# Post ts_115595765848682100 - Post ID: `ts_115595765848682100` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2025-11-22T22:43:27.605Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_115595765848682100.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > Thank you to Greg Kelly, of Newsmax, for this wonderful piece on sedition — A MUST WATCH! ## What the media says **Video transcript** (10:24), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > -This is the one that weaponized, not me. She weaponized. I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy. I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy with a fake Russia-Russia-Russia investigation that went nowhere. -We have a lot to get to, Lindsay. -Their words, their actions, did get President Trump shot in 2024, shot, almost killed. A man was murdered. So much we don't know, right? I know this. The rhetoric that the swamp is engaged in and their activities, they want him dead all over again. What we saw from those Democrat Congress people in that disgusting video where they are calling for insubordination -- that is my read on it. They're calling for military and intelligence and basically deep state revolution against President Trump. It's not going to work. President Trump took the oath, the oath that they all brag about. President Trump took the oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. He did on Inauguration Day, and he will do it. You know, everybody who brags about taking the oath, if you actually understand the Constitution, ultimately, if they work for the federal government, their ultimate job is to assist him, the executive branch, the people in the military, to ultimately to assist him and to carry out his orders. Now, what we saw was, I thought, an open call for sedition. We'll get into that later, but you saw how President Trump reacted strongly and appropriately to what those Democrats said. This is really bad and dangerous to our country. Their words cannot be allowed to stand. Seditious behavior from traitors. Lock them up, question mark, President Donald John Trump. Seditious behavior, punishable by death. He is pointing out, in that Constitution, a brag about that this is the penalty for treason, for sedition. We're allowed to do it. And what they are encouraging the military to do, and if anybody in the military listens, listens, are fine men and women in uniform. And we have, what, a million? I think two million plus the reserves? How many will listen to these members of Congress as they boast and brag about how important they are, where they come from, the military, the intelligence community? This is Senator Mark Kelly, somebody I actually briefly admired years ago. The man is without scruples, without morals. I am sorry, his words. And now what he's saying about what President Trump said. President Trump points out sedition is punishable by death. It's interesting, his reaction. It's actually fascinating and it's incriminating. Watch. - Hey folks, Donald Trump called for my execution. - No, he didn't actually. He just pointed out that the penalty for sedition is death. It seems that he's pleading guilty to sedition, punishable by death. Sedition is. So you're essentially admitting to sedition. How about that, Mark Kelly? Another bizarre, these people, they're killing themselves on social media. They all want to be like Trump. They don't know how to do it. Next, please. - Now I served 25 years in the United States Navy. I flew 39 combat missions. I flew into space four times. - And nobody cares. Nobody should care. The days of being impressed with that kind of stuff. What have you done for us lately? That's good for your resume. That's good for you to get what you want. I'm sorry, the swamp did this to themselves. After they dragged those phony Capitol Hill cops in front of Congress, after Colonel Vindman and General Milley, I see a uniform. I hope for the best, you know? In theory, I support service. I admire service, but I can't trust them. Don't be blinded by the uniform of the brass anymore. Nobody should. Next. - Never once did I expect that at some point the President of the United States was gonna threaten me with being hanged because of something I said. - Something I said. You just said something, right? This is just a freedom of speech issue. Again, he says sedition is punishable by death. You're deep down. You know what you're doing is seditious. Not that deep down. It is, it is. And you know, for something one said, didn't you guys lock up President Trump, impeach President Trump for his words, his words peacefully and patriotically, huh? You guys impeach Tim and try to throw him in jail because of words that weren't illegal. What you guys are doing, that's illegal. I'll get to what the original offense, but more from this Kelly guy playing the victim right now. - Folks, we have a constitution. We have First Amendment constitutional rights of free speech. I know a little bit about political violence. My wife, Gabby, was nearly assassinated. She was shot in the head because of political violence. She nearly died. - I am sick of the bragging. Everybody's become a braggart about their experiences. If their experience is somehow more important than your experience or my experience, don't play that. It's not gonna work anymore. And what happened to Gabby Gifford in 2010, I'm sorry, we're in a different place right now. I understand she's better. That's great. It's irrelevant. He mentions the constitution. This is getting very, very evil and they're hiding behind the constitution. It's a great, the constitution's great, but they're deliberately misrepresenting it and using it for corrupt ends. Next. - Just this week, he did this. Threatened our lives, said we should be hanged because of something we said. This is dangerous. All right, so let's get back to what they said. And it wasn't just something they said. You can actually get in serious trouble for saying things if you tell people to rebel against a sitting president of the United States. This man and his Democrat colleagues, right, each with deep state roots. We're supposed to trust them more 'cause each one was in the Navy or the Central Intelligence Agency. Hey, we trust you less, okay? If you are in the CIA, the deep state, we don't like you guys anymore. We should not trust you based on what you've done. And right here, this is sedition. - I was a captain in the United States Navy. - Former CIA officer. - Former Navy. - Former paratrooper and army ranger. - Former intelligence officer. - Former air force. - We wanna speak directly to members of the military. - And the intelligence community. - To take risks each day. - To keep Americans safe. - We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. - Americans trust their military. - But that trust is at risk. - This administration is pitting our uniform military. - And intelligence community professionals. - Against American citizens. - This is firing up people, all right? This is getting people agitated, nervous, people in the military. And they've heard this about President Trump before from the fake news. And what do they call for? Like us, you all swore an oath. - To protect and defend this Constitution. - Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad. - But from right here at home. - Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. - You can refuse illegal orders. - You must refuse illegal orders. - The people in the military already know about illegal orders, all right? They learn about them. They learn about Meli, the Meli massacre, what happened there, right? This is not happening in today's military. But what you're encouraging these troops to do, to question their superiors. A lot of them, it's not their job to evaluate the Constitution. It's not. It sounds righteous, mm-mm. And what happens when on their own judgment, they start disregarding orders? Where are they going to turn? The Congress pretends that they have some sort of authority here, that they have some sort of cushion for these guys. They don't. - No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution. - We know this is hard. - And that it's a difficult time to be a public servant. - But whether you're serving in the CIA. - The Army. - The Navy. - The Air Force. - Your vigilance is critical. - And know that we have your back. - What does that mean? She's kind of saying that like this is, we are going to take care of you. You work for us, that's not true. They shouldn't be talking to the military. I mean, is this unofficial or official? It looks awfully official. They identify themselves as members of Congress. And they're telling them something to do. The only occasion they should be talking to members of the military is in congressional hearings. And those are scheduled, right? We have a forum for this kind of give and take. But for the members of Congress to go around, the civilian and uniform leadership of the Pentagon, to tell the military to disregard orders, to evaluate orders as to their legality when they're playing with fire. President Trump already got shot. They want it to happen again. They want something worse to happen again. This is not over everybody. These people committed the crime. And let's see where this goes. ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/115/595/741/481/319/665/original/e5d20a39e67bbe6d.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 12,735 - Reposts: 4,448 - Replies: 796 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.290Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-22T06:11:00.167Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Analysis: Truth Social Post ts_115595765848682100 ### Context Trump shares a Newsmax video by Greg Kelly about "sedition," framing political opponents' actions as criminal. Posted 5:43 PM ET (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago in November), this falls squarely in business hours. ### Authorship The post is brief, grammatically correct, uses an em dash, and has a polished promotional tone ("Thank you to... for this wonderful piece"). The phrasing "A MUST WATCH!" is consistent with Trump's personal style (caps emphasis, directive to audience), but the overall construction is aide-compatible. Mixed signals—likely aide-drafted with Trump's approval or light personal touch. ### Psychological Analysis The key word is **sedition**. By amplifying a media segment characterizing opponents' behavior as sedition, Trump externalizes the framing while endorsing it. This is consistent with paranoid features (preoccupation with perceived attacks on legitimacy) and projection (Trump himself faced sedition-adjacent charges; reframing opponents as the true seditionists is classic DARVO). Given the Epstein files context and MTG fallout, this post may serve as a pivot—redirecting audience attention toward a "sedition" narrative and away from uncomfortable Epstein-related dynamics. ### Rhetorical Techniques - Appeal to authority (Greg Kelly, Newsmax) - Directive framing ("A MUST WATCH") - Laundering aggressive framing through third-party media endorsement - The word "sedition" carries eliminationist legal implications without Trump directly making the accusation ### Danger Assessment The term "sedition" applied to political opponents is inherently escalatory—it implies criminal punishment is warranted. However, this is mediated through a media endorsement rather than a direct accusation, keeping it at elevated rather than high. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Greg Kelly aired a piece on sedition on Newsmax" | **Unverifiable** | Cannot verify specific segment content without viewing the attached video | Overall Veracity: 50% ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 40%) ### Indicators - Business hours posting (5:43 PM ET) - Correct grammar and punctuation - Em dash usage - Polished thanking formula - BUT: ALL CAPS 'A MUST WATCH' is characteristic Trump ## Psychological Profile ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Preemptive Attack — Exposure (Political opponents / Epstein file fallout) Sentiment: -0.30 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 30% - Antisocial: 20% - Paranoid: 50% - Sadism: 10% **Defense Mechanisms:** - projection (immature) - displacement (neurotic) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 30% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Third-party validation laundering - Directive consumption command ('MUST WATCH') ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Use of 'sedition' to characterize political opponents implies criminal culpability - Sedition framing from a sitting president normalizes legal persecution of opposition - Third-party laundering makes the escalation less visible but no less significant ## Fact Checks (1) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-22._ > Greg Kelly aired a piece on sedition on Newsmax **UNVERIFIABLE** Cannot verify specific segment content without viewing the attached video Overall Veracity: 50% ## Tags - sedition-framing (90%) - media-endorsement (60%) - attention-redirection (70%) - criminalization-of-opposition (80%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Epstein Shadow Drives Ally Purge, Ethnic Targeting, and Narrative Flooding** Trump spent the day managing fallout from the Epstein files controversy, most dramatically by publicly branding former close ally Marjorie Taylor Greene a "Traitor" after she pushed for the files' release. He opened with an aggressive executive-style announcement terminating protected status for Somalis in Minnesota, using debunked fraud figures and eliminationist language. Between the attacks, he squeezed in a self-congratulatory post about his poll numbers. The evening devolved into rapid-fire retweets redirecting Epstein scrutiny toward Democrats — a textbook deflection pattern on a day where the underlying anxiety was palpable beneath the bluster. Full digest for 2025-11-22: https://trump.fm/date/2025-11-22/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2025, November 22). Thank you to Greg Kelly, of Newsmax, for this... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "Thank you to Greg Kelly, of Newsmax, for this wonderful..." Truth Social, 22 Nov. 2025. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "Thank you to Greg Kelly, of Newsmax, for this wonderful...," Truth Social, November 22, 2025, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_115595765848682100 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_115595765848682100 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_115595765848682100 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2025-11-22 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_115595765848682100.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._