# Post ts_115978006663781152 - Post ID: `ts_115978006663781152` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2026-01-29T10:52:19.575Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152/analysis ## Post text _No text of its own. The post is its media, below._ ## What the media says **Video transcript** (2:11), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > >> Flipping this election, but we shall see is Georgia and that state's secretary of state Brad Raffensperger is with us now, Mister secretary good morning on a busy morning, I guess with the big question is how that yeah we want to know what are we going to get your votes when we're going to find out who's won your state. >> Well, we have about 2% left to go we had great success yesterday. We have 4.7 million voters voted record breaker for us beats that 4.1 in 2016. The average wait time of only 2 minutes statewide average. We have 2% left to go. And you can see where we are right now with the results of important I don't think will change any outcomes, but that's what really people that make those predictions to what we'll do is get. >> I was interesting that we just get into the good part there because the secretary of state said they got 2% left to count check. But he did not think it would change the outcome that's interesting but then he deferred to the prognosticators which I think is a new. >> Look I get to say what our model say is where those counties are they are heavily Democratic counties. And it's the Atlanta number so it is going to shrink. You know perhaps you know if I were an arbiter of an election result, I wouldn't want to be the one saying yes and when we have the vote will change the result. I think his job is to be the umpire let's ask Mister secretary can you hear me now you just were saying something like phone bomb. >> Okay, well fair, you're busy guy probably all your friends want to know the same thing we want to know what is going to report its results. But you said something interesting Sir you said 2% left to count didn't think however that it would be changing the outcome is that based on your analysis of where those votes are outstanding or you just guessing it because of the fact that it's only 2%. >> We don't guess what we do is report we just see where the candidates are right now and both presidential congressional senatorial you look at how the votes are out there even if one of the candidates got a 100% probably would be enough to do to move it one way or the other gotcha but it is what it is will just wait everything's done the county's working ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/115/978/006/025/707/267/original/97f8de0b7ba456e6.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 7,801 - Reposts: 1,971 - Replies: 205 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.283Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-09-09T02:50:04.229Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Overview This post carries no original text — it is a bare repost of an apparent 2020 election-night broadcast segment featuring then-Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger discussing vote-counting progress. The transcript itself is unremarkable: Raffensperger reports record turnout (4.7 million voters), a 2-minute average wait time, and roughly 2% of votes outstanding, stating he does not expect the remaining count to change the outcome. Nothing in the clip contains fraud allegations or inflammatory language — it reads as routine, professional election-administration reporting from a news broadcast, not a statement by the subject. Because there is no caption, the only analyzable act is *selection*: choosing to resurface this specific clip, of this specific official, at this time. Raffensperger is the Georgia official with whom the subject has a well-documented adversarial history (the January 2021 "find 11,780 votes" call and subsequent public attacks after Raffensperger declined to alter the certified 2020 result). Surfacing years-old election-night B-roll without commentary is most parsimoniously read as a grievance callback tied to the 2020 outcome — consistent with a longstanding contamination narrative (a legitimate victory allegedly stolen) that recurs independent of proximate news hooks. Nothing in the current 7-day event window (Minneapolis unrest, ICE backlash, falling immigration approval, an Iowa economic speech, a rescinded OMB freeze memo) obviously explains why this clip surfaced now; it appears to be a self-generated tangent rather than a reaction to current events. This inference should be held with low confidence given the complete absence of text. ## Levels 1-3 (Traits, Motives, Narrative) Trait-level inference is necessarily thin without written language. At most, the selection is consistent with low Agreeableness (sustained antagonism toward a specific named former ally-turned-adversary) and mild rigidity (returning to a settled, five-year-old dispute rather than engaging current events). Motivationally, this reads as agentic/status-protective rather than communal: relitigating a contested outcome protects a self-narrative of electoral legitimacy. Narrative identity: the subject casts himself implicitly as the wronged victor (contamination sequence — 2020 as good-turned-bad through alleged betrayal by officials like Raffensperger), with Raffensperger positioned as the contrasting other/insufficiently loyal official. No explicit identity claims are made since there is no text. ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators **Malignant narcissism:** Weak evidence here. The clip contains no grandiosity, exploitation, or cruelty in what was amplified. If the selection is indeed a grievance callback, it would fit the paranoid-features dimension (bearing grudges, preoccupation with perceived past injuries) more than narcissistic or antisocial features, but this is inferential given zero accompanying commentary. **Trigger:** Best characterized as "maintenance" or low-grade preemptive grievance-airing rather than a clear injury response — no acute trigger in the surrounding week points at Raffensperger or 2020 Georgia specifically. Low confidence. **Narcissistic state/rage:** No rage is expressed (there is no text to express it). Cannot assess oscillation between grandiose/vulnerable states from a wordless repost. **Defense mechanisms:** If the contamination-narrative reading is correct, this would be most consistent with rationalization/idealization dynamics operating over time (revisiting a moment where doubt could be cast) rather than any defense visible in this post's content itself. This should be flagged as speculative — a single silent repost cannot establish a defense mechanism with confidence. **Cognitive markers:** Not assessable — no subject-authored language is present in this post. ## Authorship Attribution No stylometric evidence is available since the post contains no original text; the following rests entirely on timing and posting-pattern evidence and should be read as an inference about *who selected the clip*, not who wrote anything. The post timestamp (2026-01-29T10:52:19Z) converts to approximately 5:52 AM Eastern Time (EST, UTC-5), which falls within the subject's typical late-night/early-morning authentic posting window. However, this post is one of five consecutive content-free reposts published within a short span the same morning, a batch pattern that is equally consistent with either the subject personally scrolling and reposting in an early-morning session, or a staff member queuing multiple reposts. Given the total absence of distinguishing stylometric signal, confidence in either direction must be capped at low. ## Rhetorical & Danger Assessment No rhetorical devices are directly attributable to the subject since he added no text. The amplified content itself employs no hyperbole, dehumanization, or violent imagery — it is a neutral news segment. Danger level: **none**. There are no eliminationist, dehumanizing, or mobilization elements in either the clip or the (absent) framing. ## Confidence Note This analysis is necessarily thin and should not be over-read. A silent repost of five-year-old, factually anodyne election-night footage permits only limited, low-confidence inference about grievance rumination; it does not meet the bar for a clinically significant pattern requiring an extended summary. ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 50%) ### Indicators - Posted ~5:52 AM Eastern, within the subject's typical early-morning authentic posting window - Part of a batch of five consecutive content-free reposts the same morning, a pattern equally consistent with personal scrolling or staff queuing - No written text present, so no stylometric evidence (typos, phrasing, grammar) is available to assess - Absence of any personal caption or framing is itself ambiguous between authentic silent amplification and routine staff repost behavior ## Psychological Profile ### Traits **Big Five:** - Extraversion: 50% - Agreeableness: 30% - Conscientiousness: 40% - Neuroticism: 40% - Openness: 40% Strongest facet: low agreeableness / grudge retention (low confidence, inferred from selection only) **Motives:** - Agency: 55% - Communion: 15% Primary drive: status ### Narrative - **Role:** wronged victor / vindicated candidate (inferred) - **Arc:** contamination - **Contrasting:** Brad Raffensperger ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Unknown (Possible resurfacing of 2020 Georgia election grievance; no clear proximate trigger identified in the surrounding week's events) Sentiment: -0.05 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 10% - Antisocial: 0% - Paranoid: 25% - Sadism: 0% **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 0% ## Tags - media-only-repost (100%) - 2020-election-grievance (40%) - raffensperger (40%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Fifty-four posts, forty-four of them wordless: a day spent defending Minneapolis through other people's voices, punctuated by three flashes of his own.** Trump posted 54 times, but almost all of it was other people's work — 44 of those posts contained no words of his own, mostly videos fired off in two rapid bursts, one late the night before and one just before 6 AM. The through-line was Minneapolis: rather than address the immigration raids or the nurse killed by federal agents, he circulated clip after clip arguing the protests were secretly funded, naming two private citizens along the way. He broke his own silence three times — to call the Fed chair a moron for not cutting rates, to report a friendly call with Mexico's president, and, at the end of the day, to threaten Canada's entire aircraft industry over a certification dispute. He slept a normal night and posted nothing after 6:30 PM, so despite the volume this reads as heavy amplification rather than a manic stretch. The oddest note: eighteen minutes after posting that the economy was setting records in every way, he was threatening a 50% tariff on an ally. Full digest for 2026-01-29: https://trump.fm/date/2026-01-29/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2026, January 29). [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "" Truth Social, 29 Jan. 2026. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "," Truth Social, January 29, 2026, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_115978006663781152 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_115978006663781152 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_115978006663781152 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2026-01-29 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115978006663781152.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._