Search Posts

No change. That's the focus of tonight's angle. Well, we have more evidence today that Democrats believe they're gals in trouble. First, the pro-Harris website Axios published this piece. Behind the curtain, Dem's blue wall blues. There's growing worry among Democrats that Harris seems stuck, even sliding a bit, after a strong start to her young presidential campaign. Her media blitz, heavy spending, and largely favorable coverage don't seem to be moving the needle much, if at all, these Democrats say. Now, Michigan, once thought to be a fairly solid hold for Harris, is slipping away. Axios notes that it's where Democratic erosion among union members, Arab Americans, and young men all collide. And the numbers in the new poll by Emerson and the Hill show trouble for Harris as well. As the race there is now tied at 49. And in other states in the same survey, Trump's either tied or leading. He's up by one in Pennsylvania, ditto in Georgia, which actually seems low to me, but he's up by two in Arizona, and he's tied in Wisconsin. And then Quinnipiac, that was out yesterday, showed much more stomach-churning trend lines for Harris. Although it has her up by three in Pennsylvania, Trump is up by three in Michigan, and he's up by two there in Wisconsin. So, this is not how Team Kamala thought it was all going to look less than a month out before election day. Now, despite relentless lawfare against Trump, we can never forget that or forgive it. Despite a massive money advantage over Republicans, and of course, the historic first as their nominee, Democrats find themselves in a real jam. Now, when a campaign is on track to win, we know what things sound like. And well-known political consultants don't need to give on-air advice like this. You're really probably under 20 days that you have to really get a message out. They need to be sharp, they need to be aggressive, they need to stop answering questions and start asking questions. And those comments were just four days after Obama's campaign guru, David Axelrod, made it clear, Harris needed to start getting out there, doing town halls, interviews, because Trump was everywhere. And sure enough, the Harris team, they snapped too, and they dispatched her to do a bevy of shows, mostly friendly, and none of it made her look any more serious or any more qualified to be president. And I'll say this, and we go even further, at different points in every time she went on these shows, she looked either afraid, confused, or just plain stupid. What do you think would be the biggest specific difference between your presidency and a Biden presidency? Well, we're obviously two different people. Do we have a real close ally in Prime Minister Netanyahu? I think, with all due respect, the better question is do we have an important alliance? Do you nap at all? Not really. I wish I could. I wish I could. Well, at this point, with the polls as they are, if you're, let's say, one of Kamala's big donors, you've got to be starting to wonder, what on earth did these people do with all that dough that they raised? But maybe, apparently, a billion dollars didn't go as far as it used to, and it can't buy her any love. In what's clear from the reporting in the Washington Post today, Harris campaign officials are somehow looking to blame the donors if things go south. Now, I love this phrasing, "People familiar with the campaign strategy," that's campaign officials, "who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss plans, said Wednesday that the campaign continues to face significant headwinds that will require more money over the coming weeks. They said each of the seven targeted swing states remains within the margin of error, requiring costly spending plans." Sounds like the federal government or Ukraine, they can't give them enough money, they still lose. Now, meanwhile, reporters at the other propaganda arm of the DNC, The New York Times, they seem to be totally flummoxed by the mess that Kamala is in. So all they can do is go back to what they do best, smearing Trump by claiming that he's racially divisive and he's just mean. And when you read this piece, you've got to get to almost at the end of it, like four paragraphs on the bottom. Do they admit that despite how supposedly polarizing Trump is? Check this out. Polls show that he's expanded his support among Latino and black voters from four years ago, a shift that threatens to undermine the multiracial coalition that has long been the foundation of democratic victories. Now, how divisive can Trump be? He's building his coalition. I'm glad they're all catching up over there at The Times because we have known for years on the angle that Trump's new Republican coalition is very real. Inflation has been terrible. Definitely when Trump was in office, there was gas prices lower, you know, saying go to the movie theaters and not pay your arm in a leg. Kamala Harris has been for four years in the presidency and all we have is like problems. We have to close our border. It's easy. You don't need additional funding to do it. It's an executive order that Donald Trump proved on day one when he was in office last that you can do it. Shut it down. It was working. That's not working anymore. Now, Americans are smarter, I think, than the ad men, all those high paid consultants that want more money from the carers camp. Now, they're smarter than the abortion fanatics think they are as well. And certainly they're smarter than the media think they are. Because for all their celebrity testimonials, all the Democrats, TikTok strategizing, all their late night TV schmoozing, Kamala, in the end, is still Kamala. She's still the same annoying candidate she's always been. And I ask you tonight, how can someone be simultaneously so untalented yet so arrogant? It's quite a feat. But understand this, if they lose and look, they can still win, but if they lose, it looks like more likely that they will. Democrats are going to rush to blame her, Kamala. But we should let them get off that easy, because if they lose, it's because they have run the country into the ground. And now that Kamala said there's no nothing she would have done differently than Biden. She certainly can't run away from the Biden record. So it's just hang in there. Overall, inflation is up almost 20 percent. All food is up 22 percent. Housing up 23. Energy almost 30 percent higher for Americans. Auto insurance 60 percent almost. It's higher than it was before under Trump. Oh, and wages. Oh, yeah. Real wages from when Trump left office to last month are also down. Although Obama is stumping for Kamala tonight in Pittsburgh, and we'll get to that, I'm asking, where's the hope and change in any of these dismal statistics? The fact is, Trump has a better record, a far better record on every major issue. And the fact is, Trump picked a better VP candidate than Harris did as well. Another fact is, Democrats refuse to change any of their horrid policies. And at the same time, they actually move further left on the social issues. It's worth remembering that back in 2008, Obama was the Democrat who was against gay marriage. And before that, Bill Clinton was for don't ask, don't tell in the military. But now Kamala thinks we should pay for sex surgeries for prison inmates. That's how far they've moved. Americans supporting Trump, they believe that if he becomes president again, their lives are going to get markedly better. But I think Democrats voting for Harris, most of them can't say the same. The only thing that holds them all together is their abortion obsession and their hatred of Donald Trump. But on the economy, on the border, no hope and no change. And that's the angle.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.