# Post x_253516010974507008

- Post ID: `x_253516010974507008`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2012-10-03T15:25:01.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_253516010974507008.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor & great leader--then dumped him like a dog!

## Engagement

- Likes: 37
- Reposts: 219
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.265Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-11T21:53:34.609Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This debate-day post exemplifies Trump's opportunistic political attacks employing projection, splitting, and dehumanizing language. Posted hours before the first Obama-Romney debate, it strategically attempts to prime negative character associations with Obama by resurrecting the 2008 Reverend Wright controversy. The phrase "dumped him like a dog" is psychologically revealing: Trump projects onto Obama his own documented pattern of severing relationships when they cease serving his interests. His biography features numerous abandoned partnerships, marriages, and business relationships, making this attack particularly laden with psychological significance. The vehemence of contempt suggests personal relevance rather than purely strategic messaging.  The post employs splitting defense—creating binary moral judgment (Obama = bad betrayer) while erasing contextual complexity. Wright had made genuinely inflammatory statements ("God damn America," blaming U.S. for 9/11) that created legitimate political and moral crisis. Obama's response was gradual: denouncing statements, then Wright personally, then leaving the church over several months. Trump's framing removes this context entirely, transforming legitimate response into "betrayal."  The dehumanizing language ("like a dog") reveals sadistic element—evident pleasure in crafting maximally damaging characterization that strips dignity from both Obama (as cruel abandoner) and Wright (as discarded animal). This represents moderate-level malignant narcissism: grandiosity (positioning as moral arbiter), lack of empathy (no acknowledgment of Obama's difficult position), interpersonal exploitation (opportunistic timing), and ego-syntonic sadism (delight in dehumanizing language).  Rhetorically sophisticated despite simplicity: vivid metaphor creates visceral emotional response, strategic timing maximizes impact, and selective framing transforms complex situation into intuitive betrayal narrative requiring no background knowledge. The post demonstrates Trump's skill at political attack—distilling complexity into punchy, shareable condemnation—while revealing his characteristic psychological patterns: projection, transactional relationship view, and contempt for those who display loyalty conflicts he experiences but cannot acknowledge.

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Post on Obama and Rev. Wright (October 3, 2012)  ## Context  This post was published on **October 3, 2012 at 15:25 UTC (11:25 AM EDT)**, the day of the first Obama-Romney presidential debate. Trump was 66 years old and likely in New York City, his primary residence. The post references the 2008 Jeremiah Wright controversy, which had erupted in March 2008 when ABC News revealed controversial sermons by Obama's longtime pastor. Obama ultimately denounced Wright's statements and left Trinity United Church in May 2008.  The timing is significant: this post went out mere hours before the critical first presidential debate in Denver that evening, which Romney would decisively win. Trump was actively tweeting throughout the day about the Obama administration (Fast and Furious, national debt, UN aesthetics), suggesting heightened political engagement during campaign season.  ## Authorship Attribution  **Assessment: Authentic Trump (High Confidence)**  **Timestamp analysis:** Posted at 11:25 AM EDT on a Wednesday—mid-business hours—which might initially suggest aide authorship. However, the stylistic markers overwhelmingly indicate authentic Trump.  **Authentic Trump indicators present:** - **Vivid, visceral imagery:** "dumped him like a dog" is quintessential Trump vernacular—colloquial, direct, and employing animal metaphor - **Attack pattern:** Personal character attack rather than policy critique - **Emotional tone:** Contemptuous judgment rather than neutral reporting - **Syntactic structure:** Simple compound sentence with dramatic emphasis - **Thematic consistency:** Part of sustained anti-Obama messaging throughout the day  **Aide indicators absent:** - No event announcement or schedule information - No professional polish or careful wording - No grammatical formality  Trump was highly active on Twitter in 2012 during business hours, particularly when politically engaged. The Celebrity Apprentice Season 12 had concluded its finale in May 2012, so he was not filming during this period. This post fits his pattern of political commentary timed around campaign events.  ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)  **Extraversion (Assertive facet):** High - Forceful public condemnation, seeking to shape public discourse **Agreeableness:** Very Low - **Trust (reversed):** Implies Obama's relationship with Wright was duplicitous - **Tender-mindedness (reversed):** The phrase "dumped him like a dog" shows callousness, dehumanizing both Obama (as one who discards loyalty) and Wright (as the discarded) - **Modesty (reversed):** Positioning self as moral arbiter who exposes hypocrisy  **Conscientiousness (Deliberation, reversed):** Moderate-Low - Timing suggests opportunistic rather than strategic thinking; posting during business hours about 4-year-old controversy **Neuroticism (Angry hostility):** Moderate - Contemptuous tone but controlled expression **Openness (Values rigidity):** Low - Black-and-white moral framing, no acknowledgment of complexity in human relationships  ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations (Motives & Goals)  **Dominant motive: Power/Status** - Goal: Damage Obama's reputation on debate day - Method: Character attack questioning loyalty and integrity - Framing: Obama as disloyal betrayer  **Agency themes:** - Positioning as truth-teller exposing hidden character flaws - Asserting moral authority to judge others' relationships - Attempting to influence election narrative  **Schemas evident:** **Self-concept:** Discerning observer who sees through political facades **View of Obama:** Opportunist who discards people when politically convenient; lacking genuine loyalty **View of political relationships:** Transactional rather than authentic; "friends" are disposable  **Projection dynamic:** The attack on Obama for allegedly abandoning a relationship may reflect Trump's own transactional approach to relationships. Trump's business history includes numerous instances of severing ties when advantageous. The vehemence suggests psychological relevance.  ## Level 3: Narrative Identity  **Protagonist role:** **Moral arbiter / Exposer of hypocrisy** Trump casts himself as someone who sees through Obama's pretenses and reveals character flaws others miss or ignore.  **Identity claims:**  - "I see what others don't" - "I speak uncomfortable truths" - "I judge others by their loyalty"  **Contrasting other:** Obama, portrayed as: - Disloyal ("dumped him") - Hypocritical (called Wright "friend, counselor & great leader" then abandoned him) - Cruel ("like a dog")  **Narrative sequence:** Contamination sequence imposed on Obama's story - Good: Obama had meaningful spiritual relationship ("friend, counselor & great leader") - Bad: Obama betrayed that relationship for political expediency - Moral: Obama's character is fundamentally flawed  **Note on accuracy:** The post accurately reflects that Obama did distance himself from Wright after the 2008 controversy. However, the characterization as "dumping like a dog" frames a complex political/moral decision as simple betrayal, erasing context (Wright's genuinely inflammatory statements about 9/11 and "God damn America").  ## Level 4: Clinical Analysis  ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment  **A. Narcissistic Features: Moderate** - Grandiosity: Implicit (positioning as moral authority) - Interpersonal exploitation: Yes (opportunistic timing to damage opponent) - Lack of empathy: Yes (no acknowledgment of Obama's difficult position; contemptuous toward Wright) - Arrogance: Moderate (judgmental certainty)  **B. Antisocial Features: Low-Moderate** - Deceitfulness: Moderate (framing is misleading, omitting that Wright made genuinely controversial statements) - Disregard for others' rights: Mild (attack on public figure in political context)  **C. Paranoid Features: Low in this post** - No persecution themes present  **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism: Mild** - The phrase "like a dog" carries dehumanizing contempt - Pleasure in creating damaging narrative visible in phrasing  **Overall malignant narcissism indicators: Moderate** (primarily narcissistic and antisocial features)  ### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger type: Opportunistic Attack (Political)** - Primary: Debate-day opportunity to damage opponent - Secondary: Possible vicarious identification with "betrayed" Wright (projection)  **Narcissistic state: Grandiose** - Confident, assertive, morally superior positioning - No defensive or wounded quality  **Narcissistic rage: Absent** - Tone is contemptuous but controlled - Not a response to personal injury  ### Defense Mechanisms  **Primary: Projection (Immature/Level 2)** Trump attributes to Obama a quality (disloyalty/abandonment of relationships when convenient) that characterizes his own documented pattern of behavior. Trump's business career features numerous instances of severing partnerships, marriages, and professional relationships.  **Secondary: Splitting (Immature/Level 2)** Binary moral framework: Obama is "bad" for abandoning Wright, with no acknowledgment of: - Wright's genuinely inflammatory statements - The political impossibility of maintaining the association - The complexity of balancing personal relationships with public responsibility  **Tertiary: Devaluation (Immature/Level 2)** "Like a dog" is dehumanizing language that strips dignity from both the abandoner and the abandoned.  ### Cognitive Status  **Language production:** Normal for Trump - Simple syntax - Vivid colloquial metaphor ("like a dog") - Clear communication of intended message  **Complexity:** Typical 2012 Trump baseline - Single compound sentence - Clear logical structure (A called B friend, then A dumped B) - No word-finding difficulties or paraphasias  **Content coherence:** Logical and goal-directed - Factually rooted (Obama did distance from Wright) - Strategically timed (debate day)  **Baseline comparison:** This represents Trump's characteristic 2012 Twitter style: punchy, confrontational, metaphorical. No cognitive concerns.  ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis  **Devices employed:** 1. **Ad hominem:** Character attack rather than policy critique 2. **Selective framing:** Omits context (Wright's controversial statements that necessitated distancing) 3. **Emotional appeal:** "Like a dog" evokes visceral negative reaction 4. **Hyperbole:** "Dumped" suggests cruelty beyond what separation from church membership entails 5. **Timing/opportunism:** Released on debate day to maximize impact  **Dehumanizing language:** Yes - "Like a dog" reduces human relationship to animal treatment - Strips dignity from Obama (as betrayer) and Wright (as discarded)  **Violent imagery:** No  **Propaganda techniques:** - **Character assassination:** Attacking personal integrity - **Simplification:** Complex political/moral decision reduced to "betrayal" - **Repetition of narrative:** Part of broader "Obama is dishonest" messaging  **Effectiveness:** Moderate - Memorable phrasing ("like a dog") - Targets existing concerns about Obama's judgment - However, reaching limited audience (Trump had ~1.4M followers in Oct 2012)  ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion  **Reality distortion level: Moderate**  **Distortion present:** The post presents Obama's separation from Wright as purely opportunistic betrayal, erasing the legitimacy of Obama's position. Wright had said: - "God damn America" (not "God bless America") - Suggested U.S. brought 9/11 on itself through "terrorism" - Made inflammatory statements about race  Obama faced genuine political and moral necessity to distance himself. Framing this as "dumping like a dog" distorts the context and Obama's agency in responding to a real crisis.  **Technique:** **Selective context removal** By omitting Wright's statements that triggered the break, Trump makes Obama's decision appear arbitrary and cruel rather than responsive to genuine controversy.  **Gaslighting indicators:** Mild - Suggests relationship was betrayed rather than ended for cause - Relies on audience forgetting or not knowing Wright's actual statements  ## Archetypal Analysis  **Primary archetype: The Trickster** Trump operates as disruptor on debate day, throwing historical controversy into current discourse, breaking decorum norms of avoiding race-related religious controversies.  **Secondary archetype: The Judge** Moral arbiter who condemns Obama's character, positioning above the fray with authority to declare guilt.  **Shadow projection:** Trump projects his own pattern (transactional relationships, severing ties when convenient) onto Obama. The intensity of contempt ("like a dog") suggests psychological relevance—Trump may be attacking in Obama what he cannot acknowledge in himself.  **Mythological resonance:** The "betrayer" narrative taps into deep cultural fear of disloyalty, Judas archetype, evoking visceral moral response.  ## Order/Chaos Dynamics  **Positioning: Chaos agent** - Disrupts debate-day narrative - Resurrects resolved 2008 controversy - Introduces racial/religious tension into political discourse  **Hierarchy dynamics:** - Attempts to lower Obama's status (moral betrayer) - Elevates own status (discerning truth-teller)  **Grievance:** Implicit - Obama is "getting away with" hidden character flaws - Mainstream media not questioning Obama's loyalty/character - (Evidenced by earlier same-day posts criticizing media coverage)  ## Danger Assessment  **Danger level: None**  **Rationale:** - Standard political attack during campaign season - No calls to action - No dehumanization suggesting violence - No target identification beyond public political figure - Historical reference, not present threat  **Flags:** None  ## Fact-Checking  **Claim 1:** "Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor & great leader"  **Verdict:** **Mostly True**  **Evidence:** Obama did have a long-standing relationship with Wright. In his 2006 book *The Audacity of Hope*, Obama wrote about Wright's influence. Wright officiated Obama's wedding, baptized his children, and served as his pastor for 20 years at Trinity United Church of Christ. Obama has referred to Wright in warm terms prior to the 2008 controversy.  **Sources:** - [Jeremiah Wright controversy - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy) - [Obama And The Rev. Wright Controversy - FiveThirtyEight](https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/obama-and-the-rev-wright-controversy-what-really-happened/)  **Claim 2:** "Then dumped him like a dog"  **Verdict:** **Half True**  **Evidence:** Obama did distance himself from Wright, ultimately leaving Trinity United Church in May 2008. However, "dumped him like a dog" is inflammatory framing that omits crucial context:  1. **Wright's controversial statements** included "God damn America" and suggesting the U.S. brought 9/11 on itself 2. **Obama's response was gradual:** He first denounced statements but not Wright personally (March 2008), then spoke more forcefully after Wright's media appearances (April 2008), then left the church (May 2008) 3. **Political and moral necessity:** The separation was response to genuine controversy, not arbitrary betrayal  The characterization as callous abandonment ("like a dog") misrepresents the situation's complexity and erases Obama's legitimate reasons.  **Sources:** - [Jeremiah Wright controversy - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy) - [Obama's Pastor: God Damn America - ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/DemocraticDebate/story?id=4443788&page=1) - [Obama Seeks to Quell Furor Over Former Pastor - PBS](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/obama-seeks-to-quell-furor-over-former-pastor)  ## Personality Psychology Summary  ### Big Five Profile (This Post) - **Extraversion:** 0.75 (assertive, dominant communication) - **Agreeableness:** 0.15 (low trust, low tender-mindedness, contemptuous) - **Conscientiousness:** 0.40 (opportunistic rather than deliberative) - **Neuroticism:** 0.50 (angry hostility present but controlled) - **Openness:** 0.25 (rigid moral framing)  **Dominant facet:** Low Agreeableness/High Antagonism (contemptuous judgment of others' relationships)  ### Motives - **Agency:** 0.80 (dominance, status elevation) - **Communion:** 0.10 (no relational warmth, connection) - **Dominant motive:** Power (influencing political narrative, damaging opponent)  ### Narrative Identity - **Protagonist role:** Moral arbiter who exposes hidden character flaws - **Identity claims:** "I see through facades," "I speak hard truths about loyalty" - **Contrasting other:** Obama as disloyal betrayer - **Narrative sequence:** Contamination (imposing betrayal narrative on Obama)  ### Parasocial Techniques 1. **Direct address tone:** Speaking to audience as insider sharing revelation 2. **Moral certainty:** Inviting audience to share judgment 3. **Enemy construction:** Building shared opposition to Obama 4. **Simplification:** Making complex situation feel intuitively understandable  ## Clinical Significance  **Summary:** This post demonstrates Trump's characteristic pattern of opportunistic political attacks employing projection, splitting, and dehumanizing language. Posted on the day of the first Obama-Romney debate, it exemplifies his strategic use of character assassination while revealing his transactional view of relationships.  **Clinically significant patterns:** 1. **Projection of own traits:** Attacking Obama for abandoning relationships, which characterizes Trump's own documented pattern 2. **Splitting defense:** Binary moral judgment erasing contextual complexity 3. **Dehumanizing language:** "Like a dog" reduces human dignity 4. **Sadistic pleasure:** Evident in phrasing choice 5. **Lack of empathy:** No acknowledgment of Obama's difficult position or Wright's actual statements  **Longitudinal context:** This represents Trump's 2012 baseline—politically engaged, antagonistic toward Obama, employing vivid colloquial attacks. The cognitive complexity and language production are typical for this period, showing no markers of decline. The psychological patterns (projection, splitting, contempt, transactional relationship view) are consistent with his established personality structure.  **Deviation from baseline:** None. This is characteristic Trump political messaging from this period.  ---  ## Research Sources  ### Context & Timeline - [Jeremiah Wright controversy - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy) - [Opinion: Revisiting Obama's Rev. Wright Controversy - CBS](https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/revisiting-obamas-rev-wright-controversy/) - [Obama's Pastor: God Damn America - ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/DemocraticDebate/story?id=4443788&page=1) - [Obama And The Rev. Wright Controversy - FiveThirtyEight](https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/obama-and-the-rev-wright-controversy-what-really-happened/) - [PolitiFact | Gingrich: Obama got a 'pass' on Rev. Wright controversy](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/jan/06/newt-gingrich/gingrich-obama-got-pass-rev-wright-controversy/)  ### October 2012 Campaign Context - [2012 United States presidential debates - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_presidential_debates) - [Transcript: First Obama-Romney Presidential Debate - NPR](https://www.npr.org/2012/10/03/162258551/transcript-first-obama-romney-presidential-debate) - [October 3, 2012 Debate Transcript - Commission on Presidential Debates](https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/october-3-2012-debate-transcript/) - [Romney's Strong Debate Performance Erases Obama's Lead - Pew Research](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/10/08/romneys-strong-debate-performance-erases-obamas-lead/) - [2012 United States presidential election - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_presidential_election)

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor & great leader" | **Mostly True** | Obama did have a 20-year relationship with Wright, who officiated his wedding, baptized his children, and served as his pastor. Obama wrote about Wright's influence in his 2006 book 'The Audacity of Hope' and referred to him in warm terms prior to the 2008 controversy. |
| "Then dumped him like a dog" | **Half True** | Obama did distance himself from Wright, leaving Trinity United Church in May 2008. However, this characterization omits crucial context: Wright made genuinely controversial statements ('God damn America,' suggesting U.S. brought 9/11 on itself), and Obama's response was gradual—first denouncing statements (March 2008), then speaking more forcefully after Wright's media appearances (April 2008), then leaving the church (May 2008). The separation was a response to genuine controversy, not arbitrary abandonment. The phrase 'like a dog' is inflammatory framing that misrepresents the situation's complexity. |

Overall Veracity: 65%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 95%)

### Indicators

- Vivid colloquial metaphor ('like a dog') characteristic of Trump
- Personal character attack rather than policy critique
- Simple, punchy syntax with dramatic emphasis
- Contemptuous emotional tone
- Part of sustained same-day anti-Obama messaging pattern

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Preemptive Attack (First Obama-Romney presidential debate (same day))

Sentiment: -0.75

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 65%
- Antisocial: 45%
- Paranoid: 20%
- Sadism: 40%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- splitting (immature)
- devaluation (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 65%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Direct address tone speaking to audience as insider sharing revelation
- Moral certainty inviting audience to share judgment
- Enemy construction building shared opposition to Obama
- Simplification making complex situation feel intuitively understandable

## Danger Assessment

**NONE**

### Gaslighting

- Selective context removal: omits Wright's inflammatory statements that necessitated Obama's distancing
- Reality distortion: frames legitimate political/moral response as arbitrary betrayal
- Emotional manipulation: 'like a dog' phrase designed to override rational assessment of situation
- Suggests relationship was betrayed without cause rather than ended for documented reasons

**Dehumanizing Language Present**

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-11._

> Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor & great leader

**MOSTLY TRUE**

Obama did have a 20-year relationship with Wright, who officiated his wedding, baptized his children, and served as his pastor. Obama wrote about Wright's influence in his 2006 book 'The Audacity of Hope' and referred to him in warm terms prior to the 2008 controversy.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy; https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/obama-and-the-rev-wright-controversy-what-really-happened/

> Then dumped him like a dog

**HALF TRUE**

Obama did distance himself from Wright, leaving Trinity United Church in May 2008. However, this characterization omits crucial context: Wright made genuinely controversial statements ('God damn America,' suggesting U.S. brought 9/11 on itself), and Obama's response was gradual—first denouncing statements (March 2008), then speaking more forcefully after Wright's media appearances (April 2008), then leaving the church (May 2008). The separation was a response to genuine controversy, not arbitrary abandonment. The phrase 'like a dog' is inflammatory framing that misrepresents the situation's complexity.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy; https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/DemocraticDebate/story?id=4443788&page=1; https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/obama-seeks-to-quell-furor-over-former-pastor

Overall Veracity: 65%

## Tags

- projection (90%)
- splitting (80%)
- devaluation (75%)
- ad_hominem (85%)
- dehumanizing_language (80%)
- character_assassination (90%)
- selective_framing (85%)
- grandiose_state (70%)
- low_agreeableness (85%)
- power_motive (80%)
- reverend_wright (100%)
- obama_attack (100%)
- 2012_campaign (90%)
- debate_day (95%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Debate-Day Barrage: Trump Launches Sustained Anti-Obama Offensive Anchored by Racial Accusations**

Trump spent the day in full political combat mode ahead of the first Obama-Romney presidential debate. He fired off a steady stream of attacks on Obama covering the national debt, foreign policy weakness on China, and the Arab Spring, but the sharpest thread was a repeated accusation that Obama is "a racist" based on a resurfaced 2007 speech. Between political salvos, he worked in self-promotional asides about his daughter Ivanka's Wharton award, an offer to renovate the UN's marble walls, and his Scottish golf course. The mood was uniformly confident and combative throughout a busy but entirely daytime posting window, with no signs of emotional instability or cognitive concern.

Full digest for 2012-10-03: https://trump.fm/date/2012-10-03/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2012, October 3). Obama called Reverend Wright his friend,... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor &..." X (Twitter), 3 Oct. 2012. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "Obama called Reverend Wright his friend, counselor &...," X (Twitter), October 3, 2012, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_253516010974507008
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_253516010974507008
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_253516010974507008
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2012-10-03
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_253516010974507008.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._