Search Posts

Welcome to Hannity. Tonight, Mark Zuckerberg is confessing to something we have been telling you for years, government, deep state bureaucrats and the Biden administration. They have worked over time to censor speech they don't like. In fact, they pressured Facebook and other big tech to censor the Hunter Biden very real laptop story when they knew damn well that the laptop was real and authentic in March of 2020. But in the months leading up to the election, they are meeting weekly with big tech companies and telling them they may be victims of a disinformation campaign by Russia, maybe about Hunter and Joe and Barisma. They knew it was true. And 51 Intel officials, they knew nothing. They just took orders from Lincoln, Tony Blinken, and they use the FBI's ruse to pour even more cold water on the story while the state run media mob applauded their efforts and big tech, the corrupt media and the deep state, all colluding to lie and put cinder blocks on the scale of a presidential election and then have the goal to lecture us about misinformation on deep fake videos. All of this as other unelected bureaucrats worked with the Biden administration to wage law fair against Donald Trump that is still ongoing. And we have big updates on those two stories coming up tonight. But let's be very clear. The federal government is totally out of control and freedoms that you thought you had are non-existent. And with 69 days until election day, 21 days until early voting begins in Pennsylvania, mail-in ballots going out even sooner than that in the next week or two, many Americans are asking themselves who is in charge of this country and how corrupt are big institutions in America like big tech, like the media, state run media mob, like our government. Joe Biden is on his second consecutive beak, a beach week vacation, nothing on his calendar. He's been mentally checked out for quite some time. Well, that would mean vice president Harris, is she in charge? Do we know? Because she doesn't seem to know. She's been traveling around the country for weeks on end, pretending to be a challenger all while vowing to fix the problems that she caused with Joe on day one. Day one, Kamala was January 20th, 2021, not 2025. And now she's not giving many details at all. They don't have time for any more details. They're very stressed out. Now, there are no policy positions that are listed on her website. She has participated in zero press conferences, zero town halls, zero interviews. But this coming Thursday, we got the big announcement after seven plus weeks. Kamala will finally sit down for her very first TV interview. Take a look at the conditions, though. This is going to be a pre-recorded interview on fake news. CNN, of course. Why did they just do Rachel Maddow, the conspiracy theorist and liar on MSDNC? And she's doing it with far left Trump hater Dana Bash. Let's see if she can keep her fairness record going for two interviews in a row. Anyway, Vice President Walls will be present. He's there to offer moral support and bail Kamala out if she gets lost in one of her now famous never ending platitudes about the passage of time. Time is passing and we're all passing through time. If Kamala can't handle a single live interview by herself with a friendly CNN host, how is she going to handle President Xi of Vladimir Putin or the mullahs in Iran or any other adversarial world leader? It's pathetic. And Dana, let me give you all of your research right now. It's all on Hannity dot com. They're called the Kamala files, the walls files. This is Kamala and walls in their own words. You don't have to do the research. We did it all for you. And you can fact check. It's not AI generated. Does she still want to ban fracking and drilling? Is she still bragging about Bidenomics? Does she still think inflation is transitory? Does she still want to decriminalize illegal immigration and offer free housing, health care and education to illegals and make American taxpayers pay for it? And what does she say to the families of victims of Harris, Biden, unvetted illegals, you know, those that were murdered and raped and victims of other horrendous crimes in this country? Does she still support amnesty for illegals? Does she still refer to ICE as the KKK want to defund them and defund and dismantle the police and reimagine them and implement no bail laws? How about you going to ask about her support for the rioters in the summer of 2020, you know, the summer of love, 574 riots and insurrections at once? Is she glad that she said they're not going to stop and they shouldn't stop and tweeting out that bail fund? And what about Timmy, her running mate? He still want tampons and boys bathrooms. Does he still want to eliminate all parental rights and and offer gender affirming care for kids without adults permission and legal drivers licenses and free college for illegals? These are important questions. And so far, she will only commit to a single debate. She tried hard to get out of it even on left wing ABC after Donald Trump had already agreed to all the rules they themselves demanded. They demanded they requested them. And recently Kamala tried to change the rules at the last minute, requesting that the mics remain hot throughout the debate. She wanted to manufacture another I'm speaking. I'm speaking. Do you know I'm I'm speaking, which kind of went viral. If God forbid, Donald Trump ever interrupted her during a debate. But today on Truth Social, Donald Trump has agreed to the debate with the same rules that they originally agreed to. Jason Miller from the Trump campaign said the Harris campaign wanted to have a seated debate. She wanted cheat sheets. She wanted notes in front of her and hot mics the whole time. The opposite of everything she agreed to. Now, keep in mind, ABC News is openly hostile to former President Donald Trump and most Republicans. For example, you might recall here is ABC News reporter Rachel Scott with the very first question during Donald Trump's appearance at the National Association of Black Journalists. Take a look at this. Ask yourself, does it sound like journalism or a talk show host? I want to start by addressing the elephant in the room, sir. A lot of people did not think it was appropriate for you to be here today. You have pushed false claims about some of your rivals from Nikki Haley to former President Barack Obama saying that they were not born in the United States, which is not true. You have told for Congresswoman Moon of Color, who were American citizens to go back to where they came from. You have used words like animal and rabbit to describe black district attorneys. You've attacked black journalists calling them a loser, saying the questions that they ask are, quote, stupid and racist. You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort. So my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters to vote for you, why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that? Well, first of all, I don't think I've ever been asked a question. So in such a horrible manner. First question. Trump wins the crowd over. Anyway, it gets worse. One of ABC News top so-called journalists, a former Clinton hack. We'll be talking a lot about him in the days to come. His name is Georgie Stephanopoulos. Take a look. We better be ready for the fact that he might be leading a Republican ticket next. I know you don't believe that. The course of Trump's presidency will turn on his coming public showdown with James Comey. The big question. Did President Trump try to block the FBI's Russia investigation, commit an impeachable offense? Good morning. Hope you had a good week. It was another one of those wild ones at the White House. How strange is it for you to sit here and compare the president to a mob boss? You write the President Trump is unethical, untethered to the truth. Is Donald Trump unfit to be president? It's all too easy to fall into reflexive habits, to treat this as a normal campaign, where both sides embrace the rule of law, where both sides are dedicated to a debate based on facts and the peaceful transfer of power. But that is not what's happening this election year. As you point out, the statements from JD Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy, of course, President Trump and his supporters have have contributed to this violent rhetoric as well. Well, he claims to be a journalist. He's not. He is a liberal talk show host and a hack of one as well. Anyway, ABC is a cheerleader for the Harris campaign. And yet Kamala Harris is still scared to debate. Donald Trump tried to get our hardest to get out the last couple of days. It is not just her trouble speaking without a teleprompter and constant nervous, bizarre giggling. Kamala Harris appears to be in the midst of an identity crisis since becoming the Democratic nominee. Almost all of her radical positions that she holds held so near and dear, you know, have seemingly changed, or at least that's what anonymous aides say behind closed doors. We don't know because she won't give a press conference or talk to anybody. For example, in 2019 she called Trump's border wall a medieval vanity project and even mocked the possibility of terrorists coming across our southern border. Now keep in mind, as you see this as the 11 million plus unvetted Harris, Biden illegal immigrants have come into the country. So have hundreds with terror ties. We don't know where they are. Take a look. This is a crisis of the president's own making to fulfill his quest to to build a vanity project called the wall. This is irresponsible. It's the height of irresponsibility for the commander in chief to suggest that we have to build a wall across our southern border because there are terrorists who are trying to invade the country. It couldn't be farther from the truth. The subject of transnational gangs. Let's be perfectly clear. The president's medieval vanity project is not going to stop them. You know, the height of irresponsibility is letting people in from 180 countries, unvetted, including Iran, Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, Russia, China and Venezuela, including people with known terror ties. And we have no idea where they are. Oh, people with terror ties. Uh, that is the height of irresponsibility as the vice president and borders are, Kamala halted construction on the border wall, leaving huge gaps at our southern border. They told us for three years, the border is closed and secure. It's not, never has been all of a sudden. Well, the campaign aides say Kamala now wants to build the wall, a vanity wall, I guess. And she even features Trump's border wall at her campaign ads, as we showed you last night. And that's not all. Remember when she wanted to eliminate immigration, in other words, and customs enforcement, better known as ice that you also compared to the KKK. You might recall a lot of the signs at the rally you just held where people standing there saying abolish ice. Yeah. Is that a position that you agree with? Listen, I think there's no question that we've got to critically reexamine ice and its role and the way that it is being administered and the work it is doing. And we need to probably think about starting from scratch because there's a lot that is wrong with the way that it's conducting itself. And we need to deal with that. Anonymous aides say she no longer believes that it's not just the border. It's not just ice. During her first presidential campaign, Kamala also promised to eliminate private insurance member of Medicare for all government will take care of your health care. How's the post office working for you? Take a look. You support the Medicare for all bill, I think, initially co-sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders. You're also a co-sponder on to I believe it will totally eliminate private insurance. So for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it. Well, the list and the idea is that everyone gets access to medical care and you don't have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require. Who of us has not had that situation where you got to wait for approval and the doctor says, well, I don't know if your insurance company is going to cover this. Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on. Well, forget your freedom and joy party wants to take away, let's see, your money to pay for college health care, housing for illegals. They want to take away your money and your ability and choice to have your own health care plan. They want to pay for a $93 trillion new green deal that she co-sponsored in the Senate, you know, and now she's saying she completely changed her mind. All right. Just for the sake of the campaign, I'll let you keep your private health insurance. We hear the same message about the new green deal. She introduced both these bills in the Senate that she cosponsored with Bernie Sanders and her plan to ban fracking and offshore drilling. Nevermind. It's a campaign year. I can't run on what I really believe. And her promise to reimagine public safety with fewer police and defund and dismantle no bail laws. The list of wild flipping, flopping, flailing goes on and on. But we don't really know where Kamala stands. Kamala won't say what she believes. We have her on tape saying all of these things. You just get whispers. She might have changed her mind. Nevermind. And that is a bad sign. It means her true beliefs are too radical for the general population and her campaign knows it. And if the American people know if that's why I created the Kamala files, the wall files, you can take it for free. Friends on Hannity dot com. Send it to your friends, family, put it out on social media because the mob state run media, they're not going to run it. Michael Moore seems to agree. He wrote, Kamala will be the most progressive president in history. He's not wrong. He's about as far left as you can get. And tonight he's quote, so hopeful. Kamala Harris, Tim Walls, they're not moderates by any stretch. What they're selling is snake oil. They're lying. And if they win in November, our country is in deep trouble. Capitalism as we know it, that'll go away.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

and here with analysis. Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley. All right, there's a lot to unwrap here legally. I'll let you choose where you want to begin. But I would look at this as a big win for Donald Trump today in terms of the half a billion dollar plus, but I would like an answer. I would like somebody to be held accountable for the phone evaluation that Judge Angoran now holds till to this day of Mar-a-Lago being only worth between 18 and what, 20 some odd million dollars when I've shown empty lots, two acres going for 200 million. Well, the interesting thing about the vapors that you were witnessing from various pundits is that this is simply to allow another judge to review what Angoran did. So what they're complaining about is that Trump didn't have to do a fire sale on his property just to be able to get other judges to look at this ruling. And the ruling is ludicrous. That is, the ruling is based on really speculative numbers by the court. You drill down, there's nothing really there. And then the problem, of course, is that, you know, the penalty in this case should have been a dollar because no one lost a dollar. The people that were the supposed victims, these companies, these banks wanted more business from Trump. Now, what the judge ordered in New York was supervision, and you could have stopped there, right? If you think that there's undervaluing and overvaluing, then sure, order supervision. But that's not what this judge wanted to do. This judge picked an arbitrary number that made it almost impossible for Trump to secure an appeal to protect his businesses unless he was willing to sell off some of his businesses. Let me run some poll numbers by you. John McLaughlin and associates, 67% say politics played a role in the indictment of Donald Trump. That's over two thirds, Jonathan. 58% say Biden played a role in the indictments of Donald Trump. Only 30% say it's not true that Biden is trying to jail Trump. Wow. I think the American people, you know, you lay out facts for them in spite of a media that I think is abusively biased, they kind of get it. They do get it. And I think that they recognize for it for what it is. It's not that they necessarily like Trump, but they don't like what they're seeing, particularly in New York. They've created this inescapable political vortex that used to be a legal system. And it's damaging, not just the courts, it's damaging the city. Who wants to go to a city where they try to get you to sell off your property just to get an appeal to look at what a judge did? And so the damage there has been below the waterline. It's going to have to be repaired. But now the New York Court of Appeals could restore some integrity to their system and look at these, at this number. There's two issues here. You know, whether he overvalued and undervalued, that's something very common in the real estate area. But the other major issue is, does this violate the constitution? Almost half a billion dollars in penalty when no one lost a single cent. Let me ask you about the Bragg case now scheduled to begin on April the 15th. Andy McCarthy had a pretty interesting analysis of this. I think you share this view. He said that Bragg was falsifying his prosecution. And he said, knowing that a plain spoken admission that he was trying to enforce federal law, he goes on to say, and a federal statute that the state prosecutor had no authority to enforce that the feds themselves passed on and their lead witness, well, I wouldn't say he's the most credible human being on the face of the earth. How does that play out? Well, Andy, spot on. Many of us have been writing from the beginning of this case that it is a sort of a Frankenstein monster of a case. It's composed of different parts of the federal and state codes. What he basically did is he took a misdemeanor where the time has already run out from the prosecute and bootstrapped the federal crime so that he could extend the statute of limitations. But the Department of Justice rejected that crime. That's the same type of theory they use against John Edwards. It collapsed in a really abysmal failure by the Justice Department. And so they declined to do it. And so you created this bizarre filing. I'm surprised that it has not been dismissed, but Trump may have to face a trial in order to get serious review of the underlying theory. But now we're going to have the spectacle of a disbarred lawyer, Michael Cohen, who just recently was denounced by a judge who said that he was a serial perjurer, that he was still gaming the system. And that's going to be your star witness. It's going to be another blow, I think, to the integrity of the New York legal system. But we'll see if the New York jury buys us. I think that what Bragg is betting on is that the jury won't get past the name on the caption of the criminal complaint and that they will spend very little time looking at either the law or the evidence and focus on who's behind the defense table. All right, Jonathan, Charlie, as always, thank you. We appreciate you being with us.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.