# Post ts_113137791613651101 - Post ID: `ts_113137791613651101` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2024-09-14T20:28:17.232Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_113137791613651101.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > “NEW: Kamala Harris has completely changed her position on the 2nd Amendment in less than 72 hours.During the debate on Tuesday, Kamala Harris blasted Trump after he said she wanted to take people's firearms away.Harris told Trump to ‘stop lying’ and said she wasn't going to take ‘anybody's’ firearms away.Less than 72 hours later during an interview with ABC News, Harris revealed she *does* support taking people's firearms away, announcing her plan for an ‘assault weapon’ ban.Harris has also voiced her support for mandatory buybacks in the past.” Via Collin Rugg ## What the media says **Video transcript** (0:47), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > And then this business about taking everyone's guns away. Tim Walz and I are both gun owners. We're not taking anybody's guns away. So stop with the continuous lying about this stuff. Part of my approach to this is I was a career prosecutor for most of my career. I have personally prosecuted homicide cases. I have personally looked at autopsies. I have personally seen what assault weapons do to the human body. And so I feel very strongly that it is consistent with the Second Amendment and your right to own a gun to also say, we need an assault weapons ban. They're literally tools of war. They were literally designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly. ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/113/137/791/536/331/392/original/dddcba08c987827c.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 14,826 - Reposts: 7,043 - Replies: 1,760 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.334Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-27T08:36:17.923Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ # Analysis: ts_113137791613651101 — Harris 2nd Amendment "Flip-Flop" Repost (2024-09-14) --- ## Authorship Attribution **UTC 20:28:17 → EDT 16:28** (September 14, 2024). Trump was likely on the East Coast or in transit; the debate was September 10 in Philadelphia, 9/11 memorial September 11 in New York, with subsequent rallies in Tucson and Las Vegas around September 12–13. By September 14, East Coast is the most probable timezone. At 4:28 PM EDT, this falls firmly within business hours. Content is entirely third-party attributed: **"Via Collin Rugg"** — a right-wing media personality known for producing viral political clips. There is no Trump-authored text whatsoever: no typos, no ALL CAPS, no stream-of-consciousness syntax, no personal interjection. The post is structurally a clean repost with polished, journalistic prose. This is the canonical aide-posting pattern: sourcing external attack content from a trusted media ally and routing it through Trump's account during business hours. The attached MP4 from the static CDN further indicates a pre-packaged media artifact rather than impulsive posting. **Authorship assessment: Aide-authored/facilitated (confidence: high)**. Trump's authentic fingerprints — impulsive phrasing, reactive ALL CAPS, misspellings, late-night timing — are entirely absent. The decision to amplify this specific content is almost certainly Trump-directed; the execution is Scavino-style. --- ## Psychological Context & Trigger Analysis ### Situational Frame This post occurs within a densely adverse four-day window: Trump's debate performance (September 10) was judged as a loss by 63% of CNN poll respondents; Taylor Swift's endorsement of Harris immediately after the debate reached 283 million followers; Trump formally refused a second debate, signaling defensive posturing. The Springfield bomb threat cascade — directly traceable to Trump's debate claim about Haitian immigrants — was generating negative press. This is a **multi-vector narcissistic injury** period, not a single precipitating event. ### Trigger Classification **Primary: Narcissistic injury → defeat/unfavorable comparison** (the debate outcome). The cluster of posts on September 14 — self-congratulatory Roe v. Wade boasting, campaign mobilization links, anxiety about nuclear weapons/Low IQ officials, and this Harris attack — constitutes a standard post-injury response package: grandiose self-assertion, supply-seeking (mobilization request), externalized threat anxiety, and direct counterattack on the figure who inflicted the injury. ### Narcissistic Dynamics The post functions as **image rehabilitation via opponent delegitimization**: if Harris can be positioned as a liar who contradicts herself within 72 hours, the debate "loss" is reframed as a moral victory (Trump was right about her all along). This is a common narcissistic recovery maneuver — rather than defending the self, destroy the credibility of the comparison figure. The narcissistic state is **grandiose** in structure: casting Trump (implicitly) as the truth-teller whose accusations Harris desperately tried to deny, only to self-incriminate days later. --- ## Defense Mechanisms **1. Projection (immature)**: Harris is positioned as the deceiver, the one who lies about policy positions. During the debate, Trump was widely fact-checked for misrepresentations. The projection inverts the debate's dominant narrative: the accused (Trump as liar) becomes the accuser. **2. Rationalization (neurotic)**: The post constructs a logical-seeming argument (position A at time T1, position B at time T2, therefore flip-flop) to justify the post-debate counter-narrative. The argument has rhetorical surface coherence while obscuring the logical flaw. **3. Displacement (neurotic)**: The post avoids any engagement with Trump's debate performance, the CNN poll, or Taylor Swift's endorsement. Hostility generated by those events is redirected toward Harris's gun position — a safer, more controllable target. --- ## Rhetorical Analysis ### Central Technique: False Equivalence / Deceptive Framing The post's core argument contains a **logical sleight of hand**: Harris denied she would take "anybody's firearms away" (general confiscation rhetoric) ≠ supporting an assault weapons ban (a category-specific restriction). These are logically compatible positions. The post treats them as mutually exclusive, manufacturing an apparent contradiction where none exists. A politician can consistently hold: "I will not confiscate your handgun or hunting rifle" and "I support banning AR-15 style weapons" without contradiction. ### Secondary Techniques - **Temporal urgency weaponization**: "Less than 72 hours" creates the rhetorical impression of a caught-in-the-act exposure; the specific time compression implies dramatic, damning reversal - **Selective quotation out of context**: "Stop lying" was Harris responding to a specific characterization (full confiscation); decontextualized, it reads as blanket denial of all gun restrictions - **Credibility laundering**: Routing through Collin Rugg provides journalistic framing ("NEW:") and deniability — this is not "Trump attacking Harris" but "news being reported" - **Straw man construction**: The debate exchange concerned full confiscation; the post pivots to assault weapons bans as if they are the same category - **Implication of dishonesty without direct accusation**: "Completely changed her position" does the work of calling Harris a liar without Trump directly making that accusation (aide-authored caution) ### Propaganda Taxonomy This post fits the **flip-flop narrative** template, a reliable political attack format that works because it requires no policy knowledge from the audience — inconsistency is intuitively disqualifying regardless of the substantive content. --- ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion The post meets a moderate gaslighting threshold: it misrepresents the logical structure of Harris's positions in a way designed to make the audience doubt her credibility and their own memory of the debate. The mechanism: take Harris's accurate denial of one thing (mass confiscation) and present it as a denial of a related but distinct thing (assault weapons ban), then "reveal" the latter as proof the former was a lie. This is a form of manufactured false memory — the audience is invited to retrospectively reinterpret the debate exchange as Harris denying assault weapons bans, when she did not. --- ## Narrative Identity (Level 3 — McAdams) Trump, by selecting and amplifying this content, adopts the **Exposer/Truth-Revealer** protagonist role. The narrative sequence is **contamination**: Harris momentarily seemed credible during the debate → the credibility is contaminated by "revealed" deception → Trump's original characterization is vindicated. The contrasting other is **Harris-as-hypocrite**, which functions to launder Trump's post-debate standing. Identity claim implicit in the amplification: *I was right about her all along.* **Jungian frame**: The post invokes the **Shadow** archetype — projecting onto Harris the deceptive qualities that his own debate performance attracted. Simultaneously, the Trickster energy: using an apparent piece of "gotcha journalism" to disrupt the settled post-debate narrative. --- ## Cognitive Status No Trump-authored language is present. Assessment of personal cognitive markers is not possible for this post. N/A for this analysis unit. --- ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Harris told Trump to 'stop lying' during the debate and said she wasn't going to take 'anybody's' firearms away" | **Mostly True** | Consistent with widely reported debate exchanges at the National Constitution Center on September 10, 2024. Harris challenged Trump on multiple characterizations including gun confiscation claims. | | "Harris completely changed her position on the 2nd Amendment in less than 72 hours" | **Mostly False** | Supporting an assault weapons ban and denying plans for universal firearms confiscation are logically compatible, distinct positions. An assault weapons ban is a categorical restriction on a specific class of weapons; it is not equivalent to taking 'anybody's firearms away.' No substantive reversal occurred; the 'change' is a rhetorical construct based on false equivalence. | | "Harris announced her plan for an 'assault weapon' ban in ABC News interview" | **Mostly True** | Harris consistently supported an assault weapons ban throughout 2024. Restating this position in a post-debate interview is not a reversal of any position stated during the debate. | | "Harris has voiced support for mandatory buybacks in the past" | **True** | Harris expressed support for mandatory buyback programs during her 2019-2020 presidential campaign, though she had moderated this specific formulation by 2024. | Overall Veracity: 70% ## Danger Assessment **None**. The post contains no violent imagery, no eliminationist language, no dehumanizing characterization of Harris (she is cast as a hypocrite/liar, not as subhuman), and no implicit call to action beyond electoral opposition. Standard political attack amplification. ## Authorship Analysis **Aide-Written** (score: 15%) ### Indicators - UTC 20:28 converts to 16:28 EDT — squarely within business hours - Entirely third-party content attributed 'Via Collin Rugg' with no Trump-authored text - No typos, misspellings, or impulsive phrasing - Polished journalistic structure inconsistent with Trump's authentic posting style - Pre-packaged MP4 media artifact attached, suggesting coordinated distribution ## Psychological Profile ### State **Grandiose State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Harris debate performance and post-debate polling (63% CNN poll favored Harris)) Sentiment: -0.58 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 45% - Antisocial: 20% - Paranoid: 15% - Sadism: 10% **Defense Mechanisms:** - projection (immature) - rationalization (neurotic) - displacement (neurotic) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 0% **Parasocial Techniques:** - credibility laundering via third-party journalist framing - manufactured consensus (implying audience shares sense of betrayal) - in-group signaling (2nd Amendment as identity marker for base) ## Danger Assessment **NONE** ### Gaslighting - False equivalence structured to make audience retrospectively misremember what Harris denied during the debate - Context stripping from 'stop lying' quote to imply broader denial than was made - Manufactured contradiction designed to undermine audience trust in their own accurate interpretation of the debate exchange ## Fact Checks (4) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-27._ > Harris told Trump to 'stop lying' during the debate and said she wasn't going to take 'anybody's' firearms away **MOSTLY TRUE** Consistent with widely reported debate exchanges at the National Constitution Center on September 10, 2024. Harris challenged Trump on multiple characterizations including gun confiscation claims. Sources: Known events context: First Harris-Trump Presidential Debate > Harris completely changed her position on the 2nd Amendment in less than 72 hours **MOSTLY FALSE** Supporting an assault weapons ban and denying plans for universal firearms confiscation are logically compatible, distinct positions. An assault weapons ban is a categorical restriction on a specific class of weapons; it is not equivalent to taking 'anybody's firearms away.' No substantive reversal occurred; the 'change' is a rhetorical construct based on false equivalence. Sources: General knowledge of Harris 2024 campaign positions > Harris announced her plan for an 'assault weapon' ban in ABC News interview **MOSTLY TRUE** Harris consistently supported an assault weapons ban throughout 2024. Restating this position in a post-debate interview is not a reversal of any position stated during the debate. Sources: General knowledge of Harris 2024 campaign positions > Harris has voiced support for mandatory buybacks in the past **TRUE** Harris expressed support for mandatory buyback programs during her 2019-2020 presidential campaign, though she had moderated this specific formulation by 2024. Sources: General knowledge of Harris 2019-2020 campaign Overall Veracity: 70% ## Tags - 2nd-amendment (85%) - aide-authored (90%) - repost-amplification (95%) - post-debate-counter-offensive (80%) - false-equivalence (90%) - harris-attack (85%) - narcissistic-injury-response (70%) - credibility-laundering (75%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Four Days After Debate Loss, Trump Mounts a Full-Day Counter-Reality Campaign From Las Vegas** Trump spent the day in Las Vegas, still visibly stung by his debate loss to Harris earlier in the week. His morning posts were the most intense -- insisting he won the debate, calling ABC News journalists "mentally challenged people" pitted against "one person of extraordinary genius," and attacking Harris over McDonald's employment claims in all-caps rage. The afternoon shifted to a mix of grandiose credit-taking for overturning Roe v. Wade, nuclear saber-rattling about Russia, and continued amplification of Haitian immigrant grievance content -- notably while Springfield, Ohio was still receiving bomb threats linked to his own debate remarks. An out-of-character inclusivity repost from the American Hindu Coalition stood in sharp contrast to the day's overall tone, reading as transparent damage control. Full digest for 2024-09-14: https://trump.fm/date/2024-09-14/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2024, September 14). “NEW: Kamala Harris has completely changed her... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "“NEW: Kamala Harris has completely changed her position on..." Truth Social, 14 Sep. 2024. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "“NEW: Kamala Harris has completely changed her position on...," Truth Social, September 14, 2024, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_113137791613651101 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_113137791613651101 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_113137791613651101 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2024-09-14 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_113137791613651101.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._