond the statute of limitations and extrapolated it into, I think 34 counts. It was in the end, which had people outraged back then. Do you think that they are now looking at this situation and that they got cold feet? I mean, at one point, Marshawn did say back in the courtroom, you know, it's not lost on me that I have someone here who may be the next president of the United States. Do you think that they just said, you know what, we don't, we don't really want this on our shoulders. Well, I think that it is inevitable that this case will be reversed. And I think that maybe Marshawn did everything he had to do, that he allowed in testimony regarding a crime that nobody knows what it was. And that in the end, they will be able to say that Donald Trump is a convicted felon. He's been convicted on 34 counts, but you know what, we're going to delay this sentencing because maybe if they had this sentencing and Donald Trump took an appeal, depending upon how quickly the appellate court wanted to rule on this, I mean, this is an important case where exigent circumstances would require an appellate court to take it up immediately. They don't want to be slapped down either. So I mean, there are so many avenues here in this case, but the one thing that is so essential to understand, Martha, is that every turn was against Donald Trump. Now all of a sudden we're clean. We don't want to get involved in anything political. It's a presidential election season and we're going to, we're going to just adjourn the sentencing until after election. And by the way, Jack Smith got a superseding indictment, right? Georgia's nowhere at that case. We don't know even know who the prosecutor is. You were Sean doesn't want to be hanging alone on this where he's definitely going to be slapped. Let me ask you this, which is a purely political question about all of this, because there was clearly a big rush in all these cases. Jack Smith wanted his cases, which were January 6th in the documents case, which got thrown out by the judge in Florida. They wanted all this to happen before the election. Do you think that the fact that Kamala Harris is now the candidate has made them cool their heels a little bit, that they're less worried about a second president Trump term? They may look at it and say, you know, the, the, it looks tight. And that's why I go back to the political that this little bit where if you put or sentence of someone running for president on house arrest or whatever confinement, the country will go crazy. We are a Republic. We are, this is the United States. You don't put someone running for president in jail or house confined about November 26th when we'll know, I mean, whether he's the next president or he is not, or he loses the election. Will there be a sentencing then they will have to make a decision first on the immunity part of this based on the Supreme court's decision that will then be appealed. And then they would probably go to a sentencing. But here's the thing. If he's president, they can't put him in jail at that point. Okay. Because he's got to run the country. Yeah. You know, there's a lot of, a lot of avenues on this one, but I've never seen them say, we don't want to be political now. Yeah. You know, we're, we're within two months of this election. So this obviously would have had a big bearing on it. It may have helped Trump if he was sentenced every single move along the way here, the more he was persecuted by the legal system, the more it helped him. But this one is off the table for now. Judge, always great to see you. Thank you so much for coming. I will see you on the five.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
The Manhattan D.A. Witch Hunt has been postponed because everyone realizes that there was NO CASE, I DID NOTHING WRONG! It is a political attack against me by Comrade Kamala Harris and other Radical Left Opponents for purposes of Election Interference, and is a case that should have never been brought. Nothing like this has ever happened in the United States of America – IT IS STRICTLY THIRD WORLD, BANANA REPUBLIC “STUFF.” Importantly, The Public understands this, and so does every Legal Scholar, Expert, and Luminary, including Andy McCarthy, Jonathan Turley, Alan Dershowitz, Mark Levin, Steven Calabresi, David Rivkin, Gregg Jarrett, Katie and Andrew Cherkasky, Elie Honig, and many others. I greatly appreciate the words “if necessary” being utilized in the Decision, because there should be no “if necessary” - This case should be rightfully terminated, as we prepare for the Most Important Election in the History of our Country. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
….“In that case, campaign expenditure limits were ruled to be flatly unconstitutional as a violation of the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. Under Buckley v. Valeo, an individual like Donald Trump can spend an unlimited amount of his own money promoting his own campaign. But, the Supreme Court in Buckley did uphold contribution limits on how much an individual or a group could contribute to influence an election. Alvin Bragg argues that the Trump organization's contribution of $130,000 to pay Stormy Daniels hush money exceeded federal campaign finance limits on contributions. The federal government itself has adopted a policy of not prosecuting hush money payments as illegal campaign contributions in the wake of its embarrassing loss of such a prosecution brought against Democratic Vice Presidential contender John Edwards who had paid hush money to a mistress with who he had had a child out of wedlock….
….“The U.S. Supreme Court needs to hear this case as soon as possible because of its impact on the 2024 presidential election between President Trump and President Biden. Voters need to know that the Constitution protected everything Trump is alleged to have done with respect to allegedly paying hush money to Stormy Daniels…The federal Supreme Court needs to make clear what are the legal rules in matters of great consequence to an election to a federal office like the presidency. A highly partisan borough, Manhattan, of a highly partisan city, New York City, in a highly partisan state, like New York State, cannot be allowed to criminalize the conduct of presidential candidates in ways that violate the federal constitution. The Roman Republic fell when politicians began criminalizing politics. I am gravely worried that we are seeing that pattern repeat itself in the present-day United States. It is quite simply wrong to criminalize political differences.”
Jim Trusty: “It's the basics of is there any crime here at all?”
Caroline Polisi, CBS Mornings: “Trump himself didn’t go on the drop down menu and say these were reimbursements or retainer fee.”
What kind of a justice system is this? SO UNFAIR. Couldn’t even present evidence. The judge was an out of control disaster. Election Interference. Will win on appeal. https://youtu.be/T5s9ByP9OBA?si=DwP79-Vb5X49YNMk
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6349026157112
RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/110051167143996863 There was no “bookkeeping error.” There was no Crime!
There was no “misdemeanor” here either. There was no crime, period. All other of the many Democrat law enforcement officers that looked at it, took a pass. So did Cy Vance, and so did Bragg. But then, much latter, he changed his mind. Gee, I wonder why? Prosecutorial Misconduct and Interference with an Election. Investigate the Investigators!
They are MANY years beyond the Statute of Limitations which, in this instance, is TWO YEARS. More importantly, THERE WAS NO CRIME!!!