# Post x_236496649038491648

- Post ID: `x_236496649038491648`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2012-08-17T16:16:09.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_236496649038491648.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> .@DineshDSouza had to give $1,000 to @BarackObama's brother for his child's hospital bill  http://t.co/IqYuz9zS  Isn't that disgraceful?

## Engagement

- Likes: 24
- Reposts: 232
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.269Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-10T21:55:49.695Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This post exemplifies Trump's 2012 political psychology: instrumental exploitation of human suffering (sick child) for strategic attack on Obama. Trump amplifies conservative narrative about filmmaker D'Souza paying medical bills for Obama's half-brother's child, asking "Isn't that disgraceful?"  Psychologically significant for demonstrating **projection defense**—Trump accuses Obama of callousness while showing identical callousness (child is mere political prop). Also exhibits **splitting** (D'Souza=all good, Obama=all bad) and **antisocial features** (disregard for child's privacy/dignity in service of narcissistic goal).  **Malignant narcissism indicators**: Moderate narcissistic features (grandiose moral authority, lack of empathy), mild-moderate antisocial features (instrumental use of vulnerable parties), moderate sadism (pleasure in Obama's embarrassment). No rage—this is calculated opportunism, not emotional response.  **Trait profile**: Very low agreeableness (exploits tragedy without compassion), high extraversion (public confrontation), low openness (simplistic moral framing of complex situation).  **Motive**: Power/agency dominant—weaponizing available ammunition against political enemy.  **Rhetorical effectiveness**: Skilled use of rhetorical question creates false intimacy and invites audience to adopt his judgment. Transforms callous exploitation into righteous truth-telling.  **Clinical significance**: Documents baseline template for Trump's anti-Obama attacks—find vulnerability, simplify to moral failing, invite condemnation, express zero empathy for collateral damage. This pattern would intensify and eventually fuel his political rise. The willingness to instrumentalize vulnerable parties reveals the antisocial dimension of his narcissistic personality functioning.

## Clinical Psychological Analysis: Trump Post on D'Souza/Obama Brother Incident  ### Context This post references conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza paying ,000 for medical treatment of George Obama's (Barack Obama's half-brother in Kenya) sick child after George contacted D'Souza directly. D'Souza had interviewed George for his anti-Obama documentary "2016: Obama's America," released in August 2012. The incident was widely publicized in conservative media as evidence of alleged hypocrisy by President Obama.  ### Authorship Attribution **Assessment: Authentic Trump (HIGH confidence)**  **Timestamp analysis:** Posted at 16:16:09 UTC (12:16pm EDT if Trump was in New York). This is midday posting during business hours, which typically suggests aide authorship. However, the stylistic markers strongly override timing:  **Authentic Trump indicators:** - Rhetorical question ending ("Isn't that disgraceful?") - classic Trump device for audience engagement - Use of @ mentions to create public confrontation/shaming - Emotional framing with moral judgment ("disgraceful") - Opportunistic amplification of conservative talking point - Tone consistent with Trump's authentic voice from this period  **Scoring:** 0.85 (high probability Trump himself)  The post exhibits Trump's characteristic style despite business-hours timing. In 2012, Trump's tweeting patterns were less rigidly bifurcated between personal/aide posts than in later years.  ### Level 1: Big Five Trait Analysis  **Agreeableness: Very Low (Facets: Trust-, Modesty-, Tender-mindedness-)** - Exploits a human tragedy (sick child) for political point-scoring - No expression of concern for the child's welfare - Weaponizes charitable act to attack political opponent - Evidence: "Isn't that disgraceful?" frames Obama as villain rather than expressing compassion for child or praising D'Souza's generosity  **Extraversion: High (Facets: Assertiveness+, Excitement-seeking+)** - Public confrontation via @ mention - Amplifies controversy for attention - Evidence: Direct tagging of both D'Souza and Obama ensures maximum visibility and engagement  **Openness: Low (Facets: Values rigidity)** - Simplistic moral framing (good/bad, disgraceful/not) - No acknowledgment of complexity (family estrangement, international logistics, privacy) - Evidence: Reduces nuanced situation to single moral judgment  **Conscientiousness: Low-Moderate (Facets: Deliberation-)** - Impulsive sharing of politically advantageous narrative without apparent reflection on ethical implications - No fact-checking visible (accepts conservative narrative uncritically)  ### Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations  **Dominant Motives:** - **Power (Agency):** 9/10 - Using others' actions/circumstances as weapon against political enemy - **Status:** 8/10 - Positioning self as moral arbiter, aligned with "right" side - **Achievement:** 3/10 - Not personal accomplishment  **Goals evident in post:** 1. Damage Obama's reputation 2. Amplify conservative narrative 3. Position self as Obama critic 4. Generate engagement/controversy  **Schemas revealed:** - **View of Obama:** Uncaring, hypocritical, fails basic family obligations - **View of self:** Moral judge, truth-teller exposing hypocrisy - **View of world:** Partisan battlefield where ammunition (even sick children) should be deployed  ### Level 3: Narrative Identity  **Protagonist Role:** **Truth-Teller / Moral Exposer** Trump casts himself as someone willing to highlight uncomfortable truths that mainstream media allegedly ignores. The rhetorical question positions him as asking what "everyone" should be asking.  **Identity Claims:** - "I'm not afraid to criticize the President" - "I see through hypocrisy others ignore" - "I'll use any legitimate weapon in political combat"  **Contrasting Other:** Barack Obama (directly named) Obama is cast as hypocrite who preaches helping the poor while neglecting own family in crisis. This is contamination sequence imposed on Obama: Presents as caring leader → exposed as uncaring to own brother.  **Narrative Sequence:** Exposure narrative (hidden truth revealed)  ### Level 4: Clinical Indicators  #### Malignant Narcissism Assessment (Kernberg)  **A. Narcissistic Features: MODERATE** - Grandiose moral authority (right to judge President's family dynamics publicly) - Lack of empathy for all parties (sick child, estranged brother, President navigating complex family situation) - Interpersonal exploitation (using child's illness as political weapon) - Score: 6/10  **B. Antisocial Features: MILD-MODERATE** - Callous disregard for privacy and dignity of sick child being used as political prop - Instrumental manipulation of human suffering - Score: 4/10  **C. Paranoid Features: MINIMAL** - No paranoid content in this post - Score: 1/10  **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism: MODERATE** - Evident pleasure in creating embarrassment/pain for Obama - The rhetorical question invites audience to join in shaming - Using vulnerable parties (sick child, impoverished half-brother) to inflict reputational damage - Score: 5/10  **Overall Malignant Narcissism Indicators:** Present but not extreme in this post. The willingness to weaponize a child's medical crisis shows callousness characteristic of the construct.  #### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger Type:** Supply-seeking + Opportunistic attack - Not responding to personal injury - Amplifying existing conservative narrative for engagement - Opportunistically piling onto Obama during election season  **Narcissistic State:** Grandiose - Elevated moral position - Confident assertion of judgment - No vulnerability or defensiveness  **Narcissistic Rage:** Absent - This is calculated political attack, not rage response - Tone is performative outrage ("disgraceful") rather than personal fury  #### Defense Mechanisms  **Projection (Immature - Level 2):** Trump projects moral failing onto Obama. The implicit accusation is callous disregard for family/suffering, yet Trump himself shows zero compassion for the sick child—only interest in the political utility of the situation.  **Rationalization (Neurotic - Level 3):** The post rationalizes political exploitation of personal tragedy by framing it as legitimate moral concern ("Isn't that disgraceful?"). This transforms callous opportunism into righteous truth-telling.  **Splitting (Immature - Level 2):** D'Souza = all good (generous, caring) Obama = all bad (disgraceful, uncaring) No acknowledgment of complexity in either characterization.  ### Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis  **Devices Employed:** 1. **Rhetorical question** - "Isn't that disgraceful?" (invites audience agreement, pre-judges answer) 2. **Moral framing** - Uses emotionally charged term "disgraceful" without argument 3. **Guilt by association/omission** - Implies Obama's responsibility for brother's poverty without establishing basis 4. **Amplification** - Spreads conservative talking point to broader audience 5. **False intimacy** - Rhetorical question creates "we all agree" dynamic with audience 6. **Ad hominem** - Attacks Obama's character rather than policies 7. **Exploitative imagery** - Sick child as prop for political point  **Propaganda Techniques:** - **Appeal to emotion** - Moral disgust ("disgraceful"), implied child suffering - **Simplification** - Complex family/international situation reduced to moral failing - **Bandwagon** - Rhetorical question assumes consensus ("isn't that...") - **Transfer** - Associates Obama with neglect, suffering, hypocrisy  **Dehumanizing Language:** Not present (target not dehumanized, but exploited)  **Violent Imagery:** Absent  **Assessment:** Classic political attack rhetoric leveraging human interest story. The sophistication is moderate—effective use of rhetorical question and moral framing.  #### Gaslighting & Reality Distortion  **Present: LOW-MODERATE**  The post engages in mild reality distortion by: 1. **Implying facts not in evidence:** That Obama has responsibility for adult half-brother's finances or should have known about medical crisis 2. **Omitting context:** George Obama and Barack had minimal relationship; George lived independently in Kenya; Obama may not have been informed; family medical privacy considerations 3. **False moral clarity:** Presents as simple moral failing what is actually complex family situation across international boundaries  This isn't classic gaslighting (no denial of documented reality or attack on others' perceptions), but it is tendentious framing that distorts through selective omission.  ### Psychological State Assessment  **Emotional Valence:** Negative (critical, judgmental) **Arousal Level:** Moderate (engaged but not agitated) **Dominant Affect:** Contempt (toward Obama), moral superiority **Cognitive State:** Instrumental/strategic (using available ammunition)  This post shows Trump in **opportunistic attack mode** during the 2012 election cycle. He's not emotionally dysregulated; he's strategically amplifying a narrative that damages an adversary. The psychological stance is elevated (moral judge) rather than defensive or wounded.  ### Cognitive Status  **Language Production:** Normal for Trump baseline - No word-finding difficulty - No paraphasias or neologisms - Syntax clear and complete - Coherent logical structure (if-then: if brother needed money, then Obama disgraceful)  **Complexity:** Typical for Trump's Twitter communication - Simple declarative + rhetorical question structure - Vocabulary age-appropriate - Argument simplistic but intentionally so (Twitter format)  **Baseline Comparison:** Consistent with Trump's 2012 communication patterns. This period predates any documented cognitive decline concerns. Language is controlled and purposeful.  **Assessment:** No cognitive markers of concern. Baseline-consistent.  ### Fact-Checking  **Claim 1:** "Dinesh D'Souza had to give ,000 to @BarackObama's brother for his child's hospital bill"  **Verdict:** MOSTLY TRUE  **Evidence:** Multiple sources confirm D'Souza sent ,000 via Western Union to George Obama for medical treatment of George's sick child with a chest condition. D'Souza verified the situation with a nurse before sending money.  **Qualification:** The word "had to" is editorializing—D'Souza chose to help; he wasn't obligated. Also, "brother" should be "half-brother" for precision.  **Sources:** - [TheBlaze: D'Souza Says He Paid Hospital Bill for Obama's Half-Brother](https://www.theblaze.com/news/2012/08/16/i-have-no-one-else-to-ask-dinesh-dsouza-says-he-paid-hospital-bill-for-obamas-half-brother) - [Newsmax: D'Souza Sends Money to President Obama's Brother](https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/DSouza-George-Obama-brother/2012/08/16/id/448863/) - [Fox News: How I Became George Obama's 'Brother'](https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/how-i-became-george-obamas-brother)  **Claim 2:** [Implied] "This situation is disgraceful [on Obama's part]"  **Verdict:** OPINION/UNVERIFIABLE  This is subjective moral judgment. The factual basis (D'Souza paid, Obama apparently didn't) is established, but whether this constitutes "disgrace" depends on: - Barack's knowledge of the situation - The nature of Barack and George's relationship (they had minimal contact) - George's own agency and choices - Cultural/familial expectations across international boundaries - Privacy and boundaries in extended family medical situations  **Assessment:** Trump presents opinion as self-evident fact through rhetorical framing.  ### Danger Assessment  **Level: NONE**  - No violent imagery or language - No dehumanization of targets - No calls to action - No eliminationist rhetoric - Standard political attack during election cycle - No stochastic terrorism indicators  **Flags:** None  This is conventional political opportunism, not danger signaling.  ### Archetypal Analysis  **Primary Archetype: SHADOW PROJECTOR**  Trump positions himself as exposer of Obama's shadow—the caring, compassionate public figure who allegedly neglects his own family. This is classic shadow projection because:  1. **Trump shows identical callousness** - He expresses zero concern for the sick child, only interest in political damage to Obama 2. **Projects his own trait** - The very callousness he demonstrates (instrumentalizing child's suffering) is what he accuses Obama of (not caring about family member)  **Secondary Archetype: TRICKSTER**  Trump acts as trickster by gleefully spreading embarrassing story, disrupting Obama's carefully managed public image during campaign season.  **Mythological Pattern:** The Revealer of Hidden Shame  This invokes the archetype of the figure who exposes the king's secret unworthiness—what the king hides, the trickster reveals.  ### Order and Chaos Dynamics  **Positioning:** Order attacker (attacking Obama's moral legitimacy)  **The implicit claim:** Obama presents orderly, caring image but is chaos underneath (neglects family). Trump positions himself as exposing this disorder.  **Asymmetric Application:** - Obama subjected to moral scrutiny for complex family situation - No equivalent standard applied to Trump's own family relationships  **Hierarchy Dynamics:** - **Status attack:** Attempting to diminish Obama's moral authority - **Elevation:** Implicitly elevates D'Souza (and by association, conservatives generally) as more genuinely caring - **Method:** Exposure/shaming rather than policy argument  #

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Dinesh D'Souza had to give ,000 to Barack Obama's brother for his child's hospital bill" | **Mostly True** | D'Souza confirmed sending ,000 via Western Union to George Obama (Barack's half-brother) for medical treatment of George's sick child. D'Souza verified situation with hospital nurse before sending money. The word 'had to' is editorializing—D'Souza chose to help. Also technically 'half-brother' not 'brother.' |
| "This situation is disgraceful (implied: on Obama's part)" | **Unverifiable** | This is subjective moral judgment. The fact D'Souza paid and Obama apparently didn't is established, but whether this constitutes 'disgrace' depends on Barack's knowledge of situation, the minimal relationship between Barack and George, cultural/familial expectations across international boundaries, and privacy considerations. Trump presents opinion as self-evident fact. |

Overall Veracity: 65%

## Longitudinal Context  **Pattern Analysis (comparing to same-day posts):**  The August 17, 2012 posts show Trump in **promotional/political mode:**  1. Praising Georgia's leader (geopolitical positioning) 2. Promoting book about Trump Tower (brand management) 3. Sharing Fox News interviews attacking Obama (political warfare) 4. Promoting golf course (business interests) 5. This post (political attack)  **Consistency:** This post fits established pattern of opportunistic political attacks on Obama during the 2012 election cycle. Trump was actively building his anti-Obama brand, which would later fuel his own political ambitions.  **Deviation from baseline:** None. This is baseline-consistent Trump behavior for 2012: businessman/celebrity using Twitter to inject himself into political conversation by attacking Obama.  ### Parasocial Techniques  1. **Rhetorical question creates false intimacy** - "Isn't that disgraceful?" assumes shared values/perspective with audience 2. **Moral clarity** - Offers simple good/bad framework that followers can adopt 3. **Insider access illusion** - Sharing "news" positions Trump as information source 4. **Invitation to judgment** - Followers encouraged to join in moral condemnation  ### Summary Assessment  **Clinical Significance: MODERATE**  This post warrants documentation as characteristic example of Trump's 2012 political psychology but doesn't represent marked deviation or crisis.  **Key Patterns:** - Instrumental exploitation of human suffering for political gain - Projection of own callousness onto target - Effective use of rhetorical manipulation - Moderate antisocial features (callous disregard for child's privacy/dignity) - Grandiose moral positioning - Splitting defenses (all-good/all-bad)  **Psychological Interpretation:**  Trump demonstrates **goal-directed narcissistic personality functioning** in service of political ambition. He shows: - Low empathy (sick child is prop) - High agency motivation (power over Obama) - Simplistic moral cognition (complex situation → simple judgment) - Strategic opportunism (amplifies available ammunition) - Projection (accuses Obama of the callousness he himself exhibits)  The post is psychologically revealing not because of emotional dysregulation or cognitive impairment, but because it demonstrates **willingness to instrumentalize vulnerable parties** (sick child, impoverished man in Kenya) to inflict reputational damage on an enemy. This reflects the antisocial dimension of malignant narcissism—achieving narcissistic goals through means that disregard others' welfare or dignity.  **Pattern Evolution Note:** This 2012 post establishes baseline for Trump's anti-Obama rhetoric, which would intensify through birtherism and eventually fuel his 2016 campaign. The psychological template is already evident: find Obama's apparent vulnerability, simplify to moral failing, invite audience to join condemnation, express no empathy for collateral parties affected.  ### Sources  - [TheBlaze: 'I Have No One Else to Ask': Dinesh D'Souza Says He Paid Hospital Bill for Obama's Half-Brother](https://www.theblaze.com/news/2012/08/16/i-have-no-one-else-to-ask-dinesh-dsouza-says-he-paid-hospital-bill-for-obamas-half-brother) - [Newsmax: D'Souza Sends Money to President Obama's Brother for Sick Child](https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/DSouza-George-Obama-brother/2012/08/16/id/448863/) - [Fox News: How I Became George Obama's 'Brother'](https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/how-i-became-george-obamas-brother) - [Beliefnet: Conservative Author Dinesh D'Souza Steps In to Pay Hospital Bill for Obama's Brother](https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/watchwomanonthewall/2012/08/conservative-author-dinesh-dsouza-steps-in-to-pay-hospital-bill-for-obamas-brother.html)

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 85%)

### Indicators

- Rhetorical question ending ('Isn't that disgraceful?') - classic Trump device
- Moral outrage framing with emotionally charged language
- Direct @ mentions to create public confrontation
- Opportunistic amplification of conservative talking point
- Tone and voice consistent with authentic Trump from this period

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (Conservative media story about D'Souza/George Obama incident)

Sentiment: -0.70

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 60%
- Antisocial: 40%
- Paranoid: 10%
- Sadism: 50%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- splitting (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 75%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Rhetorical question creates false intimacy and assumes shared values with audience
- Simple moral framing (disgraceful/not) offers followers easy judgment to adopt
- Positions self as information source sharing 'news' others should know
- Invites audience to join in moral condemnation of Obama

## Danger Assessment

**NONE**

### Gaslighting

- Implies facts not in evidence (that Obama had responsibility for adult half-brother's finances or knew about medical crisis)
- Omits crucial context (Barack and George had minimal relationship, George lived independently in Kenya, family privacy considerations)
- False moral clarity—presents complex international family situation as simple moral failing
- Reality distortion through selective omission rather than explicit denial

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-10._

> Dinesh D'Souza had to give ,000 to Barack Obama's brother for his child's hospital bill

**MOSTLY TRUE**

D'Souza confirmed sending ,000 via Western Union to George Obama (Barack's half-brother) for medical treatment of George's sick child. D'Souza verified situation with hospital nurse before sending money. The word 'had to' is editorializing—D'Souza chose to help. Also technically 'half-brother' not 'brother.'

Sources: https://www.theblaze.com/news/2012/08/16/i-have-no-one-else-to-ask-dinesh-dsouza-says-he-paid-hospital-bill-for-obamas-half-brother; https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/DSouza-George-Obama-brother/2012/08/16/id/448863/; https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/how-i-became-george-obamas-brother

> This situation is disgraceful (implied: on Obama's part)

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is subjective moral judgment. The fact D'Souza paid and Obama apparently didn't is established, but whether this constitutes 'disgrace' depends on Barack's knowledge of situation, the minimal relationship between Barack and George, cultural/familial expectations across international boundaries, and privacy considerations. Trump presents opinion as self-evident fact.

Overall Veracity: 65%

## Tags

- Barack Obama (100%)
- political_attack (90%)
- moral_judgment (80%)
- projection (80%)
- splitting (70%)
- low_agreeableness (90%)
- low_empathy (85%)
- power (90%)
- rhetorical_question (90%)
- moral_framing (85%)
- instrumental_exploitation (80%)
- antisocial_features (60%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**The Birther Strategist: Calculated Conspiracy as Political Weapon**

On August 17, 2012, Donald Trump executed a calculated social media offensive against President Obama while positioning himself as a Republican kingmaker. Posting 21 times across normal business hours from Trump Tower, the 66-year-old maintained stable grandiose narcissistic state throughout—no rage, no emotional fluctuations, just relentless strategic assault.  Trump's dominant obsession was birther conspiracy propagation (8 posts, 38% of content), demanding Obama release "passport records, college records & applications" despite Obama having released his birth certificate 16 months earlier. This sustained conspiracy ideation represents profound epistemic closure and reveals the antisocial dimension of his narcissism—complete comfort weaponizing demonstrably false claims for political advantage. Beyond birther attacks, Trump systematically delegitimized Obama across multiple vectors: foreign policy weakness (China treating him "like a doormat"), economic incompetence ("bleeding us dry"), and character ("not a nice guy," doesn't "really love this country").  The psychological signature reveals malignant narcissism in political combat mode: moderate-high narcissistic features (grandiosity, entitlement, supply-seeking), mild-moderate antisocial features (comfort with deception, instrumental manipulation), and mild paranoid features (conspiracy thinking, projection). Defense mechanisms were consistently immature (splitting, projection, denial, rationalization) deployed in service of sophisticated tactical objectives. No hypomanic indicators detected—posting frequency, time distribution, and content quality all within baseline range.  Most significant: This day establishes Trump's 2012 baseline, demonstrating that patterns later visible in his presidency (conspiracy promotion, reality distortion, multi-vector attacks, empathy deficits) were already fully formed 14 years before January 6, 2021. The malignant narcissistic personality structure remained constant; only the enabling environment transformed when he gained presidential power.

Full digest for 2012-08-17: https://trump.fm/date/2012-08-17/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2012, August 17). .@DineshDSouza had to give $1,000 to... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. ".@DineshDSouza had to give $1,000 to @BarackObama's brother..." X (Twitter), 17 Aug. 2012. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, ".@DineshDSouza had to give $1,000 to @BarackObama's brother...," X (Twitter), August 17, 2012, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_236496649038491648
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_236496649038491648
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_236496649038491648
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2012-08-17
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_236496649038491648.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._