Search Posts

Jared, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. One thing I forgot in my laundry list there, Greg, was, you know, using the dirty Russian disinformation dossier for not one but four Pfizer warrants to spy on candidate Trump, later President Trump. That went on for a full year. But when you look at it all together and then you look at what happened today, I'm 99.999% certain this will get thrown out. But what is your reaction to all of it? Big picture. Oh, this case will not stand up on appeal. It'll get tossed out the conviction reversed. And, you know, you saw this today, this Orwellian theater of the absurd with the prosecutor condemning Trump and using the kind of language that's normally referred to hardened criminals or serial killers, not somebody who is convicted of a bookkeeping error and then the DA through his own little pity party in court because Trump accused him of lawfare and he whined how they were being attacked for enforcing the rule of law. Now, what they did was they abused the law. They distorted statutes. They shredded Trump's due process rights. This was the most abominable and oppressive act of lawless abuse by a prosecutor and a judge that I have ever seen. It was shameful. It was disgusting. And so Trump was right when he told Michonne today, this was a political witch hunt to damage his election chances. And by the way, that is a crime. 18 USC 241 and 242, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law. You are not allowed to conspire with others to injure someone's constitutional rights. That is a felony. And I think it's imperative for the incoming Department of Justice to launch a comprehensive investigation into this because I think there was a lot of collusion going on between these lawfare prosecutors. I'd like to get to the bottom of that big picture, everything that happened today, professor, and and all that has gone on since the day this man came down that escalator at Trump Tower. Well, first, I want to thank you for urging Republicans not to sink to the level of what the Democrats did and to use only the law and the Constitution. Nobody's above the law, but nobody should be prosecuted just because of who they are. So thank you, Sean, because you carry an enormous amount of weight with the Republicans. And this is so important. What we saw today was a scam, a ploy. It started with Judge Marchant telling in advance what his sentence was going to be. I've been doing this for 62 years. I've never been told by a judge what the sentence is going to be. When I go into the courtroom with my client, I tell him to bring his toothbrush because he doesn't know whether he's going home or going to Rikers or some other lockup. The only reason Marchant said in advance what he was going to do is to try to persuade the two justices of the Supreme Court not to take the case now. And they use that fact. And they said the reason we're not taking the case now and stopping the sentencing from going forward was because the judge said in advance that he's not sentencing him to prison. So this was a ploy and the two justices, unfortunately, fell for the ploy. This is the worst thing that's happened to the American criminal justice system since McCarthyism and the civil rights abuses back in the 1950s and the victims of the American people. Trump, yes, it was hard. He said very honestly that it was tough for him, but he prevailed. He won and the American people won because they rejected lawfare. You know, I invented that term back in the 60s. I'm proud or ashamed of it. Yeah. It's a little bit of a miracle that all this did go away. And I also mentioned the Russia hoax. I also mentioned FISA abuse. I also mentioned top secret classified information that Hillary Clinton had and Joe Biden had. And they did not, they were not covered under the presidential records act. Their homes, their offices were not rated. They were not spied on. If there was Russian disinformation, it came from Hillary Clinton. She bought it. She paid for it. The government used it when they were warned not to use it. This, these are not small levels of abuse here. This is systemic abuse of the legal system we're talking about weaponization. That's the right term. That's the essence of lawfare, that it doesn't look at the crime. It looks at the person. And if it wants to see the person defeated for office, it goes after him. That's Stalin, that's Lavrenti Beria. Show me the man and I'll find you the crime. But they couldn't find the crime. They searched high and low to find the crime in New York. They made him up. They couldn't find one. So they made it up. That's even worse. Yeah. Because it could happen to any of us. Greg. Trump won the lawfare of war waged against it because Americans were paying attention and they're smart and they saw this for what it was. It was a contemptible weaponization of the law by Democrats to win an election. But in the process, Sean, they destroyed themselves with their own blatant corruption. Voters resented it. They vented their anger at the ballot box. This is the ultimate jury verdict in America. So Trump should actually be sending a thank you card, Alvin Bragg and Juan Marchant for unwittingly helping him win reelection. But the real loser in all of this is the New York legal system. It is now in tatters. All right. We appreciate you both. Thank you, Greg Jarrett. Thank you, professor. We appreciate it.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Welcome to Hannity and tonight we begin with a warning for all Americans on the left and right, men in the middle, Kamala Harris cannot be trusted. Her only core value is her own personal, political gain and ambition. Now for decades Kamala has done and said pretty much anything to advance her political career. Now that includes padding her stats as a prosecutor. She sought, you know, she sought these cheap convictions, didn't seem to care about guilt or innocence. On the law, rapper Jamal Trulove, remember, wrongfully convicted of murder, sentenced to 50 years in prison. He said Kamala Harris, who was the San Francisco DA at the time, laughed in his face when the verdict was read. He ultimately won a large settlement over his conviction after it was overturned. Meanwhile, an elderly man named George Gage. He was convicted of sexual assault, but a judge has found Kamala's office withheld important exculpatory evidence that might well prove his innocence. But a new trial was never granted due to a technicality as Kamala fought to keep Gage behind bars. Why would you ever fight for, for somebody that has exculpatory evidence to be kept behind bars? She didn't care whether or not he was guilty or innocent. He just wanted to keep her conviction record intact. But once Kamala started to rise through the ranks of California politics, she quickly lost her appetite for throwing people in jail altogether and adopted the soft on crime politics. You know, today, why? Because of their popularity with California's far left base. Now with the country radical left and that far left base, she called on the criminal justice system to be fundamentally transformed, ending cash bail, legalizing drugs, expunging the records of thousands of felons, allowing convicts, including those on death row, oh, even the Boston bombers to vote from prison. She repeatedly vilified law enforcement calling on public safety. Let's reimagine public safety, fewer police, and demanding that resource officers be removed from schools. Why would you do that? She even compared policing to modern day lynchings and Jim Crow. I don't make this up. Here she is. When we say that America has a history of systemic racism, we mean that from slavery, Jim Crow laws, lynchings and policing, our institutions have done violence to black Americans and it has caused black Americans to be treated as less than human. We all know full well how this worked out in San Francisco. Crime is rampant. Stores are closing, homelessness, open air drug use, public defecation, urination pretty much everywhere. Kamala doesn't care because her soft on crime messaging helped her political career in the deep blue radical state of California, and in 2020 when Kamala desperately wanted to capitalize on the summer of love. What did she do? She encouraged deadly riots. They're not going to stop. They shouldn't stop. We're not going to stop. You might even call it an insurrection if your name is Liz Cheney. She even promoted a bail fund to get these violent criminals out of jail four days after police precinct was burned to the ground. Innocent people raped and murdered by violent offenders out on bail. Thanks to this insane bail fund that she supported, you know, they didn't have a lot of money. They raised over $40 million after her tweet went out. Kamala doesn't seem to care. She's only worried about advancing her own political ambition and career. That's why she accepted the job as Joe's running mate only a few weeks after calling him out as a racist. Remember, Joe partnered with the former Klansmen and he didn't want he didn't want the integration of schools. He thought public schools would become racial jungles. And she said, well, I was at that person. That's why she pretended that Biden was strong and vigorous when he was in a steep cognitive decline until the very moment Democrats sent him packing in a coup and coordinated her as the party's new nominee. If she really believed Biden was capable and really believed that he was the best man for the job. Well, why did she run to take a spot so quickly? Again, she doesn't care about truth, just personal advancement. Again, she's going to say and do anything to win an election. Now think about this for years. She has enthusiastically promoted far left policies only popular in deep blue states. She co-sponsored the $93 trillion end of capitalism green new deal in the U.S. Senate with Bernie Sanders. She co-sponsored with Bernie Sanders, Medicare for all universal health care, the elimination of private health insurance. You can't have the party of freedom says you can't have your own private health care. She called for illegal immigration to be decriminalized. She wants free housing, health care and education. And now amnesty for her illegal immigrants over 11 million unvetted Harris Biden illegal immigrants in the country. And many we now know have terror ties. Many come from countries with terror ties. Many come from our top geopolitical foes. She called Trump's border wall a medieval vanity project. She applauded AOC's plan to raise income taxes, 70 to 80 percent called for a mandatory gun confiscation. She said there's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking and drilling a disaster for our economy. It is the lifeblood of the economy of the world. It's called energy. But take a look at your screen because suddenly the very moment Kamala was elevated as the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, she supposedly now had an epiphany and has abandoned all of her long held radical, dangerous left wing view. She even reportedly went full MAGA on the border wall just this week. At least that's what the campaign is saying. Now, so far, Kamala has refused to tell us where she stands on almost anything. Now, if fake news CNN wants to be to pretend at least to be credible and be a news organization, Dana Bash will be playing Kamala in her own words and asking her about all her prior positions and all of her alleged flip flops tomorrow in that interview. Don't hold your breath. The American people deserve to know whether Kamala wants to turn the American health care system into what? The postal service? How's that working out for you? You know, isn't Social Security and isn't Medicare headed towards insolvency? What happened to that lockbox they always talked about? Now, the American people deserve to know if Kamala wants to dissolve our border, decriminalize the illegal immigration, offer free health care, housing and education. You deserve to know how much you will be paying in taxes under Harris Biden administration. She was up to recently was bragging about the great success that is known as Bidenomics. She's so proud of it. You know, one of her stated policy positions, Kamala is planning some of the largest tax increases in the history, not only of this country, but the world, including a doubling of the worldwide corporate minimum tax. Well, that would put us on par with every other country. And we'd have no companies would have no incentive to come here and create high paying jobs for American citizens. And then this insanity and unrealized gain on capital gains. In other words, if your stocks, if your property goes up in estimated value, Kamala wants you to write a check to the federal government and she wants you to write it today. And by the way, if you sell it and you didn't make money on it, do you get your money back? Even CNBC was mocking the proposal, humiliating one of Kamala's economic advisors in the process. Take a listen. Taxing unrealized gains just doesn't seem fair in any sense of the word. In the very best sense, in the very best sense, if you are taxing unrealized gains, all you're doing is pulling forward the taxes that would be paid later when someone actually sells the stock. I think that this reaction to unrealized gains is a little funny given that I bet that the majority of people watching right now are already paying a tax on unrealized gains. It's called a property tax. When the value of your home goes up, you pay higher taxes even if you don't sell your home. Your value of your home never moves the way the stock moves, the way something else moves. That's always the go to answer. You're arguing that this is some sort of foreign concept that's completely unknown. It's probably unconstitutional. It was never in anyone's intent to tax. It's not an income tax and it's never going to happen. Probably. Now maybe Kamala's tax on unrealized gains, maybe that's an election ploy, but if it's ever implemented, it would be an unmitigated disaster. Nobody, nobody, nobody would invest in any business in this country. All investment would stop a sloppy attempt at class warfare to win votes. But here's the thing about Kamala Harris. After years as the most liberal person in Washington DC, you know, even to the left of Bernie Sanders, which most Americans apparently don't know, we have to assume the worst because especially when Kamala Harris is doing everything under the sun to hide her true policies and beliefs and sharp contrast. We know everything about Donald Trump. We know what he believes. We know what he will do in office every day. He's doing interview after interview, press conference after press conference rally after rally. He's all over social media. He says what he believes the media criticizes him every day. And as the president, he followed through with his promises. So if you live in a battleground state, if you're in Georgia, by the way, governor Kemp is set to host a fundraiser for President Trump. Thank God he is. You can vote for someone who actually wants to make America safer, more prosperous, more affordable, and keep a system that is the greatest wealth creating system in the world intact. It's called capitalism. Or you could just roll the dice with a Marxist leftist socialist new green deal radical who is left of Bernie Sanders who will do or say anything for personal gain. If Kamala really had a plan to make Americans safer, improve your quality of life, she would have done it. She's on day one. I'm going to work on inflation on day one. I'm going to work on the border. Well, day one was January 20th of 2021. Well, Biden, you know, has checked out on the beach. What is she doing now? Don't be fooled by these lofty promises.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.