Jonathan Turley: “This is a judge who could’ve resolved this. He could have come up with an easy solution—this is just because of Trump’s portfolio being real estate…it’s the nature of his business. This judge has done NOTHING to introduce any element of fairness through this. You’ve (Trump) got a portfolio with estate—and people don’t take real estate in order to float a bond.”
Video transcript
This is a judge who could have resolved this. He could have come up with an easy solution. This is just because of Trump's portfolio being real estate. It's the nature of his business. But those are fixed assets. Trump Towers isn't gonna go anywhere. He's not gonna abscond with it. They could take the $100 million that he's offered and then take other agreements that he won't sell or change his interest in these fixed assets. Anyone looking at that would say, "Well, yeah, that seems fair." But that's not the profile of this case. This judge has done nothing to introduce any element of fairness through this. And so you're really in between a rock and a hard place if you're Donald Trump. You've got a portfolio with real estate and people don't take real estate in order to float a bond. - And as Mark Cuban said, when you're in a zero interest rate environment, very few people keep cash around. Smart investors invested in things and he is not a fan of Donald Trump. So let's move on and talk about your column on foxnews.com. You looked at what's happened in the case with Hunter Biden. You saw Bob Olinsky's testimony. You saw Dan Goldman ridiculously try to engage him, get the answers he didn't want and try to move on. You saw AOC make incredible outrageous accusations. And Bob Olinsky knocked it off.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.