Search Posts

Many in the media want to say that there's no evidence of any waste or abuse. And then every time I provide more evidence of waste and abuse, they dig even deeper and saying there's no evidence of waste and abuse. I just want to give you an example of a couple of updates. We're digging power forward communities. This is an NGO that you just referenced tied to Stacey Abrams. This entity received $100 in 2023. The Biden EPA gave them $2 billion in 2024, put into their grant agreement a requirement that they needed to complete training called how to develop a budget within 90 days. So the Biden EPA said they didn't know how to develop a budget. And yet in that window, they were able to start spending down the balance, even though the Biden EPA figured that they needed more training. So this is Biden EPA reviewers quote the salary structure for top officers seems high for nonprofit or rather high enough that it merits some explanation. I'm wondering if this could be a problem with public perception. Many of the costs are just presented both little or no explanation as to why they are reasonable. They're paying their CEO $800,000 or COO for $150,000, 22 people receiving over $150,000. And there's all different kinds of complaints, concerns expressed by Biden EPA officials saying quote, executive salaries appear excessive. Another added that quote, senior management salaries are seemingly high without justification. Now, I could go through a thousand different examples of what I'm reading right now. And the deeper that I get, the more that the New York Times and Politico and the Washington Post will say, there's no evidence. Well, what do you call everything that we're going through?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.