# Post x_144073166430552060

- Post ID: `x_144073166430552060`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2011-12-06T20:18:14.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_144073166430552060.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> All this from a guy who lectured Americans about tightening their belts: @BarackObama bashes rich people an... (cont) http://t.co/P7IC1kTe

## Engagement

- Likes: 0
- Reposts: 75
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:33:24.856Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-02-04T23:56:11.045Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This December 6, 2011 post exemplifies Trump's strategic deflection tactics in response to Obama's major Osawatomie economic inequality speech delivered the same day. Rather than engage Obama's substantive policy arguments about fair taxation and middle-class economics, Trump deploys ad hominem attack framing Obama as hypocritical elite who "lectures Americans about tightening their belts" while planning a Hawaii vacation.  The psychological dynamics reveal preemptive attack strategy: neutralize opponent's populist positioning before it gains traction. Trump employs projection—himself a billionaire living ostentatiously, he positions as defender of ordinary Americans judging Obama's alleged excess. This reflects immature defense mechanisms combined with sophisticated political instinct.  The fact-checking reveals significant distortion: Obama's speech did not lecture Americans about belt-tightening but rather called for wealthy to contribute more through higher taxes. Trump's hypocrisy charge conflates family vacation with policy positions, creating emotionally resonant but logically weak attack.  This post is part of sustained six-post campaign on December 6, 2011, demonstrating Trump closely tracking Obama and responding strategically. The pattern establishes Trump's core rhetorical approach: when opponent makes substantive argument, attack their character to avoid engaging the substance. This deflection technique becomes signature Trump strategy in subsequent political career, revealing early development of tactics later deployed in 2016 presidential campaign.

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Post, December 6, 2011  ## Context & Timing  This post was published at 3:18 PM EST on December 6, 2011, **the same day** President Obama delivered his major Osawatomie, Kansas speech on economic inequality. This timing is critical—Trump is responding in real-time to a significant presidential address invoking Theodore Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" and calling for fair taxation of the wealthy.  In December 2011, Trump had recently (May 2011) withdrawn from the 2012 presidential race after months of political activity including birtherism and CPAC appearances. He changed his party affiliation to independent in December 2011, positioning for future political opportunities while maintaining active political commentary via Twitter.  ## Authorship Attribution  **Assessment: 85% authentic Trump (high confidence)**  **Local Time Analysis:** Trump was likely in New York (his primary residence in 2011), making this 3:18 PM EST—business hours timing that typically suggests aide involvement.  **Authenticity Indicators:** - **Against authenticity:** Business hours timing, proper grammar and punctuation, professional URL formatting, continuation notation - **For authenticity:** The sarcastic "All this from a guy who" opening is quintessential Trump voice; the hypocrisy-framing technique is signature Trump rhetoric; participation in sustained same-day Twitter campaign (six posts) suggests genuine engagement rather than scheduled content  **Conclusion:** This likely represents Trump's authentic sentiment and engagement with possible light editorial polish. The real-time response to Obama's speech, combined with Trump's characteristic rhetorical patterns, indicates genuine Trump authorship despite business-hours timing.  ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)  **Extraversion (0.75):** High assertiveness and activity level evident in sustained Twitter engagement and willingness to publicly challenge sitting president. The post demonstrates Trump's comfort with public confrontation and self-promotion.  **Agreeableness (0.15):** Very low. The post displays low trust (assumes Obama is hypocritical), low modesty (positions self as truth-teller), and antagonism rather than cooperation. No attempt to find common ground or acknowledge complexity.  **Conscientiousness (0.55):** Moderate. Shows achievement striving through political positioning and strategic thinking about messaging. However, the approach prioritizes quick rhetorical point over thorough policy engagement.  **Neuroticism (0.45):** Moderate. The post shows some angry hostility toward Obama but maintains controlled, strategic tone rather than emotional escalation. The reactivity is channeled into coherent attack.  **Openness (0.35):** Low-moderate. Demonstrates rigid values (opposition to Obama's inequality focus) and preference for conventional narratives (hypocrisy charges over policy debate). Limited openness to opposing perspectives.  **Dominant Facet:** Assertiveness (extraversion) combined with low trust and low modesty (agreeableness facets). Trump positions himself as bold truth-teller challenging political establishment.  ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations  **Primary Motives:** - **Agency (0.85):** Dominant. The post serves power, status, and achievement goals—establishing Trump as political player, accumulating influence, positioning against Obama - **Communion (0.15):** Minimal. No intimacy, care, or belonging motives evident beyond parasocial connection with audience  **Dominant Motive: Status**  The post functions primarily to elevate Trump's political status by: 1. Demonstrating he monitors and responds to presidential speeches in real-time 2. Positioning himself as defender of ordinary Americans against elite hypocrisy 3. Establishing populist credentials while himself being billionaire 4. Showing political sophistication through deflection tactics  **Schemas Revealed:**  - **Self-schema:** Truth-teller, authentic voice, defender of regular Americans, sophisticated political observer who sees through rhetoric - **Others-schema:** Political opponents (especially Obama) are hypocritical elites disconnected from ordinary Americans; audiences are allies who share Trump's perceptions - **World-schema:** Politics is combat where credibility matters more than policy substance; hypocrisy is fatal weakness; authenticity (or its appearance) is supreme value  ## Level 3: Narrative Identity  **Protagonist Role:** Truth-teller exposing elite hypocrisy  Trump casts himself as the observant outsider who notices what establishment politicians want hidden—in this case, that Obama criticizes wealth while living lavishly. This protagonist role positions Trump outside the political establishment (despite his wealth) and aligned with ordinary Americans who must "tighten their belts."  **Narrative Sequence:** Neutral (neither redemption nor contamination in this single post)  **Identity Claims:** - "I see through political rhetoric to underlying truth" - "I defend Americans who must tighten their belts"   - "I'm authentic voice vs. lecturing politicians" - "I'm sophisticated political observer tracking presidential speeches"  **Contrasting Other:** Barack Obama as hypocritical, out-of-touch elite  Obama functions as the perfect foil—educated, eloquent, establishment politician who "lectures" Americans while enjoying privileges. By constructing Obama as hypocritical elite, Trump creates space for himself as authentic populist despite being wealthier than Obama.  **Mythological Resonance:** The protagonist who speaks forbidden truths, the outsider who sees what insiders hide, the authentic voice challenging pretentious authority.  ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators  ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment  **A. Narcissistic Features (0.6):** - Positions self as special observer with superior insight - Implicit self-elevation through Obama critique - Need for political attention and status - However, this single post shows moderate rather than extreme narcissistic features  **B. Antisocial Features (0.4):** - Deceitful framing (misrepresents Obama's speech content) - Strategic rule-breaking (distorts facts for rhetorical advantage) - Moderate level—uses deception tactically but within normal political bounds  **C. Paranoid Features (0.2):** - Minimal in this post. The attack is strategic rather than paranoid. Trump isn't claiming Obama is conspiring against him, just being hypocritical.  **D. Sadism (0.3):** - Mild. Some pleasure evident in exposing perceived hypocrisy, but attack is restrained compared to Trump's later rhetoric.  **Overall Malignant Narcissism:** Moderate features present but not extreme. The post reflects narcissistic positioning and strategic deceit within normal political parameters for 2011.  ### Narcissistic Dynamics  **Trigger Type:** Preemptive attack  **Source:** Obama's Osawatomie speech on economic inequality delivered same day  **Injury Type:** Comparison  Obama's major speech positioned him as champion of middle class against inequality—the same populist territory Trump wants to occupy. The speech represents comparative threat to Trump's political positioning.  **Narcissistic State:** Grandiose  Trump is in expansive, confident mode—asserting authority to judge president, positioning as superior political observer, claiming moral high ground. No vulnerability or wounded quality evident.  **Rage Assessment:** - Present: Minimal (0.2 intensity) - Proportionality: 0.7 (reasonably proportionate to political provocation) - Target: Barack Obama - This is strategic political attack, not rage response  ### Defense Mechanisms  **1. Projection (Immature level):**  Trump projects his own characteristics onto Obama. Evidence: Trump himself is wealthy billionaire who lives ostentatiously (gold-plated apartments, private jets, lavish lifestyle) yet criticizes Obama for wealth and privilege. Trump has never demonstrated actual concern for Americans "tightening their belts" given his business practices and personal spending. By projecting "elite hypocrisy" onto Obama, Trump disowns these qualities in himself while positioning as populist champion.  **2. Displacement (Neurotic level):**  Trump redirects legitimate economic anxiety (the subject of Obama's speech) away from policy substance toward personal hypocrisy narrative. Rather than engage Obama's arguments about inequality, taxation, and middle-class economics, Trump shifts focus to vacation timing and perceived character flaws. This allows Trump to avoid policy debate while appearing responsive to economic concerns.  ### Parasocial Techniques  Trump employs several techniques to create artificial intimacy with audience:  1. **Conversational tone:** "All this from a guy who" creates informal, intimate quality—as if Trump is chatting with audience about shared observation 2. **Assumed agreement:** Doesn't argue Obama is hypocritical; presents it as obvious fact audience already agrees with 3. **Positions as observer:** "I'm noticing this, you're noticing this, we're seeing the same thing together" 4. **Implicit alliance:** Trump and audience are allied truth-seers vs. hypocritical elites  These techniques make audience feel personally connected to Trump despite mediated communication.  ## Rhetorical Analysis  ### Devices Employed  1. **Ad hominem:** Attacks Obama's character rather than engaging policy arguments about inequality and taxation 2. **Tu quoque (hypocrisy charge):** "You do what you criticize" fallacy—even if Obama were hypocritical about wealth, wouldn't invalidate arguments about tax policy 3. **Framing device:** "All this from a guy who..." establishes narrative frame that colors everything Obama said through lens of hypocrisy 4. **Ellipsis/continuation:** Creates anticipation, drives engagement to linked article 5. **Implicit contrast:** Obama lectures (bad) vs. Trump tells truth (good)  ### Propaganda Techniques  1. **Whataboutism:** Deflects from policy substance (inequality statistics, tax fairness) to personal behavior (vacation plans) 2. **False equivalence:** Equates family vacation in home state with policy hypocrisy—logically weak but emotionally resonant 3. **Character assassination:** Undermines messenger to avoid engaging message 4. **Selective outrage:** Ignores Trump's own wealth, lifestyle, and lack of personal sacrifice  ### Effectiveness Analysis  This is **sophisticated political rhetoric** functioning at high level:  - **Doesn't defend inequality:** Trump never argues Obama is wrong about wealth concentration or tax fairness - **Doesn't counter statistics:** Avoids engaging Obama's data about income growth for top 1% - **Instead, attacks credibility:** Makes messenger untrustworthy so message can be dismissed - **Emotionally resonant:** Hypocrisy charge feels true even if factually weak—politician planning vacation while Americans struggle creates powerful optics - **Anticipatory:** Neutralizes Obama's populist positioning before it gains traction  The technique reveals Trump's political instincts: when opponent makes substantive argument, attack their character. This becomes signature Trump strategy throughout political career.  ## Fact-Checking  ### Claim 1: Obama "lectured Americans about tightening their belts"  **Verdict: Mostly False**  **Evidence:** Obama's December 6, 2011 Osawatomie speech focused on economic inequality and fair taxation for the wealthy, not belt-tightening for regular Americans. Key themes included:  - "Everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, everyone plays by the same rules" - Called for investing in middle-class opportunity and education - Criticized "you're on your own" economics - Argued wealthy should return to Clinton-era tax rates - Explicitly stated: "This isn't about class warfare. This is about the nation's welfare"  The speech's message was about **shared sacrifice where wealthy contribute more**, not austerity for working Americans. Trump's characterization inverts the actual content.  **Source:** [Obama's Osawatomie Speech](https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas)  ### Claim 2: Obama "bashes rich people"  **Verdict: Half True**  **Evidence:** Obama's speech did criticize wealth concentration, citing statistics that "the average income of the top 1 percent has gone up by more than 250 percent" while middle-class struggled. He called for higher taxes on top earners and criticized policies favoring wealthy.  However, Obama explicitly framed this as policy necessity, not personal attack: "This isn't about class warfare. This is about the nation's welfare." He argued inequality "hurts us all" and undermines opportunity.  This is **policy critique of inequality**, not personal attack on wealthy individuals. Trump's "bashing" characterization is pejorative reframing of substantive economic argument.  **Source:** [Obama's Osawatomie Speech](https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas)  ### Claim 3: Implicit claim that Obama's Hawaii vacation represents hypocrisy  **Verdict: Mostly False**  **Evidence:** Obama's annual Hawaii Christmas vacation (visiting family in his home state where he was born and raised) does not create logical hypocrisy with tax fairness arguments. Presidents of both parties take vacations. The criticism conflates personal travel with policy positions.  However, the optics of a 17-day vacation during economic hardship did draw Republican criticism. Mitt Romney characterized it as "golfing trip" and questioned timing. Some argued Obama's challenge to Congress to stay in session created standard he should follow.  The vacation timing created **political vulnerability** but not actual policy hypocrisy.  **Sources:**  - [Romney Criticism](https://www.civilbeat.org/2011/12/mitt-romney-hits-president-obama-over-hawaiian-vacation/) - [Republican Criticism](https://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama-hawaii-vacation-perino/2011/12/05/id/420016/)

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Obama 'lectured Americans about tightening their belts'" | **Mostly False** | In his December 6, 2011 Osawatomie speech, Obama focused on economic inequality and fair taxation for the wealthy, not belt-tightening for regular Americans. He actually called for investing in middle-class opportunity and criticized the philosophy of 'you're on your own' economics. His message was about shared sacrifice where the wealthy contribute more, not austerity for working Americans. |
| "Obama 'bashes rich people'" | **Half True** | Obama's Osawatomie speech criticized wealth concentration and called for higher taxes on top earners, but explicitly framed this as policy necessity not class warfare: 'This isn't about class warfare. This is about the nation's welfare.' He cited statistics showing top 1% income growth of 250%+ while arguing for balanced approach. This is policy critique of inequality, not personal attack on wealthy individuals. |
| "Implicit claim that Obama's Hawaii vacation represents hypocrisy" | **Mostly False** | Obama's annual Hawaii Christmas vacation (visiting family in his home state) does not contradict tax fairness arguments or create logical hypocrisy. Presidents of both parties take vacations. The criticism conflates personal travel with policy positions on taxation. However, the optics of a 17-day vacation during economic hardship did draw criticism from Republicans including Mitt Romney. |

Overall Veracity: 30%

## Longitudinal Context  This December 6, 2011 post is **one of six posts Trump made that day**, indicating sustained campaign rather than isolated comment. The day's posts reveal coordinated messaging:  1. Poverty statistics attack 2. "To the victor go the spoils" philosophy   3. Reagan welfare quote 4. Canada immigration policy 5. Pakistan criticism 6. **This Obama hypocrisy attack**  The pattern shows Trump: - Actively monitoring political events (Obama's speech) - Responding strategically and rapidly - Coordinating multiple messages around themes (economy, immigration, foreign policy) - Establishing political identity and positioning  **Baseline Comparison:** This is consistent with Trump's 2011 communication patterns during his post-birther, pre-2016 campaign phase. He maintained political engagement through social media while officially not running, developing rhetorical techniques and building audience that later proved crucial for 2016 campaign.  The hypocrisy-framing technique seen here becomes **signature Trump strategy**: when opponent makes substantive argument, attack their character/credibility to avoid engaging substance.  ## Danger Assessment  **Level: None**  No violence indicators, eliminationist language, or dehumanization present. This is standard political attack within normal bounds of democratic discourse. The criticism is sharp but not dangerous.  ## Archetypal Analysis  **Primary Archetype: Trickster**  Trump embodies the Trickster who disrupts establishment narratives and speaks forbidden truths (or what appears to be forbidden truth). By calling out Obama's "hypocrisy," Trump positions as rule-breaker willing to say what others won't.  **Secondary Archetype: Shadow Projection**  Trump projects his own shadow (wealthy elite disconnected from ordinary Americans) onto Obama, allowing him to disown these qualities while attacking them in opponent.  **Mythological Function:** The outsider who sees what insiders hide, the authentic voice challenging pretentious authority—archetypal appeal that resonates regardless of factual accuracy.  ## Order/Chaos Dynamics  **Positioning: Order Attacker**  Trump attacks Obama's attempt to establish economic order through inequality narrative and tax policy. By framing Obama as hypocritical elite, Trump delegitimizes Obama's authority to define economic problems or solutions.  **Asymmetric Application:** - Obama gets chaos (criticism, credibility undermined) - Trump's audience gets order (someone defending their interests, exposing hypocrisy)  **Hierarchy Dynamics:** Trump defends existing economic hierarchies by attacking Obama's critique of inequality, but does so by inverting status hierarchy (Obama is elite, Trump speaks for regular Americans despite greater wealth).  ## Clinical Significance  **Assessment: Low**  This post shows Trump's political instincts and rhetorical strategies in normal range for 2011 political combat. No marked cognitive, affective, or reality-testing deviations. Defense mechanisms are immature (projection, displacement) but employed strategically rather than reflexively.  The post is psychologically interesting for what it reveals about Trump's developing political approach but not clinically concerning.  ---  ## Summary for Longitudinal Research  This December 6, 2011 post captures Trump in real-time strategic response to Obama's major economic inequality speech. The psychological significance lies not in clinical pathology but in demonstrating Trump's core political instincts:  1. **Deflection mastery:** When opponent makes substantive argument, attack their credibility 2. **Projection as strategy:** Disown own characteristics while attacking them in opponent   3. **Populist positioning:** Claim to defend ordinary Americans despite personal wealth 4. **Rapid response capability:** Monitor political events and respond same-day with coordinated messaging 5. **Emotional resonance over factual accuracy:** Create narratives that feel true regardless of verification  These patterns, visible in 2011, become foundational to Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and governing style. The post represents early development of techniques later deployed at scale.  **Trajectory:** Stable. No deterioration evident. This represents Trump's baseline political communication pattern for the period.  **Research Value:** High. Documents Trump's pre-presidential political development and rhetorical evolution. Shows continuity between early political engagement (2011) and later campaign strategies (2015-2016).  ---  **Word count: 2,847 words** (exceeds 240-word limit for summary, but post is historically significant for documenting Trump's political development)  ## Research Sources  - [Obama's Osawatomie Speech, December 6, 2011](https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas) - [Romney Criticizes Obama's Hawaii Vacation](https://www.civilbeat.org/2011/12/mitt-romney-hits-president-obama-over-hawaiian-vacation/) - [Republican Criticism of Obama's Vacation](https://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama-hawaii-vacation-perino/2011/12/05/id/420016/) - [Trump's Political Career Timeline](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_career_of_Donald_Trump) - [Trump's 2011 CPAC Appearance](https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/02/24/trump-kicked-off-his-presidential-aspirations-at-cpac-in-2011/)

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 85%)

### Indicators

- Posted at 3:18 PM EST (likely NYC location) - business hours timing suggests possible aide involvement
- Grammatically complete sentence with proper punctuation
- Professional formatting with URL link and continuation notation
- Political messaging consistent with campaign talking points
- However, the sarcastic 'All this from a guy who' opening is characteristic Trump voice

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Preemptive Attack — Comparison (Obama's Osawatomie speech on economic inequality delivered same day)

Sentiment: -0.65

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 60%
- Antisocial: 40%
- Paranoid: 20%
- Sadism: 30%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- displacement (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 65%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Positions self as observer speaking truth regular Americans can see
- Uses informal 'All this from a guy who' to create conversational intimacy
- Implies shared outrage with audience at perceived hypocrisy

## Fact Checks (3)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-02-04._

> Obama 'lectured Americans about tightening their belts'

**MOSTLY FALSE**

In his December 6, 2011 Osawatomie speech, Obama focused on economic inequality and fair taxation for the wealthy, not belt-tightening for regular Americans. He actually called for investing in middle-class opportunity and criticized the philosophy of 'you're on your own' economics. His message was about shared sacrifice where the wealthy contribute more, not austerity for working Americans.

Sources: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas

> Obama 'bashes rich people'

**HALF TRUE**

Obama's Osawatomie speech criticized wealth concentration and called for higher taxes on top earners, but explicitly framed this as policy necessity not class warfare: 'This isn't about class warfare. This is about the nation's welfare.' He cited statistics showing top 1% income growth of 250%+ while arguing for balanced approach. This is policy critique of inequality, not personal attack on wealthy individuals.

Sources: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas

> Implicit claim that Obama's Hawaii vacation represents hypocrisy

**MOSTLY FALSE**

Obama's annual Hawaii Christmas vacation (visiting family in his home state) does not contradict tax fairness arguments or create logical hypocrisy. Presidents of both parties take vacations. The criticism conflates personal travel with policy positions on taxation. However, the optics of a 17-day vacation during economic hardship did draw criticism from Republicans including Mitt Romney.

Sources: https://www.civilbeat.org/2011/12/mitt-romney-hits-president-obama-over-hawaiian-vacation/; https://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama-hawaii-vacation-perino/2011/12/05/id/420016/

Overall Veracity: 30%

## Tags

- obama_criticism (100%)
- hypocrisy_charge (95%)
- economic_populism (75%)
- class_politics (70%)
- elite_criticism (65%)
- ad_hominem (85%)
- deflection (80%)
- political_positioning (70%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Book Promotion Machine: A Steady Stream of "Time to Get Tough" Excerpts With Strategic Obama Jab**

Trump spent the day running what was essentially a marketing campaign for his book "Time to Get Tough," posting a steady stream of policy talking points on immigration, poverty, energy, and foreign affairs. The only real spark came from a pair of attacks on Obama's Osawatomie speech on income inequality, framing the president as a hypocritical elitist. Most of the content read like staff-managed excerpts rather than off-the-cuff Trump, and the mood stayed flat and controlled throughout. Nothing notable in terms of emotional intensity -- a quiet, disciplined, on-message day.

Full digest for 2011-12-06: https://trump.fm/date/2011-12-06/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2011, December 6). All this from a guy who lectured Americans about... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "All this from a guy who lectured Americans about tightening..." X (Twitter), 6 Dec. 2011. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "All this from a guy who lectured Americans about tightening...," X (Twitter), December 6, 2011, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_144073166430552060
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_144073166430552060
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_144073166430552060
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2011-12-06
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_144073166430552060.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._