# Post x_175322903791935488

- Post ID: `x_175322903791935488`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2012-03-01T20:53:32.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_175322903791935488.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> "If history teaches us anything, it's that strong nations require strong leaders with clearly defined national (cont) http://t.co/x53gALRh

## Engagement

- Likes: 19
- Reposts: 125
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-01-31T23:43:13.273Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-06T00:32:20.328Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Twitter Post (March 1, 2012)  ## Post Context & Background  **Timestamp Analysis:** Posted at 20:53:32 UTC on March 1, 2012. Converting to EST (Trump's likely timezone in New York): 3:53 PM EST - afternoon business hours.  **Historical Context:** This post occurred on the day conservative media figure Andrew Breitbart died (pronounced dead at 12:19 AM March 1, 2012). Trump posted a brief tribute earlier that day. This was also during the 2012 Republican primary season, where Trump had endorsed Mitt Romney in February. The post references recent controversy over President Obama's apology for Koran burnings at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, which occurred February 23, 2012. Despite Obama's apology, violence continued, with two U.S. soldiers killed by an Afghan soldier on February 25, 2012.  **Post Series Pattern:** This is part of a coordinated series of five posts on March 1, 2012, all attacking Obama's foreign policy ("weak" on China, "pathetic" Koran apology) while praising Romney's toughness. The posts show thematic coherence around "strength vs. weakness" framing.  ## Authorship Attribution  **Assessment: Aide-written (Dan Scavino or social media team)**  **Confidence: High**  **Indicators:** 1. **Timing:** 3:53 PM EST is standard business hours, not Trump's typical late-night/early-morning posting window 2. **Formal structure:** Uses "(cont)" notation indicating planned multi-part message - this is organizational planning, not stream-of-consciousness 3. **Part of coordinated campaign:** One of five thematically linked posts on same day, all with similar messaging discipline 4. **No typos or emotional markers:** Clean, professional formatting 5. **Incomplete thought pattern:** The "(cont)" with link suggests this was meant to drive traffic to longer-form content, typical of campaign social media strategy 6. **Context:** Trump was actively campaigning for Romney; this appears to be surrogate messaging  **Stylometric Analysis:** Lacks Trump's authentic voice markers (no superlatives, no direct attacks with nicknames, no emotional punctuation, no tangential digressions). The phrase "If history teaches us anything" is more literary/formal than Trump's typical direct assertion style.  **Score: 0.15** (Strong likelihood of aide authorship with possible Trump approval of messaging themes)  ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)  Given the aide-written nature, this reflects **strategic personality presentation** rather than spontaneous trait expression:  - **Extraversion (Assertiveness facet):** Moderate-high - Claims authority to speak about national leadership, but in measured tones - **Agreeableness (LOW - Modesty reversed):** Positions self as authority on what history teaches and what strong leadership requires - **Conscientiousness (Achievement striving):** Moderate - Focus on national goals and strength suggests goal orientation - **Neuroticism:** Low in this post - Controlled, strategic messaging without emotional volatility - **Openness (Values rigidity):** The appeal to "history" and "strong leaders" suggests traditional, hierarchical values  **Most salient facet:** Low Agreeableness (specifically low modesty) - assuming authority to define requirements for national strength.  ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations  **Dominant Motives:** - **Agency > Communion** (Power, status, dominance)   - Focus is on hierarchy (strong leaders, strong nations)   - No communion themes (care, belonging, connection)   - Authoritarian appeal structure  **Goals evident in post:** - Establish authority as political commentator on leadership - Frame 2012 election as choice between strength (Romney/implicitly Trump worldview) and weakness (Obama) - Position self within conservative media ecosystem  **Schemas revealed:** - **Self:** Authority on leadership, aligned with "strong" leaders, keeper of historical wisdom - **Others (leaders):** Divided into strong vs. weak; weakness is existential threat to nation - **World:** Dangerous, requires strength, history validates hierarchical power  ## Level 3: Narrative Identity  **Protagonist Role:** The **Wise Counselor/Authority** - One who understands history's lessons and can identify true strength  **Identity Claims:** - "I understand what history teaches" (wisdom claim) - "I can identify requirements for national strength" (expertise claim) - Implicitly: "I am aligned with strength, not weakness"  **Contrasting Other:** Barack Obama (implicitly) - the "weak leader" who fails historical requirements. The post is part of a series attacking Obama as weak on China, apologetic, ineffective.  **Narrative Sequence:** Not present in this fragment, but within the day's posting pattern: **Contamination narrative about America** - Nation under weak leadership → decline and humiliation (Obama's apology, China "walking over us")  **Mythological Framework (Jungian):** - **Archetypal positioning:** **King archetype** - Defining what makes legitimate vs. illegitimate rule (strong vs. weak) - The incomplete post likely continues with critique of Obama as illegitimate (weak) ruler  ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators  ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment (Kernberg Framework)  **A. Narcissistic Personality Features: Mild-Moderate (in this post)** - Grandiose authority claim (defining historical lessons for nations) - Implicit claim to special insight ("If history teaches...") - No obvious need for admiration in this specific post - Moderate entitlement (assuming right to define national requirements)  **B. Antisocial Features: Not evident** - This is policy commentary, not rule-breaking or exploitation  **C. Paranoid Features: Mild** - Part of broader messaging about external threats (China, terrorism) - Suspicion toward Obama's motives (other posts suggest apology shows weakness not diplomacy)  **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism: Not evident** - Controlled messaging without pleasure-in-cruelty markers  **Component Ratings:** - Narcissistic features: 0.4/1.0 - Antisocial features: 0.1/1.0 - Paranoid features: 0.3/1.0 - Sadism: 0.1/1.0  **Overall Malignant Narcissism (this post):** 0.23/1.0 - Low, but note this is aide-filtered content  ### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger Type:** **Maintenance + Supply-seeking** - Routine audience engagement during campaign season - Building authority credentials - No evidence of acute narcissistic injury in this specific post  **Narcissistic State:** **Grandiose** - Authoritative voice - Claims historical/political wisdom - Aligned with "strength" (positive self-association)  **Narcissistic Rage:** **Absent** - The day's posts show irritation with Obama, but this specific post is measured  ### Defense Mechanisms  **Primary defenses employed:**  1. **Splitting (Immature - Level 2):**     - Clear dichotomy: Strong leaders/nations (all-good) vs. weak leaders/nations (all-bad)    - No nuance or middle ground    - Evidence: "strong nations require strong leaders" - binary framework  2. **Idealization/Devaluation (Immature - Level 2):**    - Implicit idealization of "strong leaders" (presumably Romney, self)    - Implicit devaluation of weak leaders (Obama, referenced in surrounding posts)  3. **Projection (Immature - Level 2):**    - Attributing weakness to Obama (other posts: "pathetic," "walked over")    - May represent projection of vulnerability feelings onto political opponent  **Defense Level:** Predominantly **Immature (Level 2)** - Characteristic of personality disorders, involves splitting reality into extremes  ### Cognitive Status Markers  **Language Production:** Normal for written, edited content - No word-finding difficulty - No paraphasias - Coherent syntax - Professional formatting  **Content:** No confabulation, temporal confusion, or name confusion evident  **Complexity Assessment:** Cannot assess from aide-written content  **Baseline Comparison:** This post provides **no useful cognitive baseline data** because it appears professionally written/edited. For cognitive assessment, need spontaneous speech samples (rally transcripts, unscripted interviews, authentic late-night tweets).  **Important:** March 2012 represents relatively early Trump political commentary. For longitudinal cognitive tracking, would need to compare to 1980s-1990s interviews and 2015-2016 campaign content.  ### Archetypal Analysis (Jungian Framework)  **Primary Archetype:** **The King** - Claims authority to define requirements for legitimate rule - Distinguishes proper order (strong leadership) from disorder (weak leadership) - Invokes historical mandate  **Secondary Archetype:** **The Sage/Wise Elder** - "If history teaches us anything" positions speaker as one who knows history's lessons - Authority through accumulated wisdom  **Shadow Projection:** - Weakness, vulnerability, ineffectiveness projected onto Obama - What's disowned: Any acknowledgment of limits, need for deliberation, diplomatic complexity - The shadow (weakness/vulnerability) is expelled and located in the opponent  **Mythological Narrative:** The **Philosopher-King** archetype - one who combines wisdom (understanding history) with authority (defining national requirements)  ### Order and Chaos Dynamics  **Positioning:** **Order Defender + Order Restorer** - "Strong nations require strong leaders" = defending hierarchical order - Implicit critique of Obama = current order is corrupted/weakened - Need to restore proper order through strength  **Asymmetric Application:** - Who gets order: Those aligned with "strong leaders" (implicitly: real Americans who value strength) - Who gets chaos: Those under "weak" leadership (suffering consequences of apologizing, being "walked over")  **Hierarchy Dynamics:** - **Defending hierarchy:** Explicit - "strong leaders" should rule - **Whose status elevated:** Strong, decisive, unapologetic leaders (Romney, implicitly Trump) - **Whose status diminished:** "Weak" leaders (Obama), those who apologize, diplomatic/accommodative approaches  **Grievance Mapping:** - **Specific grievance:** American weakness on world stage (China trade, Afghanistan apology) - **Intensity:** Moderate in this post, higher in surrounding posts ("pathetic") - **Who is blamed:** Obama's leadership style (apologetic, accommodating)  ### Shared Psychosis & Reality Distortion  **Epistemic Framework:** - Presents binary reality: History teaches that strength = survival, weakness = decline - This is oversimplified but not necessarily delusional - Part of long authoritarian political tradition  **Reality Distortion Level:** **Mild** - The claim "strong nations require strong leaders" is empirically debatable (many successful democracies have power-sharing, checks-and-balances) - But this is **political rhetoric** rather than reality denial - No demand to accept demonstrable falsehoods  **Epistemic Closure:** **Moderate** - The framing excludes alternative interpretations (e.g., diplomacy as strategic, apologies as cultural competence) - But doesn't yet show the severe closure of later years  ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis  ### Persuasion Techniques Identified:  1. **Appeal to History/Tradition**    - "If history teaches us anything..."     - Implies historical inevitability, ancient wisdom    - No specific historical examples provided (vague authority)  2. **False Dichotomy**    - Strong vs. weak (only two categories)    - No acknowledgment of nuanced leadership styles    - Binary framework common in authoritarian messaging  3. **Implied Syllogism:**    - Major premise: Strong nations require strong leaders    - Minor premise (implied in context): Obama is weak leader    - Conclusion (implied): America is becoming weak nation  4. **(Cont) Strategy**    - Incomplete thought creates curiosity gap    - Drives traffic to linked content    - Classic engagement technique  5. **Coordinated Messaging (across day's posts):**    - Multiple posts hitting same theme (strength/weakness)    - Repetition for narrative reinforcement    - Professional campaign strategy  ### Propaganda Techniques (RAND Firehose Model):  **Volume:** Moderate - Five posts in one day on related themes **Repetition:** High - "Strong/weak" dichotomy repeated across multiple posts **Contradictions:** Not evident in this post series **Reality Distortion:** Mild - Oversimplification rather than fabrication  ### Dangerous Rhetoric Assessment:  **Dehumanizing Language:** Not present **Violent Imagery:** Not present **Eliminationist Rhetoric:** Not present **Stochastic Terrorism Indicators:** None  **This post shows standard political attack rhetoric, not dangerous incitement.**  ## Gaslighting & Reality Manipulation  **DARVO Pattern:** Not present in this post  **Reality Denial:** Not present  **Gaslighting Assessment:** **Not present**  This is political framing/spin (casting Obama as weak), which is standard political communication, not gaslighting (which requires denying the target's perception of reality to induce self-doubt).  ## Danger Assessment  **Level: NONE**  **Rationale:** - No targeting of specific groups for violence - No dehumanization - No eliminationist language - Standard political rhetoric criticizing opposing leader's approach - No mobilization language  **This is conventional political messaging, not incitement.**  ## Fact-Checking  ### Claim 1: "Strong nations require strong leaders with clearly defined national [goals/strategy - incomplete]"  **Verdict:** **UNVERIFIABLE** (as stated)  **Analysis:** This is a normative political claim, not a factual assertion. Political science research shows: - Democracies with power-sharing often outperform autocracies economically - "Strength" is definitionally subjective - Historical examples cut both ways (some strong leaders built empires, others caused catastrophic wars)  **Sources:** - Acemoglu & Robinson, "Why Nations Fail" - argues inclusive institutions (power-sharing) create prosperity - Democratic peace theory literature - democracies (typically less "strong leader" oriented) rarely war with each other  This claim is **ideological assertion**, not verifiable fact.  ### Contextual Claims (from surrounding posts):  **Claim 2 (from related post):** Obama's Koran apology "calmed things down" but US troops were killed afterward  **Verdict:** **HALF TRUE**  **Evidence:**  - Obama did say the apology "calmed things down" in ABC interview February 29, 2012 - Two US soldiers were killed by Afghan soldier on February 25, 2012 - Timeline: Soldiers killed February 25 → Obama apology February 23  - **Actually, the killings occurred AFTER the apology**, confirming Trump's implication that the apology didn't prevent violence - However, causation is complex - violence was response to Koran burning itself, not absence/presence of apology  **Sources:** - [Obama Tells ABC Apology for Koran Burning 'Calmed' Afghanistan](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-02-29/obama-tells-abc-apology-for-koran-burning-calmed-afghanistan) - [Obama apologizes to Afghanistan for Quran burning](https://www.cnn.com/2012/02/23/world/asia/afghanistan-burned-qurans/index.html)  ## Personality Assessment Summary  ### Big Five Profile (as strategically presented): - **Extraversion (Assertiveness):** 0.65 - Claims authority confidently - **Agreeableness:** 0.25 - Low modesty, positions self above others in wisdom - **Conscientiousness:** 0.60 - Goal-focused messaging - **Neuroticism:** 0.30 - Controlled in this post (though other posts show irritation) - **Openness (Values):** 0.35 - Traditional, hierarchical values  **Dominant Facet:** Low Agreeableness (Modesty reversed) - assumes authority to define historical truth and national requirements  ### Motives Profile: - **Agency (Power/Achievement):** 0.80 - Strong focus on dominance, strength, hierarchy - **Communion (Connection/Care):** 0.15 - Minimal focus on relationships, empathy, shared humanity  **Dominant Motive:** **Power** - establishing hierarchical order with strong leaders at top  ### Narrative Identity:  **Protagonist:** The Wise Authority who understands history and can identify true strength  **Key Identity Claims:** - Keeper of historical wisdom - Aligned with strength, not weakness   - Authority on leadership requirements  **Contrasting Other:** Weak leaders (Obama) who apologize, accommodate, allow America to be "walked over"  **Narrative Arc (across day's posts):** America under contamination (decline through weak leadership) → redemption available through strong leadership (Romney/Trump worldview)  ### Clinical Summary:  **Narcissistic Features:** Moderate (0.40) - Grandiose authority claims, low modesty **Defense Mechanisms:** Splitting (strong/weak), Idealization/Devaluation **Psychological State:** Grandiose (not vulnerable) **Trigger:** Maintenance/Supply-seeking (building authority during campaign)  **Note:** Aide-written content masks many authentic psychological features. This analysis reflects **strategic personality presentation** as much as underlying traits.  ## Longitudinal Patterns  **Themes Established (March 2012):** 1. **Strength/Weakness Binary:** Already central organizing framework 2. **America in Decline Narrative:** Under "weak" leadership 3. **Authoritarian Appeal:** Strong leaders as solution 4. **Foreign Policy Focus:** China, terrorism, military strength 5. **Anti-Obama Positioning:** Systematic critique of "weakness"  **Comparison to Later Periods:** - 2015-2016: Same themes amplified, but with more aggressive rhetoric, direct attacks, emotional volatility - 2017-2021: Themes remain, but with presidential power behind them - 2020-2024: Strength/weakness frame applied to election "stolen" narrative  **Trajectory:** The **core psychological framework** (strength-worship, splitting, authoritarian appeals) is already present in 2012, but expressed through professional campaign messaging rather than unfiltered authentic voice.  ## Summary  This post is **not clinically significant** on its own - it's standard political campaign messaging. However, it's valuable for **longitudinal analysis** because it documents that Trump's core psychological framework (strength/weakness splitting, authoritarian appeals, low modesty) was already established by age 65, well before his 2016 campaign.  The aide-written nature means this reflects **strategic personality presentation** rather than spontaneous psychological expression. The fact that Trump approved this messaging (presumably) shows alignment with these themes, but we cannot assess cognitive status, authentic emotional state, or unfiltered defense mechanisms from polished campaign content.  For researchers: This post is most useful as **baseline for messaging themes and values** (authoritarianism, hierarchy, strength-worship), not for cognitive or emotional state assessment.  ---  ## Research Sources  ### Context Research: - [Andrew Breitbart - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart) - [Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart died of heart failure | CNN Politics](https://www.cnn.com/2012/04/20/politics/breitbart-autopsy) - [Conservative Activist Andrew Breitbart Dies At 43 : NPR](https://www.npr.org/2012/03/01/147752404/conservative-activist-andrew-breitbart-dies-at-43) - [Trump endorses Romney | CNN Politics](https://www.cnn.com/2012/02/02/politics/campaign-wrap) - [Mitt Romney on Donald Trump: What They Said in 2012 Campaign | TIME](https://time.com/4246367/donald-trump-mitt-romney-2012/)  ### Fact-Checking: - [Obama apologizes for Koran burning in letter to Karzai - CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-apologizes-for-koran-burning-in-letter-to-karzai/) - [Obama Tells ABC Apology for Koran Burning 'Calmed' Afghanistan - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-02-29/obama-tells-abc-apology-for-koran-burning-calmed-afghanistan) - [President Obama: Koran Apology 'Calmed Things Down' - ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/president-obama-apology-afghans-calmed-things/story?id=15819707) - [Obama apologizes to Afghanistan for Quran burning | CNN](https://www.cnn.com/2012/02/23/world/asia/afghanistan-burned-qurans/index.html)

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Strong nations require strong leaders with clearly defined national [goals/strategy]" | **Unverifiable** | This is normative political assertion, not factual claim. Political science research shows mixed evidence: democracies with power-sharing often outperform autocracies economically (Acemoglu & Robinson, 'Why Nations Fail'); 'strength' is subjective; historical examples cut both ways. This is ideological framework, not verifiable fact. |
| "Obama's Koran apology claimed to 'calm things down' but US troops were killed (from related post context)" | **Half True** | Obama did say apology 'calmed things down' in ABC interview Feb 29, 2012. Two US soldiers were killed by Afghan soldier Feb 25, 2012 - AFTER the Feb 23 apology, confirming violence continued post-apology. However, causation is complex: violence was response to Koran burning itself, not absence/presence of apology. Trump's implication (apology ineffective) has factual basis but oversimplifies complex situation. |

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Authorship Analysis

**Aide-Written** (score: 15%)

### Indicators

- Posted at 3:53 PM EST (business hours, not Trump's typical late-night window)
- Uses '(cont)' notation indicating planned multi-part message structure
- Part of coordinated five-post series with consistent messaging themes
- Clean formatting with no typos or emotional markers
- Formal literary phrasing ('If history teaches us anything') atypical of Trump's direct style

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Maintenance (Campaign season audience engagement)

Sentiment: -0.30

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 40%
- Antisocial: 10%
- Paranoid: 30%
- Sadism: 10%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- splitting (immature)
- idealization (immature)
- devaluation (immature)
- projection (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 65%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Authority positioning - 'If history teaches us...' creates wise teacher persona
- Binary clarity - Simple strong/weak framework easy to understand and align with
- Protective father archetype - Knows what nation needs to be safe

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-06._

> Strong nations require strong leaders with clearly defined national [goals/strategy]

**UNVERIFIABLE**

This is normative political assertion, not factual claim. Political science research shows mixed evidence: democracies with power-sharing often outperform autocracies economically (Acemoglu & Robinson, 'Why Nations Fail'); 'strength' is subjective; historical examples cut both ways. This is ideological framework, not verifiable fact.

Sources: Acemoglu & Robinson research on institutional economics; Democratic peace theory literature

> Obama's Koran apology claimed to 'calm things down' but US troops were killed (from related post context)

**HALF TRUE**

Obama did say apology 'calmed things down' in ABC interview Feb 29, 2012. Two US soldiers were killed by Afghan soldier Feb 25, 2012 - AFTER the Feb 23 apology, confirming violence continued post-apology. However, causation is complex: violence was response to Koran burning itself, not absence/presence of apology. Trump's implication (apology ineffective) has factual basis but oversimplifies complex situation.

Sources: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-02-29/obama-tells-abc-apology-for-koran-burning-calmed-afghanistan; https://www.cnn.com/2012/02/23/world/asia/afghanistan-burned-qurans/index.html; https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/president-obama-apology-afghans-calmed-things/story?id=15819707

Overall Veracity: 50%

## Tags

- grandiose_narcissism (50%)
- splitting_defense (80%)
- power_motive (80%)
- authoritarianism (70%)
- strength_worship (90%)
- false_dichotomy (80%)
- appeal_to_tradition (60%)
- 2012_campaign (100%)
- pre_candidacy (100%)
- aide_written (85%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Conservative Brand-Builder: Trump's Stable Grandiosity During Primary Season**

Donald Trump's March 1, 2012 posting reveals systematic conservative credential-building rather than emotional dysregulation. Ten posts across two distinct clusters (evening Feb 29, afternoon Mar 1) maintain unwavering grandiose state without rage, hypomania, or deterioration. Trump positions himself as foreign policy hawk and economic truth-teller against "weak" Obama, strategically timing attacks around Breitbart's death, Romney's primary victories, and the Afghanistan Koran-burning crisis. Normal sleep pattern (17-hour gap between clusters) contradicts hypomania despite elevated posting frequency. The psychological arc is stable campaigning—no redemption, contamination, or chaos—just methodical political messaging. Maximum danger level remains low despite one elevated-risk post on Iraq oil extraction. This snapshot captures Trump's characterological baseline: grandiose narcissism, splitting defenses, pure agency motivation, and combative rhetoric—the same psychological architecture that would later define his presidency, but operating here within normal political bounds during the 2012 Republican primary season.

Full digest for 2012-03-01: https://trump.fm/date/2012-03-01/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2012, March 1). "If history teaches us anything, it's that strong... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. ""If history teaches us anything, it's that strong nations..." X (Twitter), 1 Mar. 2012. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488. Accessed 10 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, ""If history teaches us anything, it's that strong nations...," X (Twitter), March 1, 2012, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_175322903791935488
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_175322903791935488
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_175322903791935488
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2012-03-01
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_175322903791935488.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._