# Post ts_116481910110003463

- Post ID: `ts_116481910110003463`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2026-04-28T10:41:36.116Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463/analysis

## Post text

_No text of its own. The post is its media, below._

## What the media says

**Image 1** (document), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's:

> A screenshot of a scanned legal filing document — page 1 of a federal court motion. Header in blue text reads case metadata; below is the court caption block naming the parties, followed by the motion title and body text of the first paragraph.

Text in the image: "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-04316-RJL NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, et al., Defendants. DEFENDANTS' RULE 62.1 MOTION FOR AN INDICATIVE RULING DISSOLVING THE COURT'S INJUNCTION "The National Trust for Historic Preservation" is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE because when they add the words "in the United States" to the National Trust for Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the United States refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their mission and objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. They were shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service. But this did not deter them because they suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS, as noted by Democrat Senator John Fetterman, of Pennsylvania, and are represented by the lawyer for Barack Hussein Obama, Gregory Craig. The lower section of the building does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section of the building does not work without the lower. It is all one highly 1"

**Image 2** (document), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's:

> A screenshot of a page from a court filing document. The header reads "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 2 of 9" in blue text. The body is a legal brief paragraph describing a building's integrated systems (venting, electrical, plumbing, security, HVAC, elevator, structural steel/concrete, bulletproof windows, drone-proof roof), arguing these would have prevented a described assassination attempt at the Washington Hilton during a White House Correspondents' Dinner, referencing prior attempts including one in Butler, Pennsylvania where a bullet hit "the President's ear." It argues for dissolving a court injunction blocking a construction project, disputing standing of "a woman walking her dog" to oppose it, and notes defendants asked "the Trust" whether it opposes the motion, which it does. Page number "2" appears at bottom center.

Text in the image: "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 2 of 9 integrated unit! As an example, one venting system, one electrical system, one plumbing system, one security system, one air conditioning and heating system, one elevator connector and, very importantly, one structural steel and enforced concrete system — and more. Even the bullet proof windows and glass, and the heavy steel, drone proof roof, protect what is below. With such a facility, it would have been impossible for an attack like that which took place last Saturday evening in D.C. when an attempted assassin, armed with a shotgun, pistol, and knives, charged through a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton in an attempt to assassinate President Donald J. Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, and members of the President's Cabinet and senior staff, during the White House Correspondents' Dinner. The Secret Service fortunately neutralized the assassin before he could reach the ballroom. However, Saturday's narrow miss—which marks the third assassination attempt on President Trump since 2024—confirms what should have already been obvious: Presidents need a secure space for large events, that currently does not exist in Washington, D.C., and this Court's injunction stalling this Project cannot defensibly continue, for the sake of the safety of President Trump, future Presidents, and their families, Cabinets, and staff. Defendants thus request that this Court issue an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 that it will dissolve its injunction. Three assassination attempts—including the attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, where an assassin's bullet hit the President's ear—is enough. There is absolutely no argument that a woman walking her dog in the vicinity of the White House has STANDING to stop such a desperately needed structure for the people of the United States of America, as it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to do their jobs. The day after this assassination attempt, Defendants asked the Trust whether they oppose this motion and still seek to stop this Project by continuing their dangerous lawsuit. The "Trust" refused to heed their request, and responded that it opposes this motion. 2"

**Image 3** (document), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's:

> A scanned page from a legal court filing. The header reads "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 3 of 9" and the page is numbered "3" at the bottom. The body text is numbered paragraphs 1 and 2 of what appears to be a legal brief/motion, discussing an appeal of a preliminary injunction related to "the Project," citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 and case law (Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski; Amarin Pharms. Ir. Ltd. v. FDA; Index Newspapers LLC v. City of Portland). Paragraph 2 describes an assassination attempt in which an "assassin" traveled by train with firearms and knives intending to kill "the President," "the First Lady," and senior administration officials, citing a New York Post article about a "White House Correspondents' Dinner suspect Cole Allen's full anti-Trump manifesto." The text describes the suspect identifying the WHCD as his "first real opportunity" to target the President, and claims he checked into the Washington Hilton as a guest and bragged about walking in with multiple weapons.

Text in the image: "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 3 of 9 1. Defendants have appealed this Court's preliminary injunction regarding the Project. ECF 74. That appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction over its injunction. See Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 740 (2023). Even so, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 provides that "[i]f a timely motion is made for relief that the court lacks authority to grant because of an appeal that has been docketed and is pending, the court may … state either that it would grant the motion if the court of appeals remands for that purpose or that the motion raises a substantial issue." Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(a)(3). An indicative ruling is especially appropriate where it would "obviat[e] the need for the appeal." Amarin Pharms. Ir. Ltd. v. FDA, 139 F. Supp. 3d 437, 447 (D.D.C. 2015). To that end, where, as here, a change in circumstances warrants dissolving the underlying injunction on appeal, that is a paradigmatic example of when a district court should issue such a ruling. See, e.g., Index Newspapers LLC v. City of Portland, 2022 WL 72124, at *1 (D. Ore. 2022). 2. Earlier this week, an assassin traveled by train across the Country with multiple firearms and knives planning to kill the President, the First Lady, and senior ranking officials within the Administration. See Steven Nelson and Chris Nesi, Read White House Correspondents' Dinner suspect Cole Allen's full anti-Trump manifesto, New York Post (Apr. 26, 2026), https://nypost.com/2026/04/26/us-news/read-whcd-gunman-cole-allens-full-anti-trump-manifesto. The timing was not coincidental: as stated in his "sprawling manifesto," the assassin identified the White House Correspondents' Dinner as his "first real opportunity" to target the President. Id. That is so, because the assassin understood what Defendants have been saying for months: The President lacks a secure space for large events. The Washington Hilton is no exception. Indeed, the assassin himself seems to have bragged that he was able to check into the hotel as a guest, and "walk in with multiple weapons" without anyone dealing with him as a "threat." Id. Further, he believed that come Saturday, he would be able to exploit the venue's"

**Image 4** (document), described automatically; these are a machine's words about the picture, not the poster's:

> A scanned page from a legal court filing (page 4 of 9). The header reads "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 4 of 9". The body text is legal argument discussing an assassination attempt, referencing a "Quinn Decl." (declaration by U.S. Secret Service Deputy Director Quinn) describing how an assailant ran through a security checkpoint and opened fire on a Secret Service agent before being apprehended, and citing constraints of off-site venues versus proposed security improvements at the White House Complex, including construction of a fortified structure with missile-resistant steel columns, military-grade venting, drone-proof ceilings, and bullet/ballistic/blast-proof glass, along with bomb shelters and medical facilities. Page number "4" is printed at the bottom center.

Text in the image: "Case 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Document 79 Filed 04/27/26 Page 4 of 9 security defects, and make his way up to the President—willing to "go through most everyone [there] to get to" him. Id. The assassin came horrifically close, as U.S. Secret Service Deputy Director Quinn's declaration ("Quinn Decl.," attached) explains. During the event, the assassin was able to run through a security checkpoint and open fire on a Secret Service agent, before he was apprehended. Quinn Decl. ¶¶ 6-7. While the Secret Service was able to be as effective as realistically possible that night, "as demonstrated by the prompt apprehension" of the assassin, they were nonetheless limited by the "inherent constraints" that come with available "off-site venues" that are outside the White House Complex, such as a hotel with more than a thousand rooms like the Washington Hilton. Id. ¶¶ 8-10. By contrast, having events at the White House Complex will allow for major improvements in safety, and significantly increase the ability of the Secret Service to protect the President and guests from threats. Id. ¶¶ 11-14. As the undisputed evidence demonstrates, the Project is required for National Security. It will shield the now-exposed East Room of the Executive Mansion and provide best in class, modern security to the President and his family, his Cabinet, his staff, and visitors. This "fixed structure"—constructed using "threat-resistant materials" including missile resistant steel columns, Military-grade venting, drone-proof ceilings, and bullet, ballistic, and blast proof glass—will form "a fortified structural buffer" protecting "both the main White House and West Wing." Third Quinn Decl. ¶ 10. Together, the ballroom and secure facilities throughout the Project—bomb shelters, a state of the art hospital and medical facilities, Top Secret military installations, structures, and equipment, protective partitioning, and other features—are a single integrated, complex unit that is vital for the National Security of the United States. Id. This Project will ensure that events like the horrific attack on Saturday night do not happen again. See Quinn Decl. 4"

## Media

- image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/481/909/738/428/814/original/3b4a716d62e7ef46.jpg
- image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/481/909/741/093/845/original/c776eb910f3d25af.jpg
- image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/481/909/739/399/984/original/cf0a0fa1dd6c838f.jpg
- image: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/481/909/744/152/634/original/2e08ea5c4f1e44d9.jpg

## Engagement

- Likes: 15,971
- Reposts: 4,302
- Replies: 886
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-04-30T16:01:49.519Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-09-13T18:56:00.632Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This media-only post shares page one of the government's motion to dissolve the injunction on the White House ballroom project. The quoted filing text does the psychological work: it labels the plaintiff's name "FAKE," reframes the National Trust's legal objection as evidence of "Trump Derangement Syndrome," and identifies its counsel by his prior client (Barack Hussein Obama) rather than his argument. The pattern is splitting — the plaintiff is "very bad for our Country," the project "vital to our National Security" — paired with projection, where opposition is attributed to the opponent's pathology rather than a legitimate preservation or legal claim. Coming days after an assassination attempt at the Correspondents' Dinner that he has cited to justify a secure ballroom, the filing leans on that event's authority ("Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service") to place the project above ordinary review. No written text accompanies the image, so authorship attribution rests solely on the 6:41am Eastern posting time — weakly consistent with his personal posting habits, but too thin on its own to support more than low confidence about who selected this particular filing page. Nothing in the image trades in violent or eliminationist language; the aggression is confined to delegitimizing the opposing litigant and counsel by name and diagnosis within a document addressed to a federal judge.

The post carries no words of his own — the behavior here is the choice to publish page one of the government's motion to dissolve the injunction blocking his White House ballroom, at 6:41am Eastern the Tuesday after the Correspondents' Dinner shooting. The filing itself does the talking, and what it says reads like his own voice pasted into a legal brief: "even their name is FAKE," "they suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS," "represented by the lawyer for Barack Hussein Obama, Gregory Craig." Publishing this page puts a federal court filing to work as a vindication document — the plaintiff isn't just wrong on the merits, its name is "FAKE," its motives are pathologized, and its lawyer is tied to a disfavored predecessor by his full, un-shortened name.

The splitting in the quoted text is total: the National Trust is "very bad for our Country," his ballroom project is "vital to our National Security," blessed by "Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service." There's no room in the frame for a nonprofit raising a legitimate preservation objection — only for an adversary whose resistance gets reclassified as a syndrome. That reclassification (TDS, sourced here to "Democrat Senator John Fetterman") functions as a diagnosis-as-weapon: it converts a legal disagreement into evidence of the opponent's derangement, which is projection dressed as citation. The Gregory Craig/Obama line does similar work by association rather than argument.

The timing sits at the edge of his early-morning posting pattern, but with no prose of his own attached — no typos, no capitalization tells, nothing to run stylometry against — the only evidence for who selected this image is when it went up, which is thin. This reads as a choice about which document page to surface, not an authored statement, and the confidence on that call stays low regardless of the hour.

Nothing in the image trades in violent or eliminationist language; the aggression here is confined to delegitimizing an opposing litigant by name and by diagnosis, in a document meant to be read by a federal judge.

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 55%)

### Indicators

- posted 6:41am Eastern, near his typical early-posting window
- no written text to support or contradict with stylometric markers
- selection of a specific litigation exhibit is consistent with his known habit of posting case documents that favor his position

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Preemptive Attack — Criticism (Rule 62.1 motion to dissolve the injunction blocking the White House ballroom project, filed amid ongoing litigation with the National Trust for Historic Preservation)

**Rage:** Intensity 45% targeting National Trust for Historic Preservation and its counsel, Gregory Craig
- Proportionality: 25%

Sentiment: -0.35

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 60%
- Antisocial: 25%
- Paranoid: 60%
- Sadism: 20%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- splitting (immature)
- devaluation (immature)
- projection (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

## Danger Assessment

**NONE**

### Gaslighting

- recasts a nonprofit's legal objection as a psychological syndrome ('Trump Derangement Syndrome') rather than a substantive dispute, which delegitimizes the opposing position without addressing it

## Tags

- white-house-ballroom-litigation (90%)
- national-trust-for-historic-preservation (70%)
- trump-derangement-syndrome (60%)
- ad-hominem (60%)
- splitting (50%)
- gregory-craig-obama-association (40%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Trump posts his lawyers' brief using the Correspondents' Dinner shooting to free the ballroom, then hosts the King**

He was in Washington hosting King Charles and Queen Camilla, and most of his posting went to his White House ballroom. At dawn he put up page after page of a court filing arguing that last weekend's shooting at the Correspondents' Dinner shows a judge was wrong to block the project, and later added a senator's post backing it. The evening before, he had returned to his claim that elections are rigged and demanded Republicans pass his voter ID bill. Mid-morning brought a playful joke about moving into Buckingham Palace and a claim that Iran had told him it was in "a State of Collapse." The day ended with his only real flash of anger, aimed at Germany's chancellor over Iran.

Full digest for 2026-04-28: https://trump.fm/date/2026-04-28/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, April 28).  [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 28 Apr. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, April 28, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_116481910110003463
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_116481910110003463
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_116481910110003463
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-04-28
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116481910110003463.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._