Search Posts

Platform:
Date range:
to

3 results for "tag:election_interference_reframe"

Gregg Jarrett: “Perhaps the Justices saw this for what it was: ELECTION INTERFERENCE.”

Video transcript 0:40

But the justices also don't like it, Griffin. You know, somebody tries to butt to the front of the line and rob them the justices of meaningful legal judgment. And you know, here the special counsel really offered no compelling reason, except obviously wants a trial of Trump in the middle of a presidential campaign, I think to damage him to the benefit of Democrats and Joe Biden. And perhaps the justices saw this for what it was, election interference. You know, Jack Smith, the special counsel keeps insisting Trump should be treated like everybody else, all right, and then appeal the case like everyone else.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00

A Rigged Trial going on against me by a corrupt N.Y. State Attorney General and an out of control Judge. They brought Values down to a FRACTION of what they are really worth, like Mar-a-Lago, and then called me a Fraud. They are the FRAUDSTERS, and the whole system is CORRUPT. I didn’t even include one of my most valuable assets, BRAND VALUE, in my Financial Statements. Also, this Psycho Judge refuses to acknowledge the fact that I have a 100% Disclaimer Clause on the First Page of my Statements - “DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE.” But it all doesn’t matter, because regardless of what we say to show our TOTAL INNOCENCE, and it has been proven in many ways, and many times over, this political, Trump Hating Judge, together with his horrendous, seething with ANGER Law Clerk, with her illegal campaign contributions, will find me guilty as hell. NO JURY ALLOWED, A STATUTE NEVER USED FOR THIS BEFORE, A RIGGED TRIAL, A RACIST & CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL, A TRUMP HATING JUDGE, ELECTION INTERFERENCE!

0:00 0:00

Thank you very much to Hugh Hewitt—100% true, this is all about Election Interference by the Communist Misfits and Thugs, but we will win big! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/06/16/merrick-garland-must-explain-trump-indictment/

0:00 0:00