Search Posts

(upbeat music)

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Kamala supports taxpayer-funded sex changes for prisoners. Surgery, for prisoners, for prisoners. Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access. Hell no, I don't want my taxpayer dollars going today. Kamala supports transgender sex changes in jail with our money. Kamala even supports letting biological men compete against our girls and their sports. Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you. I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

The paymaster and the strategist for all of this area. What do you think Trump would do? Take a gather. - Yeah, absolutely. I don't think they'd be doing it in the first place if he was there. We saw this all-- - They'd be scared to death. - Correct, they wouldn't-- - 'Cause they know he would take out, he took out Soleimani. - Correct. - He'd take them out. He has them all as cell phone numbers. - Right, right. - That's what he would say. - Exactly. - Go and get them all-- - Why do you send me a picture of your house? - Yeah, yes, he would, yes. He'd do a Google map, figure out where they live, and then tell them where they live. Yeah, he said, "Sir, why'd you send a picture of us?" I said, "You're gonna have to figure that one out, right? "It's this famous line, very funny, Larry, as you know." But, no, you're right. I mean, I think preemptively they wouldn't even do it. A lot of these other countries didn't wanna test them 'cause they knew that he was a strong president. The world was more safe. Our allies were more safe too under President Trump. No new wars were started. He eviscerated ISIS off the face of the planet in just a few months in his presidency. China with the tariffs, those type of things, he was standing up to them as well. And so again, I don't think this would even be happening under President Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Let's bring in former FBI special agent and ABCL, Jonathan Gilliam. Jonathan, good morning to you. Lots of different Trump cases to talk about this morning, but let's start in Georgia and this possible attempt to look into impeachment proceedings against Fulton County DA, Fonny Willis. What do you think about that? Do you think that's going anywhere? I don't know. It could, you know, but the, the politics in Georgia, as we've seen with their governor, um, some of these people are anti-Trump, so I'm not sure exactly where it will go. And even the wording of the state Senator and the way that he laid that out, uh, showed that if he can get the people to go along with him, then it could have legs. I mean, the sheer fact that they released an indictment before a jury had actually, uh, been seated and given, uh, their judgment on the indictment, it was released publicly. I mean, this, it's unbelievable. I want to say how this is connected to Jack Smith, who is a federal prosecutor or a special, uh, prosecutor. And then we look at the judge that's involved with the federal indictments. All of these individuals have shown political bias in their careers recently, even, um, that against Trump and against conservatives and the legal system, as we used to know it, as we can see now is completely shoved out the door. We have judges who are, uh, who are not, uh, impartial. They are partial. We have prosecutors, uh, both federal and, uh, at the state level, who show that, uh, they will go and try somebody based on politics and opinion. Our legal system is in dire straits right now. And Trump is a perfect example of, of a victim of this system. I'm glad you mentioned Jack Smith. And I think this timeline we're about to show bears out what you're saying. Trump's defense team wants his separate federal election interference trial. I.e. The Jack Smith, one of the Jack Smith cases to begin in April, 2026 prosecution proposing January 2nd of next year. If we could keep this wall up for a moment, you see January 2nd is the potential trial. Then you have the New Hampshire primary. Then you have the Iowa caucus, excuse me, then the primary, then you have Nevada caucuses, more primaries than March 4th potential Georgia trial. Then you have super Tuesday, then you have two more trials. Obviously you see this interspersing. And when you lay it out like that, Jonathan, how else can you explain Jack Smith and the other prosecutors, quite frankly, rush to get Trump inside a courtroom with any other explanation? Then they're trying to mess up his campaign. What we're seeing right here, and that is so telling of what you're seeing right there, they've had literally years to bring all of these issues that they have with Trump to the forefront of the court system. And now they want to do it immediately. Time is of the essence. As far as they have shown in their opinions, time is of the essence that they have to have him in court during a presidential election season. If you would have tried this from the conservative standpoint against Biden or against Hillary Clinton when they were running, the left would have had heart attacks all over the place. The reality of what we're dealing with right now is it's so interesting that January 6th occurred. If you ask all the people that were there on January 6th that actually went into the Capitol building, no matter what you want to call it, they were there not to change government, but because they saw that government was broken and illegal things were going on and they had questions about the election. And interestingly, since that day, what the left and many other Republican politicians have done is illegal, unethical types of maneuvering to keep the very man that these people were saying was given a bad voting system and lost the election because of that, whether it's true or not, the left has gone and actually impeded his ability now to run in the next election. From an investigative standpoint, this is it's very telling. Jonathan Gilliam, we've got to leave it there with you this morning. Thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Newt, who in the 2024 field can take on communist China? - Trump, look, Trump's already proven he can take on China. Xi Jinping was very, I think intimidated by Trump, just frankly, as was Kim Jong Un in North Korea, and I think Putin was in Russia. Trump understands real power and he used it. Now, I think there are a lot of other good candidates, and I think that the Sanders certainly has the potential to grow into that. I think, as you know, I'm a big fan of Tim Scott. I think he has great potential. And I think in some ways that you have Vivek Ramaswamy is the most interesting new candidate in the field. But I think that on the track record, if you compare how Trump muscled our opponents with how Biden consistently is pathetic, and as I said, it's either corruption, or he's just out of touch with reality, you don't know which it is.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.