# Post x_1263081823812366300

- Post ID: `x_1263081823812366300`
- Platform: X (Twitter)
- Posted: 2020-05-20T16:19:08.000Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_1263081823812366300.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> ....Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly. How about that jury Forewoman, does anybody think that was fair. DISGRACEFUL! Stay tuned.  @FoxNews And guys like Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough are allowed to walk the streets? Open Cold Case!

## Engagement

- Likes: 0
- Reposts: 15,553
- Replies: 0
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:33:24.804Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-23T05:12:10.932Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This post constitutes one of the more clinically and civically significant in the Trump Twitter corpus. Two parallel narcissistic injuries — Stone's conviction (proxy threat to Trump's orbit) and Scarborough's ongoing media criticism — are fused into a single retaliatory strike deploying projection, splitting, and pathological distortion. The Scarborough attack is not rhetorical excess: it reframes a medically closed accidental death from 2001 as an open murder case, doing so with awareness that the deceased's widower had publicly begged for the campaign to stop. The absence of any brake in the face of documented human suffering is a clinical indicator consistent with Kernberg's malignant narcissism construct (antisocial features, ego-syntonic sadism). The "Open Cold Case!" imperative is the post's most dangerous element: a sitting president issuing a public directive to investigate a named media critic on baseless grounds, to a multi-million person audience. This meets established criteria for stochastic terrorism — named target, articulated grievance, implied action, massive amplification. Authorship is unambiguously authentic Trump. Danger level: HIGH.

# Post Analysis: 2020-05-20 | x_1263081823812366300

## Authorship Attribution

**Local time:** 12:19 PM EDT (UTC−4; Trump at the White House, Washington DC). Business hours argue against authentic Trump authorship on timing alone, but every other stylometric marker is overwhelmingly authentic: the four-dot ellipsis opener suggesting a mid-thought continuation, unpunctuated rhetorical question, ALL CAPS "DISGRACEFUL!", invented diminutive "Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough," the amnesiac @FoxNews insertion mid-tweet, and the imperative fragment "Open Cold Case!" These are signature Trump constructions. Aides do not write like this. **Verdict: authentic.**

---

## Psychological State and Triggers

Two parallel narcissistic injuries drive this post. First, the Roger Stone conviction represents a proxy injury: Stone is a long-time Trump associate whose legal jeopardy implicates Trump's own orbit. Defending Stone is self-defense by displacement. Second, Joe Scarborough is a former ally turned vocal critic and represents the archetype Trump finds most threatening — a person from his own world who abandoned and then publicly attacked him. The twin triggers (judicial system perceived as hostile to his allies, media figure perceived as persecutor) produce a fused, rapid-fire response with markedly elevated hostility.

The narcissistic state here is **mixed but tending vindictive-grandiose**: Trump positions himself as the arbiter of fairness ("does anybody think that was fair"), the keeper of unsolved truths ("Open Cold Case!"), and the one who will deliver justice to both the wronged and the guilty. "Stay tuned" implies he commands outcomes.

---

## Defense Mechanisms

**Projection (immature):** Stone was convicted of seven felonies — lying to Congress, witness tampering, obstruction. Scarborough, against whom no credible evidence of wrongdoing exists, is cast as the one who should not "walk the streets." The actual criminal's innocence is asserted; the innocent man's guilt is implied. Classic projection of legal culpability.

**Splitting (immature):** The post constructs a perfect moral inversion. Stone = pure victim, system = corrupt/DISGRACEFUL, Scarborough = murderer walking free. No ambiguity is permitted. This all-or-nothing framing is a signature Level 2 defense.

**Distortion (pathological):** Lori Klausutis died in 2001 from an undiagnosed heart condition; her death was ruled accidental by a medical examiner. Reframing this as an open murder case for which Scarborough should be investigated is not rhetorical excess — it is reality-reshaping to serve the self. Distortion, not mere exaggeration.

**Displacement:** The rage at the justice system (Stone conviction, jury forewoman) cannot be fully targeted at the judiciary without backlash; displacing it onto Scarborough, a media critic with no institutional protection, is safer and more satisfying.

---

## Rhetorical Techniques

- **Dehumanizing nickname:** "Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough" — three-part diminishment (audience size, mental health, name as possession rather than identity)
- **Implied criminality without accusation:** "allowed to walk the streets?" syntactically casts Scarborough as someone who *should not* be free without explicitly stating a charge
- **Imperative command:** "Open Cold Case!" is not a question or observation — it is a directive to law enforcement, unprecedented in its brazenness
- **Rhetorical question as verdict:** "does anybody think that was fair" is not asking; it is asserting "no one could" in a form immune to direct refutation
- **Suspense construction:** "Stay tuned" implies coming revelations, maintaining audience engagement and implying insider knowledge
- **ALL CAPS for emotional punctuation:** DISGRACEFUL serves as crowd applause cue

---

## Danger Assessment

This post meets multiple stochastic terrorism criteria:

1. **Named target:** Joe Scarborough is specifically identified
2. **Grievance articulated:** he is framed as a murderer escaping justice
3. **Implied action:** "allowed to walk the streets?" + "Open Cold Case!" signals both that he *should not* be free and that official investigation should commence
4. **Audience:** millions of followers, some with demonstrated willingness to act on perceived enemies

The historical record confirms real-world fear response: the widower of Lori Klausutis wrote a documented letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey pleading for removal of these tweets, stating they caused his wife's memory to be violated and put his family in danger. Trump escalated the pattern *despite* this appeal being publicly known. The absence of remorse in the face of documented harm to a grieving family is a clinical indicator, not merely a rhetorical observation.

**Danger level: HIGH.**

---

## Cognitive Status

The post shows no word-finding difficulty or paraphasia. The overall syntactic complexity is low but consistent with established baseline. The abrupt topic pivot (Stone → @FoxNews tag → Scarborough) and the opening ellipsis suggest associative rather than deliberate composition. This is typical Trump, not a deviation. No cognitive markers beyond baseline.

---

## Personality Framework (McAdams & Pals)

**Level 1 — Traits:** Dominant facets: angry hostility (neuroticism), assertiveness (extraversion), low agreeableness (antagonism, distrust), low conscientiousness (impulsive, undeliberated), rigid values (low openness).

**Level 2 — Motives:** Power motive dominant — the post exercises narrative control over two narratives (Stone's victimhood, Scarborough's guilt) and implies executive power to reopen criminal investigations. Achievement motive secondary (correcting the record, winning the framing war). Communion motive absent.

**Level 3 — Narrative Identity:** Protagonist role is **avenger-arbiter**: the only one who sees the true corruption ("does anybody think that was fair"), the one who will expose it ("Stay tuned"), and the one empowered to trigger justice ("Open Cold Case!"). The contrasting other is split between the corrupt system (jury forewoman, unnamed officials who "let" Stone be treated unfairly) and the enemy-at-large (Scarborough). Identity claim: *I alone see and name the injustice.*

**Level 4 — Clinical:** The juxtaposition of defending a convicted felon as "unfairly treated" while calling for criminal investigation of an innocent person on the basis of a baseless conspiracy is consistent with Kernberg's malignant narcissism cluster: narcissistic entitlement (Stone's treatment is unjust because Stone is Trump's ally), antisocial features (disregard for the harm to Klausutis's widower), paranoid features (jury was rigged), and ego-syntonic sadism (the post shows no reluctance or ambivalence about targeting Scarborough; the attack appears pleasurable).

---

## Archetypal / Order-Chaos Analysis

Trump occupies the **Warrior** archetype here (enemies must be confronted, justice must be wrested from corrupt institutions) with a **Trickster** undertone (deploying a murder accusation as a weapon is rule-breaking, norm-shattering chaos). The shadow projection is acute: the convicted associate is blameless; the innocent man is the murderer. The order/chaos frame positions Trump as an order-*restorer* ("Open Cold Case!" implies he will fix what corrupt officials let slide) while functioning as an order-*destroyer* (weaponizing state investigative power against a media critic).

---

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly" | **Mostly False** | Stone was convicted by a federal jury on all seven counts: obstruction, witness tampering, and five counts of lying to Congress. Legal process yielded a jury verdict. While sentencing controversy existed, the underlying conviction followed established legal procedure. |
| "The jury forewoman acted in a way that was unfair (DISGRACEFUL)" | **Half True** | Tomeka Hart was subsequently found to have made anti-Trump social media posts. A legitimate procedural question exists about voir dire disclosure. However, she was seated without contemporaneous objection and the characterization as unambiguously 'DISGRACEFUL' overstates a contested procedural matter. |
| "Joe Scarborough should be subject to an open cold case investigation (implying he killed Lori Klausutis)" | **False** | Lori Klausutis died July 20, 2001, from an undiagnosed heart valve abnormality. Medical examiner ruled the death accidental: she likely fainted and struck her head. Law enforcement investigated and closed the matter. No evidence of foul play exists. The conspiracy theory is baseless. Widower Timothy Klausutis publicly documented his anguish over Trump's tweets in letters to Twitter's CEO. |

Overall Veracity: 23%

## Gaslighting Indicators

- **Reality inversion:** Transforms a coroner-ruled accidental death into an "open cold case," demanding official re-examination of a closed matter
- **DARVO (partial):** Scarborough (attacker of Trump) is reframed as the actual criminal; Trump (the attacker here) is cast as the justice-seeker
- **Epistemic closure demand:** "does anybody think that was fair" forecloses disagreement by positing the answer as self-evident

---

## Summary

This post represents a clinically significant fusion of narcissistic rage, projection, and stochastic targeting. The dual attack — defending Stone (proxy self-defense via displacement) while escalating a murder conspiracy theory against Scarborough — shows the characteristic malignant narcissism pattern: antisocial disregard for collateral harm (the widower's documented distress), paranoid framing of legal process as rigged, grandiose assumption of authority to direct criminal investigations, and sadistic pleasure in the attack (the derogatory nickname, the "allowed to walk the streets" formulation). The "Open Cold Case!" imperative is not hyperbole — it is a directive to Trump's audience of millions, some fraction of whom will interpret it as license or instruction. The post escalates a conspiracy theory the widower of the deceased had already publicly pleaded be stopped, suggesting awareness of harm and absence of empathy. Danger level is HIGH, meeting multiple criteria for stochastic terrorism: named target, articulated grievance, implied action, and massive audience reach. Authorship is unambiguously authentic Trump.

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 88%)

### Indicators

- Four-dot ellipsis opener suggesting stream-of-consciousness continuation
- Invented multi-part derogatory nickname ('Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough')
- ALL CAPS emotional punctuation ('DISGRACEFUL!')
- Imperative fragment 'Open Cold Case!' — no aide writes this
- 'Stay tuned' is a signature Trump phrase

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Criticism (Stone conviction (proxy) + Scarborough media criticism)

**Rage:** Intensity 82% targeting Joe Scarborough and judicial system
- Proportionality: 10%

Sentiment: -0.78

**Mildly Hypomanic**
- Rapid topic pivot between unrelated grievances (Stone conviction → Scarborough murder theory) within a single short post
- Imperative urgency ('Open Cold Case!') suggesting pressured thought
- Escalating conspiracy theory despite public documented harm (widower's plea) — characteristic impulsivity overriding social brake

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 88%
- Antisocial: 80%
- Paranoid: 78%
- Sadism: 72%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- splitting (immature)
- distortion (pathological)
- displacement (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 28%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- 'Stay tuned' creates anticipatory bond implying insider revelation to come
- 'Does anybody think that was fair' recruits audience as co-aggrieved jury
- 'Open Cold Case!' deputizes followers as enforcers of Trump-defined justice
- Derogatory nickname functions as shared in-group vocabulary cementing parasocial identity

## Danger Assessment

**HIGH**

**Stochastic Terrorism Pattern Detected**

### Indicators

- Named individual (Scarborough) identified as criminal who should not 'walk the streets'
- 'Open Cold Case!' is a public directive to law enforcement from a sitting president, targeting a media critic
- Pattern escalation: known events confirm this was part of an escalating conspiracy theory campaign despite public pleas from widower to stop
- Dehumanizing nickname ('Psycho') applied to target before implied criminal accusation — standard pre-violence rhetorical sequencing
- Massive audience reach amplifies any individual actor interpretation as license to act
- No qualifying language, no caveats — the accusation is stated as settled fact requiring only official action

### Gaslighting

- Transforms a medically closed accidental death (2001, ruled by medical examiner) into an 'open cold case' — denial of documented institutional reality
- DARVO structure: Scarborough (Trump's attacker via media criticism) is reframed as the actual criminal; Trump (the attacker here) is the justice-seeker
- 'Does anybody think that was fair' forecloses disagreement by framing the rigged-jury conclusion as universally self-evident
- Accelerating conspiracy framing despite public knowledge of widower's distress — gaslighting not just the audience but reality itself

**Dehumanizing Language Present**

**Violent Imagery Present**

## Fact Checks (3)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-03-23._

> Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly

**MOSTLY FALSE**

Stone was convicted by a federal jury on all seven counts: obstruction, witness tampering, and five counts of lying to Congress. Legal process yielded a jury verdict. While sentencing controversy existed, the underlying conviction followed established legal procedure.

Sources: Trial record, U.S. v. Stone, 2019

> The jury forewoman acted in a way that was unfair (DISGRACEFUL)

**HALF TRUE**

Tomeka Hart was subsequently found to have made anti-Trump social media posts. A legitimate procedural question exists about voir dire disclosure. However, she was seated without contemporaneous objection and the characterization as unambiguously 'DISGRACEFUL' overstates a contested procedural matter.

Sources: Post-trial court filings, 2020

> Joe Scarborough should be subject to an open cold case investigation (implying he killed Lori Klausutis)

**FALSE**

Lori Klausutis died July 20, 2001, from an undiagnosed heart valve abnormality. Medical examiner ruled the death accidental: she likely fainted and struck her head. Law enforcement investigated and closed the matter. No evidence of foul play exists. The conspiracy theory is baseless. Widower Timothy Klausutis publicly documented his anguish over Trump's tweets in letters to Twitter's CEO.

Sources: Okaloosa County medical examiner ruling, 2001; Timothy Klausutis letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, May 2020

Overall Veracity: 23%

## Tags

- stochastic_terrorism (92%)
- narcissistic_rage (88%)
- conspiracy_theory_escalation (90%)
- projection (85%)
- media_targeting (88%)
- reality_distortion (87%)
- malignant_narcissism (80%)
- stone_defense (72%)
- dehumanizing_nickname (78%)
- scarborough_murder_theory (95%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Pre-Dawn Conspiracy Blitz Escalates to Stochastic Threat as Trump Wages Multi-Front War on Mail-In Voting, Media, and Obama**

Trump started the day well before dawn with a rapid-fire barrage of conspiracy posts about "Obamagate," then shifted midday to threatening two states over mail-in voting and baselessly accusing a cable news host of murder. The mood was aggressive and scattered, bouncing between conspiracy amplification, voter fraud alarmism, routine government announcements, and attacks on Democratic rivals. The standout moment was a post demanding authorities "Open Cold Case!" on Joe Scarborough — the day's most dangerous escalation — sandwiched between threats to withhold federal funding from Michigan, a state simultaneously receiving disaster relief for catastrophic flooding.

Full digest for 2020-05-20: https://trump.fm/date/2020-05-20/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2020, May 20). ....Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly.... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "....Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly. How about..." X (Twitter), 20 May. 2020. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "....Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly. How about...," X (Twitter), May 20, 2020, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_1263081823812366300
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_1263081823812366300
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_1263081823812366300
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2020-05-20
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_1263081823812366300.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._