# Post ts_117555191396704437

- Post ID: `ts_117555191396704437`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2026-11-03T23:51:08.724Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437/analysis

## Post text

_No text of its own. The post is its media, below._

## What the media says

**Video transcript** (0:43), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his:

> Okay, MAGA GOP on Trump, in the 2024 election versus Kamala Harris, he got 99% of the MAGA GOP vote. Perhaps surprisingly, I might have thought it'd be 100%, but it was 99%. Compare that to his approval rating now with the MAGA GOP. It's 98%. That is, there's been no real decline in MAGA support. These folks say that they're going to vote for congressional Republicans come the midterm elections. Again, that's the 99% that Trump got against Kamala Harris. Look now, in terms of the congressional vote, 98% of them say they're going to be voting for House Republican candidates. So that support is actually really holding up strong. It's really, really strong when it comes to MAGA GOP and Republicans holding on to that vote.

## Media

- video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/117/555/191/040/321/048/original/e034be451aca4503.mp4

## Engagement

- Likes: 7,319
- Reposts: 1,659
- Replies: 425
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-11-04T03:40:06.675Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-11-04T01:28:05.568Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## A loyalty readout posted as the polls close

The post has no words of his own. It is a short video in which an unnamed analyst reads three figures about the voters he calls "MAGA GOP": 99% backed Trump against Kamala Harris in 2024, 98% approve of him now, and 98% say they will vote for House Republicans in the midterm. The speaker's verdict is "that support is actually really holding up strong." The phrase "MAGA GOP" and the delivery ("Perhaps surprisingly, I might have thought it'd be 100%") sound like a cable network's data segment. The transcript doesn't name the speaker, so the source is unconfirmed.

The timing gives the clip its meaning. It went up at 6:51 PM Eastern on Election Day, 2026-11-03, as the first polls closed. Forecasts going into the night favored Democrats to retake the House, and an NBC poll the same week had 60% disapproving of his performance. That same evening he called the Fox News poll "always the worst" and said every question is "a hit job." He also posted that he couldn't stand Jessica Tarlov's voice and would "go somewhere else until that LOSER is off the air." Read in that sequence, the clip is the poll he likes, posted shortly after attacking the poll he doesn't. Fox's broad-electorate numbers get dismissed, and a segment that measures only his most committed supporters gets amplified.

## What the clip measures and what it implies

The figures describe a group that is loyal by definition. Voters who call themselves MAGA Republicans are close to unanimous for him because of how the group is defined, and the speaker half-admits this when he expected "100%." The clip says nothing about independents, swing districts, or turnout, which are the things that decide a midterm. By posting it with no comment, he lets a narrow, favorable number stand in for the national picture on the night that picture is being counted.

This works most clearly as a preemptive frame. If results go badly, "the base held at 98%" puts the blame elsewhere: on candidates, turnout, or the counting, never on him. The defensive pattern is selective attention that shades into splitting. Unfavorable instruments are "BULLSHIT" and a "hit job," and favorable ones are passed along without caveat. There is also a supply-seeking side: under uncertainty, he puts in front of his audience proof that they still love him, which also invites them to confirm it by voting before polls close.

## Archetype and order

The clip casts him as a king whose court is still loyal while the outcome is unknown. Nothing in it attacks anyone, so this post has no warrior or victim register. That register sits in the neighboring Tarlov and Fox posts. The emotional pitch here is reassurance, not grievance. The clip names no target and makes no call to action beyond the ordinary implied one to vote.



## Authorship

The clip shows nothing about who pressed post. The 6:51 PM Eastern timestamp falls in a run of election-evening posts that are plainly his own, including a signed, first-person complaint about watching Fox. A pro-Trump data segment from another network fits his stated plan to change the channel. Aides also routinely post favorable broadcast clips, especially on election night, so the attribution leans only slightly toward him.

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 55%)

### Indicators

- Posted 6:51 PM Eastern on Election Day, inside a run of first-person, signed posts about watching election coverage
- Adjacent post announces he will switch away from Fox, and a favorable segment from another outlet follows
- No written text, so no stylometric evidence either way
- Favorable broadcast clips are a routine aide-posted genre

## Psychological Profile

### Traits

**Big Five:**
- Extraversion: 60%
- Agreeableness: 30%
- Conscientiousness: 40%
- Neuroticism: 50%
- Openness: 25%

Strongest facet: Low openness: accepts only the measurement that flatters

**Motives:**
- Agency: 70%
- Communion: 35%

Primary drive: validation

### Narrative

- **Role:** Leader of an unshakably loyal movement
- **Arc:** neutral
- **Contrasting:** Unfavorable pollsters, implicitly the Fox News poll attacked the same evening

**Identity Claims:**
- His support is intact
- The base has not declined

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Preemptive Attack — Comparison (Election-night uncertainty and unfavorable polling, including the Fox News poll he attacked the same evening)

Sentiment: +0.50

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 40%
- Antisocial: 5%
- Paranoid: 15%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- splitting (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 0%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Reflecting the base's loyalty back to it as proof of mutual devotion
- Implicit invitation to confirm the figure by voting before polls close

## Tags

- midterms-2026 (90%)
- polling (80%)
- base-loyalty (80%)
- election-night (70%)
- media-amplification (70%)
- cherry-picking (60%)

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, November 3).  [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 3 Nov. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437. Accessed 4 Nov. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, November 3, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_117555191396704437
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_117555191396704437
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_117555191396704437
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-11-03
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117555191396704437.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._