# Post ts_116795967794104702 - Post ID: `ts_116795967794104702` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2026-06-22T21:50:35.985Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702/analysis ## Post text _No text of its own. The post is its media, below._ ## What the media says **Image** (chart), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's: > A polling data graphic/chart titled "IRAN DEAL – POLLING" attributed to "Fabrizio, Lee & Associates," a polling firm. It presents results to the question "Do you favor or oppose the peace deal reached between the U.S. and Iran?" Three summary boxes show Favor 67% (green), Oppose 26% (red), Not Sure 7% (gray), matched by a bar chart below with a y-axis scaled 0-70 and bars of the same three colors and percentages. A footer credits the poll dates and sample size. Text in the image: "IRAN DEAL – POLLING Fabrizio, Lee & Associates Do you favor or oppose the peace deal reached between the U.S. and Iran? Favor 67% Oppose 26% Not Sure 7% 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 67% Favor 26% Oppose 7% Not Sure 6/16 – 6/18, 2026 · Fabrizio, Lee & Associates · n=1,500" ## Media - image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/795/967/541/806/415/original/7912d5983869a3c0.jpg ## Engagement - Likes: 8,343 - Reposts: 2,036 - Replies: 437 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-06-23T14:00:28.786Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-09-12T20:11:20.574Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## An in-house poll, posted the day after threatening the other side of the table The whole post is one graphic: a Fabrizio, Lee & Associates chart asking "Do you favor or oppose the peace deal reached between the U.S. and Iran?" with "Favor 67%," "Oppose 26%," "Not Sure 7%," fielded 6/16–6/18 with n=1,500. He added no words. What can be analyzed is which poll he picked and when he posted it. **Where the poll comes from.** Fabrizio, Lee & Associates is Tony Fabrizio's firm, Trump's longtime campaign pollster. The graphic names the firm but does not say who paid for the survey. Anyone who follows Republican polling knows the name, and most other readers won't. So he is putting forward his own camp's numbers as public opinion with no caption to flag that. A single sponsored poll presented as the public's verdict is ordinary political messaging. The notable thing is that he chose to rely on it at this moment. **Timing and what he was answering.** According to the event record, the previous day he threatened to "hit Iran very hard again" while Vice President Vance sat in talks in Switzerland. Iran's delegation filed a formal protest saying the threats broke the MOU. Days earlier he had floated charging "tolls" on the Strait of Hormuz and then dropped the idea. His feud with Meloni was also partly about Italy's opposition to the Iran war. Against that week, a chart showing two-thirds approval for "the peace deal" recasts a shaky, contested process as a finished and popular success. The best reading is supply-seeking mixed with pre-emption. The trigger is the criticism of how he handled the talks, and the graphic answers it with a popularity number rather than a response on substance. The evidence ends at the timing: nothing in the image points to a particular critic. **The word "reached."** The poll question calls the deal "reached." The event record describes a 60-day ceasefire, an MOU, and final-deal talks that were still going on, with Trump himself warning of new strikes "if they don't make a deal." Calling it a finished deal borrows the permanence of an agreement that did not exist yet. That wording belongs to the pollster, not to him, so it is not scored as his claim. Still, sharing it gives him the benefit of that framing. Defensively this is closest to **rationalization** and **idealization**: approval figures stand in for proof that the policy works, and "peace deal" sits beside threats of renewed bombing from a day earlier without anything to reconcile the two. Pairing peacemaker with bomber in the same week is also a split self-presentation. Each role gets its own post, and neither mentions the other. **Narrative role.** The graphic casts him as the dealmaker and peacemaker whom the public approves of. That is the Hero/King posture, the order-restorer who ended a war, and it runs alongside the Warrior posture of his threats. Nobody is attacked, so nothing is projected onto an enemy. The in-group being claimed is a 67% majority, an appeal to popularity (bandwagon) that treats a number as settling the question. **Personality.** On the trait level, the post shows assertive self-promotion and a need to be seen as winning. His agency and status motives come out as a demand for validation. It shows no communion: no word about Iranians, U.S. service members, or Italy, only the approval score. **Authorship.** There is no text to read stylistically. The post went up at 21:50 UTC, which is 5:50 pm Eastern if he was in Washington, near the end of business hours. It was one of several media-only posts that day. Posting a campaign pollster's chart fits both a staff-prepared asset and his well-known habit of posting favorable polls himself. Any attribution here is about who picked the graphic and pressed post, not who made it. **Risk.** He names no target and uses no hostile language, and the content points toward de-escalation. Its only edge is what it leaves out: the threats of the previous day stand unmentioned beside it. No factual claims appear in his own voice. The poll figures and the "deal reached" wording belong to the graphic. ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 45%) ### Indicators - Media-only post with no written text, so there is no stylistic evidence - 21:50 UTC ≈ 5:50 pm Eastern, the end of business hours, which leans slightly toward staff - The poll comes from his own campaign pollster, the kind of asset staff often prepare - He has long posted favorable polls personally - One of several media-only posts that day ## Psychological Profile ### Traits **Big Five:** - Extraversion: 60% - Agreeableness: 40% - Conscientiousness: 50% - Neuroticism: 35% - Openness: 30% Strongest facet: Assertiveness (self-promotion through approval metrics) **Motives:** - Agency: 75% - Communion: 15% Primary drive: validation ### Narrative - **Role:** Peacemaker / dealmaker vindicated by the public - **Arc:** redemption - **Contrasting:** Implied critics of the Iran process (Iran's delegation, Italy, the press) **Identity Claims:** - He secured a peace deal with Iran - Most Americans back his Iran policy ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Supply Seeking — Criticism (Criticism of his Iran threats during the Switzerland talks, Iran's formal protest, and the Meloni/Italy dispute over the war) Sentiment: +0.50 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 35% - Antisocial: 5% - Paranoid: 5% - Sadism: 0% **Defense Mechanisms:** - rationalization (neurotic) - idealization (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 0% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Asks followers to see themselves in a 67% majority - Signals victory without comment, leaving followers to draw the conclusion ## Tags - Iran (100%) - polling (90%) - appeal to popularity (70%) - supply-seeking (60%) - peace deal framing (60%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Algae-plagued Reflecting Pool blamed on vandals 'Probably inspired by Dirty Cop, James Comey!'** Most of the day's posting read like a campaign office working through its list: twenty boilerplate endorsements of Republican candidates, many of them posted the day before New York's primary and South Carolina's runoff, plus eight charts of friendly Iran-deal polling posted within about two minutes. His own voice came through mostly at the start and end of the day. On Sunday evening he called the New York Times 'CORRUPT' and declared that his pick in Colombia's razor-close election had 'Won, BIG!'; on Monday morning he blamed vandals for the algae-plagued Reflecting Pool, suggested James Comey had inspired them, and warned of a ten-year prison sentence. By evening that grievance had turned into mockery of a 'pro-algae' protester he suggested was paid, and his last post compared Senator Jon Ossoff to Pee-wee Herman. Full digest for 2026-06-22: https://trump.fm/date/2026-06-22/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, June 22). [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 22 Jun. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, June 22, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_116795967794104702 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_116795967794104702 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_116795967794104702 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-06-22 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795967794104702.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._