Search Posts

investigated this. We actually found the editor's template which was used for this and we can pull it up maybe full screen. You can buy this online. It's called newspaper vintage history headlines promo. If you wanted to make a vintage ad, this is exactly how you would do it. You just go online and buy this from whatever company this is and they probably use it for a long time and it basically uses a collection of old news headlines and sub headlines and articles from like the early 1900s. One of which was German industrial strength significantly increased after 1871 driven by the creation of a unified Reich. This 50 years before anybody was talking about the Nazis and the atrocities that would come before and during World War II, it has nothing to do with anything. These are just old headlines. There were other headlines as well. Expansion of violence in Bosnia was one of them that's used over and over again because this is just a wallpaper template on the internet. Confusion among central powers, the first world war and many other completely innocuous news topics from a hundred years ago. This is wallpaper background for editors who want to make vintage art. That's what it is and whoever did make this thing and it wasn't the Trump campaign, that's what they used. Anybody that's actually in the media that knows anything about how all this works and there are a lot of idiots in the media but the ones that actually understand how it all works know how fake the outrage that we saw today is. It's all performative.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

MSNBC, CNN, they're always reminding everyone that they're only going to take a Trump event if the news of the day requires it. Let me just tell our viewers so I don't startle them what we are doing. We have made a decision on this first day that if Donald Trump comes out and starts talking, we might want to listen to him for a little bit. We're going to do something. We're going to do it together. I promise we're going to come out of this if he starts lying or threatening people. Researchers are urging that Biden not debate Trump at all, as we just said with that quote from The Atlantic magazine, especially bad because they're just essentially saying that he's subhuman, he's evil, and he doesn't deserve to be treated like a real candidate. Talk about election interference. Now freedom of speech still exists for the left, but not so much for the rest of you. In fact, I think most sensible people when you talk to them about these issues, if they have a traditional set of beliefs or slightly traditional set of beliefs even, they just get used to self-censoring. They watch what they say all the time. It's the only way to avoid having their kids shunned at school or maybe even losing their jobs. Look at what happened to that poor senior editor at the taxpayer-supported NPR. After blowing the whistle on the pro-Democrat bias among what is overwhelmingly a liberal executive workforce staff there, his bosses suspended him. How's that for all things considered? Now, we're not dealing with the old liberals anymore. Get used to this. They used to relish debate. They were proud to be free speech absolutists. Today, the landscape is filled with landmines, and those landmines are planted by ruthless anti-free speech radicals. Say the wrong thing, associate with the wrong people, be in the wrong place, and yeah, they want you blown up. It's time to expose them as the sniveling cowards and wannabe tyrants that they are. It is time for all of us, each and every one of us, to be fearless, and that's the angle.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

-Donald Trump has just been kicked off the ballot in Colorado. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump engaged in an insurrection against the United States on January 6th, and under the 14th Amendment, he's constitutionally prohibited from holding office. Therefore, Donald Trump's name will not appear on the ballot of the Republican primary in Colorado and therefore not appear on the ballot in the general election in Colorado. That is, unless the U.S. Supreme Court takes the case. Donald Trump will be appealing the ruling, and the Supreme Court has until January 4th to announce if it will take it. We expect the Supreme Court to hear it before this Colorado thing sets a precedent and affects Trump's ballot access in other states. Colorado lawsuit was filed by a Soros-funded outlet decided by an all Democrat-appointed Supreme Court and the Democrat Colorado Secretary of State within a split second was celebrating on MSNBC. -Look, I believe he incited the insurrection. There were big questions around Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and the Colorado Supreme Court has weighed in in a very loud way. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has to apply to the presidency because, if not, it's a get-out-of-jail-free card. -The Trump campaign responded to the lawsuit just now, saying, "Democrat party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November. We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these un-American lawsuits." Remember, Biden won Colorado by nearly 14 points. This was never about Colorado's ballot access. This was about having a targeted lawsuit aimed at setting a precedent to knock Trump off dozens of state ballots and disqualify him by any means necessary from the presidency, therefore denying the people their right to vote. Charlie Hurt joins me now. So, we expect the Supreme Court to take the case and what do you think is going to happen, Charlie? -I think, without a doubt, they have no choice but to take up this case because -- and I think you're exactly right about this -- they're trying to set a precedent. This will open the floodgates. You'll have left-wing lunatic states all around the country trying to do the exact same thing, and you're exactly right there. This has very little to do with ballot access in the general election. It has to do with barring Donald Trump from getting the Republican nomination. I thought his statement was really interesting where he said Democrat leaders have lost faith in Joe Biden. That's true, but Democrat leaders have also lost faith in democracy, and that's what we're seeing in Colorado today. The Democrats in Colorado are so afraid of allowing American voters to vote and pick the next president. They are willing to do extrajudicial things, complete highway robbery here, in order to thwart the people's choice from being on the ballot. To them, preserving democracy requires destroying democracy, and that's who we're dealing with. These people are unhinged. They're lunatics, and they're very dangerous. -Yeah, I mean, it's more than voter suppression. It's more than voter intimidation. It's the elimination of the voter. You can't vote for the guy you want to. It's as simple as that, and it's because the court ruled, in their opinion, he's an insurrectionist. He's not been charged with insurrection. He's not been convicted of insurrection. It's just their opinion that that's what happened. -Yeah, and that's such an important point. We hear the word "insurrection" thrown around all over the place. Everybody wants to sort of hide behind that, but literally Jack Smith, who would charge Donald Trump with absolutely everything, including jaywalking, if he could get away with it, didn't even charge Donald Trump or most of the rioters on January 6th with insurrection. And by the way, another thing that I think is kind of an interesting point here is that Donald Trump faced the trial that a president faces in the United States Senate over the January 6th riots. He was charged with impeachable offenses, and he was found not guilty there. And that's obviously not the same as a court of law, but that is a very significant factor in determining whether or not this guy committed insurrection or whatever. But the other thing I think is also interesting is that these people are -- they are so determined to thwart democracy and to prevent people from voting for who they want to vote for that, to them, January 6th, that was the Civil War to them. There is no difference between that and a four-year horrifying, the deadliest war in our history. To them, it's the same thing. If it meets their political objective, they don't care. -Do you have faith in the Roberts Court? Remember, last time, they didn't even take his appeal on the 2000 election. They just didn't even take it. -Yeah, I actually do, because I think that this court, if I were to define the Roberts Court, it is that they want -- they don't want courts determining everything. They believe -- and if you look back at the Obamacare ruling, what was the court's ruling? The ruling was, "Congress, you built this monster. You deal with it." And they kicked it back to Congress. And there's a lot of criticism about that decision. And I agree with that criticism, but the main thrust of it is that they don't want the courts running the country. They want legislatures to run the country. And we saw that with the Dobbs decision as well. And I think that if that's your mindset here, then you have to look at this crazy lunatic court in Colorado and say, "We're not gonna let these people deny Americans the right to vote for who they want to vote for in the next election." -Charlie, it would be nice if we could just have an election where no one interfered -- not the Chinese, not the Russians, not the FBI, not the CIA, not some wacko judge in Colorado. Just let the people vote like we've always done, and it shakes out how it shakes out. Is that too much to ask? -Yeah, that would actually be really nice if we didn't -- if we'd have an election where the CIA and the FBI doesn't take Kremlin talking points and run with them to rig our election. I would love that. -Yeah, just a nice, normal, clean election. -Let the children fall where they may. -Right. Thanks, Charlie.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.