# Post x_1089156621002002400 - Post ID: `x_1089156621002002400` - Platform: X (Twitter) - Posted: 2019-01-26T18:42:28.000Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/x_1089156621002002400.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress, what about the lying done by Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lisa Page &, lover, Baker and soooo many others? What about Hillary to FBI and her 33,000 deleted Emails? What about Lisa &, Peter’s deleted texts &, Wiener’s laptop? Much more! ## Engagement - Likes: 0 - Reposts: 36,554 - Replies: 0 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:33:25.071Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-16T23:06:50.586Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post constitutes a textbook narcissistic injury response triggered by Roger Stone's FBI arrest. Stone's indictment for lying to Congress creates a psychologically threatening mirror — a close associate charged with precisely the behavior Trump has normalized. The response is an immediate, high-affect whataboutism cascade naming six opponents as equivalent or greater criminals. The central defense is projection: the specific charged crime (lying) is attributed wholesale to investigators and Democrats. The rhetorical structure follows the RAND Firehose model — volume and breadth of counter-accusation over evidentiary depth. Multiple named individuals are publicly implied to be unprosecuted criminals before tens of millions of followers, generating elevated harassment risk. The 'Lisa & lover' construction reveals mild ego-syntonic sadism: the affair is deployed not as evidence but as a humiliation instrument. Authorship is assessed as authentic Trump: stream-of-consciousness affect, elongated 'soooo,' mobile encoding artifacts, and emotional reactivity proportionate to Stone's inner-circle proximity. No acute cognitive markers; consistent with 2018-2019 baseline. Epistemic closure is reinforced — followers are implicitly required to treat Stone's verified indictment as illegitimate while accepting unproven accusations against opponents as self-evident fact. Danger level elevated due to named individual targeting at presidential platform scale. ## Analysis: Post x_1089156621002002400 (2019-01-26) ### Context and Trigger This post arrives approximately 24 hours after Roger Stone's pre-dawn FBI arrest on seven counts including lying to Congress, obstruction, and witness tampering. Stone is among Trump's longest-serving political associates; the arrest represents a direct threat to Trump's inner circle and constitutes a significant **narcissistic injury** — the Mueller investigation, which Trump has consistently reframed as a "witch hunt," has now physically reached someone he regards as loyal. The post is a near-pure whataboutism cascade, structurally a defensive counter-volley rather than any substantive engagement with the charges. ### Authorship Attribution UTC 18:42 converts to **1:42 PM EST** (Washington D.C., January 2019). This falls in business hours, which superficially points toward aide authorship. However, several indicators strongly favor authentic Trump: - **"soooo many others"** — affect-laden elongation characteristic of his personal posts - **Stream-of-consciousness listing** with no syntactic cohesion between accusees - **"Much more!"** — open-ended trailing accusation, a recurring authentic signature - **Multiple ampersand encoding artifacts** ("&," with comma instead of semicolon) suggest posting via mobile interface where HTML entity decoding failed - **Emotional reactivity** proportionate to the magnitude of the Stone arrest - The prior day's posts show identical register and cadence: "Greatest Witch Hunt in the History of our Country!" The business-hour timing is the only counter-indicator. Given style convergence, this is assessed as **authentic Trump** with high confidence. ### Psychological State and Trigger **Primary trigger:** Narcissistic injury via Stone arrest. Stone's indictment for lying to Congress creates a dangerous mirror — Trump's associate is charged with precisely the behavior Trump has normalized and modeled. The response is not concern for Stone's welfare but an immediate pivot to **reflexive equivalence-seeking**: if my ally is charged, why not theirs? **Narcissistic state:** Mixed grandiose/vulnerable. The post oscillates between grandiose framing ("Greatest Witch Hunt") implied from the prior day's context and a persecutory victim stance embedded in the rhetorical questions. The questions are not genuine inquiries — they are assertions of grievance delivered in interrogative form to create the appearance of logical challenge. **Rage indicators:** Present at moderate intensity. The "soooo many others" and "Much more!" constructions suggest escalating affective pressure rather than measured argumentation. The proportionality is inverse — Stone's verifiable indictment is answered with a volume-based scatter of unproven accusations. This disproportionality is consistent with Kohut's narcissistic rage model: the response is not about Stone per se but about the injury to Trump's sense of invulnerability. ### Defense Mechanisms 1. **Projection (Immature):** The post's central move is attributing "lying" — the crime for which Stone was specifically indicted — to the investigators and opponents. Deceitfulness is displaced onto the accusers. 2. **Splitting (Immature):** The accused (Stone) are implicitly innocent victims; the named opponents (Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Page, Baker, Clinton) are categorically guilty. No gradation, no evidence standard applied symmetrically. 3. **Displacement (Neurotic):** Anxiety about the Mueller investigation's proximity to Trump himself is redirected toward a volley of accusation against Democrats and former officials. 4. **Rationalization (Neurotic):** The rhetorical question structure provides a veneer of logical challenge — "if X, why not Y?" — that mimics principled consistency while actually serving pure deflection. 5. **Distortion (Pathological):** Treating Stone's proven, charged conduct as equivalent to unproven allegations against opponents constitutes a gross reshaping of legal and epistemic reality. ### Multi-Level Personality Framework **Level 1 — Dispositional Traits:** - *Extraversion (high):* Assertive, dominant, broadcasting to maximum audience - *Agreeableness (very low):* Hostile, antagonistic, zero reciprocal trust displayed - *Neuroticism (elevated):* Angry hostility, impulsive listing, affect-laden language - *Conscientiousness (low):* Reactive, undeliberated, factual claims unverified - *Openness (low):* Rigid schema — good vs. evil, witch hunt vs. legitimate investigation **Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations:** - **Agency motives dominant:** Power (reinstating narrative control after Stone arrest), revenge (naming opponents), status maintenance ("witch hunt" reframing) - **Communion motives absent:** No in-group solidarity language for Stone; the post is about Trump's persecution narrative, not Stone's welfare - **Schema:** World as zero-sum combat where legal accountability for allies is illegitimate but implied accountability for opponents is self-evident **Level 3 — Narrative Identity:** - **Protagonist role:** Victim/Fighter — persecuted by a corrupt legal apparatus while the real criminals escape - **Contamination sequence:** A legitimate presidency is being contaminated by a weaponized justice system - **Contrasting others:** "Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lisa Page & lover, Baker" — a roster of enemies whose unpunished guilt validates Trump's persecution - **Identity claims:** Implicitly, "I am the only one fighting this corruption" **Level 4 — Clinical Indicators:** *Malignant narcissism components:* - **Narcissistic features (high):** Grandiosity via victimhood inversion; entitlement to different legal standard - **Antisocial features (moderate):** Naming individuals with implied accusations of unprosecuted crimes, contempt for due process as applied to allies - **Paranoid features (elevated):** Preoccupation with perceived coordinated attacks; "Much more!" implies vast hidden conspiracy - **Sadism (mild-moderate):** The naming of "Lisa & lover" — deliberate use of the affair innuendo to humiliate — has a punitive quality beyond factual necessity ### Rhetorical and Propaganda Analysis - **Whataboutism:** The entire post is a whataboutism scaffold — Stone's indictment triggers a list of opponent accusations as deflection. A canonical RAND Firehose move: respond to specific accountability with a volume-based counter-accusation barrage. - **Rhetorical questions as assertion:** Questions perform the function of accusations without requiring evidence burden - **Superlative/hyperbole absent from this post** (unusually restrained compared to baseline) - **Listing as evidence:** The accumulation of names and accusations creates an impression of scale without substance - **Partial dehumanization (mild):** "Lisa & lover" strips Page and Strzok of names/titles to reduce them to their affair - **No explicit violent imagery** - **Stochastic terrorism indicators:** The post names multiple private citizens and officials as implied criminals to the president's 60M+ Twitter followers. While not explicitly calling for action, naming individuals as unprosecuted criminals from a platform of this scale creates real harassment risk. Assessed as **elevated** rather than high — no explicit call to action, no eliminationist language. ### Gaslighting and Reality Distortion - **DARVO pattern:** Stone (aggressor per indictment) is implicitly cast as victim; the Mueller investigation (the lawful process) is cast as the real attack - **False equivalence:** Unproven allegations presented as equivalent to proven, charged conduct - **Epistemic closure reinforcement:** Post demands followers accept that Stone's indictment is illegitimate while treating Trump's accusations against opponents as self-evidently true - **"Who alerted CNN?"** (from prior day's post) implies investigative leak conspiracy — a reality distortion that frames lawful FBI operations as political targeting ### Cognitive Status No significant cognitive markers of concern. The post is emotionally reactive and rhetorically unsophisticated, but the sentence structures are intact, sequencing is coherent, and there is no word-finding difficulty or paraphasia observable. "Soooo" represents stylistic affect, not linguistic breakdown. Complexity is lower than Trump's 1980s-era speech (consistent with documented longitudinal decline in vocabulary and syntactic complexity), but this post shows no acute deviation from his 2018-2019 baseline. ### Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress" | **True** | Stone was arrested January 25, 2019 on seven counts including lying to Congress about WikiLeaks contacts, witness tampering, and obstruction of the Mueller investigation. This is confirmed by the known events provided. | | "Comey lied to Congress" | **Mostly False** | No criminal charges were ever brought against James Comey for lying to Congress. DOJ Inspector General found he was 'insubordinate' and mishandled classified memos but found no evidence of criminal lying to Congress. The claim conflates political criticism with criminal conduct. | | "Brennan and Clapper lied to Congress" | **Half True** | Clapper acknowledged giving 'clearly erroneous' testimony about NSA surveillance programs in 2013 but was not charged. Brennan disputed CIA surveillance of Senate claims. Both cases involved disputed testimony but neither resulted in perjury charges. The characterization as equivalent to Stone's indictment is misleading. | | "Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails" | **Mostly True** | Clinton's team did delete approximately 33,000 emails they characterized as personal. FBI Director Comey in July 2016 stated the investigation found no intentional wrongdoing sufficient for prosecution. The emails were deleted; the implication of criminal conduct is contested and was not charged. | | "Lisa Page and Peter Strzok had texts deleted" | **Half True** | There were documented gaps in FBI text message records from Strzok and Page's devices during a device transition period. DOJ IG investigated and attributed most gaps to technical failures rather than deliberate deletion. The framing of deliberate deletion to obstruct is not established. | Overall Veracity: 60% ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 82%) ### Indicators - Affect-laden elongation ('soooo') characteristic of authentic Trump posts - Stream-of-consciousness listing with no syntactic cohesion - Open-ended trailing accusation ('Much more!') — recurrent authentic signature - HTML entity encoding artifacts ('&,') consistent with mobile posting interface - Emotional reactivity proportionate to Stone arrest — close associate arrested by FBI ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Roger Stone arrest — close associate indicted for lying to Congress, threatening Trump's inner circle and the 'witch hunt' narrative) **Rage:** Intensity 72% targeting Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Baker, Hillary Clinton - Proportionality: 25% Sentiment: -0.78 **Mildly Hypomanic** - Affect-laden elongation ('soooo') suggesting elevated emotional activation - Rapid accumulation of targets in single post — low inhibition, high output - Trailing escalation ('Much more!') suggesting difficulty containing affect within post boundaries ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 82% - Antisocial: 61% - Paranoid: 74% - Sadism: 42% **Defense Mechanisms:** - projection (immature) - splitting (immature) - displacement (neurotic) - rationalization (neurotic) - distortion (pathological) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 31% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Naming enemies to activate follower grievance identification - Rhetorical questions that invite followers to supply the implied answers - Volume-based accusation barrage creates impression of factual weight - Open-ended 'Much more!' implies privileged knowledge of hidden corruption ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Names six specific individuals as implied unprosecuted criminals to 60M+ followers — creates directed harassment risk at presidential platform scale - Presidential framing of named individuals as guilty amplifies threat without requiring explicit call to action - Pattern of named targeting consistent with prior posts that preceded documented harassment of named subjects - 'Much more!' open-ended framing implies additional targets, sustaining threat environment beyond named individuals ### Gaslighting - DARVO: Stone (aggressor per 7-count indictment) reframed as victim; Mueller investigation (lawful process) reframed as the real attack - False equivalence: proven, charged criminal conduct presented as equivalent to unproven allegations - Epistemic closure enforcement: followers implicitly required to reject verified indictment as illegitimate - Rhetorical question format implies opponents' guilt as self-evident without burden of proof ## Fact Checks (5) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-16._ > Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress **TRUE** Stone was arrested January 25, 2019 on seven counts including lying to Congress about WikiLeaks contacts, witness tampering, and obstruction of the Mueller investigation. This is confirmed by the known events provided. Sources: Mueller investigation indictment, January 25 2019 > Comey lied to Congress **MOSTLY FALSE** No criminal charges were ever brought against James Comey for lying to Congress. DOJ Inspector General found he was 'insubordinate' and mishandled classified memos but found no evidence of criminal lying to Congress. The claim conflates political criticism with criminal conduct. Sources: DOJ IG Report June 2018 > Brennan and Clapper lied to Congress **HALF TRUE** Clapper acknowledged giving 'clearly erroneous' testimony about NSA surveillance programs in 2013 but was not charged. Brennan disputed CIA surveillance of Senate claims. Both cases involved disputed testimony but neither resulted in perjury charges. The characterization as equivalent to Stone's indictment is misleading. Sources: Senate Intelligence Committee record; DOJ decisions not to prosecute > Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails **MOSTLY TRUE** Clinton's team did delete approximately 33,000 emails they characterized as personal. FBI Director Comey in July 2016 stated the investigation found no intentional wrongdoing sufficient for prosecution. The emails were deleted; the implication of criminal conduct is contested and was not charged. Sources: FBI Director Comey statement July 5 2016 > Lisa Page and Peter Strzok had texts deleted **HALF TRUE** There were documented gaps in FBI text message records from Strzok and Page's devices during a device transition period. DOJ IG investigated and attributed most gaps to technical failures rather than deliberate deletion. The framing of deliberate deletion to obstruct is not established. Sources: DOJ IG Report June 2018 Overall Veracity: 60% ## Tags - whataboutism (97%) - narcissistic_injury_response (92%) - projection (89%) - DARVO (85%) - mueller_investigation (88%) - roger_stone_arrest (95%) - named_individual_targeting (79%) - RAND_firehose (83%) - splitting (81%) - epistemic_closure (76%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **A Day of Denial: Shutdown Capitulation Triggers Wall-Themed Defensive Blitz** The day after ending the longest government shutdown in U.S. history without securing wall funding, Trump spent the afternoon in a rapid-fire posting blitz insisting the outcome was "in no way a concession." Roger Stone's predawn FBI arrest added a second wound, prompting a furious round of whataboutism naming half a dozen political opponents as unprosecuted criminals. The bulk of the day's energy went into repeating the wall demand at increasing volume — six of nine posts centered on border security — culminating in an all-caps slogan that read more like a rally chant than a policy statement. The mood shifted from wounded defensiveness after midnight to aggressive grandiosity by late afternoon, but the sheer volume of reframing betrayed the depth of the injury underneath. Full digest for 2019-01-26: https://trump.fm/date/2019-01-26/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2019, January 26). If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to... [Social media post]. X (Twitter). trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress, what..." X (Twitter), 26 Jan. 2019. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "If Roger Stone was indicted for lying to Congress, what...," X (Twitter), January 26, 2019, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/x_1089156621002002400 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/x_1089156621002002400 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/x_1089156621002002400 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2019-01-26 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/x_1089156621002002400.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._