# Post ts_117509193673459705 - Post ID: `ts_117509193673459705` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2026-10-26T20:53:19.167Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_117509193673459705.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > It is my Great Honor to endorse America First Patriot, Casey Askar, who is running to represent the tremendous people of Florida’s 22nd Congressional District! > > A Brave U.S. Marine Corps Veteran, and now, as a successful Businessman, Casey has a Proven Record of Success — He is a WINNER! His opponent, Pia Dandiya, is a Radical Left Democrat who is opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY and, if she and the Dumocrats ever got in, all of these things will be terminated. She wants massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women’s Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children. Pia Dandiya is Reckless, Radical, and Dangerous! > > On the other hand, as your next Congressman, Casey will work tirelessly to Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Strengthen our Incredible Military/Veterans, Keep our Border SECURE, Advance Election Integrity, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment. > > Casey Askar has my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Representative from Florida’s 22nd Congressional District. GET OUT AND VOTE FOR CASEY — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN! President DONALD J. TRUMP https://swampthevoteusa.com/florida/ ## Engagement - Likes: 6,268 - Reposts: 1,510 - Replies: 76 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-10-28T10:01:04.746Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-10-27T03:26:34.426Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## A form letter with the names swapped This is one of at least six congressional endorsements posted on October 26, and the template is easy to see. The Mike Beltran post for Florida's 14th uses the clause "voted against NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY and, if she and the Dumocrats ever got in, all of these things will be terminated." Here it comes back almost word for word, with one edit: "voted against" becomes "is opposed to." Kathy Castor is an incumbent with a voting record. Pia Dandiya is a challenger without one, so whoever filled in the template adjusted the verb to fit. The list of promises ("Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A. ... Defend our always under siege Second Amendment") is the same block of text as in the Anna Paulina Luna post, with only the order changed. ## Who wrote it The post went up at 20:53 UTC, which is 4:53 p.m. Eastern on a Monday (daylight time was still in effect). That is business hours whether he was in Washington or in Florida. It closes with a third-person signature, "President DONALD J. TRUMP," and links to a voter-turnout site. Nothing in the text drifts, interrupts itself, or reacts to something just seen. Two features match his own idiom: "Dumocrats" and "Transgender Mutilization." Both recur across the endorsement series, so they now belong to the house template rather than showing his hand in this post. "Mutilization" for "mutilation" looks like a speech error, but it was frozen into the template long ago, so it says nothing about his cognitive state on this date. The evidence points to staff assembling and posting this from a pre-approved template. His share is most likely approving the endorsement itself. ## Splitting the field into hero and threat The post is built on idealization and devaluation. Askar is a "Brave U.S. Marine Corps Veteran," a "successful Businessman" with "a Proven Record of Success," and "a WINNER!" who "WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!" Dandiya gets the full set of negative labels: "Radical Left Democrat," "Open Borders," "Men playing in Women's Sports," and the closing triad "Reckless, Radical, and Dangerous!" Nothing about either person is mixed or qualified. This is splitting, but in a mass-produced campaign form, with no sign of a personal grudge. The candidates are interchangeable, which shows it. The argument against Dandiya is guilt by association. She has no congressional record, so the post gives her the party's positions and predicts what "she and the Dumocrats" would do. "All of these things will be terminated" is a fear appeal aimed at tipped workers and retirees, who are the voters the tax provisions were designed to reach. "Transgender Mutilization of your Children" moves to child-protection framing. It is the post's most emotionally loaded phrase, and its target is a policy category, not a group named as subhuman. ## Psychological reading Nothing here looks like a reaction to an injury. No criticism is answered, and no personal slight is involved. The trigger is routine campaign maintenance in the last week before the midterms, alongside his rallies in Fort Myers and Perry. Self-reference is small: "It is my Great Honor" and "my Complete and Total Endorsement" place him as the one who confers legitimacy, the King archetype handing out his favor. The Warrior frame ("always under siege Second Amendment") is a stock phrase, not a sign of rising alarm. On the order–chaos axis, the post sets Askar up as the restorer of order (border "SECURE," "Election Integrity") against an opponent shown as an agent of disorder. Its agenda is mainly agentic: power gained through more seats in the House. ## Danger reading "Dangerous" is aimed at a named private citizen running for office. But the post asks only for votes ("GET OUT AND VOTE FOR CASEY"). It contains no call to act outside elections and no dehumanizing language. Its hostility stays inside the normal range of partisan attack ads. ## Claims Askar's biography holds up. The claims about Dandiya are assertions about a non-incumbent and cannot be checked against a voting record. The "terminated" prediction ignores what a House majority can actually do: it could not repeal the tax provisions without the Senate and a presidential signature. The tips and overtime deductions in the 2025 law already expire after 2028. "No tax on Social Security" overstates what that law did. It added a temporary extra deduction for seniors and did not exempt benefits from tax. ## Longitudinal note This post is consistent with the October 2026 endorsement series and does not depart from his baseline. Because most of the text is template, it tells us little about him psychologically. Its main research value is as evidence of how much of the feed is now produced in bulk. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Casey Askar is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a successful businessman" | **True** | Askar served in the Marine Corps and built a business career in restaurant franchises and other ventures. Both were central to his 2022 campaign in Florida's 19th District. | | "Pia Dandiya is opposed to no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security" | **Mostly False** | Pia Dandiya is a first-time candidate and former Harlem high school principal. She won the FL-22 Democratic primary in August 2026 and is running for an open seat against Casey Askar. She has never held federal office or cast a vote on these provisions. I found no statement in which she says she opposes the tips deduction, the overtime deduction or the senior deduction. Sources checked: her campaign homepage, its updates and priorities pages, her Palm Beach Post / Naples Daily News Q&A, the Palm Beach Post candidate profile, the Town-Crier profile, the Center Square race story and the smarter.vote candidate page. None of them mentions tips or overtime. The kernel behind the attack is her opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. That 2025 law contains a tips deduction of up to $25,000, a deduction for the overtime premium of up to $12,500, and a temporary $6,000 extra deduction for people 65 and older. Trump markets that last one as 'no tax on Social Security', but it does not exempt benefits from tax. The Center Square (Sept. 19, 2026) reported that Dandiya 'slammed the One Big Beautiful Bill for its cuts to Medicaid and tax policies.' It said she would reverse its cuts to aid programs and raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Her priorities page says she will 'reverse Medicaid cuts' and 'ask the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share.' The tips and overtime deductions phase out above $150,000 of income ($300,000 joint), so taxing billionaires and corporations would not reach them. A No Going Back PAC mailer says she called middle-class tax cuts 'reckless'. It cites social media posts that the pro-Askar Floridian Press says 'appear to have been deleted' and does not reproduce. An opposition site (piaexposed.com, paid for by Stronger America Together) cites a July 5, 2025 X post about tax cuts. That is one day after the bill was signed, which points to the bill as a whole, not to tips or overtime. Dandiya has called Askar's claim that she opposes middle-class tax cuts false. On Social Security she says the opposite of what the post implies: she pledges to oppose 'any effort to cut benefits, raise the retirement age, or hand the program over to Wall Street.' Context: no tax on tips is not a party-line issue. The Senate passed the standalone No Tax on Tips Act unanimously, led by Democrat Jacky Rosen with Ted Cruz. And the law Republicans wrote ends the tips and overtime deductions after 2028 on its own terms. The post turns opposition to an omnibus bill, stated mainly over its Medicaid cuts, into opposition to three specific provisions. Dandiya has never stated that position, and one of the provisions is mislabeled. The tie to her opposition to the bill keeps this from being rated false. | | "If Democrats got in, no tax on tips, overtime and Social Security would be terminated" | **Mostly False** | A House majority alone cannot repeal enacted tax provisions. Repeal would need the Senate and a presidential signature, and Trump holds the veto through January 2029. The tips and overtime deductions in the 2025 reconciliation law already expire after tax year 2028 under their own terms. | | "There is 'no tax on Social Security' as an enacted policy" | **Half True** | The 2025 law added a temporary extra deduction of up to $6,000 for taxpayers 65 and older, which phases out at higher incomes. That lowers or removes tax on benefits for many seniors, but Social Security benefits were not exempted from taxation. | | "Dandiya wants massive tax increases, open borders, men in women's sports, and 'Transgender Mutilization' of children" | **Mostly False** | I checked each part against Dandiya's own statements and against the opposition material. Tax increases: there is a kernel here. Her priorities page and the Center Square say she wants the wealthiest Americans to 'pay their fair share' and would raise taxes on billionaires and corporations to fund Medicaid and Social Security. That is a targeted tax increase. Nothing she has said proposes 'massive' increases on ordinary taxpayers, and she disputes the 'tax-hiking' label in No Going Back PAC mailers. Open borders: I found no immigration position from her at all. Her priorities page has no immigration section, smarter.vote lists 'No public position found' for immigration, and none of the race profiles quote her on the border. The NRCC release says her donors (the Soros family) want to 'abolish ICE'. It does not say she does. The opposition site piaexposed.com says only that pro-amnesty groups endorsed her, with no citation. Men in women's sports and transgender care for minors: her own words are general. On the priorities page she pledges to 'defend equal rights under the law so every American no matter who they are or who they love' can live freely. In the Naples Daily News Q&A she said 'If one of us is not free, none of us is free' and called Republican focus on these topics 'taking the bait.' I found no statement from her on transgender athletes or on gender-affirming care for minors. The attacks rest on association. The NRCC (Oct. 21, 2026) and Townhall (Oct. 20, 2026) cite a $1,500 donation from Equality PAC and the positions of the affiliated Congressional Equality Caucus, and Townhall cites her White House fellowship under Biden. Both pieces describe those as the caucus's positions, not hers. piaexposed.com asserts she backs 'sex changes for minor children' and 'boys playing in girls' sports' but cites no source. 'Transgender Mutilization' is inflammatory characterization, not a position anyone has documented her taking. The same list appears nearly word for word in Trump's other October 2026 endorsements of challengers to Democrats, which points to a template rather than a record specific to her. Only the tax piece has partial support, and even that is exaggerated. Three of the four items have no support in her public statements. | Overall Veracity: 42% ## Authorship Analysis **Aide-Written** (score: 18%) ### Indicators - Posted 4:53 p.m. Eastern on a Monday, during business hours - Template reuse: the tax clause is nearly identical to the same-day Beltran endorsement, with 'voted against' changed to 'is opposed to' for a non-incumbent - The list of promises duplicates the Luna endorsement in a different order - Signed in the third person: 'President DONALD J. TRUMP' - Ends with a link to a voter-turnout website ## Psychological Profile ### Traits **Big Five:** - Extraversion: 70% - Agreeableness: 25% - Conscientiousness: 50% - Neuroticism: 35% - Openness: 20% Strongest facet: Low agreeableness (antagonism toward the opposing candidate) inside an assertive, warm-toward-allies frame **Motives:** - Agency: 80% - Communion: 30% Primary drive: power ### Narrative - **Role:** Kingmaker conferring legitimacy on loyal candidates - **Arc:** neutral - **Contrasting:** Pia Dandiya and 'the Dumocrats' **Identity Claims:** - Endorser whose backing is 'Complete and Total' - Leader of the America First movement ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Maintenance (Midterm campaign endorsement series, final week before the election) Sentiment: +0.15 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 30% - Antisocial: 15% - Paranoid: 15% - Sadism: 5% **Defense Mechanisms:** - splitting (immature) - idealization (immature) - devaluation (immature) - projection (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 40% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Direct address to voters ('your Children,' 'your next Congressman') - Personal guarantee of loyalty ('HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!') - Endorsement offered as the leader's personal favor ('my Complete and Total Endorsement') ## Fact Checks (5) _The model's verdicts from 2026-10-27._ > Casey Askar is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a successful businessman **TRUE** Askar served in the Marine Corps and built a business career in restaurant franchises and other ventures. Both were central to his 2022 campaign in Florida's 19th District. Sources: Askar campaign biography (2022 FL-19 race) > Pia Dandiya is opposed to no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security **MOSTLY FALSE** Pia Dandiya is a first-time candidate and former Harlem high school principal. She won the FL-22 Democratic primary in August 2026 and is running for an open seat against Casey Askar. She has never held federal office or cast a vote on these provisions. I found no statement in which she says she opposes the tips deduction, the overtime deduction or the senior deduction. Sources checked: her campaign homepage, its updates and priorities pages, her Palm Beach Post / Naples Daily News Q&A, the Palm Beach Post candidate profile, the Town-Crier profile, the Center Square race story and the smarter.vote candidate page. None of them mentions tips or overtime. The kernel behind the attack is her opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. That 2025 law contains a tips deduction of up to $25,000, a deduction for the overtime premium of up to $12,500, and a temporary $6,000 extra deduction for people 65 and older. Trump markets that last one as 'no tax on Social Security', but it does not exempt benefits from tax. The Center Square (Sept. 19, 2026) reported that Dandiya 'slammed the One Big Beautiful Bill for its cuts to Medicaid and tax policies.' It said she would reverse its cuts to aid programs and raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Her priorities page says she will 'reverse Medicaid cuts' and 'ask the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share.' The tips and overtime deductions phase out above $150,000 of income ($300,000 joint), so taxing billionaires and corporations would not reach them. A No Going Back PAC mailer says she called middle-class tax cuts 'reckless'. It cites social media posts that the pro-Askar Floridian Press says 'appear to have been deleted' and does not reproduce. An opposition site (piaexposed.com, paid for by Stronger America Together) cites a July 5, 2025 X post about tax cuts. That is one day after the bill was signed, which points to the bill as a whole, not to tips or overtime. Dandiya has called Askar's claim that she opposes middle-class tax cuts false. On Social Security she says the opposite of what the post implies: she pledges to oppose 'any effort to cut benefits, raise the retirement age, or hand the program over to Wall Street.' Context: no tax on tips is not a party-line issue. The Senate passed the standalone No Tax on Tips Act unanimously, led by Democrat Jacky Rosen with Ted Cruz. And the law Republicans wrote ends the tips and overtime deductions after 2028 on its own terms. The post turns opposition to an omnibus bill, stated mainly over its Medicaid cuts, into opposition to three specific provisions. Dandiya has never stated that position, and one of the provisions is mislabeled. The tie to her opposition to the bill keeps this from being rated false. Sources: https://piaforcongress.com/; https://piaforcongress.com/priorities; https://piaforcongress.com/updates; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/florida-house-race-focused-tariffs-120000042.html; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/two-political-newcomers-vie-u-111302942.html; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/pia-dandiya-democratic-nominee-florida-090155152.html; https://floridianpress.com/2026/09/super-pac-hits-progressive-pia-dandiya-for-opposing-middle-class-tax-cuts/; https://floridianpress.com/2026/10/cbs-news-deletes-damaging-interview-segment-of-progressive-lobbyist-pia-dandiya-video/; https://piaexposed.com/; https://smarter.vote/races/fl-house-22-2026/pia-dandiya/; https://gotowncrier.com/2026/10/dandiya-and-askar-facing-off-in-new-congressional-district-22/; https://floridapolitics.com/archives/814079-casey-askar-pia-dandiya-to-compete-for-new-cd-22-seat-after-winning-their-primary-races-tuesday/; https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/its-official-no-tax-on-tips-no-tax-on-overtime-through-2028/; https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-unexpectedly-passes-no-tax-tips-act-unanimous-vote-rcna208093; https://www.rosen.senate.gov/?p=15642; https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/42742 > If Democrats got in, no tax on tips, overtime and Social Security would be terminated **MOSTLY FALSE** A House majority alone cannot repeal enacted tax provisions. Repeal would need the Senate and a presidential signature, and Trump holds the veto through January 2029. The tips and overtime deductions in the 2025 reconciliation law already expire after tax year 2028 under their own terms. Sources: One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21), 2025 > There is 'no tax on Social Security' as an enacted policy **HALF TRUE** The 2025 law added a temporary extra deduction of up to $6,000 for taxpayers 65 and older, which phases out at higher incomes. That lowers or removes tax on benefits for many seniors, but Social Security benefits were not exempted from taxation. Sources: One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21), 2025; IRS guidance on the senior deduction > Dandiya wants massive tax increases, open borders, men in women's sports, and 'Transgender Mutilization' of children **MOSTLY FALSE** I checked each part against Dandiya's own statements and against the opposition material. Tax increases: there is a kernel here. Her priorities page and the Center Square say she wants the wealthiest Americans to 'pay their fair share' and would raise taxes on billionaires and corporations to fund Medicaid and Social Security. That is a targeted tax increase. Nothing she has said proposes 'massive' increases on ordinary taxpayers, and she disputes the 'tax-hiking' label in No Going Back PAC mailers. Open borders: I found no immigration position from her at all. Her priorities page has no immigration section, smarter.vote lists 'No public position found' for immigration, and none of the race profiles quote her on the border. The NRCC release says her donors (the Soros family) want to 'abolish ICE'. It does not say she does. The opposition site piaexposed.com says only that pro-amnesty groups endorsed her, with no citation. Men in women's sports and transgender care for minors: her own words are general. On the priorities page she pledges to 'defend equal rights under the law so every American no matter who they are or who they love' can live freely. In the Naples Daily News Q&A she said 'If one of us is not free, none of us is free' and called Republican focus on these topics 'taking the bait.' I found no statement from her on transgender athletes or on gender-affirming care for minors. The attacks rest on association. The NRCC (Oct. 21, 2026) and Townhall (Oct. 20, 2026) cite a $1,500 donation from Equality PAC and the positions of the affiliated Congressional Equality Caucus, and Townhall cites her White House fellowship under Biden. Both pieces describe those as the caucus's positions, not hers. piaexposed.com asserts she backs 'sex changes for minor children' and 'boys playing in girls' sports' but cites no source. 'Transgender Mutilization' is inflammatory characterization, not a position anyone has documented her taking. The same list appears nearly word for word in Trump's other October 2026 endorsements of challengers to Democrats, which points to a template rather than a record specific to her. Only the tax piece has partial support, and even that is exaggerated. Three of the four items have no support in her public statements. Sources: https://piaforcongress.com/priorities; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/pia-dandiya-democratic-nominee-florida-090155152.html; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/florida-house-race-focused-tariffs-120000042.html; https://smarter.vote/races/fl-house-22-2026/pia-dandiya/; https://nrcc.org/2026/10/21/new-radical-pia-dandiyas-campaign-is-bankrolled-by-extremists/; https://townhall.com/news/dmitri-bolt/2026/10/20/pia-dandiya-is-out-of-touch-with-florida-voters-n2684989; https://piaexposed.com/; https://floridianpress.com/2026/09/super-pac-hits-progressive-pia-dandiya-for-opposing-middle-class-tax-cuts/; https://floridianpress.com/2026/10/casey-askar-and-pia-dandiya-look-to-win-over-coveted-hispanic-vote-video/; https://gotowncrier.com/2026/10/dandiya-and-askar-facing-off-in-new-congressional-district-22/; https://www.sparkers-soapbox.com/florida-22nd-congressional-district-general-election-2026/; https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/42742 Overall Veracity: 42% ## Tags - endorsement (100%) - 2026 midterms (90%) - Florida (70%) - tax policy (50%) - splitting (60%) - fear appeal (50%) - template (90%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **A million-dollar bounty for voter-fraud convictions, offered eight days before the midterms** Late Sunday he answered Bill Maher's on-air claim that his approval was slipping, even among Republicans, with a long and personal attack on Maher. Minutes later he posted TV clips saying that support was intact. After a quiet night and morning, Monday afternoon brought a million-dollar reward for reports of voter fraud that lead to convictions, eight days before the midterms. His account then shared articles casting four Democratic candidates as threats because of race, religion, gender or citizenship, and ran through a long string of near-identical House endorsements in about a quarter of an hour. He later said a Minnesota Senate candidate could only lose through cheating, and he ended the afternoon landing in Mississippi for a rally, pleased with the anchors praising him on air. Full digest for 2026-10-26: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-26/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, October 26). It is my Great Honor to endorse America First... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "It is my Great Honor to endorse America First Patriot,..." Truth Social, 26 Oct. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705. Accessed 28 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "It is my Great Honor to endorse America First Patriot,...," Truth Social, October 26, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_117509193673459705 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_117509193673459705 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_117509193673459705 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-26 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117509193673459705.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._