# Post x_404222660303151104

- Post ID: `x_404222660303151104`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2013-11-23T12:19:26.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_404222660303151104.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> We are using the absolute wrong negotiating technique with respect to the Iran nuclear talks. Strengthen sanctions until GREAT deal is made!

## Engagement

- Likes: 72
- Reposts: 102
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.277Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-27T14:31:56.670Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This November 2013 post functions primarily as a longitudinal baseline marker and a demonstration of Trump's core dealmaker identity schema in an early pre-political context. Posted at 7:19 AM EST from Trump Tower — authentic authorship is high-confidence based on timing, capitalized 'GREAT,' and characteristic informal grammar ('absolute wrong'). The post was timed one day before the announcement of the Joint Plan of Action interim agreement, suggesting opportunistic positioning. Psychologically, the post is supply-seeking through expertise display: the entire U.S. foreign policy apparatus is implicitly outclassed by Trump's transactional framework. Agency motives dominate — power, achievement, and status visible in the confident prescription without institutional standing. Defense mechanisms are mild: rationalization converts a hawkish ideological preference into 'correct technique'; splitting reduces complex multilateral diplomacy to a binary moral dichotomy. Clinically, narcissistic features are mild and subclinical in isolation — consistent with established baseline, not episodic elevation. No paranoid, antisocial, or sadistic features. Cognitive status is baseline-normal: coherent, appropriately simple for the medium, no markers of difficulty. The 'dealmaker' master frame — nuclear nonproliferation as a leverage problem solvable by sufficient pressure — would remain a defining political identity claim through Trump's 2024 campaign. This post is significant primarily as a data point establishing the dealmaker schema's early, pre-political form.

# Analysis: Trump Twitter Post — 2013-11-23

## Authorship Attribution

**Location & Local Time:** Trump was based at Trump Tower, New York, in November 2013. UTC 12:19:26 converts to **7:19 AM EST** — early morning, a well-documented authentic Trump posting window. No travel events on this date suggest departure from New York.

**Stylometric Markers:**
- "GREAT" capitalized — strong authentic marker
- "absolute wrong" (adjectival where adverb expected: "absolutely wrong") — recurring informal grammar pattern in authentic Trump text, likely habitual rather than edited
- Short declarative-imperative construction ("Strengthen sanctions until GREAT deal is made!") — characteristic of authentic impulsive posting
- No event announcements, schedules, or polished professional formatting indicative of aide authorship
- Transactional framing ("deal") as organizing metaphor — consistent with documented authentic voice

**Verdict:** High confidence authentic Trump. Early morning timing + grammatical informality + capitalized "GREAT" + transactional dealmaker framing converge on authentic authorship.

---

## Multi-Level Personality Analysis

### Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)

**Extraversion (High):** Assertive, unsolicited public commentary on major geopolitical matter without institutional standing; no hedge, no qualification, projects confidence.

**Agreeableness (Very Low):** Contrarian against established diplomatic consensus of six major powers (P5+1); zero acknowledgment of alternative perspectives or tradeoffs.

**Conscientiousness (Moderate-Low):** Achievement orientation visible ("GREAT deal"), but complete absence of specificity or deliberation about mechanism undermines the conscientiousness signal.

**Neuroticism (Low):** No visible anxiety. Post projects authority, not distress. Any frustration is subordinated to confident assertion.

**Openness (Very Low):** An extraordinarily complex multilateral nuclear negotiation is reduced to a single binary variable (sanctions intensity). Rigid, transactional cognitive style.

### Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations

**Dominant Motives:** Agency motives dominate — power (prescribing U.S. foreign policy from a private citizen platform), achievement (the aspirational "GREAT deal"), and status (expert knowledge claim implicitly surpassing the executive branch).

**Communion Motives:** Absent.

**Self-Schema:** The expert dealmaker whose transactional insight exceeds that of trained diplomats and the sitting president.

**Other-Schema (implicit):** The Obama administration as naive, weak, using "wrong" technique — outclassed by Trump's framework.

**World-Schema:** All geopolitical problems are ultimately negotiation leverage problems; maximum pressure produces maximum concessions. This schema is strikingly consistent across decades.

### Level 3: Narrative Identity

**Protagonist Role:** Unsolicited expert advisor / prescient dealmaker-sage. Not yet claiming the savior mantle (pre-presidential), but firmly occupying the unheeded wise counselor position.

**Identity Claims:** Implicit: "I understand negotiation better than the U.S. foreign policy establishment." The certainty embedded in "absolute wrong" presupposes secure knowledge of the correct approach.

**Contrasting Other:** The Obama administration's diplomatic engagement approach — phased sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable nuclear concessions (the framework that would produce the JCPOA in 2015).

**Narrative Sequence:** Contamination implicit — a resolvable situation is being actively mishandled by incompetent actors. No explicit redemption arc offered; Trump positions as diagnostician, not rescuer. Consistent with 2013 pre-political posture.

### Level 4: Clinical Indicators

**Narcissistic Features (Mild-Moderate):** Grandiosity is structurally present — the confident assertion of superior expertise over the entire U.S. foreign policy apparatus. However, this is subclinical in isolation and consistent with established baseline. The certainty is characteristic, not episodic.

**Paranoid, Antisocial, Sadistic Features:** Absent in this post.

---

## Narcissistic Dynamics

**Trigger:** Supply-seeking through opportunistic political positioning. The Iran nuclear talks (Joint Plan of Action interim agreement was announced the following day, November 24, 2013) provided a timely platform for expertise display. No narcissistic injury is evident — this is proactive rather than reactive.

**Narcissistic State:** Grandiose — expansive confidence, no vulnerability markers.

**Rage:** Absent. Tone is assertive and prescriptive, not reactive or wounded.

---

## Defense Mechanisms

**Rationalization (Neurotic):** The maximalist hawkish preference for sanctions escalation is framed as a technically correct "negotiating technique," converting an ideological position into apparent objective expertise.

**Splitting (Immature):** Binary frame — there is an "absolute wrong" technique and an implied correct one. The actual negotiation involved complex tradeoffs acknowledged by all six parties. Splitting collapses this into a moral-strategic dichotomy.

---

## Rhetorical Analysis

**Superlatives/Absolutes:** "absolute wrong" — projects certainty where expert opinion was genuinely divided.

**Capitalization for Emphasis:** "GREAT" — aspirational maximalism; an authentic rhetorical signature.

**False Simplification:** Reduction of P5+1 multilateral nuclear diplomacy to a single leverage variable. Omits: Iran's domestic politics, P5+1 unity requirements, verification mechanisms, escalation risks.

**Implied Authority:** No credentials offered. Authority rests entirely on the dealmaker self-presentation brand, which had been cultivated for decades via The Apprentice and Trump brand.

**Transactional Master Metaphor:** "deal" as organizing concept for nuclear nonproliferation — consistent with Trump's dealmaker identity claim. The word "technique" positions diplomacy as craftsmanship, elevating Trump's claimed skill.

**No dehumanizing language, violent imagery, or stochastic terrorism indicators present.**

---

## Cognitive Status (2013 Baseline)

**Syntax:** Simple but coherent. "We are using the absolute wrong negotiating technique with respect to the Iran nuclear talks" is grammatically functional. "Strengthen sanctions until GREAT deal is made!" is structurally imperative and logically connected.

**Complexity:** Low-moderate; appropriate for medium (Twitter character limit) and consistent with Trump's established oral and written register from this period.

**Markers:** No word-finding difficulty, perseveration, tangentiality, temporal confusion, or name confusion.

**Baseline Value:** This post is a useful 2013 cognitive reference point. Language complexity, coherence, and logical structure are appropriate. The adjectival/adverbial substitution ("absolute wrong") is a documented stylistic pattern, not a cognitive marker.

---

## Order/Chaos Dynamics

Trump positions here as **order restorer** — prescribing corrective action to address a threat being mismanaged by the current administration. The implicit hierarchy: Trump's transactional wisdom > Obama's diplomatic naivety > Iran's leverage. The "order" Trump defends is American dominance through leverage; the "chaos" is perceived weakness in the negotiating posture.

---

## Archetypal Analysis

**Warrior:** Sanctions as weapon, pressure as virtue, negotiation framed as combat requiring strength.

**King/Advisor Hybrid:** Not claiming the throne (pre-political), but occupying the Merlin role — the unheeded wise counselor who perceives what power cannot see.

**Shadow Projection:** Weakness and naivety projected onto Obama's approach; Trump's own dealmaking record (including documented business failures) is unexamined.

---

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "The United States is using the 'absolute wrong' negotiating technique in the Iran nuclear talks" | **Unverifiable** | This is an opinion claim, not a verifiable factual assertion. The P5+1 diplomatic engagement approach — phased sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable nuclear concessions — was the consensus strategy of the US, UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany, coordinated through the UN Security Council framework. The interim Joint Plan of Action was announced the following day (November 24, 2013) and led ultimately to the JCPOA in July 2015. Whether the technique was 'wrong' depends entirely on one's theory of coercive bargaining and one's definition of a 'great deal.' |
| "Strengthening sanctions would produce a 'GREAT deal' with Iran" | **Unverifiable** | This is a policy prescription with contested empirical support. Sanctions had already been instrumental in bringing Iran to the negotiating table by 2013. Whether further escalation would have improved terms, maintained P5+1 unity, or collapsed negotiations entirely is actively debated among international relations scholars. Trump's own maximum pressure sanctions campaign (2018-2021, following US withdrawal from JCPOA) did not result in a new nuclear agreement during his first term. |

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 78%)

### Indicators

- 7:19 AM EST posting time — authentic early-morning Trump window
- Capitalized 'GREAT' — documented authentic stylometric marker
- 'absolute wrong' (adjective for adverb) — recurring informal grammar pattern in authentic Trump text
- Short declarative-imperative structure — consistent with authentic impulsive posting style
- Transactional 'deal' framing as master metaphor — core authentic Trump brand identity

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (Iran P5+1 nuclear negotiations approaching interim agreement announcement)

Sentiment: -0.20

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 30%
- Antisocial: 0%
- Paranoid: 5%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- rationalization (neurotic)
- splitting (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 35%

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-27._

> The United States is using the 'absolute wrong' negotiating technique in the Iran nuclear talks

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is an opinion claim, not a verifiable factual assertion. The P5+1 diplomatic engagement approach — phased sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable nuclear concessions — was the consensus strategy of the US, UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany, coordinated through the UN Security Council framework. The interim Joint Plan of Action was announced the following day (November 24, 2013) and led ultimately to the JCPOA in July 2015. Whether the technique was 'wrong' depends entirely on one's theory of coercive bargaining and one's definition of a 'great deal.'

Sources: https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/11/218117.htm

> Strengthening sanctions would produce a 'GREAT deal' with Iran

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is a policy prescription with contested empirical support. Sanctions had already been instrumental in bringing Iran to the negotiating table by 2013. Whether further escalation would have improved terms, maintained P5+1 unity, or collapsed negotiations entirely is actively debated among international relations scholars. Trump's own maximum pressure sanctions campaign (2018-2021, following US withdrawal from JCPOA) did not result in a new nuclear agreement during his first term.

Sources: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-iran-nuclear-deal

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Tags

- Iran nuclear talks (95%)
- dealmaker identity (85%)
- Obama administration critique (75%)
- maximum pressure doctrine (70%)
- pre-presidential political positioning (65%)
- grandiose supply-seeking (55%)
- 2013 baseline marker (80%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Vigilante Saturday: From Dealmaker Gravitas to Extrajudicial Violence in Seventeen Minutes**

The morning of November 23, 2013 presents a compact but psychologically dense case study in Trump's pre-political identity schema, compressed into fifty minutes of posting from Trump Tower in New York City. The session opens at 7:19 AM EST with characteristic policy pontification on the Iran nuclear negotiations — measured grandiosity, the dealmaker identity cleanly on display — then pivots with striking speed into explicit vigilante violence advocacy in response to the "knockout game" media moment, before closing with epistemically familiar climate denial trolling. No vulnerable states appear, no state transitions occur, no redemption arc materializes. The psychological through-line is stable grandiosity modulated by topic-specific intensity, cycling through three distinct identity schemas — Expert Dealmaker, Warrior-Protector, Anti-Establishment Trickster — in under an hour.

The clinical centrepiece of the day is the seven-minute knockout game sequence (posts x_404227011801255936 and x_404228837195919360, 7:36–7:43 AM EST), which functions as a textbook two-post stochastic terrorism structure. The first post introduces dehumanizing language ("scum"), invokes vulnerable victims ("old ladies"), and deploys graphic gun imagery against a loosely defined enemy class; the second amplifies the prescription into collective action ("we have to be slightly more vicious") and adds the self-revealing parenthetical "(and violent)" — an ego-syntonic doubling down signalling not reluctant deterrence but evident pleasure in the violent scenario. The inclusory "we" implicates followers as intended agents. Both factual anchors underlying the moral panic are contested: the "knockout game" epidemic was substantially media-constructed, and the proposition that counter-violence would end crime "FAST" has no criminological support.

The day's overall output does not meet clinical thresholds for a hypomanic episode — four posts in fifty minutes during normal waking hours represents concentrated but not extraordinary activity for the 2013 baseline, and no sleep disruption indicators apply to a 7:19 AM start time. The narrative arc is contamination: a session that begins with credentialed-sounding foreign policy positioning rapidly degrades into extrajudicial violence advocacy, establishing an early archetype of a rhetorical pattern Trump would later amplify to a vastly larger audience.

Full digest for 2013-11-23: https://trump.fm/date/2013-11-23/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2013, November 23). We are using the absolute wrong negotiating... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "We are using the absolute wrong negotiating technique with..." X (Twitter), 23 Nov. 2013. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "We are using the absolute wrong negotiating technique with...," X (Twitter), November 23, 2013, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_404222660303151104
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_404222660303151104
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_404222660303151104
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2013-11-23
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_404222660303151104.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._