# Post ts_116046122963627074

- Post ID: `ts_116046122963627074`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2026-02-10T11:35:11.893Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074/analysis

## Post text

_No text of its own. The post is its media, below._

## What the media says

**Video transcript** (0:41), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his:

> Well, one of the guys that's in here is Eric Swalwell. Now, that is secondhand information from the whistleblower, but the whistleblower actually attended a meeting with Adam Schiff, a ranking member. Yeah. I stand corrected. They both hate Trump, so I kind of mix them up. Yeah, they all merge together these days. Listen, this whistleblower literally sat in a meeting, he says, he tells the FBI, where Adam Schiff authorized the leaking of classified secrets to dirty up Donald Trump and to try to build towards either a select committee in Congress or a special prosecutor.

## Media

- video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/116/046/122/243/965/375/original/681613bba84b6773.mp4

## Engagement

- Likes: 11,113
- Reposts: 3,075
- Replies: 299
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-11T11:15:22.882Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-09-09T07:20:47.253Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This media-only repost amplifies a broadcast clip in which a commentator relays whistleblower testimony alleging Adam Schiff (briefly conflated with Eric Swalwell) authorized leaking classified information to damage Trump, potentially building toward a select committee or special prosecutor. With no original text, no stylometric or cognitive markers are assessable; authorship attribution rests solely on timing (~6:35 AM Eastern, just past the canonical late-night/early-morning window) and is capped at low confidence, reflecting who likely selected the clip rather than who wrote anything. Psychologically, the selection continues a longstanding persecution-to-vindication narrative targeting Russia-investigation-era critics, reinforced by a same-day companion post referencing a 'slam dunk' conspiracy case against 'Obama's feds.' This pairing suggests an active, coordinated grievance narrative that day rather than incidental engagement. Clinical indicators center on paranoid features (persistent grudge-holding, preoccupation with perceived persecution) and mild antisocial features (amplifying calls for prosecutorial/congressional action against named opponents based on uncorroborated secondhand claims), with splitting evident in the clip's collapsing of two distinct critics into one undifferentiated enemy. No violent or dehumanizing content is present, and rage is not directly expressed since no original words accompany the post; danger is rated elevated based on the institutional-targeting content rather than any violence indicator. No fact-check items are attributed to Trump himself, since the substantive claims originate with the clip's speaker, not with him.</summary>
<parameter name="eventIds">[]

## Post Analysis: ts_116046122963627074 (2026-02-10)

**Format note:** This post carries no original text — it is a bare video repost. All analysis below concerns the *selection and amplification* of the clip, not authorship of its words. The speaker (a broadcast commentator relaying a whistleblower's FBI account) is not Trump, and nothing in the transcript is attributed to him as his own assertion. No propositional content can be scored as "his" language.

### Content of the amplified clip
A commentator discusses a whistleblower who allegedly told the FBI that Adam Schiff (initially misidentified as Eric Swalwell, then self-corrected on-air, "they all merge together these days") authorized leaking classified information to damage Trump and build toward a "select committee" or "special prosecutor." This is secondhand, unverified testimony even by the clip's own characterization.

### Levels 1-3: Traits, Motives, Narrative
With no original text, no stylometric trait evidence is available. The choice of clip fits a stable longitudinal pattern rather than revealing new information: a **persecution-to-vindication narrative** in which Trump is cast as victim of a "deep state" conspiracy (Schiff, Swalwell, Obama-era officials) now approaching vindication via whistleblower testimony. A same-day companion post ("Ex-FBI agent says Bondi has 'slam dunk' conspiracy case against Obama's feds") indicates this is a coordinated grievance narrative rather than an isolated share. Contrasting others: Schiff and Swalwell, treated as interchangeable antagonists ("they all merge together").

### Level 4: Clinical indicators
- **Paranoid features:** amplification of long-held grudges against Schiff/Swalwell dating to the Russia-investigation era; preoccupation with claimed persecution by named individuals.
- **Antisocial features (mild):** amplifying content that endorses prosecutorial/legislative action (select committee, special prosecutor) against named political opponents on the basis of uncorroborated secondhand claims — consistent with the broader "weaponization" narrative visible in the same-day Bondi post.
- **Narcissistic state:** mixed — grievance/victimization framing (leaks "to dirty up Donald Trump") paired with an implicit grandiose expectation of eventual institutional vindication.
- Not indicative of malignant narcissism's sadism component; no cruelty or gloating is present in the amplified content itself.

### Defense mechanisms
- **Splitting:** Schiff/Swalwell functionally interchangeable "all-bad" enemies.
- **Projection (plausible, low confidence):** allegations that a rival leaked material "to dirty up" Trump echo accusations Trump himself has faced regarding classified-document handling; cannot be confirmed as intentional projection from a repost alone.
- **Rationalization (by proxy):** the amplified content builds a justificatory case for pursuing legal/legislative action against opponents.

### Rhetorical technique (of the amplified content, not Trump's own words)
Appeal to institutional authority (FBI, whistleblower), guilt-by-association via name conflation, and implicit us-vs-them framing. These techniques belong to the video's speaker; Trump's contribution is curation and reach, not composition.

### Danger assessment
**Elevated.** The clip endorses using investigative/prosecutorial machinery (select committee, special prosecutor) against named political figures based on uncorroborated secondhand claims. This is consistent with a pattern of targeting perceived critics for state action rather than with eliminationist or violent rhetoric — no dehumanizing or violent imagery is present, so this falls short of "high" or "critical."

#

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 60%)

### Indicators

- No written text is present, so no stylometric evidence (typos, syntax, ALL CAPS, grammar) can inform this judgment — the attribution below concerns who selected/posted the clip, not who wrote any words
- Posted at 2026-02-10T11:35:11.893Z; no travel event places Trump outside his standard Eastern-time base (DC/Mar-a-Lago) this week, so Eastern Time is assumed
- 11:35:11 UTC converts to approximately 6:35 AM EST — just past the canonical late-night/early-morning authentic window (10pm-6am), but still consistent with early-morning personal scrolling/posting behavior documented elsewhere in his patterns
- Content amplifies a personal grievance target (Schiff, Swalwell) consistent with his own long-standing preoccupations, which slightly favors personal selection over routine staff scheduling, but this is weak circumstantial evidence, not proof
- Companion same-day posts (including a substantive link share) suggest an active posting session that morning, though sessions can include both aide-scheduled and personally selected items

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Maintenance (Ongoing grievance narrative re: Schiff/Swalwell and the Russia-investigation era, reactivated by a resurfaced whistleblower claim)

Sentiment: -0.30

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 20%
- Antisocial: 30%
- Paranoid: 55%
- Sadism: 5%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- splitting (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 0%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Amplifying third-party 'insider' testimony to lend authenticity to a persecution narrative without personally asserting the underlying claims

## Danger Assessment

**ELEVATED**

### Indicators

- Amplifies a call for institutional action (select committee, special prosecutor) against named political opponents based on uncorroborated secondhand testimony
- Continues a pattern of targeting specific named critics (Schiff, Swalwell) for potential legal/investigative consequences

## Tags

- persecution-vindication (70%)
- adam-schiff (60%)
- eric-swalwell (40%)
- deep-state-weaponization (60%)
- media-only-repost (100%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**A 2:30 a.m. start, an eight-minute burst of five-year-old grievances, and total silence on the day's actual news**

Trump posted 23 times, opening with a few news links just after 2:30 in the morning and closing before 7 p.m. with a rapid-fire block of seven near-identical endorsements of Florida Republicans. The middle of the day was an eight-minute burst of eleven old clips and images reposted from his own account — recycled 2020 election-fraud footage, a Hunter Biden laptop segment, and a complaint about Japan and Kuwait ripping off America that dates back decades. His one clearly personal moment came in the early afternoon, showing off renderings of the White House ballroom he's building and calling it on budget, ahead of schedule, and the finest ever built anywhere. There was no anger anywhere in the day, and no reaction at all to the two legal stories breaking around him: a grand jury refusing to indict six Democratic lawmakers, and Ghislaine Maxwell taking the Fifth while her lawyer floated a clemency deal. The mood was self-satisfied and low-key — but with under four hours of overnight quiet, and the day's grievances all pulled from the archive rather than the present.

Full digest for 2026-02-10: https://trump.fm/date/2026-02-10/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, February 10).  [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 10 Feb. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, February 10, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_116046122963627074
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_116046122963627074
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_116046122963627074
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-02-10
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_116046122963627074.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._