Analysis: Biden NEVER named his list of Supreme Court Justices. Never ...

5y ago Nov 2, 2020 at 11:44 PM

Biden NEVER named his list of Supreme Court Justices. Never even said whether or not he was going to Pack the Court. So how do you vote for this guy?

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-19. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

35%

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

ALL CAPS 'NEVER' for emotional emphasis is a characteristic Trump stylistic tic
Closing rhetorical question ('So how do you vote for this guy?') has the informal, conversational register of authentic Trump
Repetition of 'Never' in second sentence mirrors authentic stream-of-consciousness style
UTC 23:44 = approximately 6:44 PM ET on final campaign day — Trump was in Midwest swing states running five rallies; early evening, not late-night authentic window, but not clearly aide business hours either
No typos, but brevity and directness are consistent with authentic short-form Trump rather than aide polish

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Maintenance (Biden)

Sentiment

-0.42

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

30%

Antisocial

15%

Paranoid

10%

Sadism

Defense Mechanisms:

projectionrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

28%

Parasocial Techniques:

Rhetorical question invites audience to reach a predetermined conclusion autonomously, creating false sense of independent voter reasoningImplicit flattery of audience as discerning voters who can spot evasion

Fact Checks (2)

"Biden NEVER named his list of Supreme Court Justices"

Mostly True

Biden explicitly refused to release a SCOTUS nominee list during the 2020 campaign, stating he would not play 'the game' Trump wanted. He said he would release a list after the election. He did not release names before November 3, 2020.

"Never even said whether or not he was going to Pack the Court"

Half True

Biden repeatedly deflected the court-packing question, famously saying 'you'll know my opinion on court-packing when the election is over.' He neither committed to nor ruled out expanding the Court before Election Day, though his evasion was itself a communicative act. He later stated he was not in favor of court packing after the election.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Analysis: x_1323335185035747300 — November 2, 2020

Contextual Frame

Posted at 23:44 UTC (≈6:44 PM ET) on the final day of the 2020 presidential campaign, when Trump was executing a punishing five-rally sprint across North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan (twice), and Wisconsin. This is a closing-argument attack on Biden's two most-documented policy evasions of the campaign cycle: his refusal to release a SCOTUS nominee list and his repeated deflection on court packing. Both claims are among the more factually grounded attacks in Trump's 2020 campaign messaging.

Authorship Attribution

Moderately consistent with authentic Trump (0.72). The ALL CAPS "NEVER," informal register, and rhetorical-question close are characteristic signatures. Timestamp falls in early evening, not the late-night authentic window, but the final campaign day context — Trump moving between rallies, likely on a phone — makes impulsive tweeting plausible. No typos reduce confidence slightly; aide authorship cannot be ruled out.

Psychological State

Low-affect, instrumentally disciplined post. Narcissistic state is grandiose but subdued — this is maintenance and mobilization rather than injury-reactive behavior. No narcissistic rage signature. The implicit self-contrast (Trump released a SCOTUS list; Biden refused) serves grandiosity with restraint unusual for this subject. Defense mechanisms are mild: projection (Trump's own extensive policy evasions unremarked) and rationalization (constructing a logical-sounding brief around a pre-formed conclusion). Malignant narcissism indicators are minimal in this post.

Rhetorical Analysis

Tight, prosecutorial structure: charge → extension of charge → verdict-as-question. The rhetorical question closing is a parasocial technique that enrolls the audience as independent reasoners arriving at his conclusion. Mild contemptuous dismissal ("this guy") marks Biden as beneath engagement without dehumanizing. No violent imagery, no eliminationist language.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Biden NEVER named his list of Supreme Court Justices"	Mostly True	Biden explicitly refused to release a SCOTUS nominee list during the 2020 campaign, stating he would not play 'the game' Trump wanted. He said he would release a list after the election. He did not release names before November 3, 2020.
"Never even said whether or not he was going to Pack the Court"	Half True	Biden repeatedly deflected the court-packing question, famously saying 'you'll know my opinion on court-packing when the election is over.' He neither committed to nor ruled out expanding the Court before Election Day, though his evasion was itself a communicative act. He later stated he was not in favor of court packing after the election.

Overall Veracity: 65%

Cognitive Markers

No anomalies. Syntax is simple but coherent, logical flow is intact, no word-finding difficulties or perseveration beyond the emphatic "Never" repetition (which is stylistic, not indicative of cognitive failure).

Danger Assessment

None. Standard electoral attack rhetoric, factually grounded, no threat content, no dehumanization, no mobilization for violence. This is among the more restrained posts in the longitudinal record.

Summary

Not clinically significant by post-level standards. This is disciplined campaign-mode communication, notable primarily for its comparative restraint relative to baseline.