# Post x_407841007087419392

- Post ID: `x_407841007087419392`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2013-12-03T11:57:28.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_407841007087419392.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> I just filed a major ethics complaint against crooked New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman-he should resign from office!

## Engagement

- Likes: 98
- Reposts: 84
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.276Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-27T17:45:39.707Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

Filed 3.5 months after Schneiderman's $40M Trump University fraud lawsuit, this post enacts textbook DARVO: rather than addressing fraud allegations, Trump publicly attacks the accuser as "crooked" and demands resignation, reversing perpetrator and victim roles. The trigger is a narcissistic injury of high significance — a lawsuit directly assaulting Trump's commercial identity and self-presentation as a successful teacher of wealth. The retaliatory ethics complaint (later dismissed by NY's Joint Commission on Public Ethics, August 2015) functions less as genuine procedural redress and more as a dominance display: converting a defendant's position into an aggressor's. Projection is clinically precise — "crooked" (connoting corruption and dishonest abuse of position) is applied to the official prosecuting Trump for consumer fraud, transferring the active moral category of wrongdoing from self to other. Proportionality failure is marked: demanding resignation over an ethics complaint (subsequently dismissed) reflects narcissistic totalism rather than strategic legal response. Authorship is high-confidence authentic Trump: 6:57 AM EST timing, first-person combative construction, and characteristic epithet use align with his established Twitter pattern. Longitudinally, this post is among the earliest documented deployments of "crooked" as a strategic label against a legal or political adversary — a rhetorical weapon Trump would systematize in the 2016 campaign. The behavioral template (injury → DARVO → public filing → maximalist resignation demand) is fully formed here at age 67, establishing a baseline pattern for responses to institutional challenge.

## Post Analysis: December 3, 2013 — Ethics Complaint Against Schneiderman

### Contextual Background

This post arrives approximately 3.5 months after New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a $40 million civil fraud lawsuit against Trump, Trump University LLC, and its president on August 24, 2013 — one of the most significant legal and reputational challenges Trump had faced at that point. Schneiderman alleged systematic consumer deception: that Trump University falsely promised instruction in Trump's personal real estate methods when Trump had no meaningful involvement in curriculum or instructor selection, and that more than 5,000 consumers were upsold into programs costing up to $35,000 with false promises of mentorship. The lawsuit called the operation "straight-up fraud."

Trump's ethics complaint, filed with New York's Joint Commission on Public Ethics, alleged that Schneiderman had solicited campaign donations from Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner while his office was simultaneously prosecuting Trump University — a conflict of interest that, if true, could have undermined the lawsuit's legitimacy. The commission investigated and dismissed the complaint in August 2015. Schneiderman did return $500 to Ivanka Trump and $1,000 to a Trump attorney, but the board found no actionable misconduct. Trump University ultimately settled for $25 million in November 2016 without admission of wrongdoing.

---

### Authorship Attribution

**Local time conversion:** UTC 11:57:28 → Eastern Standard Time (UTC-5) = **6:57 AM EST, New York City** (Trump Tower, December 2013 — Trump's established base).

Six convergent indicators support authentic Trump authorship: (1) early morning posting at 6:57 AM, squarely within his established pre-dawn window; (2) first-person agency construction ("I just filed") expressing immediate personal investment rather than institutional announcement; (3) deployment of "crooked" as a preemptive character-assassination epithet — an early documented instance of the label Trump would systematize against Hillary Clinton in 2016; (4) escalating demand (resignation) that far exceeds what the legal action itself warrants, indicating emotional rather than strategic composition; (5) combative, unmediated register with no polish or hedging; (6) complete absence of aide-typical features — no event scheduling language, no grammatical precision of institutional communication, no third-person referencing. The same-day posts (retweet compliments, New York Magazine schadenfreude) confirm an active, personally engaged Twitter session consistent with authentic posting. **Confidence: High.**

---

### Multi-Level Personality Analysis

**Level 1 — Dispositional Traits**

The dominant facets activated are *angry hostility* (Neuroticism N2) and *assertiveness* (Extraversion E1), with markedly suppressed agreeableness across all facets (trust, modesty, tender-mindedness inverted). Openness is conspicuously low — the framing is rigidly binary: corrupt attacker versus righteous counterattacker, with no acknowledgment of complexity or due process. Conscientiousness is mixed: the formal act of filing a complaint reflects deliberate action, but the public announcement and resignation demand are impulsive.

**Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations**

Agency motives completely dominate. This post reveals a schema in which being sued is not a legal event to be defended through quiet procedural strategy — it is an *attack on identity* requiring escalating, public counter-force. The adversary is not merely wrong in law; they are morally corrupt ("crooked"), which pre-emptively removes their standing to pursue any action at all. The goal is not merely legal victory but the annihilation of the adversary's legitimacy. Communion motives are absent.

**Level 3 — Narrative Identity**

Trump casts himself as the Warrior/Counterattacker who strikes first and hardest. The narrative sequence is contamination: Schneiderman's fraud lawsuit has corrupted Trump's success narrative (Trump as builder, teacher, dealmaker), and this post initiates the redemptive counter-arc. The identity claim is direct: *I am not a defendant — I am someone who files complaints.* The contrasting other is "crooked Eric Schneiderman," whose moral disqualification is established by epithet before any evidence or finding. This is narrative identity work: Trump reframes the entire legal relationship from defendant/prosecutor to two combatants, one of whom happens to have filed first.

---

### Clinical Indicators

**DARVO** (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) is the organizing defensive structure of this post and is textbook-complete. Rather than addressing the fraud allegations against Trump University on their merits, Trump pivots to accuse the accuser of ethics violations, recasting himself as the true victim of corrupt institutional aggression. The defendant becomes the plaintiff; the prosecutor becomes the wrongdoer. This is not incidental framing — the structural logic of the post is entirely organized around this inversion.

**Projection** is operationally precise. The label "crooked" — denoting dishonesty, corruption, and abuse of power — is applied to the official prosecuting Trump for consumer fraud involving systematic deception of paying customers. The exact moral category of conduct Trump faces (corrupt abuse of position for personal gain) is transferred, without evidentiary basis, to the opponent. The complaint about Schneiderman soliciting donations while prosecuting Trump — if genuine — would be a real conflict of interest; but the ethics board found no actionable violation, and the "crooked" label implies a settled moral verdict that no process had reached.

**Narcissistic rage dynamics** are present at moderate intensity. The trigger — Schneiderman's lawsuit — represents a narcissistic injury of high magnitude: a direct, public, institutional attack on Trump's commercial identity and his self-presentation as a successful teacher of real estate investment. The proportionality failure is clinically notable. An ethics complaint, even if legitimate, does not ordinarily produce a public demand for the target's resignation; that demand reflects the totalistic, maximalist retaliatory calculus characteristic of narcissistic injury rather than proportionate legal strategy.

**Malignant narcissism assessment (Kernberg):** Narcissistic features are prominent — entitlement (the complaint is implicitly framed as Schneiderman being wrong to sue him at all), exploitation of public platform as weapon, absence of empathy for Trump University's defrauded students. Antisocial features are moderate — instrumentalizing a legitimate legal proceeding as part of a retaliation campaign, using a public social media platform to undermine an adversary in ongoing litigation. Paranoid features are present — "crooked" encodes a conspiracy model (Schneiderman is acting from corrupt rather than legitimate motives). Sadism is mild-moderate: there is evident pleasure in the public announcement of the complaint, the naming of the adversary, and the demand for his resignation.

---

### Rhetorical Analysis

The post achieves remarkable rhetorical compression in 29 words. "I just filed" establishes personal agency and urgency. "Major" is a self-magnifying qualifier inserted before the audience can independently evaluate the complaint's significance — a hyperbolic amplifier. "Crooked" delivers character assassination in a single word ahead of any substance, pre-poisoning all subsequent evaluation of Schneiderman's conduct. The em-dash functions as a logical pivot that collapses due process rhetorically: complaint → verdict → demanded consequence, bypassing the investigative stage entirely. "He should resign from office" escalates beyond the ethics complaint's possible remedies (which would involve findings and sanctions, not resignation), signaling that the objective is political annihilation of the adversary, not procedural accountability.

The post also performs for an audience: broadcasting the complaint converts a bureaucratic legal action into a public dominance display, inviting followers into the conflict as witnesses. The implicit message is that Trump is a powerful actor who can threaten the career of the state's highest legal officer — a status performance that serves supply-seeking alongside the retaliatory motive.

---

### Longitudinal Significance

This post documents an **early deployment** of three behavioral patterns that become defining features of Trump's public conduct: (1) "Crooked" as a preemptive epithet to character-assassinate legal or political adversaries — here used against Schneiderman, later systematized as "Crooked Hillary"; (2) DARVO as the default structural response to being accused of wrongdoing; (3) retaliatory escalation against regulatory or legal adversaries via public shaming, with demands exceeding what any procedural outcome could deliver. The behavioral template — injury → DARVO counter-filing → public announcement → maximalist demand — is fully formed in 2013.

---

### Danger Assessment

**None elevated.** This is a legal-political dispute. No violent imagery, dehumanizing language, eliminationist rhetoric, or mobilization language is present. The aggression is entirely within institutional channels (ethics filing) and political rhetoric (resignation demand).

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "I just filed a major ethics complaint against New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman" | **Mostly True** | Trump did file a complaint with New York's Joint Commission on Public Ethics in December 2013, alleging Schneiderman solicited campaign donations from Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner while his office was simultaneously investigating Trump University. The complaint was investigated and dismissed by the ethics board in August 2015. 'Major' is a self-characterization with no independent basis — the complaint was ultimately found to have no actionable merit. |
| "crooked New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman" | **Mostly False** | The ethics board dismissed Trump's complaint and found no actionable misconduct by Schneiderman. He did return $1,500 in donations (to Ivanka Trump and a Trump attorney) to resolve an apparent-conflict concern, but no corruption finding was made. Schneiderman did eventually resign in May 2018, but for entirely unrelated reasons (physical abuse allegations by romantic partners) — not because of the 2013 ethics complaint. |
| "he should resign from office" | **Unverifiable** | This is a political demand/opinion, not a factual claim. No ethics body, court, or investigative finding supported a resignation call at the time. Schneiderman continued serving as AG until 2018. |

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 88%)

### Indicators

- 6:57 AM EST posting time (pre-dawn, Trump Tower, New York)
- first-person agency construction 'I just filed' — personal investment, not institutional announcement
- characteristic 'crooked' epithet — early documented instance of Trump's systematic labeling pattern
- resignation demand exceeding what ethics complaint could procedurally achieve — emotional escalation, not strategic
- combative unmediated register with no institutional polish

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Schneiderman's August 2013 $40M civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and Trump University, publicly characterizing Trump's business as a deceptive scheme)

**Rage:** Intensity 62% targeting Eric Schneiderman, New York State Attorney General
- Proportionality: 22%

Sentiment: -0.72

**Mildly Hypomanic**
- early morning posting (6:57 AM EST)
- multiple posts same day spanning disparate content (retweets, schadenfreude, legal aggression)
- elevated combativeness with escalating demands exceeding situational necessity

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 72%
- Antisocial: 44%
- Paranoid: 58%
- Sadism: 31%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- acting out (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 35%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- inviting audience into personal legal conflict as witnesses to counter-aggression
- positioning self as protagonist in ongoing legal drama against a corrupt official
- implicit status performance — demonstrating power to threaten state's top legal officer's career

## Danger Assessment

**NONE**

### Gaslighting

- 'Crooked' label applied to a state official conducting a legitimate fraud prosecution, inverting the ethical valence of both parties — the defrauded party (Trump University students) and the prosecuting official are erased; only Trump's grievance is visible
- Framing the retaliatory ethics complaint as righteous legal action obscures Trump's status as defendant in a $40M consumer fraud case, presenting the aggressor as the aggrieved
- Implied narrative that Schneiderman's prosecution is itself the misconduct, not the consumer deception alleged in the lawsuit

## Fact Checks (3)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-27._

> I just filed a major ethics complaint against New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman

**MOSTLY TRUE**

Trump did file a complaint with New York's Joint Commission on Public Ethics in December 2013, alleging Schneiderman solicited campaign donations from Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner while his office was simultaneously investigating Trump University. The complaint was investigated and dismissed by the ethics board in August 2015. 'Major' is a self-characterization with no independent basis — the complaint was ultimately found to have no actionable merit.

Sources: https://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20150831/POLITICS/150839985/new-york-ethics-board-drops-trump-s-complaint-against-attorney-general-eric-schneiderman; https://therealdeal.com/2015/03/05/ny-ethics-board-investigating-schneidermans-ties-to-trumps/

> crooked New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman

**MOSTLY FALSE**

The ethics board dismissed Trump's complaint and found no actionable misconduct by Schneiderman. He did return $1,500 in donations (to Ivanka Trump and a Trump attorney) to resolve an apparent-conflict concern, but no corruption finding was made. Schneiderman did eventually resign in May 2018, but for entirely unrelated reasons (physical abuse allegations by romantic partners) — not because of the 2013 ethics complaint.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schneiderman; https://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20150831/POLITICS/150839985/new-york-ethics-board-drops-trump-s-complaint-against-attorney-general-eric-schneiderman

> he should resign from office

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is a political demand/opinion, not a factual claim. No ethics body, court, or investigative finding supported a resignation call at the time. Schneiderman continued serving as AG until 2018.

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Tags

- DARVO (93%)
- narcissistic_injury_response (90%)
- Trump_University (95%)
- Schneiderman (95%)
- retaliation_pattern (88%)
- projection (85%)
- authentic_Trump (88%)
- crooked_epithet_early_use (87%)
- 2013_baseline (80%)
- proportionality_failure (75%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Presidential Trial Balloons and Legal Counterattacks: A Day of Grandiose Self-Construction**

Trump spent the day cultivating his proto-presidential persona, amplifying fan calls for him to run for office while mixing in combative attacks on the New York Attorney General and media outlets. The morning brought a brief flash of anger with a filed ethics complaint against AG Schneiderman, framed as retaliation for the Trump University fraud lawsuit, but the mood quickly settled back into self-satisfied commentary on the economy, ObamaCare costs, and climate skepticism. The rest of the day was routine brand maintenance — property promotions, brief thank-yous to fans, and motivational quotes. Nothing alarming, just a man methodically building a public mythology two years before announcing his candidacy.

Full digest for 2013-12-03: https://trump.fm/date/2013-12-03/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2013, December 3). I just filed a major ethics complaint against... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "I just filed a major ethics complaint against crooked New..." X (Twitter), 3 Dec. 2013. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "I just filed a major ethics complaint against crooked New...," X (Twitter), December 3, 2013, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_407841007087419392
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_407841007087419392
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_407841007087419392
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2013-12-03
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_407841007087419392.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._