# Post x_199328290970939392

- Post ID: `x_199328290970939392`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2012-05-07T02:42:22.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_199328290970939392.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> #sweepstweet @3nVMusic I very much rely on my own ‘take’ of the situation and people involved. My instincts (cont) http://t.co/KjrV13fV

## Engagement

- Likes: 5
- Reposts: 15
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.272Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-06T18:41:03.091Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This brief May 2012 tweet, posted at 10:42 PM EDT during Celebrity Apprentice broadcast, efficiently reveals Trump's core psychological architecture at age 65. He declares his decision-making relies on personal instincts rather than external input, demonstrating grandiose narcissistic organization: belief in special abilities, extreme self-sufficiency, and dismissal of others' perspectives. Big Five profile shows high extraversion (assertiveness), low agreeableness (modesty/trust), and epistemic closure (low openness to alternatives). Defense structure relies on immature mechanisms—splitting (self=superior, others=unnecessary), idealization/devaluation, and rationalization of impulsive judgment as sophisticated methodology. Narrative identity casts him as "The Natural Judge" embodying the Seer/Magus archetype: one who possesses innate perceptive gifts unavailable to ordinary people. Agency motives dominate completely (power, autonomy, status); communion motives are absent. The narcissistic state is purely grandiose with no vulnerable elements, triggered by supply-seeking during prime-time broadcast rather than reactive injury. Rhetorical strategy builds strong-leader ethos through anti-intellectual framing (instinct > analysis) and parasocial bonding (revealing decision methodology). Language production is fluent and coherent with no cognitive concerns, establishing useful 2012 baseline. Clinical significance: demonstrates grandiose narcissistic features without paranoid or antisocial elements visible in this fragment—baseline personality organization valuable for longitudinal comparison. No danger indicators present; purely self-promotional content during reality TV engagement.

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Twitter Post (May 7, 2012)  ## Post Context  **Date:** May 7, 2012 (UTC 02:42:22)   **Platform:** Twitter   **Subject Age:** 65 years old   **Content:** "#sweepstweet @3nVMusic I very much rely on my own 'take' of the situation and people involved. My instincts (cont) http://t.co/KjrV13fV"  **Contextual background:** This post occurred during the broadcast period of Celebrity Apprentice Season 5. The episode that aired May 6, 2012 featured previous winners John Rich and Marlee Matlin returning to interview the final four contestants (Arsenio Hall, Aubrey O'Day, Lisa Lampanelli, and Clay Aiken). This was part of the elimination process leading to the finale. Major world events on May 7, 2012 included François Hollande's victory in French presidential elections and Vladimir Putin's controversial inauguration in Russia amid mass protests.  **Note on linked content:** The continuation link (http://t.co/KjrV13fV) is no longer accessible, so this analysis is based on the truncated tweet fragment available.  ---  ## 1. AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION  ### Timestamp Analysis - **UTC time:** 02:42:22 (2:42 AM) - **Trump's likely location:** New York City (Celebrity Apprentice filming location) - **Local time:** May 6, 2012, 10:42 PM EDT  This is late evening in Trump's timezone, falling within the window where he commonly tweets himself (10 PM - 6 AM).  ### Stylistic Markers  **Indicators of authentic authorship:** - Late evening timing (10:42 PM local time) - Hashtag promotional format (#sweepstweet) typical of live-tweeting during show broadcasts - Self-referential content about his own decision-making process - Fragmented sentence structure with "(cont)" indicating stream-of-consciousness posting - Personal pronoun emphasis ("I very much rely on my own 'take'")  **Indicators against aide authorship:** - Not a straightforward promotional announcement - Personal psychological disclosure - Informal continuation format  ### Confidence Assessment **Authorship score:** 0.85 (highly likely authentic Trump)   **Confidence:** High  The late evening timing, self-referential psychological content, and fragmented multi-tweet structure strongly suggest authentic authorship. This appears to be Trump live-tweeting during or immediately after the Celebrity Apprentice broadcast, engaging with viewers while emphasizing his personal decision-making methodology.  ---  ## 2. MULTI-LEVEL PERSONALITY ANALYSIS  ### Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)  **Extraversion** (High assertiveness facet) - Direct assertion of personal authority: "I very much rely on my own 'take'" - Public self-disclosure during prime-time broadcast engagement - Comfort with spotlight and audience engagement  **Agreeableness** (Low modesty, low trust) - Emphasis on individual judgment over collective wisdom - Implicit distrust of others' assessments ("my own take") - Rejection of external validation or guidance  **Conscientiousness** (High achievement striving, low deliberation) - "Instincts" over systematic analysis suggests impulsive decision-making - Gut-feel orientation rather than methodical evaluation - Confidence in immediate perceptions  **Neuroticism** (Low vulnerability, low anxiety) - Unquestioning confidence in personal judgment - No expressed doubt or second-guessing - Secure in intuitive decision framework  **Openness** (Low openness to alternative perspectives) - Closed epistemic stance: "my own take" is sufficient - Values internal intuition over external data - Low receptivity to others' insights  **Dominant trait pattern:** High extraversion (assertiveness), low agreeableness (modesty, trust), low openness (to alternatives)  ### Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations  **Agency Motives** (Dominant) - **Power:** Assertion of unilateral decision-making authority - **Autonomy:** "My own take" emphasizes independence from others - **Control:** Framing instinct as reliable guidance tool - **Status:** Public declaration positions him as uniquely capable judge  **Communion Motives** (Minimal) - No reference to collaborative decision-making - No mention of advisors, input, or others' perspectives - Solitary judgment framework  **Self-Schema:** "The Unique Decider" - Self as possessing superior instincts - Self as self-sufficient evaluator - Self as not requiring external validation  **Others-Schema:** Implicit devaluation - Others' takes are inferior or unnecessary - People can be accurately "read" via instinct - External perspectives add little value  **World-Schema:** Navigable through intuition - Reality is transparent to the gifted observer - Gut feelings are reliable guides - Systematic analysis is unnecessary  ### Level 3: Narrative Identity  **Protagonist Role:** The Natural Judge - Innately gifted at reading people and situations - Trusts gut over analysis - Decision-maker who "just knows"  **Identity Claims:** - "I very much rely on my own take" = I am self-sufficient - "My instincts" = I possess special perceptive abilities - Implicit: I don't need your advice  **Contrasting Other:** The Uncertain/Dependent - Those who need others' input (weakness) - Those who overthink (inferior to instinct) - Those who lack confident judgment  **Narrative Sequence:** Consistent self-aggrandizement - No redemption or contamination arc in this fragment - Maintenance narrative: reasserting stable superior identity  **Mythological parallel:** The Oracle/Seer archetype - one who sees truth directly without mediation  ---  ## 3. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT  ### Malignant Narcissism Components  **A. Narcissistic Personality Features** - **Grandiosity:** Claiming superior judgment abilities ("my instincts") - **Belief in being special:** Possessing unique perceptive gifts - **Lack of empathy:** No consideration of others' perspectives having value - **Arrogance:** Dismissive stance toward alternative viewpoints  **Evidence present:** 2/9 criteria clearly visible (grandiosity, specialness)   **Severity in this post:** Mild-moderate expression  **B. Antisocial Features** - No evidence in this post  **C. Paranoid Features** - Possible low-level trust issues (emphasis on "my own" take suggests others' unreliability) - Not prominent in this fragment  **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism** - No evidence in this post  **Overall malignant narcissism assessment:** This post demonstrates grandiose narcissistic features (belief in superior instincts, self-sufficiency) but lacks the paranoid and antisocial elements that would suggest full malignant presentation. This is consistent with grandiose-exhibitionistic narcissistic personality organization.  ### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger:** Supply-seeking - This is maintenance/enhancement behavior during broadcast - Not reactive to injury or threat - Proactive self-promotion and identity reinforcement  **Narcissistic State:** Grandiose - Expansive, confident, superior - No vulnerable/wounded elements - Secure in self-proclaimed abilities  **Narcissistic Supply Source:**  - Audience admiration during prime-time broadcast - Public validation of his unique judgment abilities - Positioning as ultimate authority  **Rage Indicators:** None present  ### Defense Mechanisms  **Splitting** (Immature - Level 2) - Self = all-good (possesses reliable instincts) - Others = implicitly all-bad (their takes are inferior/unnecessary) - Binary thinking: trust self vs. trust others  **Idealization** (of self) / **Devaluation** (of others) (Immature - Level 2) - Self-idealization: "my instincts" are trustworthy - Implicit devaluation: others' perspectives don't merit consideration  **Rationalization** (Neurotic - Level 3) - Framing intuitive/impulsive decision-making as superior methodology - "Instincts" sounds more sophisticated than "I do what I feel like"  **Denial** (Pathological - Level 1) (Mild) - Denial of uncertainty or fallibility - Denial that complex decisions might benefit from multiple perspectives  **Defense level:** Predominantly immature defenses (splitting, idealization/devaluation) with some neurotic rationalization and mild pathological denial.  ### Cognitive Status  **Language production:** - No word-finding difficulty - No paraphasias - Sentence is grammatically complete (allowing for Twitter truncation) - Vocabulary appropriate  **Complexity:** - Simple declarative sentence structure - Straightforward idea expression - No concerning simplification  **Baseline comparison notes:** At age 65 (2012), Trump's language shows no signs of cognitive decline. This represents a useful baseline for future comparison. The fragmented tweet format is platform-appropriate, not cognitive.  **Temporal/name confusion:** None evident  **Conclusion:** No cognitive status concerns. Language is coherent, purposeful, and baseline-appropriate for 2012.  ---  ## 4. RHETORICAL & PROPAGANDA ANALYSIS  ### Persuasion Techniques  **Appeal to Intuition/Emotion over Reason** - "Instincts" privileged over systematic analysis - Anti-intellectual framing (gut > data) - Emotional certainty presented as superior to careful deliberation  **Ethos Construction (Authority Building)** - Positioning self as possessing unique judgment abilities - "I very much rely on" = this is my proven method - Implicit: "and it works, look at my success"  **Audience Parasocial Bonding** - #sweepstweet hashtag invites audience participation - "Behind the curtain" revelation of decision methodology - Creates intimacy: "let me tell you how I really decide"  **Simplification** - Complex personnel decisions reduced to "instincts" - Eliminates messiness of systematic evaluation - Makes leadership appear effortless  ### Propaganda Techniques (Low intensity)  This is primarily self-promotional branding rather than propaganda. However, elements include:  - **Cult of personality:** Leader has special intuitive gifts - **Anti-intellectualism:** Gut feeling > analysis - **Strong leader narrative:** Decisive, confident, self-sufficient  ### RAND Firehose Elements Not applicable - this is a single coherent message, not disinformation  ### Dehumanizing Language None present  ### Violent Imagery None present  ### Stochastic Terrorism Indicators None present  ---  ## 5. GASLIGHTING & REALITY DISTORTION  **Gaslighting present:** No  **Reality distortion present:** Mild  The claim that "instincts" are a reliable decision-making methodology represents a self-serving distortion of how sound decisions are made. However, this is personal mythology rather than deliberate reality distortion targeting others. It's self-deception more than other-deception.  **Epistemic closure indicators:** Low - The statement reveals epistemic closure ("my own take" is sufficient) - But this is disclosure of existing attitude, not enforcement of it on others - No penalty threatened for those who disagree  ---  ## 6. SHARED PSYCHOSIS DYNAMICS  **Transmission of delusional thinking:** Minimal  This post models a decision-making approach (pure intuition) that, if adopted by followers, could lead to poor judgment. However, it's not demanding acceptance of factual distortions. It's more narcissistic self-disclosure than reality-distortion enforcement.  **Loyalty test:** Not present  **In-group/out-group truth claims:** Not present  ---  ## 7. ARCHETYPAL ANALYSIS  ### Primary Archetypes Embodied  **The Magus/Seer** - Possesses special sight/knowledge others lack - Sees through surface to truth beneath - Intuition as magical power  **The King** (benevolent presentation) - Wise ruler who "just knows" - Natural authority - Doesn't need council (self-sufficient monarch)  **The Trickster** (mild presence) - Rejects conventional decision-making (analysis, deliberation) - Trusts gut over establishment methods - Maverick methodology  ### Shadow Projection The shadow being projected/disowned: - **Uncertainty** → projected onto those who need others' input - **Dependence** → projected onto those who deliberate/analyze - **Ordinariness** → projected onto those lacking special instincts  ### Mythological Resonance This invokes the archetype of the **Natural King** or **Philosopher King** who doesn't need to study governance because wisdom flows naturally. Also echoes the **Prophet** who receives direct knowledge.  ### Appeal Mechanism For followers attracted to strong leadership, this is reassuring: the leader doesn't need complex bureaucratic processes; he simply knows. For those exhausted by institutional paralysis and committee-think, "instincts" appears refreshingly decisive.  ---  ## 8. ORDER AND CHAOS DYNAMICS  ### Positioning on Order/Chaos Axis  **Order defender** (moderate) - Defending traditional masculine leadership model (decisive patriarch) - Hierarchical clarity: leader at top, followers below  **Order attacker** (mild) - Attacking bureaucratic/analytical order (committees, deliberation) - Rejecting establishment methodology  ### Asymmetric Application Not applicable in this post - this is about personal methodology, not distributing order/chaos to different groups  ### Grievance Mapping No grievances articulated in this fragment  ### Hierarchy Dynamics - **Elevating:** Self (unique instincts) and those who trust their gut - **Diminishing:** Analysts, deliberators, those who seek consensus  The post reinforces hierarchy with Trump at apex as the one whose instincts are most reliable.  ---  ## 9. DANGER ASSESSMENT  **Danger Level:** None  **Rationale:** - No violent imagery - No dehumanization - No target identification - No grievance articulation - No call to action - Purely self-promotional content about decision-making style  This is benign self-aggrandizement during a reality TV show broadcast. No threat indicators present.  ---  ## 10. FACT VERIFICATION  ### Factual Claims This post makes a **meta-claim** about Trump's decision-making methodology rather than factual claims about external reality.  **Claim:** "I very much rely on my own 'take' of the situation and people involved. My instincts..."  **Analysis:** This is a subjective self-report about internal mental processes. It is **not verifiable** as true or false because: 1. We cannot observe his actual decision-making process 2. Self-reports of decision-making are notoriously unreliable (people often don't know why they decide) 3. This may be aspirational self-concept rather than accurate description  **Research evidence:** Psychological research on expert decision-making (Klein, 1998; Kahneman & Klein, 2009) shows that "intuition" is reliable only in high-validity environments where patterns repeat and feedback is clear. Reality TV contestant evaluation is a low-validity environment where "instincts" perform poorly compared to structured assessment.  **Verdict:** **Unverifiable** (subjective self-report) but likely **inflated**. Research suggests this decision methodology would produce inconsistent results.  ---  ## 11. HYPOMANIA ASSESSMENT  **Hypomanic state:** Absent  **Indicators present:** None  **Rationale:** - Speech is not pressured - No flight of ideas - No grandiose projects or schemes - Energy level appears normal - Sleep pattern unknown but late evening posting is typical for Trump  This is baseline grandiose narcissism, not elevated mood state.  ---  ## 12. LONGITUDINAL CONTEXT  ### Pattern Consistency  The preceding tweets from the same evening (May 6-7, 2012) show: 1. Live-tweeting Celebrity Apprentice broadcast 2. #sweepstweet hashtag use (NBC promotional campaign) 3. Mentions of contestants (@johnrich, @marleematlin, @clayaiken, @arsenioofficial) 4. Focus on money raised and charity  This post fits the established pattern: Trump engaging with audience during broadcast, emphasizing his role as decision-maker, building mythology around his judgment.  ### Baseline Comparison  At age 65, Trump demonstrates: - Coherent language production - Consistent self-aggrandizing narrative - Reliable grandiose narcissistic presentation - No cognitive or mood concerns - Stable personality pattern (low agreeableness, high extraversion)  **Significance:** This represents useful 2012 baseline for tracking any future deterioration in cognitive function, mood regulation, or personality structure.  ---  ## SUMMARY  This brief Twitter fragment, posted late evening during Celebrity Apprentice broadcast (May 6, 2012, 10:42 PM EDT), reveals Trump's core psychological structure with remarkable efficiency. At age 65, he publicly declares his decision-making methodology: "I very much rely on my own 'take' of the situation and people involved. My instincts..."  **Personality architecture:** The post demonstrates grandiose narcissistic organization with emphasis on special abilities (superior instincts), self-sufficiency (doesn't need others' input), and anti-intellectual orientation (gut over analysis). Big Five profile shows high extraversion (assertiveness), low agreeableness (low modesty/trust), and low openness (epistemic closure). Agency motives dominate completely; communion motives are absent.  **Defense structure:** Predominantly immature defenses—splitting (self=all-good, others=unnecessary), idealization/devaluation, and rationalization of impulsive decision-making as superior methodology. Mild pathological denial of fallibility.  **Narrative identity:** Trump casts himself as "The Natural Judge"—one who possesses innate perceptive gifts requiring no external input. This embodies the Seer/Magus archetype: special sight unavailable to ordinary people. The contrasting other is the uncertain analyzer who lacks confident judgment.  **Clinical significance:** Demonstrates grandiose narcissistic features (specialness, grandiosity, arrogance) without paranoid or antisocial elements visible in this fragment. The narcissistic state is grandiose (not vulnerable), and the trigger is supply-seeking during prime-time broadcast rather than reactive injury. This represents baseline narcissistic personality organization at age 65.  **Cognitive baseline:** Language production is fluent, coherent, and age-appropriate. No word-finding difficulty, paraphasias, or concerning simplification. This 2012 baseline is valuable for future longitudinal comparison.  **No danger indicators:** Purely self-promotional content without violent imagery, dehumanization, or target identification. Benign grandiosity during reality TV engagement.  **Rhetorical function:** Builds parasocial bond with audience ("behind the curtain" revelation), constructs strong-leader ethos (decisive, confident), and advances anti-intellectual brand (instinct > analysis). The methodology claimed—pure intuition in low-validity environments—is psychologically unreliable but narratively compelling.  ---  ## SOURCES  Research and contextual information for this analysis:  - [The Celebrity Apprentice 2012 Episode Information - CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-celebrity-apprentice-two-fired-one-to-go/) - [Celebrity Apprentice Season 11 Details - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Apprentice_(American_season_11)) - [May 7, 2012 World Events - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events/2012_May_7) - [May 7, 2012 Top News Stories - The Week](https://theweek.com/articles/475798/10-things-need-know-today-may-7-2012)  ---  **Analysis Date:** February 6, 2026   **Analyst Framework:** McAdams & Pals (2006) Multi-Level Personality; Kernberg Malignant Narcissism; Vaillant Defense Mechanisms; Jungian Archetypal Analysis

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "I very much rely on my own 'take' of the situation and people involved. My instincts..." | **Unverifiable** | This is a subjective self-report about internal mental processes that cannot be externally verified. Psychological research on expert decision-making (Klein, 1998; Kahneman & Klein, 2009) shows that intuition is reliable only in high-validity environments where patterns repeat and feedback is clear. Reality TV contestant evaluation is a low-validity environment where gut instincts would perform poorly compared to structured assessment. Self-reports of decision-making are notoriously unreliable—people often don't accurately know why they make decisions. This claim is likely aspirational self-concept rather than accurate description of actual decision process. |

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 85%)

### Indicators

- Late evening timing (10:42 PM local EDT)
- Self-referential psychological content
- Fragmented multi-tweet continuation format
- Personal pronoun emphasis and first-person disclosure
- Live-tweeting during broadcast (promotional #sweepstweet)

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (Prime-time Celebrity Apprentice broadcast audience)

Sentiment: +0.65

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 35%
- Antisocial: 0%
- Paranoid: 10%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- splitting (immature)
- idealization (immature)
- devaluation (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)
- denial (pathological)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 85%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Behind-the-curtain revelation ('let me tell you how I really decide')
- Audience engagement through #sweepstweet promotional hashtag
- Creating intimacy through personal psychological disclosure
- Positioning audience as insiders witnessing authentic decision methodology

## Fact Checks (1)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-06._

> I very much rely on my own 'take' of the situation and people involved. My instincts...

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is a subjective self-report about internal mental processes that cannot be externally verified. Psychological research on expert decision-making (Klein, 1998; Kahneman & Klein, 2009) shows that intuition is reliable only in high-validity environments where patterns repeat and feedback is clear. Reality TV contestant evaluation is a low-validity environment where gut instincts would perform poorly compared to structured assessment. Self-reports of decision-making are notoriously unreliable—people often don't accurately know why they make decisions. This claim is likely aspirational self-concept rather than accurate description of actual decision process.

Sources: Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515-526.; Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. MIT Press.

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Tags

- grandiose_narcissism (80%)
- low_agreeableness (70%)
- high_extraversion (70%)
- splitting (60%)
- idealization_self (70%)
- rationalization (50%)
- agency_power (90%)
- supply_seeking (60%)
- natural_judge (80%)
- magus_seer (70%)
- king (50%)
- anti_intellectualism (60%)
- ethos_construction (70%)
- parasocial_bonding (60%)
- celebrity_apprentice (100%)
- reality_tv (90%)
- 2012_baseline (80%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Celebrity Apprentice Live-Tweet Marathon Anchors a Low-Key Day of Brand Management and Mild Obama Jabs**

Trump spent the bulk of his evening live-tweeting a Celebrity Apprentice episode, offering play-by-play commentary and promoting the show to viewers. The mood was upbeat and self-promotional throughout, with no flashes of anger or agitation. During the workday he mixed in some political commentary -- criticizing Obama over the Gitmo trials and Afghanistan, endorsing Mitt Romney, and weighing in on the French election -- but none of it carried real heat. A quiet, on-brand day of routine media management from a reality TV host three years before entering politics.

Full digest for 2012-05-07: https://trump.fm/date/2012-05-07/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2012, May 7). #sweepstweet @3nVMusic I very much rely on my own... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "#sweepstweet @3nVMusic I very much rely on my own ‘take’ of..." X (Twitter), 7 May. 2012. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "#sweepstweet @3nVMusic I very much rely on my own ‘take’ of...," X (Twitter), May 7, 2012, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_199328290970939392
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_199328290970939392
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_199328290970939392
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2012-05-07
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_199328290970939392.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._