# Post ts_117488073122158937 - Post ID: `ts_117488073122158937` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2026-10-23T03:22:05.131Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_117488073122158937.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > The New York Times got caught! They used a Company, Wedgewood Polls, that ADMITTED that the Poll Numbers they published were made up and FAKE. This is what I’ve had to deal with, right from the beginning! Our powerful Lawsuit against them is getting stronger and stronger everyday. Everything about The Failing New York Times is “ARTIFICIAL.” Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP ## Engagement - Likes: 19,204 - Reposts: 5,599 - Replies: 980 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-10-24T06:00:34.224Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-10-23T03:41:05.885Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## A retracted third-party poll recast as a Times fraud The post went up at 03:22 UTC on October 23, which is 10:22 pm Central or 11:22 pm Eastern on October 22. Earlier that day Trump had posted "Getting ready to land in Iowa. Big Rally happening," so this came after the rally, either on the flight back or after he returned to Washington. Either way it is late at night in his local time, and it appeared in the same overnight run as the Ilhan Omar name post. The news peg is real. On October 20, after FiftyPlusOne questioned its data, Wedgewood Polls put out a statement admitting it had fabricated its results and calling the operation a "social experiment." The New York Times had listed 15 Wedgewood surveys in its midterm poll tracker. It removed all of them and added an editor's note. Newsweek, MS NOW, Decision Desk HQ and other aggregators had carried the same numbers. Trump's version, "The New York Times got caught!", changes the roles. A news outlet that was fooled by an outside firm, along with many others, becomes the party caught in a fraud. "They used a Company" turns aggregation into commissioning. ## From one retraction to "Everything ... is 'ARTIFICIAL'" The post moves in three steps, each one wider than the last: 1. One firm's fabricated numbers ("ADMITTED that the Poll Numbers they published were made up and FAKE"). 2. A lifetime of victimhood: "This is what I've had to deal with, right from the beginning!" 3. A total verdict: "Everything about The Failing New York Times is 'ARTIFICIAL.'" Taking a single verified instance as proof of a universal claim is the main defensive move here. It works as rationalization. The Wedgewood admission becomes a reason to throw out unfavorable polling in general. Three days earlier, a Washington Post-ABC-Ipsos poll had put his approval at a record-low 33%. The post never mentions that poll. It doesn't need to: if polls the Times carries can be "made up," the 33% figure loses its sting without being addressed. The likely underlying injury is the polling trend itself. The Wedgewood story supplied a vindicating fact, and the post grabs it. Splitting completes the picture. The Times is "Failing" and "ARTIFICIAL" in its entirety, with no difference drawn between its own NYT/Siena polling and a third-party entry in an aggregate. The middle sentence, "right from the beginning!", is where the post drifts from the news item to personal grievance. It casts him as a long-suffering target, while the closing claim about the lawsuit casts him as the fighter who is turning the tables. That is a small redemption arc (persecuted, then vindicated, then going on offense) and it fits his familiar Victim-to-Warrior archetype pairing. ## The lawsuit link "Our powerful Lawsuit against them is getting stronger and stronger everyday" connects the poll story to his defamation suit against the Times. That suit was first filed in September 2025, struck as too long, and refiled at $15 billion. It is about the paper's reporting on him and a related book, not its polling, so Wedgewood has no evident legal bearing on it. The sentence presents an unrelated news event as evidence in his case. This is a recurring pattern: anything embarrassing to an adversary gets folded into a pending grievance against it. ## Authorship Several features point to Trump writing it himself. It was posted late at night after a rally. "everyday" is used where "every day" is meant, which is a real usage error. ALL CAPS falls on the emotional words "ADMITTED" and "FAKE." He uses scare quotes on the capitalized "ARTIFICIAL," which is idiosyncratic. Nouns are capitalized at random ("Company," "Poll Numbers," "Lawsuit"). And the post drifts from report to grievance halfway through. The closing "Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP" has appeared on both staff-drafted and personal posts since 2025, so it doesn't decide the question either way. The firm's name is given correctly, but it was the headline name in every report, so it isn't the kind of precision that suggests a staff writer. ## Delegitimizing the press, without a call to act The hostility is aimed at an institution and stays within the language of litigation. Nothing points to a person, describes the Times in dehumanizing terms, or asks followers to do anything beyond accepting the framing. The epistemic effect matters more than the danger. The word "ARTIFICIAL" invites readers to treat everything the Times publishes, including the polls showing his low approval, as invented. Accepting that is a condition of agreeing with the post. ## Language Syntax is simple and the sentences are complete. The one usage error ("everyday") is common in edited prose and has nothing to do with paraphasia. The logic holds together within its own premise, even though that premise mischaracterizes the Times' role. Nothing here departs from his documented writing baseline. Sources: [Axios](https://www.axios.com/2026/10/21/fake-polls-midterms-wedgewood-investigation), [Washington Times](https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/oct/21/bogus-polling-firm-admits-numbers-fraudulent-claims-experimental/), [Mediaite](https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/national-polling-company-admits-its-totally-fake-crows-it-was-far-too-easy-to-get-major-media-outlets-to-bite/), [AllSides](https://www.allsides.com/story/2026-midterm-elections-poll-site-referenced-major-mainstream-outlets-says-polls-were-fake), [Urban Milwaukee](https://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=992835) ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "The New York Times used a company, Wedgewood Polls" | **Mostly True** | The Times listed 15 Wedgewood surveys in its midterm poll tracker and featured one in an article. It aggregated those polls and did not commission them. After the admission it removed all Wedgewood polls and added an editor's note. | | "Wedgewood Polls admitted that the poll numbers it published were made up and fake" | **True** | On Oct 20, 2026, after FiftyPlusOne questioned its data, Wedgewood released a statement admitting it had fabricated its polls and calling the effort a social experiment. | | "The New York Times got caught" | **Mostly False** | The fraud was Wedgewood's. The Times was one of many outlets and aggregators that carried the firm's numbers, along with MS NOW, Newsweek and Decision Desk HQ. It removed them once the admission came out. No reporting shows the Times knew the data were fake. | | "This is what I've had to deal with, right from the beginning (implying the Times' polls have been fabricated throughout)" | **Mostly False** | Wedgewood was a 2026 operation: Urban Milwaukee first questioned it in July 2026. The Times' own polling is the NYT/Siena partnership, which polling-accuracy ratings have ranked among the most accurate. The Times has been hostile to Trump for years, but the claim that its polling has been fabricated has no support. | | "Our powerful lawsuit against the Times is getting stronger and stronger every day" | **Mostly False** | The suit exists and is still alive, but nothing on the docket or in the news shows it gaining strength, and the Wedgewood episode the post ties it to plays no part in it. Status on the post date (Oct 22-23, 2026), from the CourtListener RECAP docket for Trump v. New York Times Co., 8:25-cv-02487 (M.D. Fla., Judge Steven D. Merryday): - Sept 2025: the original 85-page complaint was struck four days after filing. A 40-page amended complaint followed on Oct 16, 2025. - Dec 15, 2025: the defendants moved to dismiss for improper venue (Doc. 43) and for failure to state a claim (Doc. 44). Mediation on May 6, 2026 ended without agreement. - July 6, 2026 (Doc. 88): Merryday denied the venue motion and kept the case in Florida. This was a real procedural win for Trump. Volokh/Reason quotes the order saying the plaintiff's choice of forum "heavily weighs against transfer." - July 22, 2026: hearing on the 12(b)(6) motion. July 27 (Doc. 94): the judge deferred ruling on dismissal and gave Trump leave to amend a second time. Trump called this a win, and the Times said he "has had this chance twice previously and failed each time." - Aug 27, 2026 (Doc. 99): Trump filed a 62-page second amended complaint, still seeking $15 billion. - Sept 17 (Doc. 103): the defendants filed a supplement to their motion to dismiss. Law360 (Sept 21) reported they argued the new allegations still fail to show actual malice. - Oct 1 (Doc. 104): Trump's opposition. Oct 14 (Doc. 107): the defendants' reply. Nothing was filed between Oct 14 and the post date. So on the post date the case was a fully briefed motion to dismiss waiting for a ruling. The court has never ruled on the merits. The judge's two rulings on the pleadings so far were to strike the complaint once and to order it rewritten once. Nothing changed "every day" in the week before the post. The post links the suit to the Wedgewood polls, and that link fails. The suit is about two 2024 Times articles and the Penguin Random House book "Lucky Loser" by Craig and Buettner. A text search of the second amended complaint finds no mention of "poll," "Siena" or "Wedgewood." In January 2026 Trump said a Times/Siena poll "will be added" to the suit, and in June 2026 he said the same of the paper's Iran-war coverage. The August 2026 complaint contains neither. Wedgewood admitted on Oct 20, 2026 that it had faked its data, after the last complaint was filed. The Times was one of many aggregators it fooled, alongside Newsweek, Decision Desk HQ, The Hill and others. Wedgewood's admission therefore adds nothing to the defamation claims, and they rise or fall on actual malice over the book and articles. Why "mostly false" rather than "false": "stronger and stronger" is partly opinion. The case did survive a venue challenge, and the judge chose leave to amend over dismissal, so describing it as alive and pending is accurate. The factual claim of growing strength, and the suggestion that the Wedgewood news adds to it, are unsupported. | Overall Veracity: 48% ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 75%) ### Indicators - Posted 10:22 pm CT / 11:22 pm ET, after the Iowa rally - Usage error: 'everyday' for 'every day' - Emotional caps on 'ADMITTED' and 'FAKE' - Idiosyncratic scare quotes around a capitalized 'ARTIFICIAL' - Random capitalization of nouns ('Company', 'Poll Numbers', 'Lawsuit') ## Psychological Profile ### Traits **Big Five:** - Extraversion: 60% - Agreeableness: 15% - Conscientiousness: 40% - Neuroticism: 60% - Openness: 20% Strongest facet: Angry hostility (neuroticism) combined with low trust (agreeableness) **Motives:** - Agency: 80% - Communion: 15% Primary drive: validation ### Narrative - **Role:** Long-persecuted target now vindicated and on the offensive - **Arc:** redemption - **Contrasting:** The New York Times **Identity Claims:** - Victim of press fabrication 'right from the beginning' - Litigant whose 'powerful Lawsuit' grows 'stronger and stronger' ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Criticism (Record-low approval polling (33%, WaPo-ABC-Ipsos, Oct 18). The Oct 20-21 Wedgewood fabrication story supplied a vindicating fact to turn against it.) **Rage:** Intensity 35% targeting The New York Times - Proportionality: 40% Sentiment: -0.60 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 55% - Antisocial: 20% - Paranoid: 50% - Sadism: 10% **Defense Mechanisms:** - rationalization (neurotic) - splitting (immature) - distortion (pathological) - devaluation (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 40% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Shared-grievance framing: 'This is what I've had to deal with' - Formulaic direct address: 'Thank you for your attention to this matter' ## Danger Assessment **NONE** ### Gaslighting - Attack on how others perceive the press: 'Everything about The Failing New York Times is "ARTIFICIAL"' - Reversal of roles: the deceived outlet presented as the deceiver ('got caught') ## Fact Checks (5) _The model's verdicts from 2026-10-23._ > The New York Times used a company, Wedgewood Polls **MOSTLY TRUE** The Times listed 15 Wedgewood surveys in its midterm poll tracker and featured one in an article. It aggregated those polls and did not commission them. After the admission it removed all Wedgewood polls and added an editor's note. Sources: https://www.axios.com/2026/10/21/fake-polls-midterms-wedgewood-investigation; https://www.allsides.com/story/2026-midterm-elections-poll-site-referenced-major-mainstream-outlets-says-polls-were-fake > Wedgewood Polls admitted that the poll numbers it published were made up and fake **TRUE** On Oct 20, 2026, after FiftyPlusOne questioned its data, Wedgewood released a statement admitting it had fabricated its polls and calling the effort a social experiment. Sources: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/oct/21/bogus-polling-firm-admits-numbers-fraudulent-claims-experimental/; https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/national-polling-company-admits-its-totally-fake-crows-it-was-far-too-easy-to-get-major-media-outlets-to-bite/ > The New York Times got caught **MOSTLY FALSE** The fraud was Wedgewood's. The Times was one of many outlets and aggregators that carried the firm's numbers, along with MS NOW, Newsweek and Decision Desk HQ. It removed them once the admission came out. No reporting shows the Times knew the data were fake. Sources: https://www.axios.com/2026/10/21/fake-polls-midterms-wedgewood-investigation; https://www.allsides.com/story/2026-midterm-elections-poll-site-referenced-major-mainstream-outlets-says-polls-were-fake > This is what I've had to deal with, right from the beginning (implying the Times' polls have been fabricated throughout) **MOSTLY FALSE** Wedgewood was a 2026 operation: Urban Milwaukee first questioned it in July 2026. The Times' own polling is the NYT/Siena partnership, which polling-accuracy ratings have ranked among the most accurate. The Times has been hostile to Trump for years, but the claim that its polling has been fabricated has no support. Sources: https://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=992835 > Our powerful lawsuit against the Times is getting stronger and stronger every day **MOSTLY FALSE** The suit exists and is still alive, but nothing on the docket or in the news shows it gaining strength, and the Wedgewood episode the post ties it to plays no part in it. Status on the post date (Oct 22-23, 2026), from the CourtListener RECAP docket for Trump v. New York Times Co., 8:25-cv-02487 (M.D. Fla., Judge Steven D. Merryday): - Sept 2025: the original 85-page complaint was struck four days after filing. A 40-page amended complaint followed on Oct 16, 2025. - Dec 15, 2025: the defendants moved to dismiss for improper venue (Doc. 43) and for failure to state a claim (Doc. 44). Mediation on May 6, 2026 ended without agreement. - July 6, 2026 (Doc. 88): Merryday denied the venue motion and kept the case in Florida. This was a real procedural win for Trump. Volokh/Reason quotes the order saying the plaintiff's choice of forum "heavily weighs against transfer." - July 22, 2026: hearing on the 12(b)(6) motion. July 27 (Doc. 94): the judge deferred ruling on dismissal and gave Trump leave to amend a second time. Trump called this a win, and the Times said he "has had this chance twice previously and failed each time." - Aug 27, 2026 (Doc. 99): Trump filed a 62-page second amended complaint, still seeking $15 billion. - Sept 17 (Doc. 103): the defendants filed a supplement to their motion to dismiss. Law360 (Sept 21) reported they argued the new allegations still fail to show actual malice. - Oct 1 (Doc. 104): Trump's opposition. Oct 14 (Doc. 107): the defendants' reply. Nothing was filed between Oct 14 and the post date. So on the post date the case was a fully briefed motion to dismiss waiting for a ruling. The court has never ruled on the merits. The judge's two rulings on the pleadings so far were to strike the complaint once and to order it rewritten once. Nothing changed "every day" in the week before the post. The post links the suit to the Wedgewood polls, and that link fails. The suit is about two 2024 Times articles and the Penguin Random House book "Lucky Loser" by Craig and Buettner. A text search of the second amended complaint finds no mention of "poll," "Siena" or "Wedgewood." In January 2026 Trump said a Times/Siena poll "will be added" to the suit, and in June 2026 he said the same of the paper's Iran-war coverage. The August 2026 complaint contains neither. Wedgewood admitted on Oct 20, 2026 that it had faked its data, after the last complaint was filed. The Times was one of many aggregators it fooled, alongside Newsweek, Decision Desk HQ, The Hill and others. Wedgewood's admission therefore adds nothing to the defamation claims, and they rise or fall on actual malice over the book and articles. Why "mostly false" rather than "false": "stronger and stronger" is partly opinion. The case did survive a venue challenge, and the judge chose leave to amend over dismissal, so describing it as alive and pending is accurate. The factual claim of growing strength, and the suggestion that the Wedgewood news adds to it, are unsupported. Sources: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71354540/trump-v-new-york-times-company/; https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.447437/gov.uscourts.flmd.447437.99.0.pdf; https://clearinghouse.net/case/46972/; https://reason.com/volokh/2026/07/06/trumps-libel-lawsuit-against-n-y-times-and-penguin-random-house-can-proceed-in-florida-rather-than-n-y/; https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/07/28/judge-allows-trump-to-refile-15-billion-lawsuit-against-the-new-york-times/; https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2026/07/27/judge-doesnt-toss-trumps-15-billion-new-york-times-lawsuit-but-it-must-be-amended/; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-27/trump-allowed-by-judge-to-amend-15-billion-suit-against-nyt; https://www.thewrap.com/industry-news/public-policy-legal/judge-declines-to-dismiss-trump-15-billion-suit-against-new-york-times/; https://www.notus.org/courts/judge-trump-amend-refile-15-billion-new-york-times-defamation-lawsuit; https://gvwire.com/2026/08/28/trump-updates-defamation-suit-against-the-new-york-times/; https://www.law360.com/personal-injury-medical-malpractice/articles/2527746; https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/09/19/judge-strikes-down-trumps-15-billion-suit-against-new-york-times/; https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-refiles-15-billion-defamation-lawsuit-against-new-york-times; https://gulfnews.com/world/americas/trump-to-sue-new-york-times-over-unfavorable-opinion-poll-1.500417685; https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-calls-york-times-story-065711137.html; https://www.newsweek.com/fake-polling-firm-duped-media-in-social-experiment-12599153; https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/national-polling-company-admits-its-totally-fake-crows-it-was-far-too-easy-to-get-major-media-outlets-to-bite/; https://washingtontimes.com/news/2026/oct/21/bogus-polling-firm-admits-numbers-fraudulent-claims-experimental Overall Veracity: 48% ## Tags - New York Times (100%) - polling (90%) - Wedgewood Polls (80%) - defamation lawsuit (50%) - midterms 2026 (40%) - victimhood (50%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Trump announces a concession of Ilhan Omar's House seat that Democrats never made** Late at night after his Iowa rally, Trump went after Rep. Ilhan Omar. He claimed her real name was something else, brought back the unproven story that she married her brother, and announced that Democrats had given up her House seat, which never happened. In the same short burst he attacked the New York Times over polling, endorsed two Republicans and cheered the refilled Reflecting Pool in Washington. After a long night's break he came back angry at the Utah judge in the Charlie Kirk murder case, saying the judge was "desecrating" Kirk's memory over a slow timeline that the defense had in fact asked for. The rest of the day was travel to a Florida campaign event, a livestream link, an unexplained proverb about sickness signed with his own name, and an aerial photo of the National Mall, with each flash of anger fading quickly into routine posts. Full digest for 2026-10-23: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-23/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, October 23). The New York Times got caught! They used a... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "The New York Times got caught! They used a Company,..." Truth Social, 23 Oct. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937. Accessed 24 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "The New York Times got caught! They used a Company,...," Truth Social, October 23, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_117488073122158937 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_117488073122158937 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_117488073122158937 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-23 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117488073122158937.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._