# Post x_359857791051108353

- Post ID: `x_359857791051108353`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2013-07-24T02:09:17.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no, but it quotes a tweet by @RyanRMiner
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_359857791051108353.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

_Quotes @RyanRMiner, pasted in quotation marks the way early X retweets were made by hand. The words in quotation marks are @RyanRMiner's, not his; a reply of his, if any, follows the closing mark._

> "@RyanRMiner: @realDonaldTrump Is your fued with @Rosie over?"  No, it will never end, but she has become totally irrelevant!

## Engagement

- Likes: 28
- Reposts: 22
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.289Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-23T00:49:10.826Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This brief post encapsulates a core narcissistic dynamic in compact form: the contradiction between "it will never end" and "she has become totally irrelevant" reveals an unresolved narcissistic injury (O'Donnell's 2006–7 public attacks) that cannot be metabolized despite years of elapsed time. A psychologically resolved subject would either confirm the feud had ended or ignore the question; instead, Trump declares the feud permanent — asserting control over its terms — while simultaneously deploying devaluation to deny that O'Donnell retains any emotional significance. These two claims are logically incompatible, and the incompatibility is diagnostically informative. The same-day context strengthens the interpretation: Trump applies the "irrelevant" dismissal script to at least two perceived rivals (O'Donnell and Danny Zuker) in a single Twitter session, suggesting an active devaluation schema triggered by fan questions that force re-engagement with unresolved grievances. Posting at 10:09 PM local time, in a casual reply-quoting session, this reads as authentic Trump. Dominant defense mechanisms are devaluation and denial. No danger indicators. No cognitive concerns relative to 2013 baseline. The post is clinically interesting less for its content than for what it inadvertently reveals: that the narcissistic wound from a seven-year-old feud remains fully cathected, available for deployment at any moment a fan question unlocks it.

# Analysis: Twitter Post — July 24, 2013 (02:09 UTC)

## Authorship Attribution

**Local Time:** UTC 02:09 = **10:09 PM EDT** (Trump was almost certainly in New York City in late July 2013, his primary residence). This falls squarely in the late-evening window associated with authentic Trump posting behavior. The informal reply-quoting format (characteristic of Trump's early Twitter usage), the direct emotional register, and the single-sentence rhetorical structure all suggest authentic authorship. No event announcements, no polish, no professional formatting. Confidence: **high**.

---

## Level 1 — Dispositional Traits

The post activates several salient trait facets in condensed form:

- **Low Agreeableness**: Explicit declaration that an interpersonal conflict "will never end" signals entrenched antagonism, bearing of grudges, and refusal of reconciliation — the polar opposite of modesty or trust.
- **High Extraversion / Assertiveness**: The unsolicited declaration of permanence in a feud is an expressive, dominant move. He does not simply answer the question; he escalates it.
- **Neuroticism (Angry Hostility)**: The unresolved emotional charge around Rosie O'Donnell — despite the post being a casual fan-reply session — reveals latent hostile affect that resurfaces on demand.
- **Low Conscientiousness (Deliberation)**: No apparent reflection before declaring a personal feud eternal in a public forum.

---

## Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations (Motives & Schemas)

**Agency motive dominates.** The response to "Is your feud over?" is not conciliatory; it is a power-maintenance move. By declaring the feud permanent, Trump retains narrative control — he chooses when or whether it ends. The simultaneous devaluation ("she has become totally irrelevant") positions him as the more powerful party who has outlasted the rival.

**Contradiction reveals the schema:** If O'Donnell is truly "totally irrelevant," the feud would be *de facto* over — there is no feud with an irrelevant person. The insistence that it will "never end" betrays that the original narcissistic injury (O'Donnell's on-air attack of him in 2006–2007) has *not* been resolved. The wound remains cathected. The "irrelevance" framing is an attempt to project resolution while the "never end" clause shows the unconscious truth: this person still matters as a threat-object.

**Same-day pattern:** On this same date, Trump deploys the "irrelevant" dismissal twice — first applied to Danny Zuker (a TV writer who had publicly feuded with him), then to O'Donnell. The repeated use of an identical dismissive script across a single session suggests an active devaluation schema running that evening, possibly triggered by fan questions drawing attention to his unresolved grievances.

---

## Level 3 — Narrative Identity

**Protagonist Role:** The Enduring Combatant — someone who never backs down, whose feuds are permanent features of their identity. This is not framed as a problem but as a mark of strength and loyalty to his own grievances.

**Contamination sequence residue:** The original feud (2006–7) represents a classic contamination pattern: O'Donnell's public criticism disrupted what Trump experienced as a stable, positive self-narrative (successful businessman / TV star). The permanent nature of the feud is the ongoing psychic artifact of that contamination — a grudge that cannot be metabolized.

**Contrasting Other:** Rosie O'Donnell functions as a persistent shadow figure — someone whose public challenge to Trump's status defined a chapter of his narrative identity. The fact that the feud still "will never end" in 2013 — years after its peak — shows how central such contrasting others are to Trump's self-definition.

**Identity Claim:** *I am someone who does not forgive, does not forget, and does not concede.* This claim is made without apology; it reads as a point of pride.

---

## Level 4 — Clinical Indicators

### Malignant Narcissism Assessment

**A. Narcissistic Features:**
- *Grandiosity*: Implicit in the framing — he frames their relative status ("she has become totally irrelevant") with himself as the fixed reference point.
- *Entitlement*: Unilateral declaration of feud permanence; no consideration of O'Donnell's perspective or the social norms around resolving conflicts.
- *Envy (devaluation as defense)*: The dismissal of O'Donnell as "totally irrelevant" is a classic devaluation move typically mobilized when the rival still carries emotional charge.

**B. Antisocial Features:** Mild. The post shows contempt but no overt deception or explicit harm.

**C. Paranoid Features:**
- *Bearing grudges*: Explicit and self-declared ("it will never end"). This is the clearest paranoid feature — an inability to release perceived slights even years after the precipitating event.

**D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism:** Mild — the pleasure in declaring O'Donnell irrelevant rather than simply ignoring the question suggests some satisfaction in the dismissal.

### Narcissistic Dynamics

**Trigger:** Supply-seeking / maintenance. The fan is asking a question that invites Trump to revisit a famous feud. This is not a fresh injury; it is routine audience engagement that allows a familiar grievance to be performed.

**Narcissistic State:** Mixed — superficially *grandiose* (I am relevant, she is not; I control this feud's terms), but the "never end" declaration betrays *vulnerable* substrate. A truly secure grandiose state would allow for dismissal without the permanent grudge declaration.

**Rage:** Absent in this post. This is a low-intensity, routinized devaluation, not active rage. The affect is more contemptuous than enraged.

### Defense Mechanisms

1. **Devaluation (Immature, Level 2):** "She has become totally irrelevant" — reduces the threatening other to nullity. *Evidence:* Directly stated.
2. **Denial (Pathological, Level 1):** The post implicitly denies that the feud carries ongoing emotional weight ("she's irrelevant") while simultaneously revealing it does ("it will never end"). The contradiction is the defense.
3. **Rationalization (Neurotic, Level 3):** Framing the permanent grudge as simply an accurate status assessment ("she has become totally irrelevant") rather than an unresolved wound.

---

## Cognitive Status

No markers of concern at age 67 in this post. Sentence structure is simple but coherent and intentional, consistent with Trump's established 2013 Twitter baseline. No word-finding difficulty, no tangentiality, no perseveration beyond the recurrent "irrelevant" script (which appears situationally motivated, not pathologically repetitive). Baseline deviation: **none**.

---

## Rhetorical & Propaganda Techniques

- **Dehumanization (mild):** "Totally irrelevant" reduces a person to a category of non-person.
- **False resolution:** The post structurally implies resolution ("Is the feud over?") while actually prolonging and deepening it.
- **Contradictory assertion as dominance display:** Declaring both permanence ("never end") and nullity ("irrelevant") simultaneously is a rhetorical power move — it forecloses any counter-framing. She cannot be relevant enough to continue the feud, nor has he forgiven her.
- **Rhetorical economy:** Single punchy sentence; maximum social signal per word.

---

## Gaslighting / Reality Distortion

Not present in this post. The content is interpersonal rather than factual or political; no documented events are being distorted.

---

## Danger Assessment

**None.** This is a celebrity interpersonal feud in 2013, with no dehumanizing escalation, no mobilization cues, no eliminationist language.

---

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Trump has a feud with Rosie O'Donnell" | **True** | Well-documented feud originating from O'Donnell's December 2006 on-air criticism of Trump on The View, triggering sustained public attacks through 2007 and episodically thereafter. |
| "Rosie O'Donnell has become totally irrelevant" | **Mostly False** | O'Donnell remained an active public figure and television personality in 2013. 'Irrelevant' is a subjective devaluation without factual basis. |

Overall Veracity: 60%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 87%)

### Indicators

- 10:09 PM EDT — late evening, within authentic Trump posting window
- Informal reply-quoting format characteristic of Trump's early Twitter style
- Characteristic 'totally' intensifier
- Single punchy declarative sentence — no polish or event-announcement structure
- Emotional/interpersonal subject matter, not logistics or scheduling

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (fan question inviting performance of famous grievance)

Sentiment: -0.25

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 65%
- Antisocial: 20%
- Paranoid: 55%
- Sadism: 25%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- devaluation (immature)
- denial (pathological)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 30%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- performing grievance for audience validation
- inviting fan participation in feud narrative

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-03-23._

> Trump has a feud with Rosie O'Donnell

**TRUE**

Well-documented feud originating from O'Donnell's December 2006 on-air criticism of Trump on The View, triggering sustained public attacks through 2007 and episodically thereafter.

Sources: general knowledge / public record

> Rosie O'Donnell has become totally irrelevant

**MOSTLY FALSE**

O'Donnell remained an active public figure and television personality in 2013. 'Irrelevant' is a subjective devaluation without factual basis.

Sources: general knowledge

Overall Veracity: 60%

## Tags

- feud (90%)
- Rosie O'Donnell (90%)
- devaluation (85%)
- permanent-grudge (80%)
- irrelevant-script (75%)
- narcissistic-injury-residue (70%)
- authentic-authorship (87%)
- late-evening-post (60%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**99-Post Victory Lap: Weiner Scandal Fuels a Marathon Vindication Session and Proto-Campaign Brand-Building**

Trump had one of his highest-volume Twitter days on record, firing off nearly 100 posts in a sustained mood of cheerful self-congratulation. The Anthony Weiner "Carlos Danger" sexting scandal was his favorite topic, and he returned to it repeatedly to remind everyone he had predicted the relapse months earlier. Between Weiner mockery, he retweeted dozens of fans calling him a genius and urging him to run for president in 2016 -- an early prototype of the "reluctant savior" narrative. He also squeezed in attacks on wind energy projects near his Scottish golf course, a dismissive Obama critique, and a brief late-night innuendo about a Fox News anchor. The overall mood was expansive and pleased, with almost no detectable anger, but the posting pace -- stretching past midnight and resuming before dawn -- suggests a very short night's sleep.

Full digest for 2013-07-24: https://trump.fm/date/2013-07-24/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2013, July 24). "@RyanRMiner: @realDonaldTrump Is your fued with... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. ""@RyanRMiner: @realDonaldTrump Is your fued with @Rosie..." X (Twitter), 24 Jul. 2013. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, ""@RyanRMiner: @realDonaldTrump Is your fued with @Rosie...," X (Twitter), July 24, 2013, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_359857791051108353
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_359857791051108353
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_359857791051108353
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2013-07-24
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_359857791051108353.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._