SUCH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
28 results for "tag:all-caps-rage"
SUCH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
Will the failing New York Times apologize to its readers for getting years of “Trump” coverage so wrong. They write such phony “junk,” knowing full well how incorrect it is, only meaning to demean. Magot Hagerman, a third rate writer and fourth rate intellect, writes story after story, always terrible, and yet I almost never speak to her. They do no fact checking, because facts don’t matter to them. I don’t believe I’ve had a legitimately good story in the NYT for years, AND YET I WON, IN RECORD FASHION, THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN DECADES. WHERE IS THE APOLOGY?
FoxNews: STOP PUTTING ON THE ENEMY!
EVERY ONE OF THE LAWSUITS I AM INVOLVED WITH, INCLUDING THE CIVIL SCAMS, WERE STARTED BY CROOKED JOE BIDEN AND HIS FASCIST GOVERNMENT FOR PURPOSES OF ELECTION INTERFERENCE AND TRYING TO DAMAGE SLEEPY JOE’S POLITICAL OPPONENT. THE FAKE NEWS, INCLUDING FOX, HATES TO REPORT THAT BECAUSE IT DOESN’T PLAY INTO THEIR NARRATIVE — BUT THE PEOPLE GET IT LOUD AND CLEAR! IT IS THIS ELECTIONS FORM OF CHEATING. THEY HAVE NO SHAME! BUT FEAR NOT, WE WILL WIN, AND POSSIBLY BY HISTORIC PROPORTIONS. DJT
MY CIVIL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TOTALLY VIOLATED WITH THIS HIGHLY POLITICAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AND ELECTION INTERFERING WITCH HUNT. OUR FAILING NATION IS BEING LAUGHED AT ALL OVER THE WORLD!
ARREST DERANGED JACK SMITH. HE IS A CRIMINAL! https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/trump-whodunnit-prosecutors-admit-key-evidence-document-case-has
These are Rigged cases, all coordinated by the White House and DOJ for purposes of Election Interference. THE NUMBER ENGORON SET IS FRAUDULENT. It should be ZERO, I DID NOTHING WRONG! The D.A. Case, that I am going to today, should be dismissed. No crime. Our Country is CORRUPT!
THE COUGHING, THE COUGHING - ALWAYS THE COUGHING!
ELECTION INTERFERENCE!
-The amount, but this is a very dishonest man. This is a man that's been overturned already on this case four times. But a crooked New York state judge just ruled that I have to pay a fine of $355 million for having built the perfect company. Great cash, great buildings, great everything. It affects New York. It's mostly talking about New York, where we have a totally corrupt attorney general. She campaigned on the fact that I will get Trump. I will get Trump. Everybody's seen it -- LaDisha James. They've all seen it. Well, will be appealing, but more important than that. This is Russia. This is China. This is the same game. All comes out of the DOJ. It all comes out of Biden. It's a witch hunt against his political opponent, the likes of which our country has never seen before. You see it in third-world countries. Banana republics, but you don't see it here. So, I just want to say this. You build a great company. There was no fraud. The banks all got their money, 100 percent. They love Trump. They testified that Trump is great. Great customer, one of our best customers. They testified beautifully. And the judge knows that. He's just a corrupt person. And we knew that from the beginning. We knew it right from the beginning, because he wouldn't give it to the commercial division. This judge thought Mar-a-Lago is worth $18 million, and it's worth anywhere from 50 to 100 times that amount. So, we realized that. He ruled against me before he even got the case. He ruled against me. He said, "I was guilty." He didn't know what I was guilty of before he even got the case. And Letitia James, that's another case altogether. She's a horribly corrupt attorney general, and it's all having to do with election interference. There were no victims because the banks made a lot of money. They made $100 million. And by the way, I paid approximately $300 million in taxes as the migrants come in and they take over New York. I paid, over this period of years, over $300 million in taxes, and they want me out. Oh, let's see if we can get them out. These are radical left Democrats. They're lunatics, and it's election interfering. So, I just want to thank you for being here. We'll appeal. We'll be successful, I think because, frankly, if we're not successful, New York State is gone. People are moving out of New York State. And because of this, they're going to move out at a much faster rate. They used a statute. It's a consumer fraud statute that's never been used for a thing like this before. They used it on me because I'm running for president. I'm beating Biden by a lot. We're beating not only the Republicans, we're beating Biden by a lot. The poll came out today. We're up 20 points on Biden. If I weren't running, none of this stuff would have ever happened. None of these lawsuits would have ever happened. Nothing would -- I would have had a nice life. But I enjoy this life for a different reason. We're going to make America great again. These are corrupt people. These are people that shouldn't be allowed to do the things they do. And they're using this as weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls and always will be because I'm competing with a man who can't put two sentences together, who doesn't know what he's doing. And we're heading into a third world war because of this guy. We have to win this election. They're doing everything possible to step in a way, but we're not going to stand for it. So, thank you very much. We will get back to work. It's a ridiculous award. This is a fine of $355 million for doing a perfect job for having paid back a loan with no defaults, with no problems. The banks were totally -- you know, at the trial, they testified. We had an expert witness from the Stern School at NYU that made a statement. And I was very honored by his statement. He's one of the most respected people anywhere in the country for doing this kind of thing. Expert wisdom. He said, "This is one of the greatest financial statements I have ever witnessed before." And he talked about even the detail. So, my numbers actually were extremely conservative. They saw this, so what the judge did is he brought down certain values like Mar-a-Lago, made it ridiculous. But the expert, after having all of this, testified it's one of the best financial statements he's ever seen. And I was honored by that. But I also knew we have a corrupt judge. He's not a respected man. And again, I said before, he's been overturned on this case by the appellate division four times already. It's a record. Nobody's ever been overturned on one case four times. And I think, very importantly -- and I think, ultimately, the most important -- we've employed tens of thousands of people in New York, and we've paid taxes like few other people have ever paid in New York, and they don't care about that. They -- it's a state that's going bust. It's a state that's going bust because everybody's leaving, and it's all headed up by Biden who's destroying our country. So, this is Russia. This is China. This is what you've been reading about all your lives, and it's happening right here in our country. Thank you very much. We will stop it. We will make America great again. You have my word. Thank you very much.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
WITCH HUNT!
-Good evening, everyone. I am back from Iowa, finally. I had fun, but I did get back. This is the Ingram angle from Washington tonight. All right, Biden today meeting at the White House with top congressional leaders. Do you feel a sellout coming? Overstalled talks on Ukraine and, of course, our own border security. I'm really looking forward to speaking with Speaker Mike Johnson because he was at that meeting and is coming right over to the Ingram angle to give us details about what happened inside. But first, take the load off, Fanny. That's the focus of tonight's angle. Oh, how the mighty have fallen. Remember, the media was instantly awestruck by the Fulton County DA. She was a woman on a mission. After she announced her indictment of President Trump on the state racketeering charges in August, the New York Times, they described her as a force to be reckoned with. Fanny T. Willis strode up to the podium in a red dress last year in downtown Atlanta, flanked by an array of dark suits and stone-faced officers in uniform. Her voice rang out loud and clear with a hint of swagger. This is bad writing. And the liberal cable host, they were busy setting the narrative as well. A smart, gutsy female African-American prosecutor versus a reckless, dangerous former president. They thought they'd found their Trump slayer. Oh, my God. Like, she blew me away. And I think about this whole part of the future of Donald Trump as a former president differently now. I know, Fanny Willis said the other night that she was prepared to try the case within six months. And I'm sure she is. She has been investigating this case for two and a half years. All of her ducks will be in a row. And that's not all she had lined up. Reports show that she had her boyfriend, Nathan Wade, lined up to get paid a nice sum for doing her dirty work. She even sent him to the White House to check in with Biden's staff, billing Fulton County $2,000 on two different occasions in 2022 for his mystery work. Wade was an interesting choice, even the Washington Post conceded. And they noted that he had scant experience in prosecuting any cases. But when allegations of corruption about overpaying her unqualified boyfriend started trickling in, Fanny did what most leftists have been trained to do, play the victim and cry racism. -I appointed three special counselors. Is my right to do? Pay them all the same hourly rate. They only attack one. I hired one black man, another superstar, a great friend, and a great lawyer. Oh, Lord, they gonna be mad when I call them out on this nonsense. First thing they say, "Oh, she gonna play the race card now." But no guy is an adult who's playing the race card when they only question one. -But Fanny's a fantastic liar because her lover was paid $100 more an hour than others who are far more experienced. To be precise, records show that he was paid $100 more an hour than the experienced RICO prosecutor, John Floyd, according to documents obtained by the Daily Caller Foundation. But facts don't bother Fanny. She needs divine intervention. -Why are they so surprised that a diverse team that I assembled, your child, can accomplish extraordinary things? God, wasn't it them that attacked this lawyer of impeccable credentials? The black man I chose has been a judge more than 10 years. I'm just asking God. Is it that someone will never see a black man as qualified no matter his achievements? -Yet, as we saw with Harvard's Claudine Gay, these racial victim ploys are kind of losing their currency. Even the Daily Beast knows that Fanny has caused a major headache because if she got a hefty salary for a romantic partner, that's a genuine conflict of interest that would require her dismissal. And even Fanny's buds at CNN can't help her. -Everyone that we've spoken to, they agree that the optics in this are just horrible. In fact, there's some now high-level Democrats in this state who are calling Fanny Willis to step down and recuse herself from this case. -Now, once again, this reminds us how corrupt the corporate media are, because just a few years ago, "Time" magazine was lauding Fanny Willis as one of those boss ladies who is small in stature but big in presence, a commander armed -- get this -- with high standards. Now, Democrats have made a big mistake here. Instead of trying to win the presidency by advancing policies that actually improve lives, they decided to try to destroy America and destroy Donald Trump. Biden flunkies are flooding our border with migrants and drowning Trump with endless legal attacks waged by vicious, corrupt climbers, people like Fanny Willis. But hyperpolitical and entitled prosecutors like her, they're kind of a dime a dozen these days, and they're disliked by hard-working Americans who just want someone who will call balls and strikes. And as President Trump continues to barnstorm the country on his way to securing the GOP nomination, Fanny will be prepping for her deposition in a week in her paramours divorce case. Attorneys for Jocelyn Wade, Nathan's wife, successfully subpoenaed the DA. So how's Fanny gonna get out of this jam? Claim Mrs. Wade's a racist, too? Well, it's time to take the load off Fanny and shut down this tainted prosecution. And that's the angle.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL WITCH HUNT—ELECTION INTERFERENCE! MAGA!!!
and join us from our on all of this as former federal prosecutor, Andrew Derkaski. So good to have you. What about that point? He says this case never should have been brought. We have looked to see if anybody else has ever been indicted or prosecuted for this. It's hard to find anything on it. Should it have never happened? Well, I think Donald Trump has two fights that he's fighting right now. One is the fight that this should have never happened. And there aren't comparable cases. And it seems like even if you had some degree of comparable cases, the amount of punitive damages that Letitia James is going for is just astronomical. And that kind of brings the second point because there is a case to make in mitigation here. Going in today to say to the judge, there is no damage. There are no complainants. Nobody lost anything here. So whatever the punishment should be, should be extremely limited. Andrew, in the state of New York, what is the appeals process like? How would that unfold in a civil trial like this? Well, after a verdict, then you have a time window open in order to file your appeals. That goes on usually for months, could last into years. Obviously, an appellate court is going to have a lot of interest in this case, and they're going to move things more quickly. We see that happen all the time with Donald Trump. But appeals can take an exceptional amount of time. The point that Dana just made is that there's no precedent that we have found for the state of New York to put somebody on trial and convict them for misstating the value of the piece of property, okay? This is the first time. If it were to reach the New York State Supreme Court level, is that Republican? Is that Democrat in a blue state like New York? What is the breakdown? Well, you're largely looking at Democrat judges in the state of New York. At the end, what they're going to be looking at are two separate things, abusive discretion or plain error. Those are the standards that you're talking about in appeals courts. And so the different legal issues and factual issues at play, at each stage of appeals, the Trump team will bring those up and seek their relief. They haven't found much favor from the appellate courts yet. I want to play this for you. So we were watching the courtroom, so the president has spoken, so I don't think you're going to see him again. We'll keep an eye on that. The Tisha James is an interesting person, right? So she campaigned initially on this. She's been pushing forward. She's in the courtroom every day. She's making sure she's in that camera shot. And she had planned this for a while. Let's watch here. Call for number one. The president of the United States has complained that I'm engaging in some sort of political witch hunt, that I've got some personal vendetta against him, that I campaigned against him. That is not true. I look forward to going into the office of attorney general every day, suing him, defending your rights, and then going home. We will rise up together, and we will resist this president, and ultimately we'll bring him down. What do you make of that? She's a politician, and she's running a campaign, and she's continuing to deliver on the campaign that she ran. So what we see when we see Donald Trump in court now is her looking for astronomical damages for something that banks had an opportunity to investigate. If a real estate agent tells you your house is worth a million, you list it for 1.5, and it sells for two. What was the house worth? I mean, that's the sort of thing that Trump is looking at at the end of the day, trying to make a case that he was just doing business. He was being a businessman. And they made the case that nobody suffered damages here. The banks were fulfilled. They were happy with the loans they made, et cetera. Apparently there was an email exchange yesterday. They were trying to postpone today's hearing, in part because Melania Trump just lost her mother and the former president wouldn't go back to Florida to be with his family. I just want to put it on screen here. I don't have it on paper. And this is what lawyers said with the judge, "I won't debate this yet again. Take it or leave it. Now or never. You have until noon. Seven minutes from now, I will not grant any further extension." So that's from yesterday. It didn't happen. Is that par for the course or not? Well, it's been par for the course throughout this entire trial. I think one of the things that's most important in any trial is that a judge appears to be fair and unbiased in what they're doing. And there are serious questions about that in this case where the judge effectively ruled on a matter of fact before the trial ever took place. There's been hostility throughout. Certainly Donald Trump has had hostility towards the judge and towards the court throughout the case as well. So when the judge in the last minute continues to just all caps and that sort of message, it doesn't feel fair, I'm sure, to Donald Trump or to his supporters. Are other real estate tycoons or even investors in New York worried about the outcome of this case? I think every business person in New York should be worried about this. The idea that you are negotiating with other companies, with banks, with lending institutions, the way that that comes out and how you trust certain people in your team and what they say the value is. For example, my example about the real estate agent, it's a very difficult thing to dance through and then all of a sudden political opponents attack you. I would say just a couple more things here. Put number two up, guys. These are the properties we're talking about, primarily New York City, but also New York State. We live here. These are substantial properties. We can say that and agree on that. Absolutely. And they want to find him $370 million. What they want to do is take him and his kids out of New York State entirely and forbid them from doing business here. Yeah. Can you do that? You know, constitutionally, we talk about life and liberty. Liberty is typically this idea that you have the right to work, that you have the right to create your fortune. Donald Trump being stripped of his right to do business in the state of New York, to be stripped of these properties, that is a tremendous consequence. It is something that is just shy of going to jail. It is something that I think we should be looking at with a great degree of skepticism where he doesn't have a jury, where the judge is reaching decisions pre-trial. These are concerns for the state of New York and the people who do business here.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT!
SELECTIVE PROSECUTION!!!
ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!
WITCH HUNT!
They're wasting everybody's time for many months on this case where banks got paid a fortune, loaned money, got paid money back. Didn't even need their money. These are the great companies, and we have to go through this. So, this just broke before I discuss that. Why are we trying a case that the Appellate Division of New York State has just ruled recently that we won 80 percent of our case? And this judge refuses to acknowledge the ruling, which is very plain for all to see. We won, as you know, it had to do with Ivanka, and it had to do with other things. It had to do with the statute of limitations where they wanted to go back to 200 years ago, 500 years ago. It was limited, very much limited, and it amounted to about 80 percent of the case was won by us in the Appellate Division. And this rogue judge, a Trump painter, the only one that hates Trump more is his associate up there, his person that works with him, and she's screaming into his ear on almost every time we ask a question in disgrace. One other truth that's in disgrace. So, this rogue judge refuses to acknowledge the fact that we won 80 percent of this case in the Appellate Division, including statute of limitations. You know, in the statute of limitations, you have a period of time. He wants to go back so far that nobody's ever even heard of such a ridiculous thing. So, we won the case in the Appellate Division, and this judge refuses to acknowledge the Appellate Division, meaning he's got contempt for his own court system. Nobody's ever seen that before, where he refuses to even talk about it or acknowledge it. And the attorney general is a total -- she's a corrupt person, a terrible person, driving people out of New York, number one. That's number one. Number two, it just came out a few minutes ago, where Palm Beach County, the people that do this, agree with us 100 percent, and they say the judge is wrong. The judge is wrong in his ruling. He valued Mar-a-Lago at $18 million, and it's worth a billion dollars, maybe a billion five. And you saw where various properties that we have that are valued in the financial statements, which is totally subject to the clause that you've all been hearing about doing "buyer beware," as they call it. But this just came out. Era in New York, civil fraud case against Trump, is flagged by industry insiders who say valuation of Mar-a-Lago cited by judge is based on a misunderstanding of basic real estate practice. So they're saying the judge has misunderstood basic real estate practice. I say they're wrong about that. He didn't misunderstand it. This is a rigged court. He's put there to do a job on Trump. Now, this comes from highly respected officials in Palm Beach County. Also, a parent mistake by Judge Engoran surfaces in the use of a Palm Beach County appraisal of Mar-a-Lago that, an expert says, is detached from the true value of the property. Now, I don't know the people that we're talking about in Palm Beach County, but they saw this egregious trial, this horrible, horrible trial going on, while at the same time, people are being murdered right outside of the streets. And nothing happens to those people that do the murdering. They go after Trump. So this was just released by Palm Beach County that the judge, in this case, is wrong. And by the way, he's talking about them. So they're explaining to him that he's wrong. Here's another one. Just came out in New York. V. Trump could set precedent for the use of New York's overweening executive law. One doesn't have to be a lawyer to see the danger to anyone doing business in the Empire State. Anybody that does business in New York State is crazy. When you have a radical left attorney general like Letitia James, who's a disgrace to our country, who got elected on the fact that she's going to take down President Trump. We're going to take him down. She knew nothing about me. But she got elected on that basis. And we have others likewise. Take a look at what's going on in Georgia. Take a look at Jack Smith. Take a look at these people. This is called election interference. And worse than that. Really much worse than that. And you don't get much worse than election interference, especially when we're talking presidential election of 2024. So this judge should change his ruling because Palm Beach County said he was totally wrong. And he was ruling based on them. He ruled. We didn't even have a chance to testify. I got a call last week, "Sir, we lost part of the case." I said, "The trial didn't even start." You know, the trial starts, I guess, today. He ruled that we lost a big part of the case because he's a Democrat club politician. He's a Democrat operative, and he's a disgrace to people that call themselves judges. And I hope my lawyers go in, and I hope they fight him very hard because this guy is getting away with murder. And his clerk should not be allowed to be in his ear on every single question. You take a look at what's happening with her. She hates Trump more than he does. So that's where it is. We have 80 percent of this trial has been won. In June, they came down, the end of June, with a decision, a very powerful decision. And it said, on statute of limitations and just about everything else, would you say approximately 80 percent of the trial? -Yes, sir. -Attorneys, is that right? Approximately 80 percent of the trial is won. He refuses to acknowledge his own appellate division. And I think it's a disgrace to our country. And somebody has to fight, because if you don't fight, our country is just going to go down the tube. This is election interference. This guy is a highly partisan person. And we can't let this stuff happen. So you should ask yourselves as professionals -- have a lot of respect for you, not all of you, but a lot of you -- why is it that he didn't honor the decision of the appellate? And, by the way, I believe it was a unanimous decision, right? It's a five-to-nothing decision, unanimous decision. And he said, "I'm not going to honor it. Let's go to trial." This is a judge that should be disbarred. This is a judge that should be out of office. This is a judge that some people say could be charged criminally for what he's doing. He's interfering with an election, and it's a disgrace. Thank you very much. Thank you. -Mr. Trump, why do you want to be here in person today? -Because I want to watch this witch hunt myself. I've been going through a witch hunt for years, but this is really now getting dirty between Jack Smith and between all of these DOJ people helping them along. This is a pure witch hunt for purposes of interfering with the elections of the United States of America. It's totally illegal. This judge should be disbarred. He shouldn't be allowed to be a judge. Thank you.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
INDICT YOUR POLITICAL OPPONENT,THE NEWEST TOOL IN THE DEMOCRATS TOOLBOX OF CORRUPTION!
“I SEE THE VIDEOTAPES. I SEE THE FOOTAGE OF THE FLAGS AND THE SIGNS THAT PEOPLE WERE CARRYING AND THE HATS THAT THEY WERE WEARING, AND THE GARB. AND THE PEOPLE WHO MOBBED THAT CAPITOL WERE THERE IN FEALTY, IN LOYALTY, TO ONE MAN, NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION, OF WHICH MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO COME BEFORE ME SEEM WOEFULLY IGNORANT; NOT TO THE IDEALS OF THIS COUNTRY, AND NOT TO THE PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY. IT’S A BLIND LOYALTY TO ONE PERSON WHO, BY THE WAY, REMAINS FREE TO THIS DAY.” Judge Tanya Chutkan!
ELECTION INTERFERENCE!
RIGGED ELECTION!
REPEAL SECTION 230!!!
POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!
“We know what took place. We have already seen criminality. What is happening? Biggest political scandal of our time.” @MariaBartiromo You are 100% correct, Maria, it is a disgrace that nothing happens. Obama and Biden spied on my campaign, AND GOT CAUGHT...BUT NOTHING!
I JUST GOT IMPEACHED FOR MAKING A PERFECT PHONE CALL!
NEVER TRUMPERS!
REPUBLICANS MUST STICK TOGETHER AND FIGHT! https://t.co/chnSNURfFx
“Schiff, House Intel Chairman, Got Early Account of Whistle-Blower’s Accusations” SCHIFF IS A FRAUD! https://t.co/BNXiq5dsXg https://t.co/PHdh8PBTGb
WE WILL NEVER FORGET! https://t.co/VxrGFRFeJM
TREASON?