# Post ts_113323601576081796 - Post ID: `ts_113323601576081796` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2024-10-17T16:02:12.258Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_113323601576081796.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > Why does Suzanne Scott of FoxNews keep putting on third rate “talking heads” like Jessica Tarlov, Richard Fowler, Patrick Murphy, “something” Wolf, Keisha Lance Bottoms, and other Radical Left Lunatics that lie, and make up statements, with Fox, rarely having any counter to their storytelling? It is so bad for winning the Most Important Election in the History of our Country. Likewise, not a moment goes by when I’m not looking at negative, false Ads that the other camp stuffs the Fox airwaves with. If I win and, I hope for the Country’s sake that I do, and this Radical Left Moron, Kamala, doesn’t get a chance to run the Country, it is DESPITE Fox, not because of them! ## Engagement - Likes: 16,431 - Reposts: 4,672 - Replies: 2,002 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.330Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-28T01:45:56.863Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post reflects a narcissistic injury triggered by perceived ally defection — Fox News's broadcast of liberal commentators activating a disproportionate rage response that overrides evident strategic self-interest three weeks before election day. The most clinically notable element is "'something' Wolf": Trump renders his own real-time nominal recall failure directly in published text, a near-definitive authentic authorship marker that also constitutes a mild documented cognitive flag warranting longitudinal tracking. The psychological architecture is classically mixed-state narcissistic: grandiose positioning (he will win despite Fox's sabotage) co-exists with a victimized register (betrayed by his own side). The conditional threat — "if I win... it is DESPITE Fox" — functions as simultaneous pre-emptive blame assignment and public loyalty test directed at Fox executives. Defense mechanisms include splitting (Baier = good Fox; Scott = bad Fox), rationalization, and projection of dishonesty onto six named individuals. The dehumanizing labels applied to those six named individuals to a mass audience 21 days before election day meets threshold for elevated danger classification via stochastic amplification risk. Reality distortion is present in the claim Fox "rarely" counters liberal voices — a demonstrably false framing that functions as an epistemic loyalty test. Linguistic complexity is within established Trump baseline; no significant deviation beyond the name-recall instance. # Psychological Analysis — Truth Social Post, 2024-10-17 ## Authorship Attribution **Verdict: Authentic Trump — High Confidence** Posted at 12:02 PM EDT, which falls within typical aide-drafting hours and would ordinarily raise suspicion of Scavino involvement. However, the stylistic evidence overwhelmingly overrides the timing signal. The single most diagnostic marker is the phrase **"'something' Wolf"** — Trump encases his own real-time name-recall failure in quotation marks and publishes it. No professional communications aide would draft copy that renders their principal's nominal aphasia as a scare-quoted placeholder. This is an intimate exposure of cognitive process accessible only in direct, unmediated composition. Additional authentic markers: stream-of-consciousness cascading grievances, non-standard capitalization schema, embedded parenthetical asides, and the strategically irrational choice to publicly attack Fox News — his primary media ally — during the final three weeks of the most consequential election of his career. --- ## Psychological State & Trigger Analysis **Trigger: Narcissistic injury via perceived ally defection** Trump treats Fox News as a tributary of his media operation — a network whose loyalty he regards as owed rather than earned. Its broadcasting of liberal commentators constitutes a violation of expected fealty, which activates the injury-response cycle far more acutely than attacks from acknowledged enemies. The disproportionate rage response (publicly excoriating his own media ecosystem weeks before election day) is psychologically coherent only through this lens: the narcissistic need to respond to perceived disloyalty overrides any strategic calculation about self-interest. **Narcissistic state: Mixed (grandiose/vulnerable oscillation)** The post oscillates between two poles: - **Grandiose**: "If I win... it is DESPITE Fox" — he positions himself as capable of overcoming the active sabotage of his own media support structure, an extraordinary inflation of personal agency - **Vulnerable**: He is being actively undermined by those who should be defending him; he is surrounded by betrayal even within his own camp This oscillation — documented across the longitudinal set — is consistent with the mixed narcissistic state characteristic of Kernberg's malignant narcissism construct, where grandiosity and victimhood are not contradictory but co-constitutive. **Conditional electoral threat as loyalty test** The phrase "if I win... it is DESPITE Fox, not because of them" performs dual functions: (1) **pre-emptive blame assignment** — establishing Fox as the designated scapegoat should he lose, thereby protecting the narcissistic narrative from defeat; and (2) **public loyalty test** — Fox executives reading this post understand they are under review and must adjust coverage to avoid further public excoriation. --- ## Cognitive Status **Notable Marker: "something Wolf" — Nominal Aphasia, Mild** The rendering of "'something' Wolf" in written, published text represents a real-time nominal recall failure. In spoken speech, such failures are smoothed by "um," pauses, or circumlocution. In writing, they are typically corrected before publication. That this gap survived into the published post — with Trump apparently rendering his uncertainty as quoted scare text — suggests the thought-to-text latency is extremely compressed: authentic stream-of-consciousness composition with minimal review. The failure itself (inability to retrieve a first name of a commentator being criticized) is clinically categorized as mild nominal aphasia or benign senior moment. **In isolation, not significant. Longitudinally, this is the third or fourth such documented instance in this posting set and warrants tracking.** Overall linguistic complexity is within established Trump baseline: syntactically convoluted but functionally coherent, characteristic capitalization patterns, no neologisms, no temporal confusion. No significant departure from baseline other than the name-recall instance. --- ## Defense Mechanisms **Splitting (immature):** Fox News is not evaluated as a unified object but split along compliance lines. Bret Baier — praised in the same-day post for his Harris interview — represents the compliant good object. Suzanne Scott's programming decisions represent the betraying bad object. The split tracks perfectly to who is perceived as serving or threatening Trump's interests. **Rationalization (neurotic):** The pre-emptive "DESPITE Fox, not because of them" converts a genuine political vulnerability (reduced Fox enthusiasm) into evidence of his own exceptional capacity to overcome obstacles. The rationalization reframes weakness as a testament to strength. **Projection (immature):** The accusation that liberal commentators "lie, and make up statements" is a characteristic displacement of documented self-traits onto adversaries. This mechanism appears with high frequency across the longitudinal set. **Acting out (immature):** The publication of a public shaming list naming six specific individuals to a mass audience is direct impulse expression with no discernible strategic benefit — classic acting out under narcissistic injury. --- ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis The post's rhetorical core is a **named shaming list**: six individuals publicly designated "Radical Left Lunatics" to a multi-million-member audience 21 days before election day. This technique merges target identification with dehumanizing labeling, serving as a harassment amplification mechanism regardless of conscious intent. Key rhetorical techniques: - **Dehumanizing labels**: "Radical Left Lunatics," "Radical Left Moron" applied to named individuals and the opposing candidate - **Public nomination list**: Six names broadcast to millions with attached negative characterizations - **False dichotomy**: Win with Fox vs. win despite Fox - **Hyperbole**: "Most Important Election in the History of our Country" - **Appeal to fear**: Kamala running the country The **structural irony** of the complaint is notable: Trump demands Fox provide "counter" to liberal voices — the implicit demand is for a partisan propaganda organ, not a news network. This reveals the underlying expectation of controlled narrative while framing its absence as betrayal. --- ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion The claim that Fox "rarely" provides counter to liberal talking heads is **demonstrably false** — Fox's entire business model is built on conservative commentary as counter-programming. This misrepresentation functions as a loyalty test: Fox viewers who accept the framing must hold their preferred network is actually working against their candidate, deepening the sense of persecution and closing the epistemic loop. The false premise also functions as a **demand for total alignment** — any airing of opposing views becomes, by definition, a betrayal. --- ## Archetypal Analysis **Primary archetype: Betrayed Warrior / Persecuted King** The post activates the Betrayed Warrior archetype — a powerful fighter surrounded by disloyal allies who nonetheless advances alone. This is the archetypal complement to the Savior narrative: the hero who overcomes not just his enemies but the indifference or treachery of those who should support him. For the audience, this archetypal framing is emotionally resonant: they too feel betrayed by institutions that should serve them. **Shadow projection**: The "lying, making up statements" accusation directed at liberal commentators constitutes shadow projection — the disowned traits (documented history of false statements) are externalized onto the adversary, maintaining the split between the pure self and the corrupt other. --- ## Danger Assessment: **Elevated** Six named individuals are publicly designated "Radical Left Lunatics" to millions of followers in the final 21 days of a presidential campaign. While no explicit violence is incited, the combination of **target identification + dehumanizing language + grievance framing directed at specific individuals** meets the threshold criteria for stochastic amplification risk. The pattern is consistent with documented prior targeting behavior across this longitudinal set. The post does not constitute stochastic terrorism (no implied action, no escalation toward specific harm), but the elevated designation is warranted by the named-individual dehumanization pattern. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Fox 'rarely' has any counter to liberal talking heads" | **Mostly False** | Fox News's core business model is built on conservative hosts (Hannity, Ingraham, Carlson-era, Bret Baier, Laura Ingraham) explicitly providing counter-programming to liberal media. The claim that Fox 'rarely' counters liberal voices inverts the network's documented editorial identity. | | "The other camp stuffs Fox airwaves with negative, false Ads" | **Half True** | Harris campaign did purchase advertising on Fox News — a documented campaign strategy to reach persuadable Fox viewers. The characterization of all such ads as 'false' is an opinion claim; 'stuffs the airwaves' is hyperbolic but directionally consistent with reported ad buys. | | "This is the Most Important Election in the History of our Country" | **Unverifiable** | Superlative opinion claim repeated across multiple Trump posts; historians would note comparable cases including 1860, 1864, 1932, 1944. Unverifiable as stated. | | "Bret Baier did a great job interviewing Harris (referenced in same-day prior post)" | **Unverifiable** | The Baier-Harris interview was widely covered; assessments of interview quality are subjective. The interview did occur. | Overall Veracity: 43% ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 87%) ### Indicators - Real-time nominal failure rendered in text as "'something' Wolf" — impossible in aide-drafted copy - Stream-of-consciousness sentence structure with embedded parentheticals - Non-standard capitalization throughout (Most Important, Radical Left Lunatics, etc.) - Impulsive public attack on primary media ally 3 weeks before election — strategically irrational - Emotional reactivity consistent with viewing Fox News in real time ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Criticism (Fox News / Suzanne Scott editorial programming) **Rage:** Intensity 68% targeting Fox News leadership; named liberal commentators; Harris campaign - Proportionality: 15% Sentiment: -0.76 Baseline Deviation: slight **Mildly Hypomanic** - Pressured cascade of multiple simultaneous grievances in a single post - Impulsive public attack on primary media ally with no evident strategic benefit - Rapid topic jumps (Fox commentators → ad spending → election outcome → Fox blame) ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 88% - Antisocial: 55% - Paranoid: 62% - Sadism: 45% **Defense Mechanisms:** - splitting (immature) - rationalization (neurotic) - projection (immature) - acting out (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 38% Cognitive Markers: - name confusion **Parasocial Techniques:** - Direct address to Fox audience positioning them as victims of the network's own programming - In-group/out-group framing: 'real' Fox viewers vs. liberal infestation - Shared grievance construction: Trump suffers what the audience suffers ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Six named individuals publicly designated 'Radical Left Lunatics' to millions of followers 21 days before election day - Dehumanizing language ('Lunatics,' 'Moron') applied to specific named targets rather than abstract groups - Named-target + grievance-framing pattern consistent with stochastic amplification risk - Opponent (Harris) publicly labeled 'Radical Left Moron' in context of electoral consequence framing ### Gaslighting - Claims Fox 'rarely' provides counter to liberal talking heads — demonstrably false given Fox's business model as conservative counter-programming - Framing oppositional voices on Fox as 'lying' and 'making up statements' without evidence — attack on audience's ability to evaluate information - False premise embedded as self-evident: Fox is sabotaging Trump by airing any opposing view **Dehumanizing Language Present** ## Fact Checks (4) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-28._ > Fox 'rarely' has any counter to liberal talking heads **MOSTLY FALSE** Fox News's core business model is built on conservative hosts (Hannity, Ingraham, Carlson-era, Bret Baier, Laura Ingraham) explicitly providing counter-programming to liberal media. The claim that Fox 'rarely' counters liberal voices inverts the network's documented editorial identity. Sources: Fox News programming schedule and host lineup, general knowledge > The other camp stuffs Fox airwaves with negative, false Ads **HALF TRUE** Harris campaign did purchase advertising on Fox News — a documented campaign strategy to reach persuadable Fox viewers. The characterization of all such ads as 'false' is an opinion claim; 'stuffs the airwaves' is hyperbolic but directionally consistent with reported ad buys. Sources: General campaign advertising knowledge > This is the Most Important Election in the History of our Country **UNVERIFIABLE** Superlative opinion claim repeated across multiple Trump posts; historians would note comparable cases including 1860, 1864, 1932, 1944. Unverifiable as stated. > Bret Baier did a great job interviewing Harris (referenced in same-day prior post) **UNVERIFIABLE** The Baier-Harris interview was widely covered; assessments of interview quality are subjective. The interview did occur. Overall Veracity: 43% ## Tags - fox_news_complaint (92%) - nominal_recall_failure (72%) - narcissistic_injury_ally_defection (88%) - public_shaming_list (85%) - blame_preassignment (80%) - dehumanizing_named_targets (75%) - splitting (82%) - authentic_trump (87%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **CBS Obsession Spirals Into Authoritarian Demands as Harris Interview Fallout Dominates Day** Trump spent the day fixated on CBS News, turning a minor editing dispute from a Kamala Harris interview into demands that 60 Minutes be pulled off the air and the network lose its broadcast license. A late-night burst of posts celebrating Harris's rough Bret Baier interview gave way to an afternoon rage spiral -- five posts in just over an hour -- that escalated from sharing a link to calling for government action against a news outlet and the forced removal of a political opponent. He also lashed out at Fox News for airing liberal commentators, stumbling over a pundit's name in the process. The day wound down with a lower-key grievance about Harris skipping the Al Smith Dinner, which Trump was preparing to attend in New York. Full digest for 2024-10-17: https://trump.fm/date/2024-10-17/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2024, October 17). Why does Suzanne Scott of FoxNews keep putting on... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "Why does Suzanne Scott of FoxNews keep putting on third..." Truth Social, 17 Oct. 2024. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "Why does Suzanne Scott of FoxNews keep putting on third...," Truth Social, October 17, 2024, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_113323601576081796 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_113323601576081796 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_113323601576081796 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2024-10-17 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113323601576081796.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._