# Post ts_114203564650249629 - Post ID: `ts_114203564650249629` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2025-03-22T01:48:23.182Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_114203564650249629.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > WISCONSIN: There is a very important Election for State Supreme Court on April 1st, and Early Voting is now underway.Brad Schimel is running against Radical Left Liberal Susan Crawford, who has repeatedly given child molesters, rapists, women beaters, and domestic abusers “light” sentences. She is the handpicked voice of the Leftists who are out to destroy your State, and our Country — And if she wins, the Movement to restore our Nation will bypass Wisconsin. All Voters who believe in Common Sense should GET OUT TO VOTE EARLY for Brad Schimel. By turning out and VOTING EARLY, you will be helping to Uphold the Rule of Law, Protect our Incredible Police, Secure our Beloved Constitution, Safeguard our Inalienable Rights, and PRESERVE LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.SO IMPORTANT - PLEASE GET OUT AND VOTE. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! https://swampthevoteusa.com/wisconsin-supreme-court/ ## Engagement - Likes: 9,921 - Reposts: 3,924 - Replies: 721 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.315Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-22T00:20:06.855Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary A Wisconsin Supreme Court GOTV post for Brad Schimel vs. Susan Crawford (April 1, 2025). Clinically notable for its projection of constitutional sanctity onto an electoral mobilization effort posted the same day the administration was documented defying a federal court injunction — a reality inversion presenting the subject as constitutional defender while the known-events context shows active court defiance. The dominant defense mechanism is splitting (Schimel = constitutional order; Crawford = criminal protection and civilizational destruction), reinforced by dehumanization-by-association that links Crawford serially to the most morally repugnant offenders without direct accusation. The central threat — "the Movement...will bypass Wisconsin" if Crawford wins — functions as a coercive loyalty device, personalizing a state judicial race as a test of fealty to his national movement. The closing five-element list ("Uphold the Rule of Law / Protect our Incredible Police / Secure our Beloved Constitution / Safeguard our Inalienable Rights / PRESERVE LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL") mimics liturgical structure, invoking American civil religion to sanctify partisan electoral action. Authorship is likely aide-primary with authentic Trump voice insertion in the ALL CAPS passages and movement-personalization language. Danger is elevated: publicly contaminating a state judge's identity with serial violent criminals before a mass audience heightens the ambient threat environment, even without explicit incitement. No stochastic terrorism pattern detected. No clinically significant cognitive deviation from baseline. ## Psychological & Rhetorical Analysis: Wisconsin Supreme Court GOTV Post (2025-03-22T01:48:23Z) --- ### Authorship Attribution **Timing:** UTC 01:48:23 on March 22 converts to **9:48 PM EST on March 21** — well within plausible Trump personal posting hours (he is not an exclusively late-night poster) but not the 10 PM–6 AM deep-night window most strongly associated with authentic, unfiltered posts. Trump was likely at Mar-a-Lago or Washington; either way, ~9:48 PM local. **Stylometric assessment — mixed signals:** - **Aide indicators:** Structured multi-clause argument; clean punctuation; embedded hyperlink to a coordinated voter turnout infrastructure site (swampthevoteusa.com); deliberate five-element rhetorical list at close; professional campaign-format layout. - **Authentic indicators:** ALL CAPS burst passages ("GET OUT TO VOTE EARLY," "SO IMPORTANT," "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN"); movement-identity framing ("the Movement to restore our Nation"); hyperbolic personal stakes ("destroy your State, and our Country"); the threat/conditional construction ("will bypass Wisconsin"). **Verdict:** Likely **aide-drafted with authentic Trump voice insertion** — the structural scaffold and URL coordination point to staff, while the emotional escalation passages and movement-personalization language carry Trump's authentic register. Estimated 60% aide-primary, 40% authentic additive. Confidence: medium. The encoding artifacts ("â") are UTF-8/copy-paste rendering artifacts representing em-dashes and curly quotes — not cognitive markers. --- ### Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five) | Trait | Expression | Salience | |---|---|---| | **Extraversion** | Dominance, assertiveness, mobilization commands | High | | **Agreeableness** | Hostile framing, dehumanizing attack on Crawford | Very Low | | **Conscientiousness** | Structured argument, civic framing | Moderate (possibly aide-driven) | | **Neuroticism** | Angry hostility toward opponent, impulsive ALL CAPS | Moderate-High | | **Openness** | Rigid ideological categories, no complexity acknowledgment | Very Low | --- ### Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations **Agency motives dominant:** Power, status, and control are central — the race is framed not as a Wisconsin civic matter but as a test of loyalty to *his* national movement. The threat that the Movement "will bypass Wisconsin" if Crawford wins is a control mechanism: submit to the agenda or face political abandonment. **Communion motives:** Nominally present via appeals to community protection ("Protect our Incredible Police," "Beloved Constitution") but instrumentalized — communion language serves agency goals, binding the in-group through shared enemy identification rather than genuine relational warmth. **Schemas revealed:** - *Self*: Central actor in a national redemption drama; a state court race is meaningful only insofar as it advances his movement. - *Others (in-group)*: "Voters who believe in Common Sense" — identity defined by alignment with his framework. - *Others (out-group)*: Radical destroyers; Crawford is metonymically contaminated by association with the most vilified criminals. - *World*: Zero-sum, existential conflict; every election is a civilization-level battle. --- ### Level 3: Narrative Identity **Protagonist role:** Savior/General — he issues orders ("GET OUT TO VOTE EARLY"), frames the mission, and assigns cosmic stakes. He does not participate directly but orchestrates the battle. **Narrative sequence:** Contamination → potential redemption. Wisconsin is being contaminated by the radical left (Crawford); MAGA voters can restore it through action. **Identity claims:** Movement leader whose mandate supersedes local political boundaries; custodian of constitutional liberty. **Contrasting other:** Susan Crawford — explicitly dehumanized not through her own conduct but through the offenders she allegedly protected. She functions as a stand-in for the entire "Radical Left" contamination narrative. **Redemption sequence structure:** The five-element closing list ("Uphold the Rule of Law / Protect our Incredible Police / Secure our Beloved Constitution / Safeguard our Inalienable Rights / PRESERVE LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL") functions as a liturgical incantation — a sacred roll call of American civil religion invoked to sanctify electoral participation, mimicking the structure of a church benediction. --- ### Level 4: Clinical Indicators **Malignant Narcissism Components:** *Narcissistic features:* Moderate activation. The post personalizes a state judicial election as an extension of his personal movement, making the political landscape a mirror of his own narrative. Crawford's potential victory isn't framed as a policy loss — it's framed as the Movement bypassing Wisconsin, i.e., his movement withdrawing its blessing from a state. This is grandiosity embedded in electoral language. *Antisocial features:* Mild activation. The attack on Crawford via serial criminal association ("child molesters, rapists, women beaters, domestic abusers") is not disqualifying as a political technique but shows disregard for the reputational and physical safety implications for a sitting judge. *Paranoid features:* Moderate. Crawford is "handpicked" by unnamed "Leftists who are out to destroy your State, and our Country" — a persecutory framing assigning coordinated malevolent intent to the opposition. *Ego-syntonic sadism:* Low-moderate. The pleasure in the dehumanization-by-association attack is subtle but present in the rhetorical excess of the criminal list. --- ### Defense Mechanisms **Splitting (Immature):** Dominant defense. Schimel = constitutional order, law, liberty. Crawford = criminal protection, state destruction. No acknowledgment of judicial discretion, individual cases, or sentencing complexity. The binary is absolute. **Projection (Immature):** Highly significant in context. The post invokes "Rule of Law" and "Beloved Constitution" contemporaneously with documented administration defiance of a federal court order (Alien Enemies Act deportation injunction — see known events). The subject attributes lawlessness to his opponent while the administration is actively under judicial rebuke for defying court orders. The constitutional sanctity being invoked is precisely what is being contested in federal courts in real time. **Rationalization (Neurotic):** The five-element closing list provides logical-sounding justifications ("Uphold the Rule of Law") for what is ultimately a political mobilization effort against a specific candidate, clothing partisan action in constitutional language. --- ### Cognitive Status **Complexity score:** 0.38 (below baseline). The vocabulary is serviceable but not sophisticated; syntax is largely paratactic (lists, parallel structures); the argument is sequential but not layered. This is consistent with the post's political purpose and possible aide-drafting rather than indicative of cognitive decline per se. **Markers noted:** - No word-finding difficulties - No paraphasia - No tangentiality - No temporal confusion - Encoding artifacts are technical, not cognitive **Baseline deviation:** None. This linguistic profile is consistent with Trump's political posting baseline for this period. No clinically significant cognitive deviation detected. --- ### Rhetorical & Propaganda Techniques 1. **Dehumanization by association:** Crawford is not accused of crimes herself but is serially linked to "child molesters, rapists, women beaters, and domestic abusers." The rhetorical contamination is deliberate and potent. 2. **False dichotomy:** Vote Schimel = save constitutional order; Crawford wins = Movement abandons Wisconsin. 3. **Existential threat escalation:** A state court race becomes civilization-level stakes ("destroy your State, and our Country"). 4. **Liturgical listing:** The five-element closing list mimics sacred oratorical form — the repetitive parallel structure creates a hymnic quality that bypasses critical evaluation. 5. **Threat/conditional framing:** "If she wins, the Movement...will bypass Wisconsin" — a coercive mobilization device that functions as a loyalty threat. 6. **Sacred symbol invocation:** Police, Constitution, Liberty, Justice — all cited as under threat, requiring defense. 7. **Hyperbole:** "Incredible Police," "Beloved Constitution," "Inalienable Rights" — superlative/possessive framing that elevates ordinary referents to sacred objects. 8. **Appeal to common sense:** "All Voters who believe in Common Sense" — positions the in-group as rational and the opposition as irrational or corrupt by default. 9. **RAND Firehose element:** High-volume posting day (multiple posts March 21-22) with varied emotional register — this post is operationally mobilizing, others are grievance-venting, creating sustained attention monopolization. **Violent imagery:** None explicit. **Dehumanizing language:** Present (criminal-contamination of Crawford, though indirect). --- ### Gaslighting & Reality Distortion **Present — mild-moderate.** The simultaneous invocation of "Rule of Law" and "Beloved Constitution" while the administration is defying a specific federal court order constitutes a form of reality distortion: presenting the self as constitutional defender while engaging in documented constitutional defiance. This may not be deliberate gaslighting of this specific audience (they may be unaware of the court defiance context), but it represents objective reality inversion. No explicit DARVO pattern in this post. No denial of documented events. --- ### Epistemic Closure **Present.** The post constructs a hermetically sealed interpretive frame: Schimel = good, Crawford = bad, the stakes are existential, and the only rational response is to vote for Schimel. No factual complexity is admitted; no legitimate alternative perspective is acknowledged. Crawford's sentencing record is presented as established fact rather than contested characterization. --- ### Danger Assessment **Level: Elevated.** - A sitting state judge (Crawford) is publicly linked to serial violent criminals before a national audience of millions. - The framing invites moral outrage rather than merely policy disagreement. - Judges are a category of public figure who have faced targeted harassment and violence; attaching them to criminal-protection narratives increases threat environment. - No explicit call to violence; no stochastic terrorism pattern (no specific grievance + implied action against individual). - Danger is ambient rather than targeted. --- ### Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Wisconsin State Supreme Court election on April 1st" | **True** | Wisconsin held a Supreme Court election on April 1, 2025, pitting Brad Schimel against Susan Crawford | | "Early Voting is now underway [in Wisconsin]" | **True** | Wisconsin allows in-person absentee/early voting beginning multiple weeks before elections; early voting for April 1 would plausibly be underway by late March | | "Susan Crawford has repeatedly given child molesters, rapists, women beaters, and domestic abusers 'light' sentences" | **Mostly False** | This is the central Republican attack ad claim, derived from a small number of selectively cited cases. Legal scholars and Crawford's campaign disputed the characterization as misrepresenting judicial discretion, prosecutorial recommendation compliance, and sentencing guideline constraints. 'Repeatedly' implies systematic pattern not established by cited cases. | Overall Veracity: 73% ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 35%) ### Indicators - ALL CAPS mobilization bursts consistent with authentic Trump voice - Movement-identity framing personalizing state race to national narrative - Threat/conditional construction ('will bypass Wisconsin') is authentic register - Structural scaffold, clean punctuation, and coordinated URL suggest aide drafting - Five-element parallel closing list is more polished than typical unfiltered Trump ## Psychological Profile ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Maintenance (Wisconsin Supreme Court election cycle) Sentiment: -0.32 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 55% - Antisocial: 30% - Paranoid: 45% - Sadism: 20% **Defense Mechanisms:** - splitting (immature) - projection (immature) - rationalization (neurotic) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 38% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Collective address ('ALL Voters who believe in Common Sense') creates in-group identity - Sacred symbol invocation builds parasocial bond through shared civic religion - Coercive movement-loyalty framing ties follower identity to voting action - Commands issued directly ('GET OUT TO VOTE EARLY') simulating personal directives ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - State judge publicly contaminated with serial violent criminal association before mass audience — elevated ambient harassment risk - Moral outrage framing (child molesters, rapists) without explicit incitement creates volatile emotional environment around a judicial candidate - No stochastic terrorism pattern (no specific grievance-plus-implied-action against identified individual) but threat environment elevated ### Gaslighting - Constitutional defender framing posted contemporaneously with documented federal court injunction defiance (Alien Enemies Act) — presents self as rule-of-law champion while actively defying courts - Crawford's sentencing record presented as established fact rather than contested characterization, foreclosing audience's ability to evaluate the claim independently **Dehumanizing Language Present** ## Fact Checks (3) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-22._ > Wisconsin State Supreme Court election on April 1st **TRUE** Wisconsin held a Supreme Court election on April 1, 2025, pitting Brad Schimel against Susan Crawford Sources: General knowledge of Wisconsin 2025 judicial calendar > Early Voting is now underway [in Wisconsin] **TRUE** Wisconsin allows in-person absentee/early voting beginning multiple weeks before elections; early voting for April 1 would plausibly be underway by late March Sources: Wisconsin Elections Commission general knowledge > Susan Crawford has repeatedly given child molesters, rapists, women beaters, and domestic abusers 'light' sentences **MOSTLY FALSE** This is the central Republican attack ad claim, derived from a small number of selectively cited cases. Legal scholars and Crawford's campaign disputed the characterization as misrepresenting judicial discretion, prosecutorial recommendation compliance, and sentencing guideline constraints. 'Repeatedly' implies systematic pattern not established by cited cases. Sources: Contested campaign attack ad claims; disputed by Wisconsin legal commentary Overall Veracity: 73% ## Tags - GOTV mobilization (90%) - judicial election (85%) - dehumanization by association (80%) - rule of law projection (75%) - movement-identity coercion (72%) - splitting (80%) - aide-assisted authorship (65%) - Wisconsin Supreme Court (90%) - liturgical rhetoric (70%) - Brad Schimel (80%) - Susan Crawford (85%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Rule of Law for Thee: A Saturday of Judicial Delegitimization Wrapped in Constitutional Piety** A quiet Saturday of just six posts was dominated by a single preoccupation: the courts. The day opened with a Wisconsin judicial election pitch wrapped in constitutional language, pivoted to demanding a governor publicly pledge never to challenge federal authority again, then amplified attacks on Chief Justice Roberts before closing with a terse all-caps accusation of judicial conflict of interest. The gap between championing the rule of law in the morning and undermining judicial legitimacy by evening was the day's most striking contradiction. A brief tribute to boxer George Foreman provided the only break from the legal-authority fixation. Full digest for 2025-03-22: https://trump.fm/date/2025-03-22/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2025, March 22). WISCONSIN: There is a very important Election for... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "WISCONSIN: There is a very important Election for State..." Truth Social, 22 Mar. 2025. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629. Accessed 10 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "WISCONSIN: There is a very important Election for State...," Truth Social, March 22, 2025, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_114203564650249629 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_114203564650249629 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_114203564650249629 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2025-03-22 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_114203564650249629.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._