Search Posts

Well, Shena Bellows is the main Secretary of State. She is unelected. She's not a lawyer, but all of a sudden she's become a constitutional scholar, and she thinks that she has the unilateral power as this unelected non-lawyer Secretary of State to take away from 360,000 main Republican voters their right to choose their candidates for the President of the United States. She is clearly misreading Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The only way you can remove a candidate under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is to bring federal criminal charges for insurrection or rebellion, get a federal grand jury to indict, a federal jury to find them guilty with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, unanimously guilty. The federal district judge has to convict and that conviction has to be upheld on appeal. That is the only way you can remove under this post civil war constitutional amendment

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Alina Hava. Alina, great to see you. Thank you for being here. The good news about, I think, from my perspective, about what's happening is it's really pulling the curtain back. And we see that the only -- when they get so desperate, failing through due process to do what might be necessary to challenge Donald Trump, they throw due process out the window, and you see how corrupt these prosecutions really are. That's 100 percent right, David. I mean, how much more obvious can they be at this point? They literally can't beat him in the polls, so they can't -- they don't even want him to be an option for you. So if you take him off and you take away Americans' right to choice, to choose who they want to elect, to not only choose, but to choose who seems to be leading by independence, definitely leading by the Republican Party, and you're going to take him off the ballot because you're so afraid that the mess that you've made and the regime in the Washington corruption is going to get cleaned up in 2024 if he gets back there. And this is such a desperate attempt. Honestly, it's funny to me to watch that woman from Maine speak in a way that -- She's not a lawyer, by the way. I should have thrown that in as well. I was just going to say -- I was just going to say that she is not a lawyer. And here we go. Section 300 -- you don't know what you're talking about. You know what you've done? You've made your team look like a fool, just like Colorado, the bud light of all states. And now we've got to see this go through again, and we're going to defeat it like we always do. If anything, thank you very much. You probably flipped some left-wingers from Maine to the Republican Party. I mean, it's crazy. And, Alina, that's what happens every single time they come after Donald Trump in some way. His poll numbers go up because people see the injustice in it. But to a certain degree, when they cause a ruckus like this, they do present a legal problem for you. How do you combat this? How do you move forward? Very simply, because some of us understand the law. Some of us understand what the Constitution says, due process. There are certain amendments that are still enabled by the Constitution that we have to abide by. And I think the Supreme Court will do the right thing. They'll give us some clarity on this. But I can tell you that these are so crazy. The Jack Smiths, the DAs, the AGs, they've become so deranged, so obsessed with taking down Trump, that the law doesn't make sense to them because they don't care about it. But people like me, we take it one step at a time. We look at case law. We look at things that are precedent for this country. We look at the Constitution. And we will raise those all the way up to the Supreme Court when we have to. And they're taking issue with this. You just saw Jack Smith get shut down because he tried to rush his trial, his bogus trial, because he wants it before the election. We got Fannie in Georgia doing the same thing. This main woman that thinks she's a lawyer, she's another one, you're not making a good name for yourself. And you're going to go down on the wrong side of history. We'll take it one step at a time. And I'm not concerned. Well, the bottom bottom line of all of this and you alluded to it just then is, is that Jack Smith and the rest of the prosecutors have one thing in mind. They want to interfere in the election. They want to interfere in Donald Trump's attempt, first of all, to campaign and then to get into the White House if he's elected freely and fairly. And I think that is what is clear. That's why the Supreme Court shut down Shaq Smith, isn't it? A hundred percent. They shut him down because they said you're not a special. This is not anything different. You're going to go through things the way everybody else does. And that was really I commend them because they saw through the garbage and they said, no, no, no, no, no, there's no urgency. There's no rush. The only urgency you have is that your Soros backing is requiring you to answer to Biden and everybody else who wants to win unfairly, just like in 2020 and keep fighting in an incorrect manner. What is so wrong with fighting and winning fair and square? And guess what? If you think you're so good, let him on the ballot, let him on the ballot and win. But you can't because like you said, our borders are a mess. Our country is a mess. The economics are terrible. We the American people have had it. The desperation is obvious. It's just obvious. And that's the thing, Alina, when they use diversionary tactics like this to me, as you watch this play out, you're basically sitting there saying, wow, you are that scared of him. You are that scared that if he is on the ballot, he will absolutely annihilate you, that you have to go to these lengths. Yeah, that's exactly right. I couldn't have said it better myself. Well, Alina, we thank you. I know it's it's do you ever get any sleep, by the way? I do. I get great sleep. I feel good. You know what? I've never retired. This is this is the best job I could have. Honestly, I'm really proud to be on the right side of history. Well, congratulations for for sticking with it. And again, I you're one thing. Donald Trump's another. He also I wonder how he has the strength to go on. But he he never never fails to do that. Amazing stamina. Alina, Habba, thank you so much for being here. Appreciate it. So of course.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, all out defending the former president on the campaign trail, a month before Iowa. Absolutely. I think there's two things here. I think legally, they think that this is an unprecedented action here, and they think the Supreme Court will weigh in in their favor here. You're talking about, we've seen, you know, continued law fair against President Trump. You've had four indictments, two impeachments in the last couple of years against him. The issue is, if you look at this politically, this has not only helped him in the primary, he's up 50 to 60 points against his next closest challenger. You're talking about his opponents having to defend him now. Even folks like Chip Roy, who he was in a back and forth, is defending him now. You're talking about, it hasn't hurt him in the general election. Your CMBC polling has him up four points, Fox has him up five points, New York Times has him up two points. So clearly, I think this has backfired continually every time they've gone after President Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We're fed up. In fact, seeing what happened in Colorado tonight, Laura, makes me think, except we believe in democracy in Texas, maybe we should take Joe Biden off the ballot in Texas for allowing eight million people to cross the border since he's been president, disrupting our state far more than anything anyone else has done in recent history.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.