# Post ts_116795964890843230

- Post ID: `ts_116795964890843230`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2026-06-22T21:49:51.685Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230/analysis

## Post text

_No text of its own. The post is its media, below._

## What the media says

**Image** (chart), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's:

> A polling chart graphic titled "IRAN DEAL – POLLING" attributed to "Fabrizio, Lee & Associates" (a polling firm). It presents a pie chart under the heading "Most important reasons to favor the United States – Iran peace deal," with a subtitle noting the share of mentions is normalized to 100% and respondents could pick one or two reasons. The pie chart is divided into 8 colored slices with percentages and labels: green 36% "Peace / No more death / Ends the war"; blue 11% "Strait of Hormuz will be opened"; orange 11% "Gas / oil prices will go down"; pink/magenta 11% "Iran loses nuclear weapons"; purple 8% "Shouldn't have entered the war to begin with"; teal 8% "Economic growth / Fix the economy"; brown 10% "Other reasons (combined)"; gray 5% "Don't know / Refused". The graphic has a dark navy header bar and a red subheader bar, framed by a dark red border.

Text in the image: "IRAN DEAL – POLLING Fabrizio, Lee & Associates Most important reasons to favor the United States – Iran peace deal Share of mentions (normalized to 100%); respondents could pick one or two reasons 36% Peace / No more death / Ends the war 11% Strait of Hormuz will be opened 11% Gas / oil prices will go down 11% Iran loses nuclear weapons 8% Shouldn't have entered the war to begin with 8% Economic growth / Fix the economy 10% Other reasons (combined) 5% Don't know / Refused"

## Media

- image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/795/964/637/617/572/original/874f4d0f7203512e.jpg

## Engagement

- Likes: 6,944
- Reposts: 1,637
- Replies: 184
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-06-23T14:00:30.413Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-09-12T20:39:40.784Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## A pollster's pie chart, posted mid-negotiation

The post is one image and nothing else: a graphic headed "IRAN DEAL – POLLING," credited to Fabrizio, Lee & Associates, breaking down the "most important reasons to favor the United States – Iran peace deal." The largest slice, 36%, is "Peace / No more death / Ends the war." Three reasons tie at 11%: "Strait of Hormuz will be opened," "Gas / oil prices will go down," and "Iran loses nuclear weapons."

Timing matters here. The day before, Trump had threatened to "hit Iran very hard again" while Vice President Vance was in talks in Switzerland, and Iran's delegation had filed a formal protest. Posting a chart about why people *favor* a deal the next day moves from coercion to selling the deal. Read alongside the weekend's threats, this looks like the usual two-track approach: pressure on the adversary, then evidence of domestic support aimed at a home audience. The motive on display is agentic: he is claiming public backing for an outcome he wants credit for.

## What the chart leaves out

The chart only covers people who already favor the deal. It does not show what share of respondents that is. Anyone who scrolls past gets an impression of broad support, but the graphic never states it. Choosing a breakdown of reasons instead of a topline number is the most analytically useful thing about this post. It suggests an interest in showing momentum without committing to a figure that could be checked. That inference is limited: the full release may show a favorable topline that simply wasn't included in this image.

The source matters too. Fabrizio, Lee & Associates is Trump's own longtime campaign pollster, and nothing in the post says so. Presenting in-house polling as neutral evidence fits a pattern of self-sourced validation. It is a rhetorical move (appeal to popularity, selective framing), and nothing in the post amounts to distortion.

One slice cuts against him: 8% chose "Shouldn't have entered the war to begin with." Publishing a chart where a named reason amounts to criticism of his own decision to go to war suggests the image was not closely vetted for message, or that "people want peace" mattered more than that detail. Either way, the post reads less like a grievance-driven reaction and more like a routine effort to shape how the deal is received.

## Psychological reading

The post names no opponent, and that is what separates it from the weekend's Iran messaging: the pressure that ran through "hit Iran very hard again" has no object here, so this is not a counterattack after the Iranian protest over the Switzerland threats. The image flatters the deal and, by extension, the dealmaker. This is the grandiose side of the self-image in a quiet form: the "peacemaker" identity is implied by a slice labeled "Ends the war," set against the same week's "we'll collect tolls" threats. The defenses visible here are mild. Choosing the flattering cut of the data is closest to rationalization at the level of messaging. With no text there is nothing for splitting or projection to attach to.

Danger is low. The one feature that would matter, a target for supporters to act against, is missing, and the chart's own framing points the other way, casting the conflict in de-escalating terms ("No more death").

## Who posted it

The post went up at 21:49 UTC, which is 5:49 PM Eastern. Trump was most likely in Washington that Monday, so this falls at the end of the working day. It came in a string of polished same-day posts: a formal endorsement of Anthony Constantino and a congratulatory message to Colombia's president-elect, both in staff-style boilerplate ("It is my Great Honor to endorse"). A branded polling graphic with a designed header bar is the kind of asset a campaign or communications team prepares. That points toward staff selection, but the evidence is only about timing and format. Trump does repost polls himself, often.

Since the image carries no language from the subject, speech and cognitive markers cannot be read from this post. The only factual assertions belong to the chart, which the subject did not write, so no fact checks are attributed to him.

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 35%)

### Indicators

- Posted 5:49 PM Eastern, end of business hours in likely Washington location
- Professionally designed branded polling graphic typical of campaign/comms staff assets
- Clustered with polished staff-style endorsement and congratulation posts the same day
- No written text, so no stylometric evidence either way
- Trump has a long habit of personally sharing favorable polls, which keeps the score from going lower

## Psychological Profile

### Traits

**Big Five:**
- Extraversion: 55%
- Agreeableness: 40%
- Conscientiousness: 50%
- Neuroticism: 20%
- Openness: 30%

Strongest facet: assertiveness (claiming public mandate)

**Motives:**
- Agency: 70%
- Communion: 25%

Primary drive: validation

### Narrative

- **Role:** peacemaker / dealmaker
- **Arc:** redemption
- **Contrasting:** None named

**Identity Claims:**
- The leader who ends the war and the public supports it

### State

**Grandiose State**

**Trigger:** Supply Seeking (Pending US-Iran deal and criticism of threats made during the Switzerland talks)

Sentiment: +0.35

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 20%
- Antisocial: 5%
- Paranoid: 0%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 0%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Presenting in-house polling as evidence that the public is behind the leader

## Tags

- iran-deal (100%)
- polling (80%)
- selective-data (60%)
- image-only (50%)
- peacemaker-framing (60%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Algae-plagued Reflecting Pool blamed on vandals 'Probably inspired by Dirty Cop, James Comey!'**

Most of the day's posting read like a campaign office working through its list: twenty boilerplate endorsements of Republican candidates, many of them posted the day before New York's primary and South Carolina's runoff, plus eight charts of friendly Iran-deal polling posted within about two minutes. His own voice came through mostly at the start and end of the day. On Sunday evening he called the New York Times 'CORRUPT' and declared that his pick in Colombia's razor-close election had 'Won, BIG!'; on Monday morning he blamed vandals for the algae-plagued Reflecting Pool, suggested James Comey had inspired them, and warned of a ten-year prison sentence. By evening that grievance had turned into mockery of a 'pro-algae' protester he suggested was paid, and his last post compared Senator Jon Ossoff to Pee-wee Herman.

Full digest for 2026-06-22: https://trump.fm/date/2026-06-22/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, June 22).  [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 22 Jun. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, June 22, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_116795964890843230
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_116795964890843230
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_116795964890843230
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-06-22
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116795964890843230.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._