# Post x_278235379344220161

- Post ID: `x_278235379344220161`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2012-12-10T20:30:58.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_278235379344220161.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> China is about to acquire a unit of AIG, which we bailed out, for $5.5B http://t.co/0xBsByf6  China is making great deals on our backs.

## Engagement

- Likes: 41
- Reposts: 262
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.258Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-14T02:24:23.777Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Tweet on AIG-China Deal (December 10, 2012)  ## Post Context  **Timestamp:** December 10, 2012, 20:30:58 UTC (3:30 PM EST, assuming New York location) **Content:** "China is about to acquire a unit of AIG, which we bailed out, for .5B http://t.co/0xBsByf6  China is making great deals on our backs."  **Factual Background:** On December 9, 2012, AIG announced the sale of 90% of its aircraft leasing subsidiary ILFC (International Lease Finance Corp.) to a Chinese consortium led by New China Trust Co. for approximately .28 billion. This was part of AIG's effort to repay government bailout funds received during the 2008 financial crisis.  **Tweet Sequence Context:** This post appears within a day of aggressive attacks on British businessman Lord Alan Sugar, including four consecutive derogatory tweets calling him "dopey," a "total fool," and claiming Trump's platform made Sugar known. The contrast between the sustained personal attack sequence and this policy-oriented economic commentary is notable.  ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)  ### Extraversion: High (Facet: Assertiveness) - Confident pronouncement on complex economic transaction - Public commentary positioning self as authority on deals - No hedging language; declarative statements  ### Agreeableness: Low (Facet: Trust - Reversed) - Suspicious framing: China is exploiting "us" - Zero-sum worldview: their gain is our loss - Attribution of hostile intent to foreign actor  ### Conscientiousness: Mixed - **Achievement-striving** evident in deal-focused commentary - **Deliberation** questionable: slight factual error (.5B vs actual ~.28B), though within reasonable rounding  ### Neuroticism: Moderate (Facet: Angry Hostility) - Resentment tone: "on our backs" - Grievance framing of economic transaction - Less intense than the Lord Sugar attacks, suggesting modulation by topic  ### Openness: Low (Facet: Values - Rigidity) - Economic nationalism, zero-sum thinking - In-group/out-group framing (us vs China) - Closed to complexity: bailout repayment = exploitation  ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations  ### Agency Motives: Dominant **Power/Status:** Positions self as defender of American interests against foreign exploitation. Implicit claim: "I see what others miss; I would negotiate better deals."  **Achievement:** Deal-oriented framing reveals core schema: world understood through transactions, winners and losers.  ### Communion Motives: Minimal No intimacy or belonging language, except tribal identification ("we," "our") against out-group (China).  ### Core Schemas Revealed  **Schema of Self:** Protector, deal expert who recognizes exploitation others miss **Schema of Others:**  - Chinese: Opportunistic exploiters making shrewd deals at American expense - Implicitly, American leaders: Dupes who allow this to happen **Schema of World:** Zero-sum marketplace where vigilance prevents exploitation; transactions have winners and losers  ## Level 3: Narrative Identity  ### Protagonist Role **The Watchman/Whistleblower:** "I see the truth others don't see—China is taking advantage while everyone sleeps."  This role complements his business identity as master dealmaker. The subtext: "If I were in charge, this wouldn't happen."  ### Narrative Sequence Subtle **contamination sequence**: What should be good news (AIG repaying bailout through asset sales) is reframed as something bad (foreign exploitation). American generosity (bailout) → American victimization (China benefits).  ### Identity Claims - Deal expertise: Understands transaction dynamics - Patriotic defender: Protects American interests - Truth-teller: Reveals exploitation mainstream discourse misses  ### Contrasting Other **China** as shrewd exploiter vs. **implied American leaders** as naïve marks. Trump positions himself as neither—the savvy American who sees through the con.  ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators  ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment  **A. Narcissistic Features: Present but Moderate** - Implicit grandiosity: "I understand deals better than those who negotiated this" - Self-positioning as uniquely perceptive authority - Lower intensity than Lord Sugar tweets—topic-dependent modulation  **B. Antisocial Features: Minimal in this post** - No overt deception (facts roughly accurate within rounding) - Slight distortion through selective framing  **C. Paranoid Features: Present** - Suspicious interpretation of legitimate business transaction - Attribution of hostile/exploitative intent - "Us vs. them" framing suggesting threat vigilance  **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism: Absent** - No pleasure in others' suffering - Contrasts sharply with Lord Sugar attacks same day  **Clinical Significance:** This post shows paranoid cognitive style and narcissistic positioning but lacks the rage, sadism, and devaluation seen in interpersonal attacks. Suggests differentiated responding: measured when discussing policy/deals vs. dysregulated when triggered by perceived personal slights.  ### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger Type:** Supply-seeking + Maintenance - No evidence of narcissistic injury - Posting expertise on timely news event - Building authority narrative on business/economic topics  **Narcissistic State:** Grandiose (stable) - Confident, authoritative tone - Implicit superiority to deal-makers involved - No vulnerability or victimization language about self  **Rage Indicators:** Absent - No disproportionate affect - No personal attack - Measured tone (especially vs. Lord Sugar tweets hours earlier)  ### Defense Mechanisms  **Projection (Immature - Level 2):** Moderate evidence Attributes exploitative motives to China that may reflect his own transactional, opportunistic worldview. China doing what Trump would do in their position—seize opportunity—but framed as wrongdoing when others do it.  **Splitting (Immature - Level 2):** Present - All-bad: China (exploiters) - All-good: American taxpayers (victims) - Ignores complexity: AIG using sale proceeds to repay taxpayers, Chinese investment helping American company restructure  **Rationalization (Neurotic - Level 3):** Present Converts complex transaction (Chinese investment helping AIG repay bailout) into simple narrative (China exploiting American taxpayer generosity).  ## Cognitive Status Assessment  **Language Production:** Intact - No word-finding difficulty, paraphasias, or neologisms - Syntactically simple but coherent - Clear subject-verb-object structure  **Content:** Coherent - Logical flow: fact → interpretation - No confabulation or temporal confusion - Temporally accurate ("about to acquire" - announcement was previous day)  **Complexity:** Moderate-Low (Consistent with baseline 2012 Twitter style) - Simple sentence structure - Binary framing - Accessible vocabulary  **Baseline Comparison:** This represents typical Trump Twitter discourse from this period—declarative, simplified, deal-focused commentary on news events. No deviation from baseline warranting concern.  ## Authorship Attribution  ### Stylometric Analysis  **Timestamp in Local Time:** 3:30 PM EST (New York) **Location likelihood:** New York (business day hours, deal-focused content)  ### Authentic Trump Indicators: STRONG - **Timing:** Afternoon but consistent with his posting patterns - **Style:** Stream-of-consciousness quality, minimal punctuation refinement - **Substance:** Deal-focused, economic nationalism—signature Trump themes - **Tone:** Confident pronouncement without hedging - **Formatting:** Lowercase "http" link, casual spacing - **Impulsive quality:** Quick reaction to previous day's news  ### Aide (Scavino) Indicators: MINIMAL - Correct spelling/grammar (but Trump capable of this in business contexts) - News-reactive (but Trump frequently commented on deals/business news)  **Confidence: HIGH (90%)** this is authentic Trump voice.  **Reasoning:** Content, style, themes, and tone all signature Trump. The deal-expertise framing, economic nationalism, and zero-sum thinking are core Trump worldview elements consistently present across verified authentic communications. While posted during business hours, the substance and style strongly indicate authentic authorship.  ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Techniques  ### Techniques Identified  1. **Appeal to Fear/Threat:** "China is making great deals on our backs" - frames legitimate business transaction as victimization  2. **Economic Nationalism:** "We" (Americans) vs. "they" (China) - tribal identification  3. **Selective Framing:** Emphasizes Chinese benefit, ignores that sale proceeds repay American taxpayers  4. **Implicit Contrast:** Unstated but clear: "I would negotiate better; I wouldn't let this happen"  5. **Simplification:** Reduces complex financial restructuring (helping AIG emerge from government ownership) to "China exploiting us"  6. **Moral Loading:** "On our backs" adds parasitism/exploitation connotation to neutral transaction  ### Propaganda Assessment **Intensity:** Moderate - Not overtly dehumanizing - No violent imagery - No call to action - Functions more as positioning/branding than mass mobilization  **Pattern:** Consistent with Trump's pre-political brand-building through economic nationalism commentary  ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion  **Gaslighting Present:** No - Not denying documented events - Not attacking others' perception of reality - Not DARVO pattern  **Reality Distortion:** Moderate - Transaction framed as "China acquiring from us" when actually: Chinese investors helping American company (AIG) restructure to repay American taxpayers - Factually grounded (deal happened) but interpretatively slanted - Omits key context: sale enables taxpayer repayment  **Distinction:** This is **selective framing** and **spin**, not gaslighting or delusional thinking. Standard political rhetoric exaggerating foreign threat for domestic audience.  ## Danger Assessment  **Danger Level:** NONE  **Rationale:** - No violent imagery or rhetoric - No dehumanization beyond economic competitor framing - No target identification for action - No mobilization language - Standard political/economic commentary  **Stochastic Terrorism Indicators:** Absent - No specific villain beyond abstract "China" - No articulated grievance requiring citizen action - No implied violence  ## Archetypal Analysis  ### Primary Archetype: The Watchman/Protector Trump casts himself as the vigilant guardian who sees threats others miss. Not yet the Hero/Savior (no offer to fix), but the Warner pointing out danger.  ### Shadow Projection Projects opportunism and transactional ruthlessness onto China—traits Trump celebrates in himself ("Art of the Deal") but condemns when others exercise them against American interests.  ### Mythological Resonance Invokes nationalist myth: America as innocent victim of shrewd foreigners. Appeals to audience desire for leader who "won't let them take advantage of us."  ## Order/Chaos Dynamics  ### Positioning: Order Attacker (Implicitly) Doesn't explicitly attack American leadership, but implies current order allows exploitation. Sets foundation for future "I alone can fix it" messaging.  ### Asymmetric Application - **American taxpayers:** Deserve protection, order, fair deals - **China:** Playing by different rules, taking advantage of American openness  ### Grievance Mapping **Grievance:** Foreign nations exploit American generosity/openness **Intensity:** Moderate (3/10)—annoyed commentary, not rage **Blamed:** China (primarily), implicitly weak American negotiators  ### Hierarchy Dynamics Implicitly challenges competence hierarchy—those negotiating deals aren't as savvy as they should be. Trump signals he belongs at top of "deal-making" hierarchy.  ## Fact Verification  ### Claim 1: "China is about to acquire a unit of AIG" **Verdict:** MOSTLY TRUE **Evidence:** On December 9, 2012, AIG announced agreement to sell 90% of ILFC to Chinese consortium led by New China Trust Co. **Nuance:** Not "China" (government) but Chinese private investors **Sources:** - [AIG to Sell ILFC to Chinese Group](https://www.cnbc.com/2012/12/09/aig-to-sell-ilfc-to-chinese-group-for-up-to-48-billion.html) - [AIG sells 90 pct of plane leasing unit](https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-aig-sells-90-pct-of-plane-leasing-unit-for-528b-2012dec09-story.html)  ### Claim 2: "For .5B" **Verdict:** MOSTLY TRUE **Evidence:** Deal valued ILFC at .28 billion; Chinese investors acquiring 80.1% for .23B with option for additional 9.9% **Nuance:** Trump rounded up slightly; .28B vs. .5B claimed **Assessment:** Within reasonable approximation range for casual commentary  ### Claim 3: "Which we bailed out" **Verdict:** TRUE **Evidence:** AIG received 82 billion government bailout during 2008 financial crisis, largest in U.S. history **Sources:** Public record, widely documented  ### Claim 4: "China is making great deals on our backs" **Verdict:** OPINION/HALF TRUE **Evidence:**  - Chinese investors paying market price for distressed asset - Sale proceeds help AIG repay taxpayer bailout - Could frame as "China helping American taxpayers get repaid" or "China acquiring valuable asset at crisis discount" **Assessment:** Interpretive framing, not factual claim. Zero-sum perspective ignores mutual benefit.

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "China is about to acquire a unit of AIG" | **Mostly True** | On December 9, 2012, AIG announced agreement to sell 90% of its aircraft leasing subsidiary ILFC to a Chinese consortium led by New China Trust Co., with P3 Investments and China Aviation Industrial Fund. Nuance: Not Chinese government but private Chinese investors. |
| "For .5B" | **Mostly True** | Deal valued ILFC at .28 billion, with Chinese investors acquiring 80.1% for .23 billion plus option for additional 9.9%. Trump rounded up slightly but within reasonable approximation range for casual commentary. |
| "Which we bailed out" | **True** | AIG received 82 billion government bailout during 2008 financial crisis, the largest in U.S. history. This is well-documented public record. |
| "China is making great deals on our backs" | **Half True** | This is interpretive framing rather than factual claim. Chinese investors paid market price for distressed asset; sale proceeds helped AIG repay taxpayer bailout. Could equally be framed as 'China helping American taxpayers get repaid' or 'China acquiring asset at crisis discount.' Zero-sum perspective ignores mutual benefit. Represents opinion/political spin rather than objectively verifiable fact. |

Overall Veracity: 78%

## Longitudinal Context & Pattern Analysis  ### Comparison to Same-Day Posts (Lord Sugar Attacks)  **Striking Contrast:** - **Lord Sugar tweets:** Highly personal, derogatory, ego-wounded, sustained attack - **AIG/China tweet:** Measured, policy-focused, educational tone  **Pattern Interpretation:** Trump demonstrates differential self-regulation: - **Personal slights** (Sugar's criticism) → Disinhibited rage, multiple attack tweets, name-calling - **Impersonal topics** (business deals, policy) → Controlled, strategic positioning  This suggests: 1. Intact capacity for self-regulation when ego not threatened 2. Dramatic dysregulation when narcissistic injury occurs 3. Cognitive control is preserved but emotionally contingent  ### Thematic Consistency (2012 Pattern)  This tweet exemplifies Trump's consistent 2012-era themes: - Economic nationalism - "America getting bad deals" - China as shrewd competitor - Implicit "I could do better" - Building authority on deal-making/business  **Developmental Note:** These tweets function as rehearsal for 2015-2016 campaign themes. The "China is ripping us off" narrative becomes central to his presidential announcement.  ### Deterioration Trajectory Assessment  **Finding:** No evidence of cognitive deterioration in this post - Language intact - Factual accuracy high - Logical coherence maintained - Temporal accuracy preserved  **Baseline Status (2012):** This represents Trump's normative communication style at age 66—simplified but coherent, strategically framed, factually grounded with interpretive spin.  ## Personality Profile Summary  ### Big Five Snapshot - **Extraversion:** 0.75 (assertive, dominant communication) - **Agreeableness:** 0.15 (suspicious, untrusting, competitive) - **Conscientiousness:** 0.60 (achievement-focused, but impulsive) - **Neuroticism:** 0.55 (moderate angry hostility, situation-dependent) - **Openness:** 0.30 (rigid values, closed to complexity)  **Dominant Facet:** Assertiveness (Extraversion) combined with low Trust (Agreeableness-reversed)  ### Motivational Profile - **Agency (Power):** 0.85 - Dominance, control, superiority demonstration - **Agency (Achievement):** 0.75 - Deal-making, winning, transaction success - **Communion:** 0.20 - Minimal, only tribal in-group identification  **Dominant Motive:** Power/Status through deal-making expertise demonstration  ### Narrative Identity Elements - **Protagonist Role:** Business savant, America's protector from bad deals - **Identity Claims:** Deal expertise, patriotic vigilance, truth-telling - **Contrasting Other:** Weak negotiators, foreign exploiters - **Narrative Sequence:** Contamination (American openness → exploitation)  ## Clinical Summary  **Clinically Significant?** NO - This post does not meet threshold for clinical significance summary.  **Rationale:**  - Represents normative Trump communication pattern from this period - No marked deviation from baseline - No dangerous content - Personality features evident but within range seen across his 2012 Twitter output - The contrast with Lord Sugar tweets is notable but represents known pattern (topic-dependent regulation) rather than new deterioration  **What IS significant:** The **differential regulation** pattern visible when comparing this policy-focused tweet to same-day personal attacks. This pattern—measured when discussing deals/policy, dysregulated when ego-threatened—becomes important for understanding his later political communication and threat assessment.  ## Parasocial Dynamics  **Techniques Employed:** 1. **Direct address:** "We" includes audience as in-group 2. **Shared grievance:** "Our backs" creates collective victimhood 3. **Expert guide:** "Let me show you what's really happening" 4. **Protective stance:** Watching out for "our" interests  **Effect:** Positions Trump as insider sharing privileged insight, creating intimacy through shared knowledge and tribal identification.  ## Key Takeaways for Research  1. **Baseline documentation:** This exemplifies Trump's 2012 normative style—important for later deterioration assessment  2. **Thematic continuity:** Economic nationalism and "bad deals" narrative fully formed 3+ years before presidential run  3. **Regulatory capacity:** Demonstrates intact self-control on impersonal topics, highlighting that dysregulation is trigger-dependent, not global  4. **Paranoid cognitive style:** Zero-sum thinking and threat attribution evident even in measured posts  5. **Narcissistic positioning:** Even without rage, maintains implicit superiority through expertise claims  6. **Pre-political identity:** Building "defender of American interests" brand years before political pivot  ---  **Confidence Levels:** - Authorship attribution: HIGH (90% authentic Trump) - Personality assessment: HIGH (clear trait markers) - Clinical assessment: MEDIUM-HIGH (based on single post, pattern emerging across day) - Danger assessment: HIGH (clearly no danger present) - Fact-checking: HIGH (well-documented public transaction)  **Recommended Follow-up:** Track evolution of China/trade rhetoric from 2012→2016 to document development of campaign narrative. Compare regulatory capacity on policy topics across time to assess whether topic-dependent control deteriorates.  ## Sources  - [AIG to Sell ILFC to Chinese Group for Up to .8 Billion](https://www.cnbc.com/2012/12/09/aig-to-sell-ilfc-to-chinese-group-for-up-to-48-billion.html) - [AIG sells 90 pct of plane leasing unit for .28B](https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-aig-sells-90-pct-of-plane-leasing-unit-for-528b-2012dec09-story.html) - [Chinese investors buying bulk of AIG unit](https://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/2012-12/11/content_16005898.htm)

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 90%)

### Indicators

- Deal-focused content aligns with Trump's signature business expertise positioning
- Economic nationalism theme consistent across verified Trump communications
- Zero-sum framing ('on our backs') matches Trump's worldview in authenticated posts
- Simple declarative style without hedging typical of Trump's voice
- Posted at 3:30 PM EST - afternoon but consistent with his active posting pattern

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (AIG-China deal announcement (Dec 9, 2012))

Sentiment: -0.45

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 55%
- Antisocial: 15%
- Paranoid: 65%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- splitting (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 65%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Direct address using 'we' and 'our' to create in-group tribal identification
- Expert guide positioning: 'Let me show you what's really happening that others miss'
- Shared grievance creation: 'our backs' establishes collective victimhood
- Protective stance: Implicitly watching out for 'our' interests as vigilant defender

## Fact Checks (4)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-14._

> China is about to acquire a unit of AIG

**MOSTLY TRUE**

On December 9, 2012, AIG announced agreement to sell 90% of its aircraft leasing subsidiary ILFC to a Chinese consortium led by New China Trust Co., with P3 Investments and China Aviation Industrial Fund. Nuance: Not Chinese government but private Chinese investors.

Sources: https://www.cnbc.com/2012/12/09/aig-to-sell-ilfc-to-chinese-group-for-up-to-48-billion.html; https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-aig-sells-90-pct-of-plane-leasing-unit-for-528b-2012dec09-story.html

> For .5B

**MOSTLY TRUE**

Deal valued ILFC at .28 billion, with Chinese investors acquiring 80.1% for .23 billion plus option for additional 9.9%. Trump rounded up slightly but within reasonable approximation range for casual commentary.

Sources: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-aig-sells-90-pct-of-plane-leasing-unit-for-528b-2012dec09-story.html

> Which we bailed out

**TRUE**

AIG received 82 billion government bailout during 2008 financial crisis, the largest in U.S. history. This is well-documented public record.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_International_Group

> China is making great deals on our backs

**HALF TRUE**

This is interpretive framing rather than factual claim. Chinese investors paid market price for distressed asset; sale proceeds helped AIG repay taxpayer bailout. Could equally be framed as 'China helping American taxpayers get repaid' or 'China acquiring asset at crisis discount.' Zero-sum perspective ignores mutual benefit. Represents opinion/political spin rather than objectively verifiable fact.

Sources: https://www.cnbc.com/2012/12/09/aig-to-sell-ilfc-to-chinese-group-for-up-to-48-billion.html

Overall Veracity: 78%

## Tags

- narcissistic_grandiosity (55%)
- paranoid_cognition (65%)
- low_agreeableness (85%)
- projection (60%)
- splitting (70%)
- economic_nationalism (90%)
- victimization_narrative (60%)
- expert_authority (75%)
- protector_role (70%)
- supply_seeking (80%)
- differential_regulation (85%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**The Sugar Assault: Narcissistic Rage Cycle with Strategic Credibility Management**

December 10, 2012 documents a sustained narcissistic rage episode targeting UK businessman Lord Alan Sugar, followed by strategic pivoting to business credibility. Trump executed a three-hour, six-post assault (10:14 AM - 1:07 PM EST) demonstrating core malignant narcissistic features: systematic devaluation, reality distortion (falsely claiming to own UK Apprentice), gratitude demands, and ultimate dehumanization. The trigger was Sugar's apparent criticism of Trump's Scotland golf course, activating narcissistic injury requiring overwhelming counterattack. Critically, Trump immediately pivoted post-rage to credibility management: announcing Tiffany's/McDonald's stock purchases, China policy commentary, and normalcy signaling. This controlled termination suggests strategic emotional regulation rather than dysregulation. The day also reveals proto-political messaging—three posts on China's economic advantage establish the zero-sum worldview that would define his 2016 campaign four years later. No hypomanic episode detected: 21 posts across 8 business hours (10 AM - 6 PM) represent normal activity with strategic clustering. Cognitive baseline stable with no decline markers. The day captures Trump's personality organization at age 66: malignant narcissism (0.85), wealth-based hierarchical dominance, and capacity for instrumental rage deployment followed by sophisticated reputation management.

Full digest for 2012-12-10: https://trump.fm/date/2012-12-10/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2012, December 10). China is about to acquire a unit of AIG, which we... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "China is about to acquire a unit of AIG, which we bailed..." X (Twitter), 10 Dec. 2012. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "China is about to acquire a unit of AIG, which we bailed...," X (Twitter), December 10, 2012, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_278235379344220161
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_278235379344220161
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_278235379344220161
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2012-12-10
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_278235379344220161.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._