# Post x_1138023190020730900 - Post ID: `x_1138023190020730900` - Platform: X (Twitter) - Posted: 2019-06-10T14:00:46.000Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_1138023190020730900.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > Now with our new deal, Mexico is doing more for the USA on Illegal Immigration than the Democrats. In fact, the Democrats are doing NOTHING, they want Open Borders,which means Illigal Immigration, Drugs and Crime. ## Engagement - Likes: 0 - Reposts: 15,797 - Replies: 0 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:33:25.064Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-17T18:01:45.499Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post represents a textbook supply-consolidation sequence following a perceived political win. The Mexico tariff deal resolution is immediately converted into narcissistic currency through a three-part rhetorical move: claim personal credit ("our new deal"), magnify the win via absurd favorable comparison (Mexico is doing more than American Democrats), and reactivate the base through fear-based immigration rhetoric ("Drugs and Crime"). The grandiose narcissistic state is fully active — no vulnerability or persecution language is present, which distinguishes this from the injury-triggered rage posts in the broader corpus. Psychologically, splitting dominates: Mexico has been reclassified from adversary to cooperative actor while Democrats are cast as malevolent nihilists who actively desire the criminal outcomes Trump claims to be preventing. This projection of malevolent desire ("they want") onto the political opposition is a characteristic immature defense mechanism, attributing agency and culpability to those who merely disagree on policy. The post contains a documented misspelling ("Illigal") consistent with unedited personal composition and falls within early business hours following Trump's return from the UK/Normandy trip. Authorship is assessed as likely authentic. No cognitive deviation from baseline is present. The "Drugs and Crime" association with immigration policy warrants elevated danger flagging as a contribution to the ambient dehumanization environment, though no specific targeting or mobilization language appears. Fully consistent with the June 2019 cluster baseline. # Analysis: June 10, 2019 — Mexico Deal / Democrat Attack ## Authorship Attribution The post bears strong markers of authentic Trump composition. The misspelling **"Illigal"** (for "Illegal") is a classic orthographic error consistent with rapid, unedited thumb-typing. The missing space after "Open Borders,which" is another unedited formatting artifact. The stream-of-consciousness structure — making an assertion, then restating it with added emotional charge — is a baseline Trump rhetorical pattern. **Timing:** UTC 14:00:46. Trump was in the UK for his state visit (June 3–5 in UK; June 6 in Normandy; by June 10 he had returned to the US). Per the events record, the D-Day 75th Anniversary activities concluded around June 6, placing Trump likely back in the US by June 10. Eastern time would be approximately 10:00 AM — within business hours but early enough that it could be personal posting. The emotional tone and typos favor authentic authorship. **Confidence: medium-high (authentic Trump)** --- ## Psychological State and Triggers The **precipitating trigger** is clearly the just-announced Mexico tariff deal resolution. Trump secured a politically visible win — Mexico agreed to deploy National Guard troops and expand the "Remain in Mexico" program, allowing him to suspend the threatened 5% tariffs. This is a **supply-seeking/victory consolidation** moment: the win is immediately converted into narcissistic supply by (a) claiming personal credit ("our new deal"), (b) magnifying the win by unfavorably comparing a foreign adversary-turned-cooperator to the domestic political opposition, and (c) reactivating the fear-based immigration narrative to sustain audience engagement. **Narcissistic state: grandiose.** The post radiates expansive confidence. There is no vulnerability or persecution language here — Trump is in the triumphant mode, casting himself as the deal-maker who extracted concessions where his political enemies offer only obstruction and complicity. **Trigger type: supply-seeking + maintenance.** No acute narcissistic injury is present. This is routine audience activation following a perceived win. --- ## Personality Framework (McAdams & Pals) ### Level 1 — Dispositional Traits - **Extraversion (high):** Assertive, declarative, dominant tone throughout. No hedging. - **Agreeableness (very low):** Zero charitable framing of political opponents. Binary, derogatory characterization. - **Conscientiousness (low on deliberation):** Typo, missing space — unpolished output consistent with low impulse control in written expression. - **Neuroticism (moderate-high):** Angry hostility directed at Democrats; the "NOTHING" capitalization signals emotional intensity. - **Openness (very low):** Rigid, absolutist values framing. No acknowledgment of complexity. ### Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations **Agency motives dominate:** The post is structured around power, achievement, and control. "Our new deal" positions Trump as the active agent extracting compliance from a foreign nation. Democrats are cast as passive failures — they "want" bad outcomes rather than actively pursuing good ones, which is itself a rhetorical diminishment. **Schemas revealed:** Self = uniquely capable deal-maker; Democrats = malevolent nihilists; Mexico = former adversary now subordinate; immigration = existential threat requiring strong executive action. ### Level 3 — Narrative Identity - **Protagonist role:** The Deal-Maker/Warrior. Trump closes with force where others fail. - **Redemption sequence:** Tariff threat (chaos/pressure) → Mexico capitulates → deal secured (order restored by Trump). Classic contamination-to-redemption arc completed in a single cycle. - **Contrasting other:** Democrats — who are not merely ineffective but actively desire the negative outcomes Trump is preventing. - **Identity claims:** "I get things done. They want failure." --- ## Defense Mechanisms 1. **Splitting (immature):** Mexico is now all-good (doing more than American politicians); Democrats are all-bad (doing NOTHING, wanting crime). The nuance of a coercive tariff threat extracting partial compliance is erased in favor of a clean moral binary. 2. **Projection (immature):** The charge that Democrats "want" illegal immigration, drugs, and crime attributes a malevolent desire to the opposition that mirrors the accusatory logic Trump applies to himself when attacked. The projection serves to preempt the counter-narrative that his tariff threat itself destabilized immigration policy. 3. **Rationalization (neurotic):** Framing a coercive tariff threat (which faced rare Republican opposition) as a "deal" obscures the coercive mechanism and presents it as skilled negotiation. --- ## Rhetorical Techniques 1. **False equivalence/comparison:** Comparing Mexico (a sovereign nation that made a calculated concession under economic duress) to the Democratic Party (which has no independent authority to enact immigration enforcement) creates an illogical but emotionally potent contrast. 2. **False dichotomy:** The frame implies only two options exist — Trump's deal-making or Democratic-enabled open borders. No middle ground or alternative policy framework is acknowledged. 3. **Association fallacy / fear appeal:** "Open Borders → Illegal Immigration → Drugs and Crime" is a syllogistic chain where each link is presented as self-evident causation. This activates fear without requiring evidentiary support. 4. **ALL CAPS emphasis:** "NOTHING" — emotional italicization. Standard Trump intensifier. 5. **Definitional capture:** Labeling the Democratic position as "Open Borders" is a strawman that substitutes an extreme position for the actual spectrum of Democratic immigration proposals. 6. **Tricolon of threat:** "Illegal Immigration, Drugs and Crime" — three-part list creates cumulative rhetorical weight and the illusion of comprehensiveness. --- ## Cognitive Status **"Illigal"** — orthographic error (transposed vowels). Likely simple typing error rather than phonemic paraphasia. Consistent with Trump's documented pattern of unedited typing. No novel cognitive concern. The post is syntactically simple but structurally coherent. Sentence length is short. Logic follows a basic enthymeme structure. No tangentiality, no perseveration beyond Trump's baseline immigration rhetoric. **No deviation from established cognitive baseline.** --- ## Danger Assessment **Elevated.** The association of an immigrant-influx policy position with "Drugs and Crime" is a form of **soft dehumanization by categorical association** — linking a group or policy to criminal harm without individual attribution. This is below the threshold of eliminationist language but contributes to the **normalizing environment** in which harsher rhetoric gains legitimacy. No specific target identification, no mobilization call, no violent imagery. Standard elevated-baseline scapegoating. --- ## Gaslighting / Reality Distortion **"Democrats want Open Borders"** is a documented strawman — no mainstream Democratic politician has advocated open borders as a policy. The claim deliberately substitutes an extreme caricature for the actual position, then attributes malevolent intent ("want") rather than policy disagreement. This is a mild **DARVO-adjacent** move: framing Democratic inaction on Trump's preferred border measures as affirmative desire for criminal chaos. --- ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Mexico is doing more for the USA on Illegal Immigration than the Democrats" | **Half True** | Mexico did agree to concrete enforcement measures (National Guard deployment, expanded MPP/Remain in Mexico). However, comparing a sovereign nation making coerced concessions to a domestic political party (which lacks independent enforcement authority) is a category error that makes the comparison logically unfair even if Mexico's concessions are real. | | "The Democrats are doing NOTHING" | **Mostly False** | Democrats had proposed DREAM Act reauthorizations, supplemental humanitarian border funding, and participated in bipartisan border security discussions in 2019. 'NOTHING' is demonstrably inaccurate as a characterization of legislative activity. | | "They want Open Borders" | **False** | No mainstream Democratic elected official held an 'open borders' policy position in 2019. Even the most progressive Democratic immigration proposals included border enforcement components. This is a documented strawman characterization. | | "Open Borders means Illegal Immigration, Drugs and Crime" | **Mostly False** | The empirical literature on immigration and crime consistently finds that immigrant populations, including undocumented immigrants, commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens. The causal chain asserted ('open borders' → crime) contradicts the social science consensus and conflates immigration status with criminal propensity. | Overall Veracity: 22% ## Longitudinal Context This post is fully consistent with the June 2019 cluster. The preceding 48-hour posts show: Twitter/Free Speech grievance → Obama comparison/credit-denial → Mueller Report victory lap → NYT fake news attack → and now Mexico deal victory lap. The pattern is **grievance → attack media → claim victimization → pivot to win → attack Democrats**. The immigration theme is a consistent throughline. No deviation from established June 2019 baseline patterns. ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 78%) ### Indicators - Misspelling 'Illigal' for 'Illegal' - unedited orthographic error - Missing space after comma in 'Open Borders,which' - Stream-of-consciousness escalation structure - ALL CAPS 'NOTHING' for emotional emphasis - Post time ~10 AM ET - early business hours, consistent with personal posting ## Psychological Profile ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Supply Seeking (Mexico tariff deal resolution) Sentiment: -0.35 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 72% - Antisocial: 30% - Paranoid: 20% - Sadism: 15% **Defense Mechanisms:** - splitting (immature) - projection (immature) - rationalization (neurotic) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 28% Cognitive Markers: - phonemic paraphasia **Parasocial Techniques:** - Direct audience address ('for the USA') - Us vs. them frame positioning followers as co-victims of Democratic malevolence - Fear activation through crime association to maintain emotional engagement ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Categorical association of policy position (immigration) with crime ('Drugs and Crime') - soft dehumanization by criminal linkage - Attribution of malevolent desire to domestic political opposition ('they want Open Borders, which means... Crime') - escalates rhetorical hostility beyond policy disagreement - Part of sustained multi-post same-day cluster maintaining high-volume anti-Democrat messaging (RAND Firehose pattern contribution) ## Fact Checks (4) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-17._ > Mexico is doing more for the USA on Illegal Immigration than the Democrats **HALF TRUE** Mexico did agree to concrete enforcement measures (National Guard deployment, expanded MPP/Remain in Mexico). However, comparing a sovereign nation making coerced concessions to a domestic political party (which lacks independent enforcement authority) is a category error that makes the comparison logically unfair even if Mexico's concessions are real. Sources: Known events: Mexico tariff deal resolution - Mexico deployed National Guard, expanded Remain in Mexico program > The Democrats are doing NOTHING **MOSTLY FALSE** Democrats had proposed DREAM Act reauthorizations, supplemental humanitarian border funding, and participated in bipartisan border security discussions in 2019. 'NOTHING' is demonstrably inaccurate as a characterization of legislative activity. Sources: General congressional record knowledge > They want Open Borders **FALSE** No mainstream Democratic elected official held an 'open borders' policy position in 2019. Even the most progressive Democratic immigration proposals included border enforcement components. This is a documented strawman characterization. Sources: General political knowledge > Open Borders means Illegal Immigration, Drugs and Crime **MOSTLY FALSE** The empirical literature on immigration and crime consistently finds that immigrant populations, including undocumented immigrants, commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens. The causal chain asserted ('open borders' → crime) contradicts the social science consensus and conflates immigration status with criminal propensity. Sources: Social science literature on immigration and crime rates Overall Veracity: 22% ## Tags - deal-making-narrative (85%) - immigration-fear-appeal (90%) - democrat-attack (88%) - splitting-defense (82%) - supply-consolidation (75%) - strawman-open-borders (87%) - crime-association (65%) - grandiose-state (80%) - authentic-authorship (78%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Post-Europe Victory Lap Collapses Into Mueller and Media Grievance Cycles** Trump spent the day toggling between celebrating his Mexico immigration deal and relitigating the Mueller investigation. A late-night grievance session gave way to morning triumph over the border agreement, but investigative reporting questioning the deal's novelty triggered a sharp defensive flare. The evening brought a second wave of Mueller anxiety when the House Judiciary Committee brought in Nixon-era witness John Dean, prompting Trump to recycle his "No Collusion" talking points. The day closed on a calmer note with a presidential statement on a Manhattan helicopter crash. Full digest for 2019-06-10: https://trump.fm/date/2019-06-10/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2019, June 10). Now with our new deal, Mexico is doing more for... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "Now with our new deal, Mexico is doing more for the USA on..." X (Twitter), 10 Jun. 2019. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "Now with our new deal, Mexico is doing more for the USA on...," X (Twitter), June 10, 2019, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_1138023190020730900 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_1138023190020730900 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_1138023190020730900 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2019-06-10 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_1138023190020730900.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._