Search Posts

>> Yeah, Shannon and Trey, my Twitter's been on fire ever since I put out Trey, what you reported earlier today that four jurors could agree on one crime, four jurors could agree on a different crime and four jurors could agree on a different crime other than that. And as long as it adds up to 12, that's okay. So it's not unanimity on exactly what the crime is, but you get 12 jurors saying he's guilty. As Andy said earlier today, he doesn't know how to square that with the constitution. Trey, you want to go first then, Shannon? >> I don't want to go first because I don't know how to square it either. I think what makes it even more complicated is, I mean, I would have asked for a special verdict form, at least tell us which crime you picked. The judge mentioned three crimes, but as Andy and Shannon and I have been discussing, it could be a crime that the judge didn't even mention. Furthermore, when does something become a crime? To me, it's when a jury of 12 says you're guilty or when you admit it, but crime has a specific meaning to me, does it have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? What are the elements of this unknown crime? It is, to me, void for vagueness.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

-What's it feel to have a jury? -So, thank you very much. I wanted to just say that I'm supposed to be in New Hampshire. I'm supposed to be in Georgia. I'm supposed to be in North Carolina, South Carolina. I'm supposed to be in a lot of different places campaigning. But I've been here all day on a trial that really is a very unfair trial. These are all stories. This is over the last few days from legal experts. This is Wall Street Journal editorial. But all of these are stories from legal experts saying how this is not a case. The case is ridiculous. This is another one. The case is a ridiculous Trump indictment. It's missing fraud. There is no fraud. All of these stories are stories of how -- and these are done by the experts -- and editorials. Bragg falsified this record, and he falsifies them. He's the one. He's the fraud. Take a look at all of these, our stories. You see them here. Bragg's indictment even falls as an indictment. All of them. Bragg crosses the Rubicon indicting Trump. On that sense, the whopping outrage in Trump's indictment is a whopping outrage. And it is an outrage. Everybody's outraged, right? You know, we had 18 -- DA or DA type store clubs -- 18 or 19 or 21. They counted all their in and out life. And in the meantime, we have murders going on right outside New York. Look at this national review. Another national review. Jonathan Turrell and Greg Jarrett. Andrew McCarthy. Every one of them sang -- they called it a zombie case, meaning it is no case. And they say it's unconstitutional. They don't think the case is -- these are all stories that have taken place over the last few days. Take a look at this. DA Bragg wants us to believe that his pursuit of Trump isn't political. Of course, it's political. And they're doing it for Biden. They're doing this for Joe Biden. Even the Rolling Stone. No friend of mine. They don't like -- it says -- they don't like Bragg's chances on this case. That's a disgrace. That's a nice headline. I like to read that one, too. But everyone who lies about the case -- justice is on trial. You know, the whole world is watching this New York scam. The trial spectacle begins as Wall Street Journal. It's a spectacle. Every one of these -- America is the third world country. Daily call it. Wow. That's New York Magazine, even. All of them. They just came out. These are all -- every single one -- I haven't seen one that says it's a good trial. It's political. It's a -- this is a Wall Street Journal editorial. And it's a shame. It's a shame. And I'm sitting here for days now, from morning till night, in that freezing room. Freezing. Everybody was freezing in there. And all for this. And this is your result. Look at that. Each one of them is snoring. And it's very unfair. Very bad thing. Very bad thing. The whole world is watching this hoax. You got a DA that's out of control. You have a judge that's highly conflicted. The whole thing is a mess. And you have the leading candidate and leading Crooked Joe by quite a lot. He's the one that should be in trial. He's a crook. You got a Crooked President. He should be in trial with all the stuff he's done and his family. He should be in trial. But he's the one in charge. His top people are here, working with the DA's office to make sure everything goes right. But it shouldn't go right because they have no case. And that's what this is all about. And it really is a shame. This country is devolving into a third world country between having no borders, having no justice -- we have no justice -- and having a press that doesn't want to cover the facts. So, thank you very much. See you tomorrow.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Thank you very much. This is a trial that should have never been brought. It's a trial that is being looked upon, looked at all over the world, they're calling. They're looking at it and analyzing it. Every legal pundit, every legal scholar said this trial is a disgrace. We have a Trump-hating judge. We have a judge who should be on this case. He's totally conflicted, but this is a trial that should never happen. It should have been thrown out a long time ago. If you look at Jonathan Turner, Andy McCarthy, all great legal scholars, there's not one that we've been able to find that said this should be a trial. I called a, I was paying a lawyer and marked it down as a legal expense, some accountant. I didn't know. Marked it down as a legal expense. That's exactly what it was and you've been indicted over that. I should be right now in Pennsylvania, in Florida, in many other states, North Carolina, Georgia, campaigning. This is all coming from the Biden White House because the guy can't put two sentences together. He can't campaign. He's using this in order to try and win an election and it's not working that way. It's working the opposite way. So check it out, legal expense. It's called legal expense. That's what you're supposed to call it. Nobody has ever seen it. Nobody has ever seen anything like it. So thank you very much for coming. I'm now going to sit down. I am now going to sit down. The voters understand. All you have to do is look at the polls. This is a sham trial and the judge should be guilty. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Well, thank you very much, as you know, because it is an unconstitutional witch hunt. It's election interference at the highest level, it's a disgrace. It's in coordination with the White House and Joe Biden, because he can't win a campaign fairly. And we're going through it, but he is indeed a terrible witch hunt. We're going to have a news conference a little later on. As you know, I want to speak, I want to make the summation. At this moment, the judge is not letting me make the summation because I'll bring up things that he doesn't want to hear. And it's a very unfair drought, nobody's seen anything like this. I don't think they've ever seen anything like this. We have a situation where a statute was used that doesn't give me a jury, so I have no jury. I really have no rights, and nobody thinks it's constitutional people. Illegal scholars are writing about it like it's something they've never seen before. So it's interference, it's political interference, and it's something that shouldn't be allowed. So I am hoping to speak and to help my lawyers reveal all of the defects of this case, which have never been brought. Very, very strong financial statements, they thought it was the opposite, they had no idea because I'm a private company, and then they saw them knock their socks off, you couldn't believe it. But great financial statements, everything is good. We have a level of detail in our defense that nobody's ever had. This is a case that should have never been brought, and it was brought. And it's very unfair, and it's very bad for New York State. People are fleeing, the streets are driving, and Latisha James, all she thinks about is get drunk. She's been dreaming about it for years, and it's not the way a state should be run, because this is a state that's been in big trouble. You have all the businesses fleeing, and you have the people fleeing, the people that pay taxes, people that don't pay taxes are coming in, so it's not what you want. So I want to thank you. We're going to have a news conference today. We don't know the time. We don't know the time, we'll notify you, but sometime in the early afternoon at 40 Wall Street, so we'll give a news conference where we can actually speak and have a microphone here, because even then, they don't want us to have, and they really don't want us to speak too much. So we'll see whether or not the judge allows me to speak. Perhaps he won't, but I certainly would like to. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.