Search Posts

has just compiled a report on that Russian hoax that DNI Gabbard has since declassified. I want to ask you the same question that I just asked Senator Graslie and that is do you think there will be accountability for people like John Brennan and James Comey? Well we're certainly hoping for that. I mean that was the reason why we actually released the report and DNI Gabbard declassified it so everybody could get a look at just exactly what happened, what under President Obama's direction and with a complicit Director Comey and CIA Director Brennan and others, what they were able to do. I mean they hobbled President Trump in his first term and went on and really impaired his ability to secure a second term in 2020 and it's really a hot time that someone was held to account. Congressman if I could just add, it's Raymond Arroyo, as you look at this anew my question is what's changed since John Durham did an investigation and prosecuted this case? Durham looked at this extensively. He was the special prosecutor they named. He explored it. There were two prosecutions I believe both ended in acquittals. What's different now? What do you know now that Durham didn't know? I think it's classified annex is the difference maker and the fact that it has been reviewed and declassified so then now we get a look at it. These are things that we knew on the intel committee but really couldn't talk about obviously because it was classified and so you know we can you know in our world we can our job is to oversee the intelligence community and we can do investigations but we can't prosecute. We can make criminal referrals where it's necessary but you recall the Durham investigation took a long long time but it was limited to just the unclassified stuff so when the classified annex was declassified using the appropriate procedure to do so. Tell people what that is. They don't know the world of information. The viewers don't know what a classified annex is. Tell them what that that secure room was and how it was discovered. Sure so the classified annex basically had all that information that he couldn't go public with that was you know classified so it was prepared in an annex to the report that is the you know appended to the report that essentially it was never released to the public so most everybody didn't realize the extent of of that investigation so if all you did was look at the unclassified material what they deemed was appropriate to share you would probably come to the same conclusion but when you look at the classified material that was since been released you have a completely different picture a more fulsome picture exactly what happened. Congressman Chairman thank you so much for your time on the Saturday Night Molly line here. Also on the investigative front but this time about these violent riots that have erupted all across the country this year. There's reporting that some of the organizers have ties to Soros funded groups. Now the president is calling for George Soros and his friend and his son Alexander to be brought up on potentially RICO charges over these allegations. There was a statement to Fox Soros open society foundations denies any involvement in this violence so the question is should the FBI other intel agencies be investigating potential ties with these Soros groups? I would think that would certainly be in the FBI's lane to look at that because the reality is you know there's the old saying you know follow the money and you know I want to start by saying in this country you're innocent until proven guilty but you know most of the time where there's smoke there's fire and there's a lot of smoke here and and it's the endless supply of money that they've been able to provide candidates up and down the ballot across the country. I mean how is that even possible? I think these are valid questions and and you know Soros has had his hands in this for a long long time so I do think it's entirely appropriate to investigate thoroughly what's taking place there. Congressman David Webb here. Thanks for joining us. Scale and scope to add to what Molly asked about. George Soros has been very clear with the open society foundation. He's given over 32 billion dollars through the foundation. He supported Biden, Hillary, various other organizations numerous organizations and it goes to the question of whether there is a potential for federal or equal or even state level. Also it's been very effective in the judicial space beginning in 2015 with his money that was put into various prosecutors and getting judges elected and still ongoing today with organizations that are literally training judges. We see legal warfare underway with all of this. This is why so many people to your point when they see all this smoke ask how can you not find the fire. I understand it's difficult but the C3 versus C4 structure are you going to look into this at the federal level and then work with state partners where there may be violations not only of federal IRS code potential reco statutes or even state non-profit statutes. Yeah I think that's a good point. Federal and state ought to be working you know together on this but I have every confidence that FBI Director Patel and Attorney General Bondi will definitely take this on aggressively and to your point I mean all up and down the ticket it seems like it just appears it gives the appearance of a giant money laundering operation whether it's act blue or whether it's the open society foundation or whatever it is you have to start asking the question where is all this money coming from how do they do it and what other organizations are involved to help continue to fund those organizations. Are there other NGOs involved in this and those are things that I think are right in the FBI's lane and they show

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

And you know what I can't name? I can't name one Democrat. I mean, I look at the Democrats, they're in total disarray. They have a new person named Crockett. I watched her speak the other day. She's definitely a low IQ person. And they said she's the future of the party. I said, you have to be kidding. I don't know what they're gonna do. And I really believe in a two party system. Because it's good to be challenged. It's really good to have a two party. You know, being challenged is okay. It keeps you sharp. I don't know what they're gonna do. They have nobody. Bernie's 87 years old or something. And you know, Biden is the worst thing that ever happened to old people. Because he was grossly incompetent. And I think maybe for artificial reasons, generally at operations and things. So maybe that's an artificial. But I know people that are unbelievably sharp and they're older than 87. But I watch Bernie Sanders. He's a nut job, but he's still sharp. He's the same guy he was. He hasn't gone down. But Biden is really, he's the worst thing to happen to old people.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

(Applause.) And it's really nice of you that we're going to have our captains give Mr. President Mr. Vice President. (Applause.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.) (End of Audio.) (Applause.)

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Mr. President, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you. We got a readout of your call with Vladimir Putin, and it was a fairly optimistic take. Vladimir Putin agreed to a ceasefire immediately on energy and infrastructure, but not to a 30-day ceasefire. Tell us what happened. Well, you have a situation. We have a lot of guns pointing at each other foolishly, because it would have never happened if I were president. That was not a war that was supposed to happen. And it did happen. So that's where we are. And right now, you have a lot of guns pointing at each other. And a ceasefire without going a little bit further would have been tough. Russia has the advantage, as you know. They have encircled about 2,500 soldiers. They're nicely encircled, and that's not good. And we want to get it over with. Look, we're doing this. There are no Americans involved. There could be if you end up in World War III over this, which is so ridiculous. But strange things happen. And I think we had a great call, lasted almost two hours, talked about a lot of things toward getting it to peace. And we talked about other things also. Was there non-negotiables mentioned by Putin? It was reported that I think the Kremlin media actually stated that he demanded an immediate cessation of aid to Ukraine in order to get to this multi-step deal. No, we didn't talk about aid, actually. We didn't talk about aid at all. We talked about a lot of things, but aid was never discussed. In the readout, it also stated that both sides want to get to an improved bilateral relationship, the United States and Russia. That's true. How can we trust that Vladimir Putin actually wants that, in that he's not also being influenced at the same time by his close friend, President Xi of China? Well, look, we have our own discussions with President Xi of China, and he wants to get along also. And he's looking to get along, and we're looking to get along with him. And we will. We have a problem with trade, where we have a very big imbalance with China. With Russia, we don't have that much trade, and they'd like to, and we'd like to also. They have some very valuable things for us, including very big forms of rare earth. They have a lot of earth. You know, they have a big chunk of real estate, the biggest, actually the biggest in the world for a country by far. And on that, they have things that we could use, frankly, and that other people could use. I think that President Xi would like to get along, and I think Russia wants to get along with the United States. I also think we're a much different country than we were just a few months ago. We're a country that's now respected. We were not respected. We were being laughed at. We had incompetent leadership. This was a war, as an example, that would have never happened if I were president. Is part of your desire to forge this new relationship with Russia also impacted by Russia's closer relationship since you left office in 2021 with China? Because I think you talked about before the desire to box out China from that part of the world and have a closer relationship with Russia. So as a student of history, which I am, and I've watched it all, the first thing you learn is you don't want Russia and China to get together. With that being said, no, it's not a big part of it, but maybe that'll happen, or maybe it won't. Obama really forced them together through energy and bad energy policies, and when he did so many different things, he forced a marriage which would never have taken place. It was not a natural. And for one reason, Russia has tremendous land, a lot of land, and China doesn't have enough land. Russia has a much smaller population than China, and it was always a natural enemy situation. They're probably friendly now, but we're going to be friendly with both. I think we're going to be friendly with both. China needs us in terms of trade very badly, but we have to straighten out the deficit. We have now more than a trillion-dollar deficit with China. It's not even believable, and we're going to be doing something about that. But with Russia, they would like to have some of our economic power. The criticism that you've heard since really 2015 is that you have more in common with Vladimir Putin than you do with globalist leaders, maybe some NATO leaders, and in this case with Zelensky. You're both nationalists. Zelensky is more of a globalist. How do you respond to that criticism? Well, I am a nationalist, but I'm a nationalist for the United States, not for anybody else. And it's interesting, because there's nobody been tougher on Russia than me. I'm the one that pointed out Nord Stream 2, and I stopped it. Nord Stream is the biggest pipeline, I guess, in the world, taking care of all of Europe. And it was being built from before I got there, and somehow they were on the way, and I stopped it. It was just stone-cold dead. I stopped it, and it's tracks. That's not somebody that's being particularly – this is the biggest project they ever had. I had it stopped. When Biden got in, he immediately approved it, like immediately. One of the first things he did in office was he approved Nord Stream 2. Nobody ever heard of Nord Stream until I was president. I said, "What are you doing? You mean you're building a pipeline to Germany and various places in Europe. You're paying them billions of dollars a month, and then we're paying a lot of money to fight them. This is not going to work out well." And it stopped. And then Biden approved it, which was a really stupid thing to do, but he did it. And Putin actually said to me, "If you're my friend, I'd hate to see you as my enemy." He said that very strongly. But I had – with all of that, I had a very good relationship with Putin, I had a very good relationship with President Xi, a very good relationship with Kim Jong-un of North Korea, lots of good relationships. And that's a positive thing, that's not a negative thing. But at the same time, I'm about our country.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Thanks. Without President Trump, this would be impossible. So I'd just like to say, you know, it's only possible with this president. And we've got this narrow window of opportunity with a House, Senate and a popular vote. And really, we're just implementing the will of the people. And we've got this window where we can finally take corrective action, we can fix the government, fix the country and create a great future. And again, it's only possible because of President Trump. I can't say no good things about him.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

-Give me all of them. -Sure. -Look. -Yeah. -See that? Trump was right about everything. He just came in. Somebody sent. I said, "This was sent in by a fan." I said, "I think we should make some of them, right?" But we were, pretty much. You want one? -I'll pass. -Are you allowed to take one? -No, I'm not. -Because he'll consider it. I know him well. He's sort of a stiff. -I said you were like -- -Brian, you're not a stiff. You're sort of a stiff guy. He'll take other things, but not a free hand. -Always say yes to the president. Always say yes to the president. -Would anybody like one?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

My favorite word -- tariff! (Applause.) And one of the things I'm going to do -- I'll give you this as a little insight. I just announced that in Pittsburgh. I didn't think I'd ever -- it's become a very big story already, so -- we're going to tell Mexico you're killing tremendous numbers of our people by allowing China to send their fentanyl through your system and through your country. And we're going to give them a little period of time. But we don't want drugs coming across our border -- or any border. (Applause.) And whether it's Mexico or Canada or wherever -- because they're starting now in Canada; they're starting to go up north. But whether it's Mexico or Canada, we're going to explain to them quickly that if you allow fentanyl and these drugs to come through -- through your country -- we're going to charge you large-scale tariffs on everything you send into the United States. (Applause.) And they're making a lot of money in the United States. They couldn't exist without us. So we're going to do that. And we're going to tell China that if you continue to send fentanyl to Mexico or anyplace else that comes into our country, we're going to charge you a 25 percent tariff on everything you sell into the United States of America. We're not going to let -- we can't let them -- (Applause.) -- and you've never heard that from anybody but me. And I've had it in my mind for a long time, but I didn't want to tell these guys about it because they had only screwed up like they do everything else. But I say it now because now -- because now we have the election coming up in a matter of hours, hours, hours. (Applause.) And we're not going to let them destroy our country.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

NFL, but those celebrations, eh, they sure lived. There are new concerns that the league could be cracking down on them. A USA Today reporter says that right after he talked to Raiders tight end Brock Bowers about his Trump touchdown dance, the team abruptly ended his post game availability. Joining us now, Brett Favre, NFL Hall of Fame quarterback, Brett. Fantastic to see you. I don't know how you follow Hulk Hogan, man, but you're going to have to figure it out, Brett. I can't believe the NFL players are doing the little dance. What's going on there? Uh, yeah, I think people have had enough and, uh, they're, you know, they're coming out of the woodworks right and left. And when I woke up election day and saw the, the landslide victory, it really put put where I think everyone's perspective is on this country, uh, right to the forefront. I mean, we, we were in desperate need of president Trump to take back over and get this country back where it needs to be. I mean, we were, we were definitely going in the wrong direction. And I think our youth, um, and I say youth NFL players, college players, high school players, um, see it. You know, when I was 22, 25, 30 years old, I never thought about politics. It was never an issue. There was never a, a focus on politics like it was this year. And I think people just saw it for what it was that we were in desperate need of help. And that, that helped us president Trump. Brad, don't you also think that some of this is almost an athlete's competitive spirit? Like when you're counted out, you're injured. No one thinks you can come back again and you, and you throw the perfect pass or you go for the perfect pattern and you catch the perfect ball. And again, no one thought you could do it, but you do it that, that is someone who played some college sports. Just to me, what I see that connection between the athlete and him, maybe that's overblown. Well, Laura, you're, you're right. Um, I don't think a lot of people gave president Trump a chance of winning. Um, I know I did. I was very hopeful that he would, that he would win, uh, like, like most of us, which you just didn't really know based on what's happened in the past. You really didn't know. And so again, when I woke up that morning and I'm sure a lot of people felt the same way, it was like, you have got to be kidding. Um, not only did he win, he just dominated and I, I just, I just think that, uh, we, you know, as I said, we were in desperate need of, do you think Brett, sorry to interrupt, but do you think the NFL should be cracking down on players doing the little Trump dance in the end zone? Because some believe they are. Well, I think back to back in the, just over the years, I mean, the icky shuffle. I don't know if you remember that, uh, if he would split the Cincinnati Bengals had the shuffle and I could go on and on. I don't remember anyone being fined or threatened for doing that or, or some of the other, the sack dance. So, uh, you name it. I don't remember that being an issue other than, Oh, look, that's sticky shuffle. That's pretty cool. Uh, so I, I find it hard to believe that the NFL would crack down, uh, on, on this Trump dance. I really do. Well, I would hope it looks like people are just having some fun and I think why not have a little fun, you know, like there's been all there's, you can take a knee, Colin Kaepernick took the knee and everyone had to support that or a lot of people did. And that was all celebrated, but you know, doing a little dance, somehow you cancel his post game availability, how threatening to us and that little dance, uh, some may say, but I think like with John Jones, that was a very just powerful moment with he and president Trump, the baddest man, arguably on the planet who came over and showed the respect, uh, to president Trump. I think is sense a lot about where we are in this country right now. Yeah. A fighter to a fighter Brett Farve will come back soon. Great to have you on.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

we lost was over 110,000 jobs over August and September. - 12,000 jobs, that's a pretty big slowdown. - This is the worst jobs number we've had, Maria, in three years. - The biggest issues for the American people right now, because you're talking about the essentials, Cheryl, right? I mean, this is what, food, energy, and shelter. - Gas, groceries. - Housing, mortgage payments. You know how much those are up? 97% over the last four years. - Okay, we were looking for 90,000 added, negative 28,000 on private factory jobs, a loss of 46,000 jobs. - 12,000, 12,000 in non-farm payroll. That is the lightest going back to December of 2020. - Private sector jobs, negative 28,000, negative. (dramatic music)

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Kamala backed Biden on everything. She supported his disastrous economic agenda, higher taxes on the middle class. Kamala backed his open border policies and their weakness invited wars. President Trump fights for you. His strength kept us safe. Trump cut taxes for families. Prices were lower and the border secure. But Kamala wants to double down on failure. Kamala broke it. President Trump will fix it. I'm Donald J. Trump and I approve this message.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.