# Post ts_117373336850052625

- Post ID: `ts_117373336850052625`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2026-10-02T21:03:08.557Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625/analysis

## Post text

_No text of its own. The post is its media, below._

## What the media says

**Video transcript** (8:28), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his:

> an online lynch mob has morphed into a Democrat talking point and now a malicious prosecution in New York. New York Governor Kathy Hochul is taking the Cornell case away from the local district attorney and handing it to a familiar face to determine whether anyone should face criminal charges. You just heard it mentioned there to President Trump. Now taking center stage New York Attorney General Letitia James. In what world would the police learn from a victim that she'd been literally gang raped while intoxicated by five men in a fraternity house and not elevate those allegations to the district attorney. I'm invoking the power conferred to me as the governor of the state of New York to enlist Attorney General James as an independent special prosecutor in this case. She'll follow the facts. She'll examine the evidence and go wherever it leads. Follow the facts, examine the evidence. That's the job. Can she do the job? Will she do the job? Can she be fair? Here's how James described as a reminder the Trump administration just a few years back. Stand up to the federal government. We've got to stand up to bullies. We've got to stand up to an administration which is two male, two pale, and two stale. Two male, two pale, two stale. Now this time facts matter. Details matter. Slogans would not, should not get the job done. So here's how she's framing her role as prosecutor. We will review the facts, gather evidence, interview witnesses, and if warranted, pursue prosecutions. I know that you want answers. I do too. This is now an active criminal investigation led by the office of the Attorney General. Sounds absolutely serious and prosecutorial. Doesn't sound sloganeering like two male, two pale, two stale. But just days before her appointment, we saw that old familiar voice. Here was Latisha James on social media. What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable. I'm holding her in my heart and my prayers to her and to all survivors. You're not alone. We stand with you. It doesn't appear to be a prosecutor neutral to the facts, ready to examine the evidence. And because of that, she and the governor on that were pressed today. Why did you affirm her allegations as fact without doing your own fact finding investigation into the governor? Why did you appoint an official who made a public statement affirming those allegations as fact as someone who's supposed to be doing an investigation? I will answer that. I have every confidence in our Attorney General to do what she has always done. Look at the facts, examine the record, and draw the proper conclusions. That's exactly what's going to happen in this case. I will not comment on a Facebook post. I will not comment on a Facebook post. The presumption there is some anonymous poster on Facebook doesn't dignify the response of the Attorney General, but it's her post on Facebook that demands answers. Also demanding answers is the litany of politicians lining up Democrats to stake a claim on the so-called Cornell seven Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed. He put out a statement taking the word of Jane Doe, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, she not only took the word of Jane Doe, she made up words and facts for Jane Doe. Seven men drugged and gang-raped a 20 year old woman. They lured her in to a fraternity house. They drugged her with ketamine. They then posted to a group chat that she was incapacitated, and seven men took turns gang-raping her for seven hours. Seven men took turns gang-raping her. They lured her to a fraternity house. They drugged her, and again seven men took turns gang-raping her. That's not even in the civil complaint alleged by Jane Doe. Yes, seven men are named in the lawsuit, but Jane Doe doesn't out alleged that seven men gang-raped her. What each man did is alleged to be different, some doing absolutely nothing. She doesn't allege they took turns raping her. She doesn't allege she was lured to the fraternity house. She doesn't allege that she was involuntarily drugged. That's pure defamation, and the only thing saving Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the pin she wears on her lapel that she sits in Congress, because we all know if congressional representatives were held to the truth, our jails would be full of politicians. The men themselves though have now given their account of the night. The New York Times has obtained documents from Cornell's Title IX investigation. Here's what they say. One said that he in fact was the victim of sexual misconduct because the woman had given him oral sex when he was too incapacitated to consent. Another saying he snorted a line of ketamine off her body and she then tried to initiate sex. And yet another said he asked Jane Doe for consent before engaging and gave her a chance to stop. Here's the quote. You recall telling Jane Doe that if you're uncomfortable with any of this or you won't want to do this, that's perfectly fine. We can call it a night. To that, he says Jane Doe replied, "We're all consenting adults here." Another male says, "I remember the girl in specific saying something along the lines of this was normal in medieval times." This was normal in medieval times. Jane Doe is telling a story, a very different story than what you just heard from the men. A transcript of her interview with campus police that came out when that happened in the weeks that followed that event says that she relayed with 100% confidence that she was raped. Of course, that's in contradiction to the statement she gave under the penalty of perjury to the prosecutor or to the police that she edited over 20 times. Leaving you with a question, what and who do you trust? Which version of Jane Doe? In the law when you are confronted with a witness, a witness with contradictory statements, that witness is impeached on the stand. They are often deemed uncredible. And what you're left with is turned to evidence outside the words, the contradictory words of the accuser. In this case, you have the text messages, you have the testimony of friends and roommates, you have the sorority big sister, all of which do undercut the testimony of Jane Doe. And then there's the law. Back to Governor Kathy Hoku. She says the law is at fault in New York. She describes it as a loophole that when someone voluntarily becomes intoxicated, that person can retain the capability of consent. She wants it changed. If someone is too intoxicated to consent, it should not matter whether they chose to use drugs or alcohol. Voluntary intoxication is not a license for sexual assault or gang rape, period. I support closing this loophole and will work with the New York State Legislature to accomplish this. Suggesting is a loophole that two people, consenting adults who get intoxicated, can't then have consensual sex, suggests be careful this weekend. Anyone who would have a drink is incapable of consent. You could all be guilty if this law were changed this weekend in New York.

## Media

- video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/117/373/330/865/008/482/original/31629e5d2f1b4d4b.mp4

## Engagement

- Likes: 7,722
- Reposts: 1,991
- Replies: 400
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-10-09T06:01:51.300Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-10-02T21:22:32.555Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

A captionless cable segment attacks New York Attorney General Letitia James after Governor Hochul appointed her special prosecutor in a Cornell fraternity sexual-assault case. The case has nothing to do with Trump. James is the link: she won the civil fraud judgment against him, and his Justice Department indicted her in 2025 before a court dismissed the charges. The clip's frame, "an online lynch mob" turned into "a malicious prosecution," is his own description of his legal troubles, applied here to strangers. That reads as displacement of a long-running grievance, together with projection: the clip charges James with prejudging the evidence and acting from political motives, the same charges brought against the administration's own prosecution of her. The segment also replays her "too male, too pale, and too stale" line to suggest she is biased against the accused as white men, and it dismisses a rape allegation as a mob product before any charging decision. James is a named, repeated target and the reach is large, but nothing in the clip calls for action. It is the one post that day that leaves policy for personal grievance.

## A cable segment about Letitia James, posted between two oil announcements

The post went up at 5:03 p.m. Eastern on a Friday, most likely from Washington. Around it that day were signed, staff-formatted announcements about a Korean enhanced-oil-recovery deal, European diesel releases and the Sunshine Protection Act. It is a cable-news segment with no caption. The segment is about a sexual-assault case tied to a Cornell fraternity, and about Governor Kathy Hochul's decision to take the case from the local district attorney and give it to New York Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor. The host sets the frame in the first sentence: "an online lynch mob has morphed into a Democrat talking point and now a malicious prosecution in New York." The rest of the segment argues that James cannot be neutral.

One line, "You just heard it mentioned there to President Trump," shows the broadcast had included him being asked about the case shortly before. So he is probably posting a segment that sat next to his own appearance. The truncated transcript doesn't show what he said.

## The case is unrelated to him. The prosecutor is not

Nothing in the clip involves him. James is the connection. She brought the civil fraud case that produced the 2024 judgment against him and his company, whose monetary penalty the Appellate Division threw out in August 2025. His Justice Department indicted her on mortgage-fraud charges in October 2025. A federal judge dismissed that indictment in November 2025 after finding the interim U.S. attorney's appointment invalid. "Malicious prosecution" is how he has described the cases against himself for years. Posting a segment that applies the phrase to James's newest assignment reads as displacement. An old grievance comes out through a case he has no stake in, where the attack can pass as concern for due process. The host's questions, "Can she do the job? Will she do the job? Can she be fair?", are the ones he has asked about her since 2022, now asked in a sympathetic broadcaster's voice.

The projection follows the same line. The segment says James is a prosecutor who reached a conclusion before the evidence ("It doesn't appear to be a prosecutor neutral to the facts"). The administration that published the post is the one that charged her through a prosecutor whose appointment a court voided. Using prosecution as a political weapon is the trait he disowns, and the clip pins it on her. Read as a story, he casts himself as the Victim at one remove: men he has never met stand in for him, and the familiar persecutor is back in the role.

## What the clip does with the complainant and with race

Two parts of the clip go further than the argument about James's neutrality. First, by calling a report of gang rape an "online lynch mob", it makes the accused men the victims of a mob and the prosecutor the aggressor. That is the reversal he applies to his own legal history, used here on strangers. The host also says politicians embellished the allegations beyond the civil complaint ("She doesn't allege they took turns raping her"). That is the broadcaster's reading of court filings, not something the subject asserted, so it is left out of the fact checks. Second, the clip replays James's old campaign line about an administration "too male, too pale, and too stale" (the transcript has "two male, two pale") to suggest she is biased against the accused as white men. Posting it lets a racial-resentment cue travel inside a neutrality argument without him writing a word of it.

## Where the risk sits

The target is a named official he has attacked for years. The clip calls an open investigation she leads "malicious" and frames her as racially biased, and it reaches a large audience. Nothing in it calls for action, and no one is described in dehumanizing terms, which is why the rating stops at elevated. The anonymous complainant is not identified. The harm the clip can do is to how her allegation is received, since it is called a mob's invention before any charging decision.

## Who chose it

With no written text, the attribution is only about who selected the clip. Two signals point to staff: the late-afternoon business-hours timing and the run of signed, polished posts around it. Two point to him: a segment featuring him, and a personal adversary he has pursued in court. They roughly cancel out.

Compared with the rest of the day, this is the only post that turns from policy to personal grievance. It continues his years-long fight with James through a third party's case.

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 50%)

### Indicators

- No written text: no stylometric evidence available
- Posted 5:03 p.m. Eastern on a Friday, during business hours
- Surrounded by signed, staff-formatted announcements the same day
- Segment references Trump being asked about the case, raising his personal interest
- Target (Letitia James) is a long-standing personal adversary

## Psychological Profile

### Traits

**Big Five:**
- Extraversion: 55%
- Agreeableness: 10%
- Conscientiousness: 40%
- Neuroticism: 60%
- Openness: 20%

Strongest facet: Low agreeableness (low trust, antagonism toward a long-standing adversary)

**Motives:**
- Agency: 70%
- Communion: 10%

Primary drive: revenge

### Narrative

- **Role:** Absent protagonist; persecuted party by analogy to the accused men
- **Arc:** contamination
- **Contrasting:** Letitia James, with Kathy Hochul and Democratic politicians as supporting cast

**Identity Claims:**
- Implied fellow target of 'malicious prosecution' by Letitia James

### State

**Vulnerable State**

**Trigger:** Preemptive Attack — Exposure (Letitia James's appointment as special prosecutor in the Cornell case)

Sentiment: -0.60

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 35%
- Antisocial: 20%
- Paranoid: 50%
- Sadism: 10%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- displacement (neurotic)
- projection (immature)
- devaluation (immature)
- splitting (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 0%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Borrowed authority of a sympathetic broadcaster
- Implicit invitation for followers to see his own prosecutions in the accused men's case

## Danger Assessment

**ELEVATED**

### Indicators

- Named, repeatedly targeted official (Letitia James) labeled as running a 'malicious prosecution'
- Racial-bias insinuation via replayed 'too male, too pale, too stale' clip
- Sexual-assault allegation recast as 'an online lynch mob' during an open investigation
- Large-audience amplification with no call to action

## Tags

- Letitia James (90%)
- Kathy Hochul (40%)
- malicious prosecution (80%)
- sexual assault allegation (60%)
- racial grievance cue (50%)
- displacement (70%)
- cable news amplification (60%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**A Cornell case that isn't his becomes a reason to post a cable attack on Letitia James, twice**

The day began with Trump landing in Oklahoma on Thursday evening, local time, and ended with him thanking the state. In between, the mood stayed upbeat and promotional. He posted a near-midnight push for Senate Republicans to end the twice-yearly clock change, a slogan about America belonging "to those who love it," and two morning announcements crediting South Korea and Europe with new oil and diesel commitments. The one turn came late Friday afternoon. He posted a cable news segment attacking New York Attorney General Letitia James over a Cornell sexual-assault case that has nothing to do with him, then posted it again minutes later. The clip calls the case a "lynch mob" turned "malicious prosecution," the language he uses for his own legal fights, but it asks no one to act and the grievance didn't carry into anything else he posted.

Full digest for 2026-10-02: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-02/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, October 2).  [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 2 Oct. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, October 2, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_117373336850052625
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_117373336850052625
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_117373336850052625
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-10-02
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_117373336850052625.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._